P. 54 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 5301-5400   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	somo 5301*	A totally ordered set has at most one minimal element. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.) (Revised by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (𝑅 Or 𝐴 → ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)
2.3.9  Founded and well-ordering relations
Syntax	wfr 5302	Extend wff notation to include the well-founded predicate. Read: "𝑅 is a well-founded relation on 𝐴".
wff 𝑅 Fr 𝐴
Syntax	wse 5303	Extend wff notation to include the set-like predicate. Read: "𝑅 is set-like on 𝐴".
wff 𝑅 Se 𝐴
Syntax	wwe 5304	Extend wff notation to include the well-ordering predicate. Read: "𝑅 well-orders 𝐴".
wff 𝑅 We 𝐴
Definition	df-fr 5305*	Define the well-founded relation predicate. Definition 6.24(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 30. For alternate definitions, see dffr2 5311 and dffr3 5743. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-1994.)
⊢ (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦))
Definition	df-se 5306*	Define the set-like predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝑅 Se 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑦𝑅𝑥} ∈ V)
Definition	df-we 5307	Define the well-ordering predicate. For an alternate definition, see dfwe2 7247. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-1994.)
⊢ (𝑅 We 𝐴 ↔ (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Or 𝐴))
Theorem	fri 5308*	Property of well-founded relation (one direction of definition). (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-1997.)
⊢ (((𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑅 Fr 𝐴) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅)) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)
Theorem	seex 5309*	The 𝑅-preimage of an element of the base set in a set-like relation is a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑅 Se 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑥𝑅𝐵} ∈ V)
Theorem	exse 5310	Any relation on a set is set-like on it. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝑅 Se 𝐴)
Theorem	dffr2 5311*	Alternate definition of well-founded relation. Similar to Definition 6.21 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 30. (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 {𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ 𝑧𝑅𝑦} = ∅))
Theorem	frc 5312*	Property of well-founded relation (one direction of definition using class variables). (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 {𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝑦𝑅𝑥} = ∅)
Theorem	frss 5313	Subset theorem for the well-founded predicate. Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 31. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝑅 Fr 𝐵 → 𝑅 Fr 𝐴))
Theorem	sess1 5314	Subset theorem for the set-like predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝑅 ⊆ 𝑆 → (𝑆 Se 𝐴 → 𝑅 Se 𝐴))
Theorem	sess2 5315	Subset theorem for the set-like predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝑅 Se 𝐵 → 𝑅 Se 𝐴))
Theorem	freq1 5316	Equality theorem for the well-founded predicate. (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-1997.)
⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 Fr 𝐴))
Theorem	freq2 5317	Equality theorem for the well-founded predicate. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ↔ 𝑅 Fr 𝐵))
Theorem	seeq1 5318	Equality theorem for the set-like predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → (𝑅 Se 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 Se 𝐴))
Theorem	seeq2 5319	Equality theorem for the set-like predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝑅 Se 𝐴 ↔ 𝑅 Se 𝐵))
Theorem	nffr 5320	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for well-founded relations. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑅 Fr 𝐴
Theorem	nfse 5321	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for set-like relations. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑅 Se 𝐴
Theorem	nfwe 5322	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for well-orderings. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑅 We 𝐴
Theorem	frirr 5323	A well-founded relation is irreflexive. Special case of Proposition 6.23 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 30. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jun-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → ¬ 𝐵𝑅𝐵)
Theorem	fr2nr 5324	A well-founded relation has no 2-cycle loops. Special case of Proposition 6.23 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 30. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jun-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → ¬ (𝐵𝑅𝐶 ∧ 𝐶𝑅𝐵))
Theorem	fr0 5325	Any relation is well-founded on the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-1993.)
⊢ 𝑅 Fr ∅
Theorem	frminex 5326*	If an element of a well-founded set satisfies a property 𝜑, then there is a minimal element that satisfies 𝜑. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 18-Jun-2010.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 18-Nov-2016.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜓 → ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))))
Theorem	efrirr 5327	Irreflexivity of the epsilon relation: a class founded by epsilon is not a member of itself. (Contributed by NM, 18-Apr-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jun-2015.)
⊢ ( E Fr 𝐴 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	efrn2lp 5328	A set founded by epsilon contains no 2-cycle loops. (Contributed by NM, 19-Apr-1994.)
⊢ (( E Fr 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → ¬ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	epse 5329	The epsilon relation is set-like on any class. (This is the origin of the term "set-like": a set-like relation "acts like" the epsilon relation of sets and their elements.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jun-2015.)
⊢ E Se 𝐴
Theorem	tz7.2 5330	Similar to Theorem 7.2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 35, of except that the Axiom of Regularity is not required due to antecedent E Fr 𝐴. (Contributed by NM, 4-May-1994.)
⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ E Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴))
Theorem	dfepfr 5331*	An alternate way of saying that the epsilon relation is well-founded. (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2015.)
⊢ ( E Fr 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
Theorem	epfrc 5332*	A subset of an epsilon-founded class has a minimal element. (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2004.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 22-Feb-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (( E Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐵 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)
Theorem	wess 5333	Subset theorem for the well-ordering predicate. Exercise 4 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 31. (Contributed by NM, 19-Apr-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝑅 We 𝐵 → 𝑅 We 𝐴))
Theorem	weeq1 5334	Equality theorem for the well-ordering predicate. (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-1997.)
⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → (𝑅 We 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 We 𝐴))
Theorem	weeq2 5335	Equality theorem for the well-ordering predicate. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝑅 We 𝐴 ↔ 𝑅 We 𝐵))
Theorem	wefr 5336	A well-ordering is well-founded. (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-1994.)
⊢ (𝑅 We 𝐴 → 𝑅 Fr 𝐴)
Theorem	weso 5337	A well-ordering is a strict ordering. (Contributed by NM, 16-Mar-1997.)
⊢ (𝑅 We 𝐴 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)
Theorem	wecmpep 5338	The elements of an epsilon well-ordering are comparable. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1994.)
⊢ (( E We 𝐴 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))
Theorem	wetrep 5339	An epsilon well-ordering is a transitive relation. (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-1994.)
⊢ (( E We 𝐴 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑧) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧))
Theorem	wefrc 5340*	A nonempty (possibly proper) subclass of a class well-ordered by E has a minimal element. Special case of Proposition 6.26 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 31. (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2004.)
⊢ (( E We 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐵 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)
Theorem	we0 5341	Any relation is a well-ordering of the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 16-Mar-1997.)
⊢ 𝑅 We ∅
Theorem	wereu 5342*	A subset of a well-ordered set has a unique minimal element. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅)) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)
Theorem	wereu2 5343*	All nonempty (possibly proper) subclasses of 𝐴, which has a well-founded relation 𝑅, have 𝑅-minimal elements. Proposition 6.26 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 31. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 29-Jan-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅)) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)
2.3.10  Relations
Syntax	cxp 5344	Extend the definition of a class to include the Cartesian product.
class (𝐴 × 𝐵)
Syntax	ccnv 5345	Extend the definition of a class to include the converse of a class.
class ◡𝐴
Syntax	cdm 5346	Extend the definition of a class to include the domain of a class.
class dom 𝐴
Syntax	crn 5347	Extend the definition of a class to include the range of a class.
class ran 𝐴
Syntax	cres 5348	Extend the definition of a class to include the restriction of a class. Read: "the restriction of 𝐴 to 𝐵".
class (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵)
Syntax	cima 5349	Extend the definition of a class to include the image of a class. Read: "the image of 𝐵 under 𝐴".
class (𝐴 “ 𝐵)
Syntax	ccom 5350	Extend the definition of a class to include the composition of two classes. (Read: The composition of 𝐴 and 𝐵.)
class (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵)
Syntax	wrel 5351	Extend the definition of a wff to include the relation predicate. Read: "𝐴 is a relation".
wff Rel 𝐴
Definition	df-xp 5352*	Define the Cartesian product of two classes. This is also sometimes called the "cross product" but that term also has other meanings; we intentionally choose a less ambiguous term. Definition 9.11 of [Quine] p. 64. For example, ({1, 5} × {2, 7}) = ({⟨1, 2⟩, ⟨1, 7⟩} ∪ {⟨5, 2⟩, ⟨5, 7⟩}) (ex-xp 27847). Another example is that the set of rational numbers are defined in df-q 12079 using the Cartesian product (ℤ × ℕ); the left- and right-hand sides of the Cartesian product represent the top (integer) and bottom (natural) numbers of a fraction. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 × 𝐵) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)}
Definition	df-rel 5353	Define the relation predicate. Definition 6.4(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 23. For alternate definitions, see dfrel2 5828 and dfrel3 5836. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (Rel 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ (V × V))
Definition	df-cnv 5354*	Define the converse of a class. Definition 9.12 of [Quine] p. 64. The converse of a binary relation swaps its arguments, i.e., if 𝐴 ∈ V and 𝐵 ∈ V then (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐴), as proven in brcnv 5541 (see df-br 4876 and df-rel 5353 for more on relations). For example, ◡{⟨2, 6⟩, ⟨3, 9⟩} = {⟨6, 2⟩, ⟨9, 3⟩} (ex-cnv 27848). We use Quine's breve accent (smile) notation. Like Quine, we use it as a prefix, which eliminates the need for parentheses. Many authors use the postfix superscript "minus one". The term "converse" is Quine's terminology; some authors call it "inverse", especially when the argument is a function. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-1994.)
⊢ ◡𝐴 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝑦𝐴𝑥}
Definition	df-co 5355*	Define the composition of two classes. Definition 6.6(3) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 24. For example, ((exp ∘ cos)‘0) = e (ex-co 27849) because (cos‘0) = 1 (see cos0 15259) and (exp‘1) = e (see df-e 15178). Note that Definition 7 of [Suppes] p. 63 reverses 𝐴 and 𝐵, uses / instead of ∘, and calls the operation "relative product." (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧(𝑥𝐵𝑧 ∧ 𝑧𝐴𝑦)}
Definition	df-dm 5356*	Define the domain of a class. Definition 3 of [Suppes] p. 59. For example, 𝐹 = {⟨2, 6⟩, ⟨3, 9⟩} → dom 𝐹 = {2, 3} (ex-dm 27850). Another example is the domain of the complex arctangent, (𝐴 ∈ dom arctan ↔ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ -i ∧ 𝐴 ≠ i)) (for proof see atandm 25023). Contrast with range (defined in df-rn 5357). For alternate definitions see dfdm2 5912, dfdm3 5546, and dfdm4 5552. The notation "dom " is used by Enderton; other authors sometimes use script D. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
⊢ dom 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦 𝑥𝐴𝑦}
Definition	df-rn 5357	Define the range of a class. For example, 𝐹 = {⟨2, 6⟩, ⟨3, 9⟩} → ran 𝐹 = {6, 9} (ex-rn 27851). Contrast with domain (defined in df-dm 5356). For alternate definitions, see dfrn2 5547, dfrn3 5548, and dfrn4 5840. The notation "ran " is used by Enderton; other authors sometimes use script R or script W. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
⊢ ran 𝐴 = dom ◡𝐴
Definition	df-res 5358	Define the restriction of a class. Definition 6.6(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 24. For example, the expression (exp ↾ ℝ) (used in reeff1 15229) means "the exponential function e to the x, but the exponent x must be in the reals" (df-ef 15177 defines the exponential function, which normally allows the exponent to be a complex number). Another example is that (𝐹 = {⟨2, 6⟩, ⟨3, 9⟩} ∧ 𝐵 = {1, 2}) → (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) = {⟨2, 6⟩} (ex-res 27852). (Contributed by NM, 2-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 × V))
Definition	df-ima 5359	Define the image of a class (as restricted by another class). Definition 6.6(2) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 24. For example, (𝐹 = {⟨2, 6⟩, ⟨3, 9⟩} ∧ 𝐵 = {1, 2}) → (𝐹 “ 𝐵) = {6} (ex-ima 27853). Contrast with restriction (df-res 5358) and range (df-rn 5357). For an alternate definition, see dfima2 5713. (Contributed by NM, 2-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 “ 𝐵) = ran (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵)
Theorem	xpeq1 5360	Equality theorem for Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 × 𝐶) = (𝐵 × 𝐶))
Theorem	xpss12 5361	Subset theorem for Cartesian product. Generalization of Theorem 101 of [Suppes] p. 52. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) → (𝐴 × 𝐶) ⊆ (𝐵 × 𝐷))
Theorem	xpss 5362	A Cartesian product is included in the ordered pair universe. Exercise 3 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 2-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ⊆ (V × V)
Theorem	inxpssres 5363	Intersection with a Cartesian product is a subclass of restriction. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 19-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴)
Theorem	relxp 5364	A Cartesian product is a relation. Theorem 3.13(i) of [Monk1] p. 37. (Contributed by NM, 2-Aug-1994.)
⊢ Rel (𝐴 × 𝐵)
Theorem	xpss1 5365	Subset relation for Cartesian product. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 30-Aug-2009.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐴 × 𝐶) ⊆ (𝐵 × 𝐶))
Theorem	xpss2 5366	Subset relation for Cartesian product. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 30-Aug-2009.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐶 × 𝐴) ⊆ (𝐶 × 𝐵))
Theorem	xpeq2 5367	Equality theorem for Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jul-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐶 × 𝐴) = (𝐶 × 𝐵))
Theorem	elxpi 5368*	Membership in a Cartesian product. Uses fewer axioms than elxp 5369. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) → ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝐴 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)))
Theorem	elxp 5369*	Membership in a Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝐴 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)))
Theorem	elxp2 5370*	Membership in a Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM, 23-Feb-2004.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 13-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝐴 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩)
Theorem	xpeq12 5371	Equality theorem for Cartesian product. (Contributed by FL, 31-Aug-2009.)
⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 = 𝐷) → (𝐴 × 𝐶) = (𝐵 × 𝐷))
Theorem	xpeq1i 5372	Equality inference for Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM, 21-Dec-2008.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 × 𝐶) = (𝐵 × 𝐶)
Theorem	xpeq2i 5373	Equality inference for Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM, 21-Dec-2008.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 × 𝐴) = (𝐶 × 𝐵)
Theorem	xpeq12i 5374	Equality inference for Cartesian product. (Contributed by FL, 31-Aug-2009.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐷    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 × 𝐶) = (𝐵 × 𝐷)
Theorem	xpeq1d 5375	Equality deduction for Cartesian product. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 17-Jun-2010.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 × 𝐶) = (𝐵 × 𝐶))
Theorem	xpeq2d 5376	Equality deduction for Cartesian product. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 17-Jun-2010.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 × 𝐴) = (𝐶 × 𝐵))
Theorem	xpeq12d 5377	Equality deduction for Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2013.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 × 𝐶) = (𝐵 × 𝐷))
Theorem	sqxpeqd 5378	Equality deduction for a Cartesian square, see Wikipedia "Cartesian product", https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cartesian_product#n-ary_Cartesian_power. (Contributed by AV, 13-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 × 𝐴) = (𝐵 × 𝐵))
Theorem	nfxp 5379	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐴 × 𝐵)
Theorem	0nelxp 5380	The empty set is not a member of a Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM, 2-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 13-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)
Theorem	0nelelxp 5381	A member of a Cartesian product (ordered pair) doesn't contain the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 15-Dec-2008.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) → ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	opelxp 5382	Ordered pair membership in a Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 12-Aug-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ (𝐶 × 𝐷) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷))
Theorem	opelxpi 5383	Ordered pair membership in a Cartesian product (implication). (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1995.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ (𝐶 × 𝐷))
Theorem	opelxpd 5384	Ordered pair membership in a Cartesian product, deduction form. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 3-Mar-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ (𝐶 × 𝐷))
Theorem	opelvv 5385	Ordered pair membership in the universal class of ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ (V × V)
Theorem	opelvvg 5386	Ordered pair membership in the universal class of ordered pairs. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-May-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ (V × V))
Theorem	opelxp1 5387	The first member of an ordered pair of classes in a Cartesian product belongs to first Cartesian product argument. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ (𝐶 × 𝐷) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	opelxp2 5388	The second member of an ordered pair of classes in a Cartesian product belongs to second Cartesian product argument. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ (𝐶 × 𝐷) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷)
Theorem	otelxp1 5389	The first member of an ordered triple of classes in a Cartesian product belongs to first Cartesian product argument. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-2008.)
⊢ (⟨⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩, 𝐶⟩ ∈ ((𝑅 × 𝑆) × 𝑇) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅)
Theorem	otel3xp 5390	An ordered triple is an element of a doubled Cartesian product. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-Feb-2018.)
⊢ ((𝑇 = ⟨𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑍)) → 𝑇 ∈ ((𝑋 × 𝑌) × 𝑍))
Theorem	rabxp 5391*	Membership in a class builder restricted to a Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM, 20-Feb-2014.)
⊢ (𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)}
Theorem	brxp 5392	Binary relation on a Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴(𝐶 × 𝐷)𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷))
Theorem	brrelex12 5393	A true binary relation on a relation implies the arguments are sets. (This is a property of our ordered pair definition.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((Rel 𝑅 ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))
Theorem	brrelex1 5394	A true binary relation on a relation implies the first argument is a set. (This is a property of our ordered pair definition.) (Contributed by NM, 18-May-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((Rel 𝑅 ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝐵) → 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	brrelex2 5395	A true binary relation on a relation implies the second argument is a set. (This is a property of our ordered pair definition.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((Rel 𝑅 ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝐵) → 𝐵 ∈ V)
Theorem	brrelex12i 5396	Two classes that are related by a binary relation are sets. (An artifact of our ordered pair definition.) (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2022.)
⊢ Rel 𝑅    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))
Theorem	brrelex1i 5397	The first argument of a binary relation exists. (An artifact of our ordered pair definition.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-1998.)
⊢ Rel 𝑅    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	brrelex2i 5398	The second argument of a binary relation exists. (An artifact of our ordered pair definition.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ Rel 𝑅    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 → 𝐵 ∈ V)
Theorem	nprrel12 5399	Proper classes are not related via any relation. (Contributed by AV, 29-Oct-2021.)
⊢ Rel 𝑅    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → ¬ 𝐴𝑅𝐵)
Theorem	nprrel 5400	No proper class is related to anything via any relation. (Contributed by Roy F. Longton, 30-Jul-2005.)
⊢ Rel 𝑅    &   ⊢ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ 𝐴𝑅𝐵