P. 24 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 2301-2400   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	hban 2301	If 𝑥 is not free in 𝜑 and 𝜓, it is not free in (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓). (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 2-Jan-2018.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ∀𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	hb3an 2302	If 𝑥 is not free in 𝜑, 𝜓, and 𝜒, it is not free in (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒). (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-2003.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 2-Jan-2018.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → ∀𝑥𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → ∀𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))
Theorem	sbi2 2303	Introduction of implication into substitution. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1993.)
⊢ (([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓) → [𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	sbim 2304	Implication inside and outside of a substitution are equivalent. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1993.)
⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓))
Theorem	sbrim 2305	Substitution in an implication with a variable not free in the antecedent affects only the consequent. See sbrimv 2306 for a version with disjoint variables not requiring ax-10 2141. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jun-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓))
Theorem	sbrimv 2306*	Substitution in an implication with a variable not free in the antecedent affects only the consequent. Version of sbrim 2305 not depending on ax-10 2141, but with disjoint variables. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 28-Jan-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓))
Theorem	sblim 2307	Substitution in an implication with a variable not free in the consequent affects only the antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	sbor 2308	Disjunction inside and outside of a substitution are equivalent. (Contributed by NM, 29-Sep-2002.)
⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∨ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓))
Theorem	sbbi 2309	Equivalence inside and outside of a substitution are equivalent. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1993.)
⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓))
Theorem	sblbis 2310	Introduce left biconditional inside of a substitution. (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-1993.)
⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜒 ↔ 𝜑) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜒 ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	sbrbis 2311	Introduce right biconditional inside of a substitution. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.)
⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ↔ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜒))
Theorem	sbrbif 2312	Introduce right biconditional inside of a substitution. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒    &   ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ↔ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
Theorem	sbiev 2313*	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit substitution. Version of sbie 2505 with a disjoint variable condition, not requiring ax-13 2371. See sbievw 2099 for a version with a disjoint variable condition requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-1994.) (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 18-Jan-2023.) Remove dependence on ax-10 2141 and shorten proof. (Revised by BJ, 18-Jul-2023.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)
Theorem	sbiedw 2314*	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit substitution (deduction version of sbiev 2313). Version of sbied 2506 with a disjoint variable condition, requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-1994.) (Revised by Gino Giotto, 10-Jan-2024.) Avoid ax-10 2141. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 28-Jan-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
Theorem	sbiedwOLD 2315*	Obsolete version of sbiedw 2314 as of 28-Jan-2024. (Contributed by Gino Giotto, 10-Jan-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
Theorem	axc7 2316	Show that the original axiom ax-c7 36636 can be derived from ax-10 2141 (hbn1 2142) , sp 2180 and propositional calculus. See ax10fromc7 36646 for the rederivation of ax-10 2141 from ax-c7 36636. Normally, axc7 2316 should be used rather than ax-c7 36636, except by theorems specifically studying the latter's properties. (Contributed by NM, 21-May-2008.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 ¬ ∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜑)
Theorem	axc7e 2317	Abbreviated version of axc7 2316 using the existential quantifier. Corresponds to the dual of Axiom (B) of modal logic. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 8-Jul-2022.)
⊢ (∃𝑥∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜑)
Theorem	modal-b 2318	The analogue in our predicate calculus of the Brouwer axiom (B) of modal logic S5. (Contributed by NM, 5-Oct-2005.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ¬ ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	19.9ht 2319	A closed version of 19.9h 2287. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 3-Mar-2018.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → (∃𝑥𝜑 → 𝜑))
Theorem	axc4 2320	Show that the original axiom ax-c4 36635 can be derived from ax-4 1817 (alim 1818), ax-10 2141 (hbn1 2142), sp 2180 and propositional calculus. See ax4fromc4 36645 for the rederivation of ax-4 1817 from ax-c4 36635. Part of the proof is based on the proof of Lemma 22 of [Monk2] p. 114. (Contributed by NM, 21-May-2008.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜓))
Theorem	axc4i 2321	Inference version of axc4 2320. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-1993.)
⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜓)
Theorem	nfal 2322	If 𝑥 is not free in 𝜑, it is not free in ∀𝑦𝜑. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑦𝜑
Theorem	nfex 2323	If 𝑥 is not free in 𝜑, it is not free in ∃𝑦𝜑. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 30-Dec-2017.) Reduce symbol count in nfex 2323, hbex 2324. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 16-Oct-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∃𝑦𝜑
Theorem	hbex 2324	If 𝑥 is not free in 𝜑, it is not free in ∃𝑦𝜑. (Contributed by NM, 12-Mar-1993.) Reduce symbol count in nfex 2323, hbex 2324. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 16-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥∃𝑦𝜑)
Theorem	nfnf 2325	If 𝑥 is not free in 𝜑, it is not free in Ⅎ𝑦𝜑. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 30-Dec-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
Theorem	19.12 2326	Theorem 19.12 of [Margaris] p. 89. Assuming the converse is a mistake sometimes made by beginners! But sometimes the converse does hold, as in 19.12vv 2348 and r19.12sn 4636. (Contributed by NM, 12-Mar-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 3-Jan-2018.)
⊢ (∃𝑥∀𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑦∃𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	nfald 2327	Deduction form of nfal 2322. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 16-Oct-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑦𝜓)
Theorem	nfexd 2328	If 𝑥 is not free in 𝜓, it is not free in ∃𝑦𝜓. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥∃𝑦𝜓)
Theorem	nfsbv 2329*	If 𝑧 is not free in 𝜑, it is not free in [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 when 𝑧 is distinct from 𝑥 and 𝑦. Version of nfsb 2526 requiring more disjoint variables, but fewer axioms. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 7-Feb-2023.) Remove disjoint variable condition on 𝑥, 𝑦. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 13-Aug-2023.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 25-Oct-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑
Theorem	nfsbvOLD 2330*	Obsolete version of nfsbv 2329 as of 25-Oct-2024. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 7-Feb-2023.) Remove disjoint variable condition on 𝑥, 𝑦. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 13-Aug-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑
Theorem	hbsbwOLD 2331*	Obsolete version of hbsbw 2173 as of 23-May-2024. (Contributed by NM, 12-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Gino Giotto, 10-Jan-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∀𝑧[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
Theorem	sbco2v 2332*	A composition law for substitution. Version of sbco2 2514 with disjoint variable conditions, not requiring ax-13 2371, but ax-11 2158. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-1994.) (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 29-Apr-2023.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
Theorem	aaan 2333	Rearrange universal quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 12-Aug-1993.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜓))
Theorem	eeor 2334	Rearrange existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 8-Aug-1994.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (∃𝑥𝜑 ∨ ∃𝑦𝜓))
Theorem	cbv3v 2335*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Version of cbv3 2396 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2371. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by BJ, 31-May-2019.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜓)
Theorem	cbv1v 2336*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Version of cbv1 2401 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2371. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by BJ, 16-Jun-2019.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝜓 → ∀𝑦𝜒))
Theorem	cbv2w 2337*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Version of cbv2 2402 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2371. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Gino Giotto, 10-Jan-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑦𝜒))
Theorem	cbvaldw 2338*	Deduction used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Version of cbvald 2406 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2371. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2002.) (Revised by Gino Giotto, 10-Jan-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑦𝜒))
Theorem	cbvexdw 2339*	Deduction used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Version of cbvexd 2407 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2371. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2002.) (Revised by Gino Giotto, 10-Jan-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦𝜒))
Theorem	cbv3hv 2340*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Version of cbv3h 2403 with a disjoint variable condition on 𝑥, 𝑦, which does not require ax-13 2371. Was used in a proof of axc11n 2425 (but of independent interest). (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2015.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 29-Nov-2020.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 30-Nov-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜓)
Theorem	cbvalv1 2341*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Version of cbval 2397 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2371. See cbvalvw 2044 for a version with two more disjoint variable conditions, requiring fewer axioms, and cbvalv 2399 for another variant. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-1993.) (Revised by BJ, 31-May-2019.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦𝜓)
Theorem	cbvexv1 2342*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Version of cbvex 2398 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2371. See cbvexvw 2045 for a version with two disjoint variable conditions, requiring fewer axioms, and cbvexv 2400 for another variant. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.) (Revised by BJ, 31-May-2019.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦𝜓)
Theorem	cbval2v 2343*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Version of cbval2 2410 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2371. (Contributed by NM, 22-Dec-2003.) (Revised by BJ, 16-Jun-2019.) (Proof shortened by Gino Giotto, 10-Jan-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑧∀𝑤𝜓)
Theorem	cbval2vOLD 2344*	Obsolete version of cbval2v 2343 as of 14-Jan-2024. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Jan-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑧∀𝑤𝜓)
Theorem	cbvex2v 2345*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Version of cbvex2 2411 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2371. (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-2003.) (Revised by BJ, 16-Jun-2019.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧∃𝑤𝜓)
Theorem	dvelimhw 2346*	Proof of dvelimh 2449 without using ax-13 2371 but with additional distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 1-Oct-2002.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 21-Jul-2011.) (Revised by NM, 1-Aug-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 23-Dec-2018.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑧𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 = 𝑧))    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓))
Theorem	pm11.53 2347*	Theorem *11.53 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 164. See pm11.53v 1952 for a version requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (∃𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜓))
Theorem	19.12vv 2348*	Special case of 19.12 2326 where its converse holds. See 19.12vvv 1997 for a version with a disjoint variable condition requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jul-2001.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (∃𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ ∀𝑦∃𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	eean 2349	Rearrange existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 27-Oct-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (∃𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑦𝜓))
Theorem	eeanv 2350*	Distribute a pair of existential quantifiers over a conjunction. Combination of 19.41v 1958 and 19.42v 1962. For a version requiring fewer axioms but with additional disjoint variable conditions, see exdistrv 1964. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jul-1995.)
⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (∃𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑦𝜓))
Theorem	eeeanv 2351*	Distribute three existential quantifiers over a conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jul-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) Reduce distinct variable restrictions. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 20-Jan-2018.)
⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ (∃𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑦𝜓 ∧ ∃𝑧𝜒))
Theorem	ee4anv 2352*	Distribute two pairs of existential quantifiers over a conjunction. For a version requiring fewer axioms but with additional disjoint variable conditions, see 4exdistrv 1965. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-1995.)
⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧∃𝑤(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑧∃𝑤𝜓))
Theorem	sb8v 2353*	Substitution of variable in universal quantifier. Version of sb8 2520 with a disjoint variable condition, not requiring ax-13 2371. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-1993.) (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 19-Jan-2023.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
Theorem	sb8ev 2354*	Substitution of variable in existential quantifier. Version of sb8e 2521 with a disjoint variable condition, not requiring ax-13 2371. (Contributed by NM, 12-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 19-Jan-2023.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
Theorem	2sb8ev 2355*	An equivalent expression for double existence. Version of 2sb8e 2534 with more disjoint variable conditions, not requiring ax-13 2371. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 28-Jan-2023.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑤𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧∃𝑤[𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑)
Theorem	sb6rfv 2356*	Reversed substitution. Version of sb6rf 2467 requiring disjoint variables, but fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 7-Feb-2023.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑥 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
Theorem	sbnf2 2357*	Two ways of expressing "𝑥 is (effectively) not free in 𝜑". (Contributed by Gérard Lang, 14-Nov-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 22-Sep-2018.) Avoid ax-13 2371. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 30-Jan-2023.)
⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦∀𝑧([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑))
Theorem	exsb 2358*	An equivalent expression for existence. One direction (exsbim 2010) needs fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2005.) Avoid ax-13 2371. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 16-Oct-2022.)
⊢ (∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))
Theorem	2exsb 2359*	An equivalent expression for double existence. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2005.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 30-Sep-2018.)
⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧∃𝑤∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → 𝜑))
Theorem	sbbib 2360*	Reversal of substitution. (Contributed by AV, 6-Aug-2023.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 4-Sep-2023.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ [𝑥 / 𝑦]𝜓))
Theorem	sbbibvv 2361*	Reversal of substitution. (Contributed by AV, 6-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ [𝑥 / 𝑦]𝜓))
Theorem	sbievg 2362*	Substitution applied to expressions linked by implicit substitution. The proof was part of a former cbvabw 2812 version. (Contributed by GG and WL, 26-Oct-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜓)
Theorem	cleljustALT 2363*	Alternate proof of cleljust 2119. It is kept here and should not be modified because it is referenced on the Metamath Proof Explorer Home Page (mmset.html) as an example of how disjoint variable conditions are inherited by substitutions. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jan-2004.) (Revised by BJ, 29-Dec-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦))
Theorem	cleljustALT2 2364*	Alternate proof of cleljust 2119. Compared with cleljustALT 2363, it uses nfv 1922 followed by equsexv 2265 instead of ax-5 1918 followed by equsexhv 2293, so it uses the idiom Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 instead of 𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑 to express nonfreeness. This style is generally preferred for later theorems. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jan-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 21-Dec-2016.) (Revised by BJ, 29-Dec-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦))
Theorem	equs5aALT 2365	Alternate proof of equs5a 2456. Uses ax-12 2175 but not ax-13 2371. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2007.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜑) → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))
Theorem	equs5eALT 2366	Alternate proof of equs5e 2457. Uses ax-12 2175 but not ax-13 2371. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2007.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 15-Jan-2018.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∃𝑦𝜑))
Theorem	axc11r 2367	Same as axc11 2429 but with reversed antecedent. Note the use of ax-12 2175 (and not merely ax12v 2176 as in axc11rv 2262). This theorem is mostly used to eliminate conditions requiring set variables be distinct (cf. cbvaev 2059 and aecom 2426, for example) in proofs. In practice, theorems beyond elementary set theory do not really benefit from such eliminations. As of 2024, it is used in conjunction with ax-13 2371 only, and like that, it should be applied only in niches where indispensable. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2015.)
⊢ (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥 → (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜑))
Theorem	dral1v 2368*	Formula-building lemma for use with the Distinctor Reduction Theorem. Version of dral1 2438 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2371. Remark: the corresponding versions for dral2 2437 and drex2 2441 are instances of albidv 1928 and exbidv 1929 respectively. (Contributed by NM, 24-Nov-1994.) (Revised by BJ, 17-Jun-2019.) Base the proof on ax12v 2176. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 30-Mar-2024.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦𝜓))
Theorem	drex1v 2369*	Formula-building lemma for use with the Distinctor Reduction Theorem. Version of drex1 2440 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2371. (Contributed by NM, 27-Feb-2005.) (Revised by BJ, 17-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦𝜓))
Theorem	drnf1v 2370*	Formula-building lemma for use with the Distinctor Reduction Theorem. Version of drnf1 2442 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2371. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2016.) (Revised by BJ, 17-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 ↔ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓))
1.5.4  Axiom scheme ax-13 (Quantified Equality)
Axiom	ax-13 2371	Axiom of Quantified Equality. One of the equality and substitution axioms of predicate calculus with equality. An equivalent way to express this axiom that may be easier to understand is (¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (¬ 𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑥𝑦 = 𝑧))) (see ax13b 2040). Recall that in the intended interpretation, our variables are metavariables ranging over the variables of predicate calculus (the object language). In order for the first antecedent ¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦 to hold, 𝑥 and 𝑦 must have different values and thus cannot be the same object-language variable (so they are effectively "distinct variables" even though no $d is present). Similarly, 𝑥 and 𝑧 cannot be the same object-language variable. Therefore, 𝑥 will not occur in the wff 𝑦 = 𝑧 when the first two antecedents hold, so analogous to ax-5 1918, the conclusion (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑥𝑦 = 𝑧) follows. Note that ax-5 1918 cannot prove this because its distinct variable ($d) requirement is not satisfied directly but only indirectly (outside of Metamath) by the argument above. The original version of this axiom was ax-c9 36641 and was replaced with this shorter ax-13 2371 in December 2015. The old axiom is proved from this one as Theorem axc9 2381. The primary purpose of this axiom is to provide a way to introduce the quantifier ∀𝑥 on 𝑦 = 𝑧 even when 𝑥 and 𝑦 are substituted with the same variable. In this case, the first antecedent becomes ¬ 𝑥 = 𝑥 and the axiom still holds. This axiom is mostly used to eliminate conditions requiring set variables be distinct (cf. ax6ev 1978 and ax6e 2382, for example) in proofs. In practice, theorems beyond elementary set theory do not really benefit from such eliminations, so direct or indirect application of this axiom is discouraged now. You need to explicitly confirm its use in case you see a sensible application in a niche. After some assisting contributions by others over the years, it was in particular the extensive work of Gino Giotto in 2024 that helped reducing dependencies on this axiom on a large scale. Although this version is shorter, the original version axc9 2381 may be more practical to work with because of the "distinctor" form of its antecedents. A typical application of axc9 2381 is in dvelimh 2449 which converts a distinct variable pair to the distinctor antecedent ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦. In particular, it is conjectured that it is not possible to prove ax6 2383 from ax6v 1977 without this axiom. This axiom can be weakened if desired by adding distinct variable restrictions on pairs 𝑥, 𝑧 and 𝑦, 𝑧. To show that, we add these restrictions to Theorem ax13v 2372 and use only ax13v 2372 for further derivations. Thus, ax13v 2372 should be the only theorem referencing this axiom. Other theorems can reference either ax13v 2372 (preferred) or ax13 2374 (if the stronger form is needed). This axiom scheme is logically redundant (see ax13w 2136) but is used as an auxiliary axiom scheme to achieve scheme completeness (i.e. so that all possible cases of bundling can be proved; see text linked at mmtheorems.html#ax6dgen 2136). It is not known whether this axiom can be derived from the others. (Contributed by NM, 21-Dec-2015.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 = 𝑧))
Theorem	ax13v 2372*	A weaker version of ax-13 2371 with distinct variable restrictions on pairs 𝑥, 𝑧 and 𝑦, 𝑧. In order to show (with ax13 2374) that this weakening is still adequate, this should be the only theorem referencing ax-13 2371 directly. Had we additionally required 𝑥 and 𝑦 be distinct, too, this theorem would have been a direct consequence of ax-5 1918. So essentially this theorem states, that a distinct variable condition can be replaced with an inequality between set variables. Preferably, use the version ax13w 2136 to avoid the propagation of ax-13 2371. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 = 𝑧))
