Theorem exanaliim 1635

Description: A transformation of quantifiers and logical connectives. In classical logic the converse also holds. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
exanaliim	⊢ (∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) → ¬ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓))

Proof of Theorem exanaliim

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		annimim 676	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) → ¬ (𝜑 → 𝜓))
2	1	eximi 1588	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) → ∃𝑥 ¬ (𝜑 → 𝜓))
3		exnalim 1634	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ¬ (𝜑 → 𝜓) → ¬ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓))
4	2, 3	syl 14	1 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) → ¬ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 103  ∀wal 1341  ∃wex 1480

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-in1 604  ax-in2 605  ax-5 1435  ax-gen 1437  ax-ie1 1481  ax-ie2 1482  ax-4 1498  ax-17 1514  ax-ial 1522

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-tru 1346  df-fal 1349  df-nf 1449

This theorem is referenced by:  rexnalim  2455  nssr  3202  nssssr  4200  brprcneu  5479