Theorem ceqsrexv2 33067

Description: Alternate elimitation of a restricted existential quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Sep-2017.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
ceqsrexv2.1	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ceqsrexv2	⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝜓,𝑥

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜑(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem ceqsrexv2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ceqsrexv2.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
2	1	ceqsrexbv 3598	1 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 399   = wceq 1538   ∈ wcel 2111  ∃wrex 3107

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-ext 2770

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 400  df-ex 1782  df-cleq 2791  df-clel 2870  df-rex 3112

This theorem is referenced by:  ceqsralv2  33069