Theorem	ax13lem1 2373*	A version of ax13v 2372 with one distinct variable restriction dropped. For convenience, 𝑦 is kept on the right side of equations. The proof of ax13 2374 bases on ideas from NM, 24-Dec-2015. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 8-Sep-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥 𝑧 = 𝑦))
Theorem	ax13 2374	Derive ax-13 2371 from ax13v 2372 and Tarski's FOL. This shows that the weakening in ax13v 2372 is still sufficient for a complete system. Preferably, use the weaker ax13w 2136 to avoid the propagation of ax-13 2371. (Contributed by NM, 21-Dec-2015.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 31-Jan-2018.) Reduce axiom usage. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 2-Jun-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 = 𝑧))
Theorem	ax13lem2 2375*	Lemma for nfeqf2 2376. This lemma is equivalent to ax13v 2372 with one distinct variable constraint removed. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 8-Sep-2018.) Reduce axiom usage. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 18-Oct-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∃𝑥 𝑧 = 𝑦 → 𝑧 = 𝑦))
Theorem	nfeqf2 2376*	An equation between setvar is free of any other setvar. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2371. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 9-Jun-2019.) Remove dependency on ax-12 2175. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 16-Dec-2022.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑧 = 𝑦)
Theorem	dveeq2 2377*	Quantifier introduction when one pair of variables is distinct. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2371. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2002.) (Revised by NM, 20-Jul-2015.) Remove dependency on ax-11 2158. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 8-Sep-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥 𝑧 = 𝑦))
Theorem	nfeqf1 2378*	An equation between setvar is free of any other setvar. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2371. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 10-Jun-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 = 𝑧)
Theorem	dveeq1 2379*	Quantifier introduction when one pair of variables is distinct. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2371. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2002.) Remove dependency on ax-11 2158. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 8-Sep-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 = 𝑧))
Theorem	nfeqf 2380	A variable is effectively not free in an equality if it is not either of the involved variables. Ⅎ version of ax-c9 36641. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2371. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2016.) Remove dependency on ax-11 2158. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 6-Sep-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑥 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦) → Ⅎ𝑧 𝑥 = 𝑦)
Theorem	axc9 2381	Derive set.mm's original ax-c9 36641 from the shorter ax-13 2371. Usage is discouraged to avoid uninformed ax-13 2371 propagation. (Contributed by NM, 29-Nov-2015.) (Revised by NM, 24-Dec-2015.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 29-Apr-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑥 → (¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑧 𝑥 = 𝑦)))
Theorem	ax6e 2382	At least one individual exists. This is not a theorem of free logic, which is sound in empty domains. For such a logic, we would add this theorem as an axiom of set theory (Axiom 0 of [Kunen] p. 10). In the system consisting of ax-4 1817 through ax-9 2120, all axioms other than ax-6 1976 are believed to be theorems of free logic, although the system without ax-6 1976 is not complete in free logic. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2371. It is preferred to use ax6ev 1978 when it is sufficient. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1993.) Shortened after ax13lem1 2373 became available. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 8-Sep-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦
Theorem	ax6 2383	Theorem showing that ax-6 1976 follows from the weaker version ax6v 1977. (Even though this theorem depends on ax-6 1976, all references of ax-6 1976 are made via ax6v 1977. An earlier version stated ax6v 1977 as a separate axiom, but having two axioms caused some confusion.) This theorem should be referenced in place of ax-6 1976 so that all proofs can be traced back to ax6v 1977. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2371. When possible, use the weaker ax6v 1977 rather than ax6 2383 since the ax6v 1977 derivation is much shorter and requires fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 12-Nov-2013.) (Revised by NM, 25-Jul-2015.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 4-Feb-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ¬ ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦
Theorem	axc10 2384	Show that the original axiom ax-c10 36637 can be derived from ax6 2383 and axc7 2316 (on top of propositional calculus, ax-gen 1803, and ax-4 1817). See ax6fromc10 36647 for the rederivation of ax6 2383 from ax-c10 36637. Normally, axc10 2384 should be used rather than ax-c10 36637, except by theorems specifically studying the latter's properties. Usage of this theorem has been discouraged later on to avoid ax-13 2371 propagation. Check out bj-axc10v 34712 for a weaker version requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → 𝜑)
Theorem	spimt 2385	Closed theorem form of spim 2386. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2371. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jan-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 21-Mar-2023.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))) → (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	spim 2386	Specialization, using implicit substitution. Compare Lemma 14 of [Tarski] p. 70. The spim 2386 series of theorems requires that only one direction of the substitution hypothesis hold. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2371. Check out spimw 1979 for a version requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 18-Feb-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	spimed 2387	Deduction version of spime 2388. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2371. Use the weaker spimedv 2195 if possible. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 19-Feb-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜒 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜓))
Theorem	spime 2388	Existential introduction, using implicit substitution. Compare Lemma 14 of [Tarski] p. 70. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2371. Check out spimew 1980 for a weaker version requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 6-Mar-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜓)
Theorem	spimv 2389*	A version of spim 2386 with a distinct variable requirement instead of a bound-variable hypothesis. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2371. See spimfv 2237 and spimvw 2004 for versions requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-1993.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	spimvALT 2390*	Alternate proof of spimv 2389. Note that it requires only ax-1 6 through ax-5 1918 together with ax6e 2382. Currently, proofs derive from ax6v 1977, but if ax-6 1976 could be used instead, this proof would reduce axiom usage. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-1993.) Remove dependency on ax-10 2141. (Revised by BJ, 29-Nov-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	spimev 2391*	Distinct-variable version of spime 2388. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2371. Use the weaker spimevw 2003 if possible. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1993.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜓)
Theorem	spv 2392*	Specialization, using implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2371. Use the weaker spvv 2005 if possible. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-1993.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	spei 2393	Inference from existential specialization, using implicit substitution. Remove a distinct variable constraint. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2371. Use the weaker speiv 1981 if possible. (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 12-May-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ 𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ ∃𝑥𝜑
Theorem	chvar 2394	Implicit substitution of 𝑦 for 𝑥 into a theorem. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2371. Use the weaker chvarfv 2238 if possible. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 9-Jul-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜓
Theorem	chvarv 2395*	Implicit substitution of 𝑦 for 𝑥 into a theorem. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2371. Use the weaker chvarvv 2007 if possible. (Contributed by NM, 20-Apr-1994.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 22-Apr-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜓
Theorem	cbv3 2396	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution, that does not use ax-c9 36641. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2371. Use the weaker cbv3v 2335 if possible. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 12-May-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜓)
Theorem	cbval 2397	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2371. Check out cbvalw 2043, cbvalvw 2044, cbvalv1 2341 for versions requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦𝜓)
Theorem	cbvex 2398	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2371. Check out cbvexvw 2045, cbvexv1 2342 for weaker versions requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦𝜓)
Theorem	cbvalv 2399*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2371. See cbvalvw 2044 for a version requiring fewer axioms, to be preferred when sufficient. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) Remove dependency on ax-10 2141, shorten. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 11-Sep-2023.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦𝜓)
Theorem	cbvexv 2400*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2371. See cbvexvw 2045 for a version requiring fewer axioms, to be preferred when sufficient. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.) Remove dependency on ax-10 2141, shorten. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 11-Sep-2023.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦𝜓)