Theorem bj-ceqsalg 37374

Description: Remove from ceqsalg 3489 dependency on ax-ext 2734 (and on df-cleq 2754 and df-v 3456). See also bj-ceqsalgv 37376. (Contributed by BJ, 12-Oct-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bj-ceqsalg.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
bj-ceqsalg.2	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-ceqsalg	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝜓(𝑥)   𝑉(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem bj-ceqsalg

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elisset 2844	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴)
2		bj-ceqsalg.1	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
3		bj-ceqsalg.2	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
4	2, 3	bj-ceqsalg0 37373	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))
5	1, 4	syl 17	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208  ∀wal 1558   = wceq 1560  ∃wex 1799  Ⅎwnf 1803   ∈ wcel 2142

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1815  ax-4 1829  ax-5 1930  ax-6 1987  ax-7 2028  ax-8 2144  ax-12 2212

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 400  df-3an 1100  df-tru 1563  df-ex 1800  df-nf 1804  df-sb 2091  df-clab 2741  df-clel 2837

This theorem is referenced by: (None)