Theorem 19.36v 1984

Description: Version of 19.36 2219 with a disjoint variable condition instead of a nonfreeness hypothesis. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 17-Jan-2020.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
19.36v	⊢ (∃𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓))

Distinct variable group:   𝜓,𝑥

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜑(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem 19.36v

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		19.35 1873	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜓))
2		19.9v 1980	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥𝜓 ↔ 𝜓)
3	2	imbi2i 336	. 2 ⊢ ((∀𝑥𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓))
4	1, 3	bitri 275	1 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205  ∀wal 1532  ∃wex 1774

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1790  ax-4 1804  ax-5 1906  ax-6 1964

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-ex 1775

This theorem is referenced by:  19.12vvv  1985  19.12vv  2339  ax13lem2  2371  axexte  2700  spcimdv  3580  bnj1090  34610  bj-spimvwt  36145  bj-spcimdv  36373  bj-spcimdvv  36374  19.36vv  43820