![]() |
Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > exnalim | GIF version |
Description: One direction of Theorem 19.14 of [Margaris] p. 90. In classical logic the converse also holds. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2018.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
exnalim | ⊢ (∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ∀𝑥𝜑) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | alexim 1645 | . 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → ¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑) | |
2 | 1 | con2i 627 | 1 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ∀𝑥𝜑) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ∀wal 1351 ∃wex 1492 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-in1 614 ax-in2 615 ax-5 1447 ax-gen 1449 ax-ie1 1493 ax-ie2 1494 ax-4 1510 ax-17 1526 ax-ial 1534 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-tru 1356 df-fal 1359 df-nf 1461 |
This theorem is referenced by: exanaliim 1647 alexnim 1648 nnal 1649 dtru 4558 brprcneu 5507 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |