Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > reximssdv | GIF version |
Description: Derivation of a restricted existential quantification over a subset (the second hypothesis implies 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵), deduction form. (Contributed by AV, 21-Aug-2022.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
reximssdv.1 | ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓) |
reximssdv.2 | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) |
reximssdv.3 | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝜒) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
reximssdv | ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | reximssdv.1 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓) | |
2 | reximssdv.2 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) | |
3 | reximssdv.3 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝜒) | |
4 | 2, 3 | jca 304 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒)) |
5 | 4 | ex 114 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒))) |
6 | 5 | reximdv2 2569 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒)) |
7 | 1, 6 | mpd 13 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 103 ∈ wcel 2141 ∃wrex 2449 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 105 ax-ia2 106 ax-ia3 107 ax-5 1440 ax-gen 1442 ax-ie1 1486 ax-ie2 1487 ax-4 1503 ax-17 1519 ax-ial 1527 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 116 df-rex 2454 |
This theorem is referenced by: suplocexprlemrl 7679 neissex 12959 iscnp4 13012 suplociccex 13397 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |