Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > exnalim | GIF version |
Description: One direction of Theorem 19.14 of [Margaris] p. 90. In classical logic the converse also holds. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2018.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
exnalim | ⊢ (∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ∀𝑥𝜑) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | alexim 1624 | . 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → ¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑) | |
2 | 1 | con2i 616 | 1 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ∀𝑥𝜑) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ∀wal 1329 ∃wex 1468 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 105 ax-ia2 106 ax-ia3 107 ax-in1 603 ax-in2 604 ax-5 1423 ax-gen 1425 ax-ie1 1469 ax-ie2 1470 ax-4 1487 ax-17 1506 ax-ial 1514 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 116 df-tru 1334 df-fal 1337 df-nf 1437 |
This theorem is referenced by: exanaliim 1626 alexnim 1627 dtru 4470 brprcneu 5407 bj-nnal 12938 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |