P. 24 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 2301-2400   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	sbim 2301	Implication inside and outside of a substitution are equivalent. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1993.)
⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓))
Theorem	sbrim 2302	Substitution in an implication with a variable not free in the antecedent affects only the consequent. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jun-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2016.) Avoid ax-10 2138. (Revised by GG, 20-Nov-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓))
Theorem	sbrimOLD 2303	Obsolete version of sbrim 2302 as of 20-Nov-2024. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jun-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓))
Theorem	sblim 2304	Substitution in an implication with a variable not free in the consequent affects only the antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	sbor 2305	Disjunction inside and outside of a substitution are equivalent. (Contributed by NM, 29-Sep-2002.)
⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∨ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓))
Theorem	sbbi 2306	Equivalence inside and outside of a substitution are equivalent. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1993.)
⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓))
Theorem	sblbis 2307	Introduce left biconditional inside of a substitution. (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-1993.)
⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜒 ↔ 𝜑) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜒 ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	sbrbis 2308	Introduce right biconditional inside of a substitution. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.)
⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ↔ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜒))
Theorem	sbrbif 2309	Introduce right biconditional inside of a substitution. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒    &   ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ↔ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
Theorem	sbnf 2310*	Move nonfree predicate in and out of substitution; see sbal 2166 and sbex 2279. (Contributed by BJ, 2-May-2019.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 2-May-2025.)
⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑦]Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 ↔ Ⅎ𝑥[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑)
Theorem	sbnfOLD 2311*	Obsolete version of sbnf 2310 as of 2-May-2025. (Contributed by BJ, 2-May-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑦]Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 ↔ Ⅎ𝑥[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑)
Theorem	sbiev 2312*	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit substitution. Version of sbie 2504 with a disjoint variable condition, not requiring ax-13 2374. See sbievw 2090 for a version with a disjoint variable condition requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-1994.) (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 18-Jan-2023.) Remove dependence on ax-10 2138 and shorten proof. (Revised by BJ, 18-Jul-2023.) (Proof shortened by SN, 24-Jul-2025.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)
Theorem	sbievOLD 2313*	Obsolete version of sbiev 2312 as of 24-Aug-2025. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-1994.) (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 18-Jan-2023.) Remove dependence on ax-10 2138 and shorten proof. (Revised by BJ, 18-Jul-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)
Theorem	sbiedw 2314*	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit substitution (deduction version of sbiev 2312). Version of sbied 2505 with a disjoint variable condition, requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-1994.) Avoid ax-13 2374. (Revised by GG, 10-Jan-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
Theorem	axc7 2315	Show that the original axiom ax-c7 38866 can be derived from ax-10 2138 (hbn1 2139), sp 2180 and propositional calculus. See ax10fromc7 38876 for the rederivation of ax-10 2138 from ax-c7 38866. Normally, axc7 2315 should be used rather than ax-c7 38866, except by theorems specifically studying the latter's properties. (Contributed by NM, 21-May-2008.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 ¬ ∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜑)
Theorem	axc7e 2316	Abbreviated version of axc7 2315 using the existential quantifier. Corresponds to the dual of Axiom (B) of modal logic. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 8-Jul-2022.)
⊢ (∃𝑥∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜑)
Theorem	modal-b 2317	The analogue in our predicate calculus of the Brouwer axiom (B) of modal logic S5. (Contributed by NM, 5-Oct-2005.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ¬ ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	19.9ht 2318	A closed version of 19.9h 2284. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 3-Mar-2018.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → (∃𝑥𝜑 → 𝜑))
Theorem	axc4 2319	Show that the original axiom ax-c4 38865 can be derived from ax-4 1805 (alim 1806), ax-10 2138 (hbn1 2139), sp 2180 and propositional calculus. See ax4fromc4 38875 for the rederivation of ax-4 1805 from ax-c4 38865. Part of the proof is based on the proof of Lemma 22 of [Monk2] p. 114. (Contributed by NM, 21-May-2008.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜓))
Theorem	axc4i 2320	Inference version of axc4 2319. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-1993.)
⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜓)
Theorem	nfal 2321	If 𝑥 is not free in 𝜑, then it is not free in ∀𝑦𝜑. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑦𝜑
Theorem	nfex 2322	If 𝑥 is not free in 𝜑, then it is not free in ∃𝑦𝜑. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 30-Dec-2017.) Reduce symbol count in nfex 2322, hbex 2323. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 16-Oct-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∃𝑦𝜑
Theorem	hbex 2323	If 𝑥 is not free in 𝜑, then it is not free in ∃𝑦𝜑. (Contributed by NM, 12-Mar-1993.) Reduce symbol count in nfex 2322, hbex 2323. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 16-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥∃𝑦𝜑)
Theorem	nfnf 2324	If 𝑥 is not free in 𝜑, then it is not free in Ⅎ𝑦𝜑. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 30-Dec-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
Theorem	19.12 2325	Theorem 19.12 of [Margaris] p. 89. Assuming the converse is a mistake sometimes made by beginners! But sometimes the converse does hold, as in 19.12vv 2347 and r19.12sn 4724. (Contributed by NM, 12-Mar-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 3-Jan-2018.)
⊢ (∃𝑥∀𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑦∃𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	nfald 2326	Deduction form of nfal 2321. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 16-Oct-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑦𝜓)
Theorem	nfexd 2327	If 𝑥 is not free in 𝜓, then it is not free in ∃𝑦𝜓. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥∃𝑦𝜓)
Theorem	nfsbv 2328*	If 𝑧 is not free in 𝜑, then it is not free in [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 when 𝑧 is disjoint from both 𝑥 and 𝑦. Version of nfsb 2525 with an additional disjoint variable condition on 𝑥, 𝑧 but not requiring ax-13 2374. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 7-Feb-2023.) Remove disjoint variable condition on 𝑥, 𝑦. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 13-Aug-2023.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 25-Oct-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑
Theorem	nfsbvOLD 2329*	Obsolete version of nfsbv 2328 as of 25-Oct-2024. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 7-Feb-2023.) Remove disjoint variable condition on 𝑥, 𝑦. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 13-Aug-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑
Theorem	sbco2v 2330*	A composition law for substitution. Version of sbco2 2513 with disjoint variable conditions but not requiring ax-13 2374. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-1994.) (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 29-Apr-2023.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
Theorem	aaan 2331	Distribute universal quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 12-Aug-1993.) Avoid ax-10 2138. (Revised by GG, 21-Nov-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜓))
Theorem	aaanOLD 2332	Obsolete version of aaan 2331 as of 21-Nov-2024. (Contributed by NM, 12-Aug-1993.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜓))
Theorem	eeor 2333	Distribute existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 8-Aug-1994.) Avoid ax-10 2138. (Revised by GG, 21-Nov-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (∃𝑥𝜑 ∨ ∃𝑦𝜓))
Theorem	eeorOLD 2334	Obsolete version of eeor 2333 as of 21-Nov-2024. (Contributed by NM, 8-Aug-1994.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (∃𝑥𝜑 ∨ ∃𝑦𝜓))
Theorem	cbv3v 2335*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Version of cbv3 2399 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2374. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by BJ, 31-May-2019.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜓)
Theorem	cbv1v 2336*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Version of cbv1 2404 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2374. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by BJ, 16-Jun-2019.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝜓 → ∀𝑦𝜒))
Theorem	cbv2w 2337*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Version of cbv2 2405 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2374. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) Avoid ax-13 2374. (Revised by GG, 10-Jan-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑦𝜒))
Theorem	cbvaldw 2338*	Deduction used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Version of cbvald 2409 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2374. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2002.) Avoid ax-13 2374. (Revised by GG, 10-Jan-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑦𝜒))
Theorem	cbvexdw 2339*	Deduction used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Version of cbvexd 2410 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2374. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2002.) Avoid ax-13 2374. (Revised by GG, 10-Jan-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦𝜒))
Theorem	cbv3hv 2340*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Version of cbv3h 2406 with a disjoint variable condition on 𝑥, 𝑦, which does not require ax-13 2374. Was used in a proof of axc11n 2428 (but of independent interest). (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2015.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 29-Nov-2020.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 30-Nov-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜓)
Theorem	cbvalv1 2341*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Version of cbval 2400 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2374. See cbvalvw 2032 for a version with two more disjoint variable conditions, requiring fewer axioms, and cbvalv 2402 for another variant. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-1993.) (Revised by BJ, 31-May-2019.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦𝜓)
Theorem	cbvexv1 2342*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Version of cbvex 2401 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2374. See cbvexvw 2033 for a version with two disjoint variable conditions, requiring fewer axioms, and cbvexv 2403 for another variant. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.) (Revised by BJ, 31-May-2019.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦𝜓)
Theorem	cbval2v 2343*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Version of cbval2 2413 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2374. (Contributed by NM, 22-Dec-2003.) (Revised by BJ, 16-Jun-2019.) (Proof shortened by GG, 10-Jan-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑧∀𝑤𝜓)
Theorem	cbvex2v 2344*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Version of cbvex2 2414 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2374. (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-2003.) (Revised by BJ, 16-Jun-2019.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧∃𝑤𝜓)
Theorem	dvelimhw 2345*	Proof of dvelimh 2452 without using ax-13 2374 but with additional distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 1-Oct-2002.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 21-Jul-2011.) (Revised by NM, 1-Aug-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 23-Dec-2018.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑧𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 = 𝑧))    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓))
Theorem	pm11.53 2346*	Theorem *11.53 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 164. See pm11.53v 1941 for a version requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (∃𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜓))
Theorem	19.12vv 2347*	Special case of 19.12 2325 where its converse holds. See 19.12vvv 1985 for a version with a disjoint variable condition requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jul-2001.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (∃𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ ∀𝑦∃𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	eean 2348	Distribute existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 27-Oct-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (∃𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑦𝜓))
Theorem	eeanv 2349*	Distribute a pair of existential quantifiers over a conjunction. Combination of 19.41v 1946 and 19.42v 1950. For a version requiring fewer axioms but with additional disjoint variable conditions, see exdistrv 1952. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jul-1995.)
⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (∃𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑦𝜓))
Theorem	eeeanv 2350*	Distribute three existential quantifiers over a conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jul-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) Reduce distinct variable restrictions. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 20-Jan-2018.)
⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ (∃𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑦𝜓 ∧ ∃𝑧𝜒))
Theorem	ee4anv 2351*	Distribute two pairs of existential quantifiers over a conjunction. For a version requiring fewer axioms but with additional disjoint variable conditions, see 4exdistrv 1953. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-1995.)
⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧∃𝑤(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑧∃𝑤𝜓))
Theorem	sb8v 2352*	Substitution of variable in universal quantifier. Version of sb8f 2353 with a disjoint variable condition replacing the nonfree hypothesis Ⅎ𝑦𝜑, not requiring ax-12 2174. (Contributed by SN, 5-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
Theorem	sb8f 2353*	Substitution of variable in universal quantifier. Version of sb8 2519 with a disjoint variable condition, not requiring ax-10 2138 or ax-13 2374. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-1993.) (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 19-Jan-2023.) Avoid ax-10 2138. (Revised by SN, 5-Dec-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
Theorem	sb8fOLD 2354*	Obsolete version of sb8f 2353 as of 5-Dec-2024. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-1993.) (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 19-Jan-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
Theorem	sb8ef 2355*	Substitution of variable in existential quantifier. Version of sb8e 2520 with a disjoint variable condition, not requiring ax-13 2374. (Contributed by NM, 12-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 19-Jan-2023.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
Theorem	2sb8ef 2356*	An equivalent expression for double existence. Version of 2sb8e 2532 with more disjoint variable conditions, not requiring ax-13 2374. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 28-Jan-2023.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑤𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧∃𝑤[𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑)
Theorem	sb6rfv 2357*	Reversed substitution. Version of sb6rf 2470 requiring disjoint variables, but fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 7-Feb-2023.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑥 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
Theorem	sbnf2 2358*	Two ways of expressing "𝑥 is (effectively) not free in 𝜑". (Contributed by Gérard Lang, 14-Nov-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 22-Sep-2018.) Avoid ax-13 2374. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 30-Jan-2023.)
⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦∀𝑧([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑))
Theorem	exsb 2359*	An equivalent expression for existence. One direction (exsbim 1998) needs fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2005.) Avoid ax-13 2374. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 16-Oct-2022.)
⊢ (∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))
Theorem	2exsb 2360*	An equivalent expression for double existence. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2005.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 30-Sep-2018.)
⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧∃𝑤∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → 𝜑))
Theorem	sbbib 2361*	Reversal of substitution. (Contributed by AV, 6-Aug-2023.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 4-Sep-2023.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ [𝑥 / 𝑦]𝜓))
Theorem	sbbibvv 2362*	Reversal of substitution. (Contributed by AV, 6-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ [𝑥 / 𝑦]𝜓))
Theorem	cbvsbvf 2363*	Change the bound variable (i.e. the substituted one) in wff's linked by implicit substitution. The proof was part of a former cbvabw 2810 version. (Contributed by GG and WL, 26-Oct-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜓)
Theorem	cleljustALT 2364*	Alternate proof of cleljust 2114. It is kept here and should not be modified because it is referenced on the Metamath Proof Explorer Home Page (mmset.html) as an example of how disjoint variable conditions are inherited by substitutions. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jan-2004.) (Revised by BJ, 29-Dec-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦))
Theorem	cleljustALT2 2365*	Alternate proof of cleljust 2114. Compared with cleljustALT 2364, it uses nfv 1911 followed by equsexv 2265 instead of ax-5 1907 followed by equsexhv 2290, so it uses the idiom Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 instead of 𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑 to express nonfreeness. This style is generally preferred for later theorems. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jan-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 21-Dec-2016.) (Revised by BJ, 29-Dec-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦))
Theorem	equs5aALT 2366	Alternate proof of equs5a 2459. Uses ax-12 2174 but not ax-13 2374. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2007.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜑) → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))
Theorem	equs5eALT 2367	Alternate proof of equs5e 2460. Uses ax-12 2174 but not ax-13 2374. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2007.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 15-Jan-2018.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∃𝑦𝜑))
Theorem	axc11r 2368	Same as axc11 2432 but with reversed antecedent. Note the use of ax-12 2174 (and not merely ax12v 2175 as in axc11rv 2262). This theorem is mostly used to eliminate conditions requiring set variables be distinct (cf. cbvaev 2050 and aecom 2429, for example) in proofs. In practice, theorems beyond elementary set theory do not really benefit from such eliminations. As of 2024, it is used in conjunction with ax-13 2374 only, and like that, it should be applied only in niches where indispensable. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2015.)
⊢ (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥 → (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜑))
Theorem	dral1v 2369*	Formula-building lemma for use with the Distinctor Reduction Theorem. Version of dral1 2441 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2374. Remark: the corresponding versions for dral2 2440 and drex2 2444 are instances of albidv 1917 and exbidv 1918 respectively. (Contributed by NM, 24-Nov-1994.) (Revised by BJ, 17-Jun-2019.) Base the proof on ax12v 2175. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 30-Mar-2024.) Avoid ax-10 2138. (Revised by GG, 18-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦𝜓))
Theorem	dral1vOLD 2370*	Obsolete version of dral1v 2369 as of 18-Nov-2024. (Contributed by NM, 24-Nov-1994.) (Revised by BJ, 17-Jun-2019.) Base the proof on ax12v 2175. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 30-Mar-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦𝜓))
Theorem	drex1v 2371*	Formula-building lemma for use with the Distinctor Reduction Theorem. Version of drex1 2443 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2374. (Contributed by NM, 27-Feb-2005.) (Revised by BJ, 17-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦𝜓))
Theorem	drnf1v 2372*	Formula-building lemma for use with the Distinctor Reduction Theorem. Version of drnf1 2445 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2374. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2016.) (Revised by BJ, 17-Jun-2019.) Avoid ax-10 2138. (Revised by GG, 18-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 ↔ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓))
Theorem	drnf1vOLD 2373*	Obsolete version of drnf1v 2372 as of 18-Nov-2024. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2016.) (Revised by BJ, 17-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 ↔ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓))
1.5.4  Axiom scheme ax-13 (Quantified Equality)
Axiom	ax-13 2374	Axiom of Quantified Equality. One of the equality and substitution axioms of predicate calculus with equality. An equivalent way to express this axiom that may be easier to understand is (¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (¬ 𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑥𝑦 = 𝑧))) (see ax13b 2028). Recall that in the intended interpretation, our variables are metavariables ranging over the variables of predicate calculus (the object language). In order for the first antecedent ¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦 to hold, 𝑥 and 𝑦 must have different values and thus cannot be the same object-language variable (so they are effectively "distinct variables" even though no $d is present). Similarly, 𝑥 and 𝑧 cannot be the same object-language variable. Therefore, 𝑥 will not occur in the wff 𝑦 = 𝑧 when the first two antecedents hold, so analogous to ax-5 1907, the conclusion (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑥𝑦 = 𝑧) follows. Note that ax-5 1907 cannot prove this because its distinct variable ($d) requirement is not satisfied directly but only indirectly (outside of Metamath) by the argument above. The original version of this axiom was ax-c9 38871 and was replaced with this shorter ax-13 2374 in December 2015. The old axiom is proved from this one as Theorem axc9 2384. The primary purpose of this axiom is to provide a way to introduce the quantifier ∀𝑥 on 𝑦 = 𝑧 even when 𝑥 and 𝑦 are substituted with the same variable. In this case, the first antecedent becomes ¬ 𝑥 = 𝑥 and the axiom still holds. This axiom is mostly used to eliminate conditions requiring set variables be distinct (cf. ax6ev 1966 and ax6e 2385, for example) in proofs. In practice, theorems beyond elementary set theory do not really benefit from such eliminations, so direct or indirect application of this axiom is discouraged now. You need to explicitly confirm its use in case you see a sensible application in a niche. After some assisting contributions by others over the years, it was in particular the extensive work of Gino Giotto in 2024 that helped reducing dependencies on this axiom on a large scale. Although this version is shorter, the original version axc9 2384 may be more practical to work with because of the "distinctor" form of its antecedents. A typical application of axc9 2384 is in dvelimh 2452 which converts a distinct variable pair to the distinctor antecedent ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦. In particular, it is conjectured that it is not possible to prove ax6 2386 from ax6v 1965 without this axiom. This axiom can be weakened if desired by adding distinct variable restrictions on pairs 𝑥, 𝑧 and 𝑦, 𝑧. To show that, we add these restrictions to Theorem ax13v 2375 and use only ax13v 2375 for further derivations. Thus, ax13v 2375 should be the only theorem referencing this axiom. Other theorems can reference either ax13v 2375 (preferred) or ax13 2377 (if the stronger form is needed). This axiom scheme is logically redundant (see ax13w 2133) but is used as an auxiliary axiom scheme to achieve scheme completeness (i.e. so that all possible cases of bundling can be proved; see text linked at mmtheorems.html#ax6dgen 2133). It is not known whether this axiom can be derived from the others. (Contributed by NM, 21-Dec-2015.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 = 𝑧))
Theorem	ax13v 2375*	A weaker version of ax-13 2374 with distinct variable restrictions on pairs 𝑥, 𝑧 and 𝑦, 𝑧. In order to show (with ax13 2377) that this weakening is still adequate, this should be the only theorem referencing ax-13 2374 directly. Had we additionally required 𝑥 and 𝑦 be distinct, too, this theorem would have been a direct consequence of ax-5 1907. So essentially this theorem states, that a distinct variable condition can be replaced with an inequality between set variables. Preferably, use the version ax13w 2133 to avoid the propagation of ax-13 2374. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 = 𝑧))
Theorem	ax13lem1 2376*	A version of ax13v 2375 with one distinct variable restriction dropped. For convenience, 𝑦 is kept on the right side of equations. The proof of ax13 2377 bases on ideas from NM, 24-Dec-2015. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 8-Sep-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥 𝑧 = 𝑦))
Theorem	ax13 2377	Derive ax-13 2374 from ax13v 2375 and Tarski's FOL. This shows that the weakening in ax13v 2375 is still sufficient for a complete system. Preferably, use the weaker ax13w 2133 to avoid the propagation of ax-13 2374. (Contributed by NM, 21-Dec-2015.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 31-Jan-2018.) Reduce axiom usage. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 2-Jun-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 = 𝑧))
Theorem	ax13lem2 2378*	Lemma for nfeqf2 2379. This lemma is equivalent to ax13v 2375 with one distinct variable constraint removed. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 8-Sep-2018.) Reduce axiom usage. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 18-Oct-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∃𝑥 𝑧 = 𝑦 → 𝑧 = 𝑦))
Theorem	nfeqf2 2379*	An equation between setvar is free of any other setvar. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2374. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 9-Jun-2019.) Remove dependency on ax-12 2174. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 16-Dec-2022.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑧 = 𝑦)
Theorem	dveeq2 2380*	Quantifier introduction when one pair of variables is distinct. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2374. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2002.) (Revised by NM, 20-Jul-2015.) Remove dependency on ax-11 2154. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 8-Sep-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥 𝑧 = 𝑦))
Theorem	nfeqf1 2381*	An equation between setvar is free of any other setvar. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2374. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 10-Jun-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 = 𝑧)
Theorem	dveeq1 2382*	Quantifier introduction when one pair of variables is distinct. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2374. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2002.) Remove dependency on ax-11 2154. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 8-Sep-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 = 𝑧))
Theorem	nfeqf 2383	A variable is effectively not free in an equality if it is not either of the involved variables. Ⅎ version of ax-c9 38871. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2374. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2016.) Remove dependency on ax-11 2154. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 6-Sep-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑥 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦) → Ⅎ𝑧 𝑥 = 𝑦)
Theorem	axc9 2384	Derive set.mm's original ax-c9 38871 from the shorter ax-13 2374. Usage is discouraged to avoid uninformed ax-13 2374 propagation. (Contributed by NM, 29-Nov-2015.) (Revised by NM, 24-Dec-2015.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 29-Apr-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑥 → (¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑧 𝑥 = 𝑦)))
