Theorem con5VD 44218

Description: Virtual deduction proof of con5 43840. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. con5 43840 is con5VD 44218 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from con5VD 44218.

1::	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)   ▶   (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)   )
2:1:	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)   ▶   (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜑)   )
3:2:	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)   ▶   (¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ 𝜓 )   )
4::	⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ¬ ¬ 𝜓)
5:3,4:	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)   ▶   (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓)   )
qed:5:	⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓))

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 21-Apr-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
con5VD	⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓))

Proof of Theorem con5VD

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		idn1 43892	. . . . 5 ⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)   ▶   (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)   )
2		biimpr 219	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜑))
3	1, 2	e1a 43945	. . . 4 ⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)   ▶   (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜑)   )
4		con3 153	. . . 4 ⊢ ((¬ 𝜓 → 𝜑) → (¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ 𝜓))
5	3, 4	e1a 43945	. . 3 ⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)   ▶   (¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ 𝜓)   )
6		notnotb 315	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ¬ ¬ 𝜓)
7		imbi2 348	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜓 ↔ ¬ ¬ 𝜓) → ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ 𝜓)))
8	7	biimprcd 249	. . 3 ⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ 𝜓) → ((𝜓 ↔ ¬ ¬ 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓)))
9	5, 6, 8	e10 44012	. 2 ⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)   ▶   (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓)   )
10	9	in1 43889	1 ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-vd1 43888

This theorem is referenced by: (None)