Theorem alexim 1659

Description: One direction of theorem 19.6 of [Margaris] p. 89. The converse holds given a decidability condition, as seen at alexdc 1633. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-Jul-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
alexim	⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → ¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑)

Proof of Theorem alexim

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		pm2.24 622	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ 𝜑 → ⊥))
2	1	alimi 1469	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥(¬ 𝜑 → ⊥))
3		exim 1613	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥(¬ 𝜑 → ⊥) → (∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 → ∃𝑥⊥))
4	2, 3	syl 14	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 → ∃𝑥⊥))
5		nfv 1542	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥⊥
6	5	19.9 1658	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥⊥ ↔ ⊥)
7	4, 6	imbitrdi 161	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 → ⊥))
8		dfnot 1382	. 2 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 ↔ (∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 → ⊥))
9	7, 8	sylibr 134	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → ¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4  ∀wal 1362  ⊥wfal 1369  ∃wex 1506

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 615  ax-in2 616  ax-5 1461  ax-gen 1463  ax-ie1 1507  ax-ie2 1508  ax-4 1524  ax-17 1540  ax-ial 1548

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1367  df-fal 1370  df-nf 1475

This theorem is referenced by:  exnalim  1660  exists2  2142