Theorem reximdv2 2629

Description: Deduction quantifying both antecedent and consequent, based on Theorem 19.22 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2003.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
reximdv2.1	⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒)))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
reximdv2	⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))

Distinct variable group:   𝜑,𝑥

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜓(𝑥)   𝜒(𝑥)   𝐴(𝑥)   𝐵(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem reximdv2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		reximdv2.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒)))
2	1	eximdv 1926	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒)))
3		df-rex 2514	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓))
4		df-rex 2514	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒))
5	2, 3, 4	3imtr4g 205	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104  ∃wex 1538   ∈ wcel 2200  ∃wrex 2509

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-5 1493  ax-gen 1495  ax-ie1 1539  ax-ie2 1540  ax-4 1556  ax-17 1572  ax-ial 1580

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-rex 2514

This theorem is referenced by:  reximssdv  2634  ssrexv  3289  ssimaex  5688  ico0  10468  ioc0  10469  r19.2uz  11490  unitgrp  14065  lgsquadlem2  15742  ushgredgedg  16009  ushgredgedgloop  16011  trilpolemlt1  16340