Theorem ceqsalg 3430

Description: A representation of explicit substitution of a class for a variable, inferred from an implicit substitution hypothesis. For an alternate proof, see ceqsalgALT 3431. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 29-Sep-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ceqsalg.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
ceqsalg.2	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ceqsalg	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝜓(𝑥)   𝑉(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem ceqsalg

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ceqsalg.1	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
2		ceqsalg.2	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
3	2	ax-gen 1802	. 2 ⊢ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
4		ceqsalt 3428	. 2 ⊢ ((Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))
5	1, 3, 4	mp3an12 1452	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209  ∀wal 1540   = wceq 1542  Ⅎwnf 1790   ∈ wcel 2114

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1802  ax-4 1816  ax-5 1917  ax-6 1975  ax-7 2020  ax-8 2116  ax-12 2179

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 400  df-3an 1090  df-tru 1545  df-ex 1787  df-nf 1791  df-sb 2075  df-clab 2717  df-clel 2811

This theorem is referenced by:  ceqsal  3432  clel2gOLD  3556  uniiunlem  3975  ralrnmpo  7304  fimaxre3  11664  pmapglbx  37426