P. 54 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 5301-5400   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	unidif0 5301	The removal of the empty set from a class does not affect its union. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-2004.) (Proof shortened by Eric Schmidt, 25-Apr-2026.)
⊢ ∪ (𝐴 ∖ {∅}) = ∪ 𝐴
Theorem	unidif0OLD 5302	Obsolete version of unidif0 5301 as of 25-Apr-2026. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-2004.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ∪ (𝐴 ∖ {∅}) = ∪ 𝐴
Theorem	eqsnuniex 5303	If a class is equal to the singleton of its union, then its union exists. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 24-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 = {∪ 𝐴} → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	iin0 5304*	An indexed intersection of the empty set, with a nonempty index set, is empty. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2005.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ ↔ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∅ = ∅)
Theorem	notzfaus 5305*	In the Separation Scheme zfauscl 5233, we require that 𝑦 not occur in 𝜑 (which can be generalized to "not be free in"). Here we show special cases of 𝐴 and 𝜑 that result in a contradiction if that requirement is not met. (Contributed by NM, 8-Feb-2006.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 18-Nov-2023.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {∅}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦)    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ ∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	intv 5306	The intersection of the universal class is empty. (Contributed by NM, 11-Sep-2008.)
⊢ ∩ V = ∅
2.3  ZF Set Theory - add the Axiom of Power Sets
2.3.1  Introduce the Axiom of Power Sets
Axiom	ax-pow 5307*	Axiom of Power Sets. An axiom of Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory. It states that a set 𝑦 exists that includes the power set of a given set 𝑥 i.e. contains every subset of 𝑥. The variant axpow2 5309 uses explicit subset notation. A version using class notation is pwex 5322. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.)
⊢ ∃𝑦∀𝑧(∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦)
Theorem	zfpow 5308*	Axiom of Power Sets expressed with the fewest number of different variables. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-2003.)
⊢ ∃𝑥∀𝑦(∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)
Theorem	axpow2 5309*	A variant of the Axiom of Power Sets ax-pow 5307 using subset notation. Problem in [BellMachover] p. 466. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2006.)
⊢ ∃𝑦∀𝑧(𝑧 ⊆ 𝑥 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦)
Theorem	axpow3 5310*	A variant of the Axiom of Power Sets ax-pow 5307. For any set 𝑥, there exists a set 𝑦 whose members are exactly the subsets of 𝑥 i.e. the power set of 𝑥. Axiom Pow of [BellMachover] p. 466. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2006.)
⊢ ∃𝑦∀𝑧(𝑧 ⊆ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦)
Theorem	elALT2 5311*	Alternate proof of el 5390 using ax-9 2124 and ax-pow 5307 instead of ax-pr 5375. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2002.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ∃𝑦 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
Theorem	dtruALT2 5312*	Alternate proof of dtru 5389 using ax-pow 5307 instead of ax-pr 5375. See dtruALT 5330 for another proof using ax-pow 5307 instead of ax-pr 5375. (Contributed by NM, 7-Nov-2006.) Avoid ax-13 2376. (Revised by BJ, 31-May-2019.) Avoid ax-12 2185. (Revised by Rohan Ridenour, 9-Oct-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦
Theorem	dtrucor 5313*	Corollary of dtru 5389. This example illustrates the danger of blindly trusting the standard Deduction Theorem without accounting for free variables: the theorem form of this deduction is not valid, as shown by dtrucor2 5314. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jun-2002.)
⊢ 𝑥 = 𝑦    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦
Theorem	dtrucor2 5314	The theorem form of the deduction dtrucor 5313 leads to a contradiction, as mentioned in the "Wrong!" example at mmdeduction.html#bad 5313. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2376. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2007.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	dvdemo1 5315*	Demonstration of a theorem that requires the setvar variables 𝑥 and 𝑦 to be disjoint (but without any other disjointness conditions, and in particular, none on 𝑧). That theorem bundles the theorems (⊢ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) with 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 disjoint), often called its "principal instance", and the two "degenerate instances" (⊢ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑥) with 𝑥, 𝑦 disjoint) and (⊢ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) with 𝑥, 𝑦 disjoint). Compare with dvdemo2 5316, which has the same principal instance and one common degenerate instance but crucially differs in the other degenerate instance. See https://us.metamath.org/mpeuni/mmset.html#distinct 5316 for details on the "disjoint variable" mechanism. (The verb "bundle" to express this phenomenon was introduced by Raph Levien.) Note that dvdemo1 5315 is partially bundled, in that the pairs of setvar variables 𝑥, 𝑧 and 𝑦, 𝑧 need not be disjoint, and in spite of that, its proof does not require ax-11 2163 nor ax-13 2376. (Contributed by NM, 1-Dec-2006.) (Revised by BJ, 13-Jan-2024.)
⊢ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)
Theorem	dvdemo2 5316*	Demonstration of a theorem that requires the setvar variables 𝑥 and 𝑧 to be disjoint (but without any other disjointness conditions, and in particular, none on 𝑦). That theorem bundles the theorems (⊢ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) with 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 disjoint), often called its "principal instance", and the two "degenerate instances" (⊢ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑥 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) with 𝑥, 𝑧 disjoint) and (⊢ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) with 𝑥, 𝑧 disjoint). Compare with dvdemo1 5315, which has the same principal instance and one common degenerate instance but crucially differs in the other degenerate instance. See https://us.metamath.org/mpeuni/mmset.html#distinct 5315 for details on the "disjoint variable" mechanism. Note that dvdemo2 5316 is partially bundled, in that the pairs of setvar variables 𝑥, 𝑦 and 𝑦, 𝑧 need not be disjoint, and in spite of that, its proof does not require any of the auxiliary axioms ax-10 2147, ax-11 2163, ax-12 2185, ax-13 2376. (Contributed by NM, 1-Dec-2006.) Avoid ax-13 2376. (Revised by BJ, 13-Jan-2024.)
⊢ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)
Theorem	nfnid 5317	A setvar variable is not free from itself. This theorem is not true in a one-element domain, as illustrated by the use of dtruALT2 5312 in its proof. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Oct-2016.)
⊢ ¬ Ⅎ𝑥𝑥
Theorem	nfcvb 5318	The "distinctor" expression ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦, stating that 𝑥 and 𝑦 are not the same variable, can be written in terms of Ⅎ in the obvious way. This theorem is not true in a one-element domain, because then Ⅎ𝑥𝑦 and ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 will both be true. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Oct-2016.) Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2376. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝑦 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦)
Theorem	vpwex 5319	Power set axiom: the powerclass of a set is a set. Axiom 4 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 17. (Contributed by NM, 30-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.) Revised to prove pwexg 5320 from vpwex 5319. (Revised by BJ, 10-Aug-2022.)
⊢ 𝒫 𝑥 ∈ V
Theorem	pwexg 5320	Power set axiom expressed in class notation, with the sethood requirement as an antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 30-Oct-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝒫 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	pwexd 5321	Deduction version of the power set axiom. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 26-Jun-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝒫 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	pwex 5322	Power set axiom expressed in class notation. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ 𝒫 𝐴 ∈ V
Theorem	pwel 5323	Quantitative version of pwexg 5320: the powerset of an element of a class is an element of the double powerclass of the union of that class. Exercise 10 of [Enderton] p. 26. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jan-2007.) Remove use of ax-nul 5241 and ax-pr 5375 and shorten proof. (Revised by BJ, 13-Apr-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 𝒫 ∪ 𝐵)
Theorem	abssexg 5324*	Existence of a class of subsets. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jul-2006.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∈ V)
Theorem	snexALT 5325	Alternate proof of snex 5381 using Power Set (ax-pow 5307) instead of Pairing (ax-pr 5375). Unlike in the proof of zfpair 5363, Replacement (ax-rep 5212) is not needed. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ {𝐴} ∈ V
Theorem	p0ex 5326	The power set of the empty set (the ordinal 1) is a set. See also p0exALT 5327. (Contributed by NM, 23-Dec-1993.)
⊢ {∅} ∈ V
Theorem	p0exALT 5327	Alternate proof of p0ex 5326 which is quite different and longer if snexALT 5325 is expanded. (Contributed by NM, 23-Dec-1993.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ {∅} ∈ V
Theorem	pp0ex 5328	The power set of the power set of the empty set (the ordinal 2) is a set. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-1993.)
⊢ {∅, {∅}} ∈ V
Theorem	ord3ex 5329	The ordinal number 3 is a set, proved without the Axiom of Union ax-un 7689. (Contributed by NM, 2-May-2009.)
⊢ {∅, {∅}, {∅, {∅}}} ∈ V
Theorem	dtruALT 5330*	Alternate proof of dtru 5389 which requires more axioms but is shorter and may be easier to understand. Like dtruALT2 5312, it uses ax-pow 5307 rather than ax-pr 5375. Assuming that ZF set theory is consistent, we cannot prove this theorem unless we specify that 𝑥 and 𝑦 be distinct. Specifically, Theorem spcev 3548 requires that 𝑥 must not occur in the subexpression ¬ 𝑦 = {∅} in step 4 nor in the subexpression ¬ 𝑦 = ∅ in step 9. The proof verifier will require that 𝑥 and 𝑦 be in a distinct variable group to ensure this. You can check this by deleting the $d statement in set.mm and rerunning the verifier, which will print a detailed explanation of the distinct variable violation. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jul-1994.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦
Theorem	axc16b 5331*	This theorem shows that Axiom ax-c16 39338 is redundant in the presence of Theorem dtruALT2 5312, which states simply that at least two things exist. This justifies the remark at mmzfcnd.html#twoness 5312 (which links to this theorem). (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Nov-2006.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑))
Theorem	eunex 5332	Existential uniqueness implies there is a value for which the wff argument is false. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-2010.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 2-Jan-2023.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	eusv1 5333*	Two ways to express single-valuedness of a class expression 𝐴(𝑥). (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2010.)
⊢ (∃!𝑦∀𝑥 𝑦 = 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑦∀𝑥 𝑦 = 𝐴)
Theorem	eusvnf 5334*	Even if 𝑥 is free in 𝐴, it is effectively bound when 𝐴(𝑥) is single-valued. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
⊢ (∃!𝑦∀𝑥 𝑦 = 𝐴 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)
Theorem	eusvnfb 5335*	Two ways to say that 𝐴(𝑥) is a set expression that does not depend on 𝑥. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Nov-2016.)
⊢ (∃!𝑦∀𝑥 𝑦 = 𝐴 ↔ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V))
Theorem	eusv2i 5336*	Two ways to express single-valuedness of a class expression 𝐴(𝑥). (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 18-Nov-2016.)
⊢ (∃!𝑦∀𝑥 𝑦 = 𝐴 → ∃!𝑦∃𝑥 𝑦 = 𝐴)
Theorem	eusv2nf 5337*	Two ways to express single-valuedness of a class expression 𝐴(𝑥). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Nov-2016.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑦∃𝑥 𝑦 = 𝐴 ↔ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)
Theorem	eusv2 5338*	Two ways to express single-valuedness of a class expression 𝐴(𝑥). (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-2010.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 18-Nov-2016.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑦∃𝑥 𝑦 = 𝐴 ↔ ∃!𝑦∀𝑥 𝑦 = 𝐴)
Theorem	reusv1 5339*	Two ways to express single-valuedness of a class expression 𝐶(𝑦). (Contributed by NM, 16-Dec-2012.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 18-Nov-2016.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 7-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝐶) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝐶)))
Theorem	reusv2lem1 5340*	Lemma for reusv2 5345. (Contributed by NM, 22-Oct-2010.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 19-Nov-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (∃!𝑥∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = 𝐵))
Theorem	reusv2lem2 5341*	Lemma for reusv2 5345. (Contributed by NM, 27-Oct-2010.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 19-Nov-2016.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 7-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = 𝐵 → ∃!𝑥∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = 𝐵)
Theorem	reusv2lem3 5342*	Lemma for reusv2 5345. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2012.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 19-Nov-2016.)
⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ V → (∃!𝑥∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = 𝐵 ↔ ∃!𝑥∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = 𝐵))
Theorem	reusv2lem4 5343*	Lemma for reusv2 5345. (Contributed by NM, 13-Dec-2012.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐶) ↔ ∃!𝑥∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝑥 = 𝐶))
Theorem	reusv2lem5 5344*	Lemma for reusv2 5345. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 19-Nov-2016.)
⊢ ((∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 = 𝐶 ↔ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 = 𝐶))
Theorem	reusv2 5345*	Two ways to express single-valuedness of a class expression 𝐶(𝑦) that is constant for those 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 such that 𝜑. The first antecedent ensures that the constant value belongs to the existential uniqueness domain 𝐴, and the second ensures that 𝐶(𝑦) is evaluated for at least one 𝑦. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 19-Nov-2016.)
⊢ ((∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑) → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐶) ↔ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝐶)))
Theorem	reusv3i 5346*	Two ways of expressing existential uniqueness via an indirect equality. (Contributed by NM, 23-Dec-2012.)
⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝐶) → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐶 = 𝐷))
Theorem	reusv3 5347*	Two ways to express single-valuedness of a class expression 𝐶(𝑦). See reusv1 5339 for the connection to uniqueness. (Contributed by NM, 27-Dec-2012.)
⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜑 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝐶)))
Theorem	eusv4 5348*	Two ways to express single-valuedness of a class expression 𝐵(𝑦). (Contributed by NM, 27-Oct-2010.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑥∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = 𝐵 ↔ ∃!𝑥∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = 𝐵)
Theorem	alxfr 5349*	Transfer universal quantification from a variable 𝑥 to another variable 𝑦 contained in expression 𝐴. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2007.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ ((∀𝑦 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥∃𝑦 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦𝜓))
Theorem	ralxfrd 5350*	Transfer universal quantification from a variable 𝑥 to another variable 𝑦 contained in expression 𝐴. (Contributed by NM, 15-Aug-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 19-Nov-2016.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 7-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥 = 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝜒))
Theorem	rexxfrd 5351*	Transfer existential quantification from a variable 𝑥 to another variable 𝑦 contained in expression 𝐴. (Contributed by FL, 10-Apr-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Aug-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥 = 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝜒))
Theorem	ralxfr2d 5352*	Transfer universal quantification from a variable 𝑥 to another variable 𝑦 contained in expression 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Aug-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥 = 𝐴))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝜒))
Theorem	rexxfr2d 5353*	Transfer existential quantification from a variable 𝑥 to another variable 𝑦 contained in expression 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Aug-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 19-Nov-2016.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥 = 𝐴))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝜒))
Theorem	ralxfrd2 5354*	Transfer universal quantification from a variable 𝑥 to another variable 𝑦 contained in expression 𝐴. Variant of ralxfrd 5350. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Apr-2018.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥 = 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝜒))
Theorem	rexxfrd2 5355*	Transfer existence from a variable 𝑥 to another variable 𝑦 contained in expression 𝐴. Variant of rexxfrd 5351. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Apr-2018.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥 = 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝜒))
Theorem	ralxfr 5356*	Transfer universal quantification from a variable 𝑥 to another variable 𝑦 contained in expression 𝐴. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jun-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Aug-2014.)
⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥 = 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝜓)
Theorem	ralxfrALT 5357*	Alternate proof of ralxfr 5356 which does not use ralxfrd 5350. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jun-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Aug-2014.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥 = 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝜓)
Theorem	rexxfr 5358*	Transfer existence from a variable 𝑥 to another variable 𝑦 contained in expression 𝐴. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jun-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Aug-2014.)
⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥 = 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝜓)
Theorem	rabxfrd 5359*	Membership in a restricted class abstraction after substituting an expression 𝐴 (containing 𝑦) for 𝑥 in the formula defining the class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2012.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐵    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐶    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → 𝐴 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝐶 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ 𝐵 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ∣ 𝜒}))
Theorem	rabxfr 5360*	Membership in a restricted class abstraction after substituting an expression 𝐴 (containing 𝑦) for 𝑥 in the formula defining the class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jun-2005.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐵    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐶    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → 𝐴 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 → (𝐶 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝐵 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ∣ 𝜓}))
Theorem	reuhypd 5361*	A theorem useful for eliminating the restricted existential uniqueness hypotheses in riotaxfrd 7358. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝑥 = 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) → ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥 = 𝐴)
Theorem	reuhyp 5362*	A theorem useful for eliminating the restricted existential uniqueness hypotheses in reuxfr1 3698. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2004.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝑥 = 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 → ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥 = 𝐴)
Theorem	zfpair 5363	The Axiom of Pairing of Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory. Axiom 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. In some textbooks this is stated as a separate axiom; here we show it is redundant since it can be derived from the other axioms. This theorem should not be referenced by any proof other than axprALT 5364. Instead, use zfpair2 5376 below so that the uses of the Axiom of Pairing can be more easily identified. (Contributed by NM, 18-Oct-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ {𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ V
Theorem	axprALT 5364*	Alternate proof of axpr 5369. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ∃𝑧∀𝑤((𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧)
2.3.2  Derive the Axiom of Pairing
Theorem	axprlem1 5365*	Lemma for axpr 5369. There exists a set to which all empty sets belong. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 10-Aug-2023.) (Revised by BJ, 13-Aug-2023.) (Proof shortened by Matthew House, 6-Apr-2026.)
⊢ ∃𝑥∀𝑦(∀𝑧 ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)
Theorem	axprlem2 5366*	Lemma for axpr 5369. There exists a set to which all sets whose only members are empty sets belong. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 9-Aug-2023.) (Revised by BJ, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ ∃𝑥∀𝑦(∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∀𝑤 ¬ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)
Theorem	axprlem3 5367*	Lemma for axpr 5369. Eliminate the antecedent of the relevant replacement instance. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 10-Aug-2023.) (Proof shortened by Matthew House, 18-Sep-2025.)
⊢ ∃𝑧∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ ∃𝑠(𝑠 ∈ 𝑝 ∧ if-(∃𝑛 𝑛 ∈ 𝑠, 𝑤 = 𝑥, 𝑤 = 𝑦)))
Theorem	axprlem4 5368*	Lemma for axpr 5369. If an existing set of empty sets corresponds to one element of the pair, then the element is included in any superset of the set whose existence is asserted by the axiom of replacement. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 10-Aug-2023.) (Revised by BJ, 13-Aug-2023.) (Revised by Matthew House, 18-Sep-2025.)
⊢ ∃𝑠∀𝑛𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑛 ∈ 𝑠 → ∀𝑡 ¬ 𝑡 ∈ 𝑛))    &   ⊢ (∀𝑛𝜑 → (if-(∃𝑛 𝑛 ∈ 𝑠, 𝑤 = 𝑥, 𝑤 = 𝑦) ↔ 𝑤 = 𝑣))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑠(∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑠 ∀𝑡 ¬ 𝑡 ∈ 𝑛 → 𝑠 ∈ 𝑝) → (𝑤 = 𝑣 → ∃𝑠(𝑠 ∈ 𝑝 ∧ if-(∃𝑛 𝑛 ∈ 𝑠, 𝑤 = 𝑥, 𝑤 = 𝑦))))
Theorem	axpr 5369*	Unabbreviated version of the Axiom of Pairing of ZF set theory, derived as a theorem from the other axioms. This theorem should not be referenced by any proof. Instead, use ax-pr 5375 below so that the uses of the Axiom of Pairing can be more easily identified. For a shorter proof using ax-ext 2708, see axprALT 5364. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-2006.) Remove dependency on ax-ext 2708. (Revised by Rohan Ridenour, 10-Aug-2023.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 13-Aug-2023.) (Proof shortened by Matthew House, 18-Sep-2025.) Use ax-pr 5375 instead. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ∃𝑧∀𝑤((𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧)
Theorem	axprlem1OLD 5370*	Obsolete version of axprlem1 5365 as of 6-Apr-2026. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 10-Aug-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ∃𝑥∀𝑦(∀𝑧 ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)
Theorem	axprlem3OLD 5371*	Obsolete version of axprlem3 5367 as of 18-Sep-2025. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 10-Aug-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ∃𝑧∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ ∃𝑠(𝑠 ∈ 𝑝 ∧ if-(∃𝑛 𝑛 ∈ 𝑠, 𝑤 = 𝑥, 𝑤 = 𝑦)))
Theorem	axprlem4OLD 5372*	Obsolete version of axprlem4 5368 as of 18-Sep-2025. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 10-Aug-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((∀𝑠(∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑠 ∀𝑡 ¬ 𝑡 ∈ 𝑛 → 𝑠 ∈ 𝑝) ∧ 𝑤 = 𝑥) → ∃𝑠(𝑠 ∈ 𝑝 ∧ if-(∃𝑛 𝑛 ∈ 𝑠, 𝑤 = 𝑥, 𝑤 = 𝑦)))
Theorem	axprlem5OLD 5373*	Obsolete version of axprlem4 5368 as of 18-Sep-2025. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 10-Aug-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((∀𝑠(∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑠 ∀𝑡 ¬ 𝑡 ∈ 𝑛 → 𝑠 ∈ 𝑝) ∧ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → ∃𝑠(𝑠 ∈ 𝑝 ∧ if-(∃𝑛 𝑛 ∈ 𝑠, 𝑤 = 𝑥, 𝑤 = 𝑦)))
Theorem	axprOLD 5374*	Obsolete version of axpr 5369 as of 18-Sep-2025. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-2006.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ∃𝑧∀𝑤((𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧)
Axiom	ax-pr 5375*	The Axiom of Pairing of ZF set theory. It was derived as Theorem axpr 5369 above and is therefore redundant, but we state it as a separate axiom here so that its uses can be identified more easily. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-2006.)
⊢ ∃𝑧∀𝑤((𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧)
Theorem	zfpair2 5376	Derive the abbreviated version of the Axiom of Pairing from ax-pr 5375. See zfpair 5363 for its derivation from the other axioms. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-2006.)
⊢ {𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ V
Theorem	vsnex 5377	A singleton built on a setvar is a set. (Contributed by BJ, 15-Jan-2025.)
⊢ {𝑥} ∈ V
Theorem	axprglem 5378*	Lemma for axprg 5379. (Contributed by GG, 11-Mar-2026.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ∃𝑧∀𝑤((𝑤 = 𝐴 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝐵) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧))
Theorem	axprg 5379*	Derive The Axiom of Pairing with class variables. (Contributed by GG, 6-Mar-2026.)
⊢ ∃𝑧∀𝑤((𝑤 = 𝐴 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝐵) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧)
Theorem	prex 5380	The Axiom of Pairing using class variables. Theorem 7.13 of [Quine] p. 51. By virtue of its definition, an unordered pair remains a set (even though no longer a pair) even when its components are proper classes (see prprc 4711), so we can dispense with hypotheses requiring them to be sets. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jul-1993.) Avoid ax-nul 5241 and shorten proof. (Revised by GG, 6-Mar-2026.)
⊢ {𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ V
Theorem	snex 5381	A singleton is a set. Theorem 7.12 of [Quine] p. 51, proved using Extensionality, Separation and Pairing. See also snexALT 5325. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-May-2013.) Avoid ax-nul 5241 and shorten proof. (Revised by GG, 6-Mar-2026.)
⊢ {𝐴} ∈ V
Theorem	snexg 5382	A singleton built on a set is a set. Special case of snex 5381 which is intuitionistically valid. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-May-2013.) Extract from snex 5381 and shorten proof. (Revised by BJ, 15-Jan-2025.) (Proof shortened by GG, 6-Mar-2026.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝐴} ∈ V)
Theorem	snexgALT 5383	Alternate proof of snexg 5382 based on vsnex 5377, which uses an instance of ax-sep 5231. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-May-2013.) Extract from snex 5381 and shorten proof. (Revised by BJ, 15-Jan-2025.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝐴} ∈ V)
Theorem	snexOLD 5384	Obsolete version of snex 5381 as of 6-Mar-2026. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-May-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ {𝐴} ∈ V
Theorem	prexOLD 5385	Obsolete version of prex 5380 as of 6-Mar-2026. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jul-1993.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ {𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ V
Theorem	exel 5386*	There exist two sets, one a member of the other. This theorem looks similar to el 5390, but its meaning is different. It only depends on the axioms ax-mp 5 to ax-4 1811, ax-6 1969, and ax-pr 5375. This theorem does not exclude that these two sets could actually be one single set containing itself. That two different sets exist is proved by exexneq 5387. (Contributed by SN, 23-Dec-2024.)
⊢ ∃𝑦∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
Theorem	exexneq 5387*	There exist two different sets. (Contributed by NM, 7-Nov-2006.) Avoid ax-13 2376. (Revised by BJ, 31-May-2019.) Avoid ax-8 2116. (Revised by SN, 21-Sep-2023.) Avoid ax-12 2185. (Revised by Rohan Ridenour, 9-Oct-2024.) Use ax-pr 5375 instead of ax-pow 5307. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 3-Dec-2024.) Extract this result from the proof of dtru 5389. (Revised by BJ, 2-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ∃𝑥∃𝑦 ¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦
Theorem	exneq 5388*	Given any set (the "𝑦 " in the statement), there exists a set not equal to it. The same statement without disjoint variable condition is false, since we do not have ∃𝑥¬ 𝑥 = 𝑥. This theorem is proved directly from set theory axioms (no class definitions) and does not depend on ax-ext 2708, ax-sep 5231, or ax-pow 5307 nor auxiliary logical axiom schemes ax-10 2147 to ax-13 2376. See dtruALT 5330 for a shorter proof using more axioms, and dtruALT2 5312 for a proof using ax-pow 5307 instead of ax-pr 5375. (Contributed by NM, 7-Nov-2006.) Avoid ax-13 2376. (Revised by BJ, 31-May-2019.) Avoid ax-8 2116. (Revised by SN, 21-Sep-2023.) Avoid ax-12 2185. (Revised by Rohan Ridenour, 9-Oct-2024.) Use ax-pr 5375 instead of ax-pow 5307. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 3-Dec-2024.) Extract this result from the proof of dtru 5389. (Revised by BJ, 2-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦
Theorem	dtru 5389*	Given any set (the "𝑦 " in the statement), not all sets are equal to it. The same statement without disjoint variable condition is false since it contradicts stdpc6 2030. The same comments and revision history concerning axiom usage as in exneq 5388 apply. See dtruALT 5330 and dtruALT2 5312 for alternate proofs avoiding ax-pr 5375. (Contributed by NM, 7-Nov-2006.) Extract exneq 5388 as an intermediate result. (Revised by BJ, 2-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦
Theorem	el 5390*	Any set is an element of some other set. See elALT 5394 for a shorter proof using more axioms, and see elALT2 5311 for a proof that uses ax-9 2124 and ax-pow 5307 instead of ax-pr 5375. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2002.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.) Use ax-pr 5375 instead of ax-9 2124 and ax-pow 5307. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 2-Dec-2024.) (Proof shortened by Matthew House, 6-Apr-2026.)
⊢ ∃𝑦 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
Theorem	elOLD 5391*	Obsolete version of el 5390 as of 6-Apr-2026. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2002.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ∃𝑦 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
Theorem	sels 5392*	If a class is a set, then it is a member of a set. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2002.) Generalize from the proof of elALT 5394. (Revised by BJ, 3-Apr-2019.) Avoid ax-sep 5231, ax-nul 5241, ax-pow 5307. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 15-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ∃𝑥 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥)
Theorem	selsALT 5393*	Alternate proof of sels 5392, requiring ax-sep 5231 but not using el 5390 (which is proved from it as elALT 5394). (especially when the proof of el 5390 is inlined in sels 5392). (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2002.) Generalize from the proof of elALT 5394. (Revised by BJ, 3-Apr-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ∃𝑥 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥)
Theorem	elALT 5394*	Alternate proof of el 5390, shorter but requiring ax-sep 5231. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2002.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ∃𝑦 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
Theorem	snelpwg 5395	A singleton of a set is a member of the powerclass of a class if and only if that set is a member of that class. (Contributed by NM, 1-Apr-1998.) Put in closed form and avoid ax-nul 5241. (Revised by BJ, 17-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ {𝐴} ∈ 𝒫 𝐵))
Theorem	snelpwi 5396	If a set is a member of a class, then the singleton of that set is a member of the powerclass of that class. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → {𝐴} ∈ 𝒫 𝐵)
Theorem	snelpw 5397	A singleton of a set is a member of the powerclass of a class if and only if that set is a member of that class. (Contributed by NM, 1-Apr-1998.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ {𝐴} ∈ 𝒫 𝐵)
Theorem	prelpw 5398	An unordered pair of two sets is a member of the powerclass of a class if and only if the two sets are members of that class. (Contributed by AV, 8-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) ↔ {𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝒫 𝐶))
Theorem	prelpwi 5399	If two sets are members of a class, then the unordered pair of those two sets is a member of the powerclass of that class. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 10-Mar-2017.) (Proof shortened by AV, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → {𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝒫 𝐶)
Theorem	rext 5400*	A theorem similar to extensionality, requiring the existence of a singleton. Exercise 8 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 16. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-1993.)
⊢ (∀𝑧(𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑧) → 𝑥 = 𝑦)