Theorem bnj911 35329

Description: Technical lemma for bnj69 35407. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bnj911.1	⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅))
bnj911.2	⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj911	⊢ ((𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ∀𝑖(𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑓,𝑖   𝑖,𝑛   𝜑,𝑖

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑦, 𝑓, 𝑛)   𝜓(𝑦, 𝑓, 𝑖, 𝑛)   𝐴(𝑦, 𝑓, 𝑖, 𝑛)   𝑅(𝑦, 𝑓, 𝑖, 𝑛)   𝑋(𝑦, 𝑓, 𝑖, 𝑛)

Proof of Theorem bnj911

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj911.2	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
2	1	bnj1095 35179	. 2 ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑖𝜓)
3	2	bnj1350 35222	1 ⊢ ((𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ∀𝑖(𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ w3a 1102  ∀wal 1567   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2142  ∀wral 3078  ∅c0 4285  ∪ ciun 4955  suc csuc 6362   Fn wfn 6531  ‘cfv 6536  ωcom 7860   predc-bnj14 35086

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1824  ax-4 1838  ax-5 1939  ax-6 1996  ax-7 2037  ax-10 2175  ax-12 2212

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1104  df-tru 1572  df-ex 1809  df-nf 1813  df-ral 3079

This theorem is used by:  bnj916  35330  bnj1014  35358