Theorem	ax6e 2385	At least one individual exists. This is not a theorem of free logic, which is sound in empty domains. For such a logic, we would add this theorem as an axiom of set theory (Axiom 0 of [Kunen] p. 10). In the system consisting of ax-4 1805 through ax-9 2115, all axioms other than ax-6 1964 are believed to be theorems of free logic, although the system without ax-6 1964 is not complete in free logic. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2374. It is preferred to use ax6ev 1966 when it is sufficient. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1993.) Shortened after ax13lem1 2376 became available. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 8-Sep-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦
Theorem	ax6 2386	Theorem showing that ax-6 1964 follows from the weaker version ax6v 1965. (Even though this theorem depends on ax-6 1964, all references of ax-6 1964 are made via ax6v 1965. An earlier version stated ax6v 1965 as a separate axiom, but having two axioms caused some confusion.) This theorem should be referenced in place of ax-6 1964 so that all proofs can be traced back to ax6v 1965. When possible, use the weaker ax6v 1965 rather than ax6 2386 since the ax6v 1965 derivation is much shorter and requires fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 12-Nov-2013.) (Revised by NM, 25-Jul-2015.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 4-Feb-2018.) Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2374. Use ax6v 1965 instead. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ¬ ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦
Theorem	axc10 2387	Show that the original axiom ax-c10 38867 can be derived from ax6 2386 and axc7 2315 (on top of propositional calculus, ax-gen 1791, and ax-4 1805). See ax6fromc10 38877 for the rederivation of ax6 2386 from ax-c10 38867. Normally, axc10 2387 should be used rather than ax-c10 38867, except by theorems specifically studying the latter's properties. See bj-axc10v 36775 for a weaker version requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2374. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → 𝜑)
Theorem	spimt 2388	Closed theorem form of spim 2389. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jan-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 21-Mar-2023.) Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2374. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))) → (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	spim 2389	Specialization, using implicit substitution. Compare Lemma 14 of [Tarski] p. 70. The spim 2389 series of theorems requires that only one direction of the substitution hypothesis hold. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2374. See spimw 1967 for a version requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 18-Feb-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	spimed 2390	Deduction version of spime 2391. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 19-Feb-2018.) Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2374. Use spimedv 2194 instead. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜒 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜓))
Theorem	spime 2391	Existential introduction, using implicit substitution. Compare Lemma 14 of [Tarski] p. 70. See spimew 1968 and spimevw 1991 for weaker versions requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 6-Mar-2018.) Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2374. Use spimefv 2195 instead. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜓)
Theorem	spimv 2392*	A version of spim 2389 with a distinct variable requirement instead of a bound-variable hypothesis. See spimfv 2236 and spimvw 1992 for versions requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-1993.) Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2374. Use spimvw 1992 instead. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	spimvALT 2393*	Alternate proof of spimv 2392. Note that it requires only ax-1 6 through ax-5 1907 together with ax6e 2385. Currently, proofs derive from ax6v 1965, but if ax-6 1964 could be used instead, this proof would reduce axiom usage. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-1993.) Remove dependency on ax-10 2138. (Revised by BJ, 29-Nov-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	spimev 2394*	Distinct-variable version of spime 2391. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1993.) Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2374. Use spimevw 1991 instead. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜓)
Theorem	spv 2395*	Specialization, using implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2374. Use the weaker spvv 1993 if possible. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-1993.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	spei 2396	Inference from existential specialization, using implicit substitution. Remove a distinct variable constraint. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2374. Use the weaker speiv 1969 if possible. (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 12-May-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ 𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ ∃𝑥𝜑
Theorem	chvar 2397	Implicit substitution of 𝑦 for 𝑥 into a theorem. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2374. Use the weaker chvarfv 2237 if possible. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 9-Jul-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜓
Theorem	chvarv 2398*	Implicit substitution of 𝑦 for 𝑥 into a theorem. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2374. Use the weaker chvarvv 1995 if possible. (Contributed by NM, 20-Apr-1994.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 22-Apr-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜓
Theorem	cbv3 2399	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution, that does not use ax-c9 38871. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2374. Use the weaker cbv3v 2335 if possible. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 12-May-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜓)
Theorem	cbval 2400	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2374. Check out cbvalw 2031, cbvalvw 2032, cbvalv1 2341 for versions requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦𝜓)