Theorem bnj911 35629

Description: Technical lemma for bnj69 35707. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bnj911.1	⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅))
bnj911.2	⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj911	⊢ ((𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ∀𝑖(𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑓,𝑖   𝑖,𝑛   𝜑,𝑖

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑦, 𝑓, 𝑛)   𝜓(𝑦, 𝑓, 𝑖, 𝑛)   𝐴(𝑦, 𝑓, 𝑖, 𝑛)   𝑅(𝑦, 𝑓, 𝑖, 𝑛)   𝑋(𝑦, 𝑓, 𝑖, 𝑛)

Proof of Theorem bnj911

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj911.2	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
2	1	bnj1095 35479	. 2 ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑖𝜓)
3	2	bnj1350 35522	1 ⊢ ((𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ∀𝑖(𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ w3a 1103  ∀wal 1568   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2147  ∀wral 3080  ∅c0 4281  ∪ ciun 4954  suc csuc 6379   Fn wfn 6550  ‘cfv 6555  ωcom 7898   predc-bnj14 35386

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-10 2180  ax-12 2216

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-ral 3081

This theorem is used by:  bnj916  35630  bnj1014  35658