| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 365 of 501) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-30993) |
(30994-32516) |
(32517-50046) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | itgeq1i 36401 | Equality inference for an integral. (Contributed by GG, 1-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ ∫𝐴𝐶 d𝑥 = ∫𝐵𝐶 d𝑥 | ||
| Theorem | itgeq2i 36402 | Equality inference for an integral. (Contributed by GG, 1-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ ∫𝐴𝐵 d𝑥 = ∫𝐴𝐶 d𝑥 | ||
| Theorem | ditgeq123i 36403 | Equality inference for the directed integral. General version of ditgeq12i 36404 and ditgeq3i 36405. (Contributed by GG, 1-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐷 & ⊢ 𝐸 = 𝐹 ⇒ ⊢ ⨜[𝐴 → 𝐶]𝐸 d𝑥 = ⨜[𝐵 → 𝐷]𝐹 d𝑥 | ||
| Theorem | ditgeq12i 36404 | Equality inference for the directed integral. (Contributed by GG, 1-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐷 ⇒ ⊢ ⨜[𝐴 → 𝐶]𝐸 d𝑥 = ⨜[𝐵 → 𝐷]𝐸 d𝑥 | ||
| Theorem | ditgeq3i 36405 | Equality inference for the directed integral. (Contributed by GG, 1-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐷 ⇒ ⊢ ⨜[𝐴 → 𝐵]𝐶 d𝑥 = ⨜[𝐴 → 𝐵]𝐷 d𝑥 | ||
| Theorem | rmoeqdv 36406* | Formula-building rule for restricted at-most-one quantifier. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 1-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | rmoeqbidv 36407* | Formula-building rule for restricted at-most-one quantifier. Deduction form. General version of rmobidv 3365. (Contributed by GG, 1-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | sbequbidv 36408* | Deduction substituting both sides of a biconditional. (Contributed by GG, 1-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑢 = 𝑣) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ([𝑢 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ [𝑣 / 𝑥]𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | disjeq12dv 36409* | Equality theorem for disjoint collection. Deduction version. (Contributed by GG, 1-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (Disj 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 ↔ Disj 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | ixpeq12dv 36410* | Equality theorem for infinite Cartesian product. Deduction version. (Contributed by GG, 1-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = X𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | sumeq12sdv 36411* | Equality deduction for sum. General version of sumeq2sdv 15626. (Contributed by GG, 1-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | prodeq12sdv 36412* | Equality deduction for product. General version of prodeq2sdv 15846. (Contributed by GG, 1-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | itgeq12sdv 36413* | Equality theorem for an integral. Deduction form. General version of itgeq1d 46197 and itgeq2sdv 36414. (Contributed by GG, 1-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∫𝐴𝐶 d𝑥 = ∫𝐵𝐷 d𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | itgeq2sdv 36414* | Equality theorem for an integral. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 1-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∫𝐴𝐵 d𝑥 = ∫𝐴𝐶 d𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | ditgeq123dv 36415* | Equality theorem for the directed integral. Deduction form. General version of ditgeq3sdv 36417. (Contributed by GG, 1-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 = 𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ⨜[𝐴 → 𝐶]𝐸 d𝑥 = ⨜[𝐵 → 𝐷]𝐹 d𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | ditgeq12d 36416* | Equality theorem for the directed integral. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 1-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ⨜[𝐴 → 𝐶]𝐸 d𝑥 = ⨜[𝐵 → 𝐷]𝐸 d𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | ditgeq3sdv 36417* | Equality theorem for the directed integral. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 1-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ⨜[𝐴 → 𝐵]𝐶 d𝑥 = ⨜[𝐴 → 𝐵]𝐷 d𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | in-ax8 36418 | A proof of ax-8 2115 that does not rely on ax-8 2115. It employs df-in 3908 to perform alpha-renaming and eliminates disjoint variable conditions using ax-9 2123. Since the nature of this result is unclear, usage of this theorem is discouraged, and this method should not be applied to eliminate axiom dependencies. (Contributed by GG, 1-Aug-2025.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑧)) | ||
| Theorem | ss-ax8 36419 | A proof of ax-8 2115 that does not rely on ax-8 2115. It employs df-ss 3918 to perform alpha-renaming and eliminates disjoint variable conditions using ax-9 2123. Contrary to in-ax8 36418, this proof does not rely on df-cleq 2728, therefore using fewer axioms . This method should not be applied to eliminate axiom dependencies. (Contributed by GG, 30-Aug-2025.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑧)) | ||
| Theorem | cbvralvw2 36420* | Change bound variable and domain in the restricted universal quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | cbvrexvw2 36421* | Change bound variable and domain in the restricted existential quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | cbvrmovw2 36422* | Change bound variable and domain in the restricted at-most-one quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | cbvreuvw2 36423* | Change bound variable and domain in the restricted existential uniqueness quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | cbvsbcvw2 36424* | Change bound variable of a class substitution using implicit substitution. General version of cbvsbcvw 3774. (Contributed by GG, 1-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝐵 / 𝑦]𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | cbvcsbvw2 36425* | Change bound variable of a proper substitution into a class using implicit substitution. General version of cbvcsbv 3861. (Contributed by GG, 1-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 = ⦋𝐵 / 𝑦⦌𝐷 | ||
| Theorem | cbviunvw2 36426* | Change bound variable and domain in indexed unions, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷 | ||
| Theorem | cbviinvw2 36427* | Change bound variable and domain in an indexed intersection, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = ∩ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷 | ||
| Theorem | cbvmptvw2 36428* | Change bound variable and domain in a maps-to function, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | cbvdisjvw2 36429* | Change bound variable and domain in a disjoint collection, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (Disj 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 ↔ Disj 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | cbvriotavw2 36430* | Change bound variable and domain in a restricted description binder, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | cbvoprab1vw 36431* | Change the first bound variable in an operation abstraction, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑤 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} = {〈〈𝑤, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜒} | ||
| Theorem | cbvoprab2vw 36432* | Change the second bound variable in an operation abstraction, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} = {〈〈𝑥, 𝑤〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜒} | ||
| Theorem | cbvoprab123vw 36433* | Change all bound variables in an operation abstraction, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (((𝑥 = 𝑤 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑣) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} = {〈〈𝑤, 𝑢〉, 𝑣〉 ∣ 𝜒} | ||
| Theorem | cbvoprab23vw 36434* | Change the second and third bound variables in an operation abstraction, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑦 = 𝑤 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑣) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} = {〈〈𝑥, 𝑤〉, 𝑣〉 ∣ 𝜒} | ||
| Theorem | cbvoprab13vw 36435* | Change the first and third bound variables in an operation abstraction, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑤 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑣) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} = {〈〈𝑤, 𝑦〉, 𝑣〉 ∣ 𝜒} | ||
| Theorem | cbvmpovw2 36436* | Change bound variables and domains in a maps-to function, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → 𝐸 = 𝐹) & ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → 𝐶 = 𝐷) & ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝐸) = (𝑧 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑤 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | cbvmpo1vw2 36437* | Change domains and the first bound variable in a maps-to function, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → 𝐸 = 𝐹) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝐸) = (𝑧 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | cbvmpo2vw2 36438* | Change domains and the second bound variable in a maps-to function, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → 𝐸 = 𝐹) & ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝐸) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑧 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | cbvixpvw2 36439* | Change bound variable and domain in an indexed Cartesian product, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = X𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷 | ||
| Theorem | cbvsumvw2 36440* | Change bound variable and the set of integers in a sum, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by GG, 1-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 & ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑘 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ Σ𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷 | ||
| Theorem | cbvprodvw2 36441* | Change bound variable and the set of integers in a product, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by GG, 1-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 & ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑘 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ ∏𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷 | ||
| Theorem | cbvitgvw2 36442* | Change bound variable and domain in an integral, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ ∫𝐴𝐶 d𝑥 = ∫𝐵𝐷 d𝑦 | ||
| Theorem | cbvditgvw2 36443* | Change bound variable and domain in a directed integral, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by GG, 1-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐷 & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐸 = 𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ ⨜[𝐴 → 𝐶]𝐸 d𝑥 = ⨜[𝐵 → 𝐷]𝐹 d𝑦 | ||
| Theorem | cbvmodavw 36444* | Change bound variable in the at-most-one quantifier. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃*𝑥𝜓 ↔ ∃*𝑦𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | cbveudavw 36445* | Change bound variable in the existential uniqueness quantifier. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃!𝑥𝜓 ↔ ∃!𝑦𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | cbvrmodavw 36446* | Change bound variable in the restricted at-most-one quantifier. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | cbvreudavw 36447* | Change bound variable in the restricted existential uniqueness quantifier. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | cbvsbdavw 36448* | Change bound variable in proper substitution. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | cbvsbdavw2 36449* | Change bound variable in proper substitution. General version of cbvsbdavw 36448. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑧 = 𝑤) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ [𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | cbvabdavw 36450* | Change bound variable in class abstractions. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝜒}) | ||
| Theorem | cbvsbcdavw 36451* | Change bound variable of a class substitution. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑦]𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | cbvsbcdavw2 36452* | Change bound variable of a class substitution. General version of cbvsbcdavw 36451. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ [𝐵 / 𝑦]𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | cbvcsbdavw 36453* | Change bound variable of a proper substitution into a class. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑦⦌𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | cbvcsbdavw2 36454* | Change bound variable of a proper substitution into a class. General version of cbvcsbdavw 36453. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 = ⦋𝐵 / 𝑦⦌𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | cbvrabdavw 36455* | Change bound variable in restricted class abstractions. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜒}) | ||
| Theorem | cbviundavw 36456* | Change bound variable in indexed unions. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | cbviindavw 36457* | Change bound variable in indexed intersections. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∩ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | cbvopab1davw 36458* | Change the first bound variable in an ordered-pair class abstraction. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜓} = {〈𝑧, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜒}) | ||
| Theorem | cbvopab2davw 36459* | Change the second bound variable in an ordered-pair class abstraction. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑧) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜓} = {〈𝑥, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜒}) | ||
| Theorem | cbvopabdavw 36460* | Change bound variables in an ordered-pair class abstraction. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜓} = {〈𝑧, 𝑤〉 ∣ 𝜒}) | ||
| Theorem | cbvmptdavw 36461* | Change bound variable in a maps-to function. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | cbvdisjdavw 36462* | Change bound variable in a disjoint collection. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (Disj 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ↔ Disj 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | cbviotadavw 36463* | Change bound variable in a description binder. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜓) = (℩𝑦𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | cbvriotadavw 36464* | Change bound variable in a restricted description binder. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | cbvoprab1davw 36465* | Change the first bound variable in an operation abstraction. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑤) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} = {〈〈𝑤, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜒}) | ||
| Theorem | cbvoprab2davw 36466* | Change the second bound variable in an operation abstraction. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} = {〈〈𝑥, 𝑤〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜒}) | ||
| Theorem | cbvoprab3davw 36467* | Change the third bound variable in an operation abstraction. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑤) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} = {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑤〉 ∣ 𝜒}) | ||
| Theorem | cbvoprab123davw 36468* | Change all bound variables in an operation abstraction. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑤) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑣) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} = {〈〈𝑤, 𝑢〉, 𝑣〉 ∣ 𝜒}) | ||
| Theorem | cbvoprab12davw 36469* | Change the first and second bound variables in an operation abstraction. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑤) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} = {〈〈𝑤, 𝑣〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜒}) | ||
| Theorem | cbvoprab23davw 36470* | Change the second and third bound variables in an operation abstraction. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑣) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} = {〈〈𝑥, 𝑤〉, 𝑣〉 ∣ 𝜒}) | ||
| Theorem | cbvoprab13davw 36471* | Change the first and third bound variables in an operation abstraction. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑤) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑣) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} = {〈〈𝑤, 𝑦〉, 𝑣〉 ∣ 𝜒}) | ||
| Theorem | cbvixpdavw 36472* | Change bound variable in an indexed Cartesian product. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = X𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | cbvsumdavw 36473* | Change bound variable in a sum. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 = 𝑗) → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = Σ𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | cbvproddavw 36474* | Change bound variable in a product. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 = 𝑘) → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | cbvitgdavw 36475* | Change bound variable in an integral. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∫𝐴𝐵 d𝑥 = ∫𝐴𝐶 d𝑦) | ||
| Theorem | cbvditgdavw 36476* | Change bound variable in a directed integral. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ⨜[𝐴 → 𝐵]𝐶 d𝑥 = ⨜[𝐴 → 𝐵]𝐷 d𝑦) | ||
| Theorem | cbvrmodavw2 36477* | Change bound variable and quantifier domain in the restricted at-most-one quantifier. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | cbvreudavw2 36478* | Change bound variable and quantifier domain in the restricted existential uniqueness quantifier. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | cbvrabdavw2 36479* | Change bound variable and domain in restricted class abstractions. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜒}) | ||
| Theorem | cbviundavw2 36480* | Change bound variable and domain in indexed unions. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐶 = 𝐷) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | cbviindavw2 36481* | Change bound variable and domain in indexed intersections. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐶 = 𝐷) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = ∩ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | cbvmptdavw2 36482* | Change bound variable and domain in a maps-to function. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐶 = 𝐷) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | cbvdisjdavw2 36483* | Change bound variable and domain in a disjoint collection. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐶 = 𝐷) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (Disj 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 ↔ Disj 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | cbvriotadavw2 36484* | Change bound variable and domain in a restricted description binder. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | cbvmpodavw2 36485* | Change bound variable and domains in a maps-to function. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → 𝐸 = 𝐹) & ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → 𝐶 = 𝐷) & ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝐸) = (𝑧 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑤 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | cbvmpo1davw2 36486* | Change first bound variable and domains in a maps-to function. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) → 𝐸 = 𝐹) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) → 𝐶 = 𝐷) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝐸) = (𝑧 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | cbvmpo2davw2 36487* | Change second bound variable and domains in a maps-to function. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑧) → 𝐸 = 𝐹) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑧) → 𝐶 = 𝐷) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑧) → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝐸) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑧 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | cbvixpdavw2 36488* | Change bound variable and domain in an indexed Cartesian product. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐶 = 𝐷) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = X𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | cbvsumdavw2 36489* | Change bound variable and the set of integers in a sum. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 = 𝑘) → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | cbvproddavw2 36490* | Change bound variable and the set of integers in a product. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 = 𝑘) → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | cbvitgdavw2 36491* | Change bound variable and domain in an integral. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐶 = 𝐷) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∫𝐴𝐶 d𝑥 = ∫𝐵𝐷 d𝑦) | ||
| Theorem | cbvditgdavw2 36492* | Change bound variable and limits in a directed integral. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐸 = 𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ⨜[𝐴 → 𝐶]𝐸 d𝑥 = ⨜[𝐵 → 𝐷]𝐹 d𝑦) | ||
| Theorem | mpomulnzcnf 36493* | Multiplication maps nonzero complex numbers to nonzero complex numbers. Version of mulnzcnf 11783 using maps-to notation, which does not require ax-mulf 11106. (Contributed by GG, 18-Apr-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}), 𝑦 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}) ↦ (𝑥 · 𝑦)):((ℂ ∖ {0}) × (ℂ ∖ {0}))⟶(ℂ ∖ {0}) | ||
| Theorem | a1i14 36494 | Add two antecedents to a wff. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 4-Aug-2009.) |
| ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))) | ||
| Theorem | a1i24 36495 | Add two antecedents to a wff. Deduction associated with a1i13 27. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 5-Aug-2009.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))) | ||
| Theorem | exp5d 36496 | An exportation inference. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 7-Jul-2009.) |
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) → ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))))) | ||
| Theorem | exp5g 36497 | An exportation inference. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 7-Jul-2009.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (((𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))))) | ||
| Theorem | exp5k 36498 | An exportation inference. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 7-Jul-2009.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝜓 ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)) ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))))) | ||
| Theorem | exp56 36499 | An exportation inference. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 7-Jul-2009.) |
| ⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ (𝜃 ∧ 𝜏)) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))))) | ||
| Theorem | exp58 36500 | An exportation inference. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 7-Jul-2009.) |
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏)) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))))) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |