Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > ax13lem2 | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Lemma for nfeqf2 2389. This lemma is equivalent to ax13v 2385 with one distinct variable constraint removed. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 8-Sep-2018.) Reduce axiom usage. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 18-Oct-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
ax13lem2 | ⊢ (¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∃𝑥 𝑧 = 𝑦 → 𝑧 = 𝑦)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | ax13lem1 2386 | . . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑤 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥 𝑤 = 𝑦)) | |
2 | equeucl 2025 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝑤 = 𝑦 → 𝑧 = 𝑤)) | |
3 | 2 | eximi 1829 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑧 = 𝑦 → ∃𝑥(𝑤 = 𝑦 → 𝑧 = 𝑤)) |
4 | 19.36v 1988 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑤 = 𝑦 → 𝑧 = 𝑤) ↔ (∀𝑥 𝑤 = 𝑦 → 𝑧 = 𝑤)) | |
5 | 3, 4 | sylib 220 | . . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑧 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑥 𝑤 = 𝑦 → 𝑧 = 𝑤)) |
6 | 1, 5 | syl9 77 | . . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∃𝑥 𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝑤 = 𝑦 → 𝑧 = 𝑤))) |
7 | 6 | alrimdv 1924 | . 2 ⊢ (¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∃𝑥 𝑧 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑤(𝑤 = 𝑦 → 𝑧 = 𝑤))) |
8 | equequ2 2027 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 = 𝑤 ↔ 𝑧 = 𝑦)) | |
9 | 8 | equsalvw 2004 | . 2 ⊢ (∀𝑤(𝑤 = 𝑦 → 𝑧 = 𝑤) ↔ 𝑧 = 𝑦) |
10 | 7, 9 | syl6ib 253 | 1 ⊢ (¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∃𝑥 𝑧 = 𝑦 → 𝑧 = 𝑦)) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ∀wal 1529 ∃wex 1774 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1790 ax-4 1804 ax-5 1905 ax-6 1964 ax-7 2009 ax-13 2384 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 209 df-an 399 df-ex 1775 |
This theorem is referenced by: nfeqf2 2389 wl-speqv 34754 wl-19.2reqv 34756 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |