Theorem axsepg 5197

Description: A more general version of the axiom scheme of separation ax-sep 5196, where variable 𝑧 can also occur (in addition to 𝑥) in formula 𝜑, which can therefore be thought of as 𝜑(𝑥, 𝑧). This version is derived from the more restrictive ax-sep 5196 with no additional set theory axioms. Note that it was also derived from ax-rep 5183 but without ax-sep 5196 as axsepgfromrep 5194. (Contributed by NM, 10-Dec-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2016.) Remove dependency on ax-12 2176 and ax-13 2389 and shorten proof. (Revised by BJ, 6-Oct-2019.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
axsepg	⊢ ∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧   𝜑,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑧)

Proof of Theorem axsepg

Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elequ2 2128	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑧 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧))
2	1	anbi1d 631	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑧 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑)))
3	2	bibi2d 345	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑧 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑))))
4	3	albidv 1920	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑧 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑))))
5	4	exbidv 1921	. 2 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑧 → (∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ ∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑))))
6		ax-sep 5196	. 2 ⊢ ∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑))
7	5, 6	chvarvv 2004	1 ⊢ ∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 398  ∀wal 1534  ∃wex 1779

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2014  ax-9 2123  ax-sep 5196

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-ex 1780

This theorem is referenced by: (None)