| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer | 
      
      
      < Previous  
      Next >
      
       Nearby theorems  | 
  ||
| Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > nfcdeq | GIF version | ||
| Description: If we have a conditional equality proof, where 𝜑 is 𝜑(𝑥) and 𝜓 is 𝜑(𝑦), and 𝜑(𝑥) in fact does not have 𝑥 free in it according to Ⅎ, then 𝜑(𝑥) ↔ 𝜑(𝑦) unconditionally. This proves that Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 is actually a not-free predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) | 
| Ref | Expression | 
|---|---|
| nfcdeq.1 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 | 
| nfcdeq.2 | ⊢ CondEq(𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | 
| Ref | Expression | 
|---|---|
| nfcdeq | ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) | 
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression | 
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | nfcdeq.1 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 | |
| 2 | 1 | sbf 1791 | . 2 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜑) | 
| 3 | nfv 1542 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 | |
| 4 | nfcdeq.2 | . . . 4 ⊢ CondEq(𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | |
| 5 | 4 | cdeqri 2975 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | 
| 6 | 3, 5 | sbie 1805 | . 2 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) | 
| 7 | 2, 6 | bitr3i 186 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) | 
| Colors of variables: wff set class | 
| Syntax hints: ↔ wb 105 Ⅎwnf 1474 [wsb 1776 CondEqwcdeq 2972 | 
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-5 1461 ax-gen 1463 ax-ie1 1507 ax-ie2 1508 ax-4 1524 ax-17 1540 ax-i9 1544 ax-ial 1548 | 
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-nf 1475 df-sb 1777 df-cdeq 2973 | 
| This theorem is referenced by: nfccdeq 2987 | 
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |