| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 444 of 494) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-30937) |
(30938-32460) |
(32461-49324) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | mnurndlem2 44301* | Lemma for mnurnd 44302. Deduction theorem input. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ran 𝐹 ∈ 𝑈) | ||
| Theorem | mnurnd 44302* | Minimal universes contain ranges of functions from an element of the universe to the universe. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ran 𝐹 ∈ 𝑈) | ||
| Theorem | mnugrud 44303* | Minimal universes are Grothendieck universes. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑀) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ Univ) | ||
| Theorem | grumnudlem 44304* | Lemma for grumnud 44305. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Univ) & ⊢ 𝐹 = ({〈𝑏, 𝑐〉 ∣ ∃𝑑(∪ 𝑑 = 𝑐 ∧ 𝑑 ∈ 𝑓 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑑)} ∩ (𝐺 × 𝐺)) & ⊢ ((𝑖 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝐺) → (𝑖𝐹ℎ ↔ ∃𝑗(∪ 𝑗 = ℎ ∧ 𝑗 ∈ 𝑓 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑗))) & ⊢ ((ℎ ∈ (𝐹 Coll 𝑧) ∧ (∪ 𝑗 = ℎ ∧ 𝑗 ∈ 𝑓 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑗)) → ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑓 (𝑖 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ ∪ 𝑢 ∈ (𝐹 Coll 𝑧))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑀) | ||
| Theorem | grumnud 44305* | Grothendieck universes are minimal universes. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 12-Aug-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Univ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑀) | ||
| Theorem | grumnueq 44306* | The class of Grothendieck universes is equal to the class of minimal universes. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.) |
| ⊢ Univ = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))} | ||
| Theorem | expandan 44307 | Expand conjunction to primitives. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ ¬ (𝜓 → ¬ 𝜃)) | ||
| Theorem | expandexn 44308 | Expand an existential quantifier to primitives while contracting a double negation. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | expandral 44309 | Expand a restricted universal quantifier to primitives. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | expandrexn 44310 | Expand a restricted existential quantifier to primitives while contracting a double negation. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | expandrex 44311 | Expand a restricted existential quantifier to primitives. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ¬ 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | expanduniss 44312* | Expand ∪ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 to primitives. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.) |
| ⊢ (∪ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | ismnuprim 44313* | Express the predicate on 𝑈 in ismnu 44280 using only primitives. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 (𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ 𝑈 ∧ ∀𝑓∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑈 (𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ 𝑤 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝑧 (∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑈 (𝑖 ∈ 𝑣 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑓) → ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑓 (𝑖 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ ∪ 𝑢 ⊆ 𝑤)))) ↔ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 → ∀𝑓 ¬ ∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑈 → ¬ ∀𝑣 ¬ ((∀𝑡(𝑡 ∈ 𝑣 → 𝑡 ∈ 𝑧) → ¬ (𝑣 ∈ 𝑈 → ¬ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑤)) → ¬ ∀𝑖(𝑖 ∈ 𝑧 → (𝑣 ∈ 𝑈 → (𝑖 ∈ 𝑣 → (𝑣 ∈ 𝑓 → ¬ ∀𝑢(𝑢 ∈ 𝑓 → (𝑖 ∈ 𝑢 → ¬ ∀𝑜(𝑜 ∈ 𝑢 → ∀𝑠(𝑠 ∈ 𝑜 → 𝑠 ∈ 𝑤)))))))))))) | ||
| Theorem | rr-grothprimbi 44314* | Express "every set is contained in a Grothendieck universe" using only primitives. The right side (without the outermost universal quantifier) is proven as rr-grothprim 44319. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥∃𝑦 ∈ Univ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∀𝑥 ¬ ∀𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ¬ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ∀𝑓 ¬ ∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 → ¬ ∀𝑣 ¬ ((∀𝑡(𝑡 ∈ 𝑣 → 𝑡 ∈ 𝑧) → ¬ (𝑣 ∈ 𝑦 → ¬ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑤)) → ¬ ∀𝑖(𝑖 ∈ 𝑧 → (𝑣 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝑖 ∈ 𝑣 → (𝑣 ∈ 𝑓 → ¬ ∀𝑢(𝑢 ∈ 𝑓 → (𝑖 ∈ 𝑢 → ¬ ∀𝑜(𝑜 ∈ 𝑢 → ∀𝑠(𝑠 ∈ 𝑜 → 𝑠 ∈ 𝑤))))))))))))) | ||
| Theorem | inagrud 44315 | Inaccessible levels of the cumulative hierarchy are Grothendieck universes. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ Inacc) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅1‘𝐼) ∈ Univ) | ||
| Theorem | inaex 44316* | Assuming the Tarski-Grothendieck axiom, every ordinal is contained in an inaccessible ordinal. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ∃𝑥 ∈ Inacc 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | gruex 44317* | Assuming the Tarski-Grothendieck axiom, every set is contained in a Grothendieck universe. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.) |
| ⊢ ∃𝑦 ∈ Univ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 | ||
| Theorem | rr-groth 44318* | An equivalent of ax-groth 10863 using only simple defined symbols. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.) |
| ⊢ ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 (𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑓∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 (𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ 𝑤 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝑧 (∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑦 (𝑖 ∈ 𝑣 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑓) → ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑓 (𝑖 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ ∪ 𝑢 ⊆ 𝑤))))) | ||
| Theorem | rr-grothprim 44319* | An equivalent of ax-groth 10863 using only primitives. This uses only 123 symbols, which is significantly less than the previous record of 163 established by grothprim 10874 (which uses some defined symbols, and requires 229 symbols if expanded to primitives). (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.) |
| ⊢ ¬ ∀𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ¬ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ∀𝑓 ¬ ∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 → ¬ ∀𝑣 ¬ ((∀𝑡(𝑡 ∈ 𝑣 → 𝑡 ∈ 𝑧) → ¬ (𝑣 ∈ 𝑦 → ¬ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑤)) → ¬ ∀𝑖(𝑖 ∈ 𝑧 → (𝑣 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝑖 ∈ 𝑣 → (𝑣 ∈ 𝑓 → ¬ ∀𝑢(𝑢 ∈ 𝑓 → (𝑖 ∈ 𝑢 → ¬ ∀𝑜(𝑜 ∈ 𝑢 → ∀𝑠(𝑠 ∈ 𝑜 → 𝑠 ∈ 𝑤)))))))))))) | ||
| Theorem | ismnushort 44320* | Express the predicate on 𝑈 and 𝑧 in ismnu 44280 in a shorter form while avoiding complicated definitions. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 10-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑓 ∈ 𝒫 𝑈∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑈 (𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ (𝑈 ∩ 𝑤) ∧ (𝑧 ∩ ∪ 𝑓) ⊆ ∪ (𝑓 ∩ 𝒫 𝒫 𝑤)) ↔ (𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ 𝑈 ∧ ∀𝑓∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑈 (𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ 𝑤 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝑧 (∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑈 (𝑖 ∈ 𝑣 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑓) → ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑓 (𝑖 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ ∪ 𝑢 ⊆ 𝑤))))) | ||
| Theorem | dfuniv2 44321* | Alternative definition of Univ using only simple defined symbols. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 10-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ Univ = {𝑦 ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝒫 𝑦∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 (𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ (𝑦 ∩ 𝑤) ∧ (𝑧 ∩ ∪ 𝑓) ⊆ ∪ (𝑓 ∩ 𝒫 𝒫 𝑤))} | ||
| Theorem | rr-grothshortbi 44322* | Express "every set is contained in a Grothendieck universe" in a short form while avoiding complicated definitions. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 8-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥∃𝑦 ∈ Univ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∀𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝒫 𝑦∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 (𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ (𝑦 ∩ 𝑤) ∧ (𝑧 ∩ ∪ 𝑓) ⊆ ∪ (𝑓 ∩ 𝒫 𝒫 𝑤)))) | ||
| Theorem | rr-grothshort 44323* | A shorter equivalent of ax-groth 10863 than rr-groth 44318 using a few more simple defined symbols. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 8-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝒫 𝑦∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 (𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ (𝑦 ∩ 𝑤) ∧ (𝑧 ∩ ∪ 𝑓) ⊆ ∪ (𝑓 ∩ 𝒫 𝒫 𝑤))) | ||
| Theorem | nanorxor 44324 | 'nand' is equivalent to the equivalence of inclusive and exclusive or. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 28-Feb-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ⊼ 𝜓) ↔ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | undisjrab 44325 | Union of two disjoint restricted class abstractions; compare unrab 4315. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 28-Feb-2020.) |
| ⊢ (({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) = ∅ ↔ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓)}) | ||
| Theorem | iso0 44326 | The empty set is an 𝑅, 𝑆 isomorphism from the empty set to the empty set. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 24-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ ∅ Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (∅, ∅) | ||
| Theorem | ssrecnpr 44327 | ℝ is a subset of both ℝ and ℂ. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Nov-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ {ℝ, ℂ} → ℝ ⊆ 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | seff 44328 | Let set 𝑆 be the real or complex numbers. Then the exponential function restricted to 𝑆 is a mapping from 𝑆 to 𝑆. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 6-Nov-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ {ℝ, ℂ}) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (exp ↾ 𝑆):𝑆⟶𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | sblpnf 44329 | The infinity ball in the absolute value metric is just the whole space. 𝑆 analogue of blpnf 24407. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 8-Nov-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ {ℝ, ℂ}) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((abs ∘ − ) ↾ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑃(ball‘𝐷)+∞) = 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | prmunb2 44330* | The primes are unbounded. This generalizes prmunb 16952 to real 𝐴 with arch 12523 and lttrd 11422: every real is less than some positive integer, itself less than some prime. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ 𝐴 < 𝑝) | ||
| Theorem | dvgrat 44331* | Ratio test for divergence of a complex infinite series. See e.g. remark "if (abs‘((𝑎‘(𝑛 + 1)) / (𝑎‘𝑛))) ≥ 1 for all large n..." in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ratio_test#The_test. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 28-Feb-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑊 = (ℤ≥‘𝑁) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ≠ 0) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑊) → (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) ≤ (abs‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ∉ dom ⇝ ) | ||
| Theorem | cvgdvgrat 44332* |
Ratio test for convergence and divergence of a complex infinite series.
If the ratio 𝑅 of the absolute values of successive
terms in an
infinite sequence 𝐹 converges to less than one, then the
infinite
sum of the terms of 𝐹 converges to a complex number; and
if 𝑅
converges greater then the sum diverges. This combined form of
cvgrat 15919 and dvgrat 44331 directly uses the limit of the ratio.
(It also demonstrates how to use climi2 15547 and absltd 15468 to transform a limit to an inequality cf. https://math.stackexchange.com/q/2215191 15468, and how to use r19.29a 3162 in a similar fashion to Mario Carneiro's proof sketch with rexlimdva 3155 at https://groups.google.com/g/metamath/c/2RPikOiXLMo 3155.) (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 28-Feb-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑊 = (ℤ≥‘𝑁) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ≠ 0) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (𝑘 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (abs‘((𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1)) / (𝐹‘𝑘)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ⇝ 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ≠ 1) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐿 < 1 ↔ seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝ )) | ||
| Theorem | radcnvrat 44333* | Let 𝐿 be the limit, if one exists, of the ratio (abs‘((𝐴‘(𝑘 + 1)) / (𝐴‘𝑘))) (as in the ratio test cvgdvgrat 44332) as 𝑘 increases. Then the radius of convergence of power series Σ𝑛 ∈ ℕ0((𝐴‘𝑛) · (𝑥↑𝑛)) is (1 / 𝐿) if 𝐿 is nonzero. Proof "The limit involved in the ratio test..." in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radius_of_convergence 44332 —a few lines that evidently hide quite an involved process to confirm. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 8-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝐴‘𝑛) · (𝑥↑𝑛)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴:ℕ0⟶ℂ) & ⊢ 𝑅 = sup({𝑟 ∈ ℝ ∣ seq0( + , (𝐺‘𝑟)) ∈ dom ⇝ }, ℝ*, < ) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (abs‘((𝐴‘(𝑘 + 1)) / (𝐴‘𝑘)))) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐴‘𝑘) ≠ 0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ⇝ 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ≠ 0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 = (1 / 𝐿)) | ||
| Theorem | reldvds 44334 | The divides relation is in fact a relation. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) |
| ⊢ Rel ∥ | ||
| Theorem | nznngen 44335 | All positive integers in the set of multiples of n, nℤ, are the absolute value of n or greater. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (( ∥ “ {𝑁}) ∩ ℕ) ⊆ (ℤ≥‘(abs‘𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | nzss 44336 | The set of multiples of m, mℤ, is a subset of those of n, nℤ, iff n divides m. Lemma 2.1(a) of https://www.mscs.dal.ca/~selinger/3343/handouts/ideals.pdf p. 5, with mℤ and nℤ as images of the divides relation under m and n. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (( ∥ “ {𝑀}) ⊆ ( ∥ “ {𝑁}) ↔ 𝑁 ∥ 𝑀)) | ||
| Theorem | nzin 44337 | The intersection of the set of multiples of m, mℤ, and those of n, nℤ, is the set of multiples of their least common multiple. Roughly Lemma 2.1(c) of https://www.mscs.dal.ca/~selinger/3343/handouts/ideals.pdf p. 5 and Problem 1(b) of https://people.math.binghamton.edu/mazur/teach/40107/40107h16sol.pdf p. 1, with mℤ and nℤ as images of the divides relation under m and n. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (( ∥ “ {𝑀}) ∩ ( ∥ “ {𝑁})) = ( ∥ “ {(𝑀 lcm 𝑁)})) | ||
| Theorem | nzprmdif 44338 | Subtract one prime's multiples from an unequal prime's. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℙ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℙ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ≠ 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (( ∥ “ {𝑀}) ∖ ( ∥ “ {𝑁})) = (( ∥ “ {𝑀}) ∖ ( ∥ “ {(𝑀 · 𝑁)}))) | ||
| Theorem | hashnzfz 44339 | Special case of hashdvds 16812: the count of multiples in nℤ restricted to an interval. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐽 − 1))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘(( ∥ “ {𝑁}) ∩ (𝐽...𝐾))) = ((⌊‘(𝐾 / 𝑁)) − (⌊‘((𝐽 − 1) / 𝑁)))) | ||
| Theorem | hashnzfz2 44340 | Special case of hashnzfz 44339: the count of multiples in nℤ, n greater than one, restricted to an interval starting at two. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘(( ∥ “ {𝑁}) ∩ (2...𝐾))) = (⌊‘(𝐾 / 𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | hashnzfzclim 44341* | As the upper bound 𝐾 of the constraint interval (𝐽...𝐾) in hashnzfz 44339 increases, the resulting count of multiples tends to (𝐾 / 𝑀) —that is, there are approximately (𝐾 / 𝑀) multiples of 𝑀 in a finite interval of integers. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ ℤ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐽 − 1)) ↦ ((♯‘(( ∥ “ {𝑀}) ∩ (𝐽...𝑘))) / 𝑘)) ⇝ (1 / 𝑀)) | ||
| Theorem | caofcan 44342* | Transfer a cancellation law like mulcan 11900 to the function operation. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 16-Nov-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑇) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝑅𝑦) = (𝑥𝑅𝑧) ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑧)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺) = (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐻) ↔ 𝐺 = 𝐻)) | ||
| Theorem | ofsubid 44343 | Function analogue of subid 11528. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 5-Nov-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ) → (𝐹 ∘f − 𝐹) = (𝐴 × {0})) | ||
| Theorem | ofmul12 44344 | Function analogue of mul12 11426. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 13-Nov-2015.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ) ∧ (𝐺:𝐴⟶ℂ ∧ 𝐻:𝐴⟶ℂ)) → (𝐹 ∘f · (𝐺 ∘f · 𝐻)) = (𝐺 ∘f · (𝐹 ∘f · 𝐻))) | ||
| Theorem | ofdivrec 44345 | Function analogue of divrec 11938, a division analogue of ofnegsub 12264. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 3-Nov-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ ∧ 𝐺:𝐴⟶(ℂ ∖ {0})) → (𝐹 ∘f · ((𝐴 × {1}) ∘f / 𝐺)) = (𝐹 ∘f / 𝐺)) | ||
| Theorem | ofdivcan4 44346 | Function analogue of divcan4 11949. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 4-Nov-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ ∧ 𝐺:𝐴⟶(ℂ ∖ {0})) → ((𝐹 ∘f · 𝐺) ∘f / 𝐺) = 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | ofdivdiv2 44347 | Function analogue of divdiv2 11979. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 23-Nov-2015.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ) ∧ (𝐺:𝐴⟶(ℂ ∖ {0}) ∧ 𝐻:𝐴⟶(ℂ ∖ {0}))) → (𝐹 ∘f / (𝐺 ∘f / 𝐻)) = ((𝐹 ∘f · 𝐻) ∘f / 𝐺)) | ||
| Theorem | lhe4.4ex1a 44348 | Example of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, part two (ftc2 26085): ∫(1(,)2)((𝑥↑2) − 3) d𝑥 = -(2 / 3). Section 4.4 example 1a of [LarsonHostetlerEdwards] p. 311. (The book teaches ftc2 26085 as simply the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus", then ftc1 26083 as the "Second Fundamental Theorem of Calculus".) (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 28-Oct-2015.) (Revised by Steve Rodriguez, 31-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ ∫(1(,)2)((𝑥↑2) − 3) d𝑥 = -(2 / 3) | ||
| Theorem | dvsconst 44349 | Derivative of a constant function on the real or complex numbers. The function may return a complex 𝐴 even if 𝑆 is ℝ. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 11-Nov-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ {ℝ, ℂ} ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) → (𝑆 D (𝑆 × {𝐴})) = (𝑆 × {0})) | ||
| Theorem | dvsid 44350 | Derivative of the identity function on the real or complex numbers. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 11-Nov-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ {ℝ, ℂ} → (𝑆 D ( I ↾ 𝑆)) = (𝑆 × {1})) | ||
| Theorem | dvsef 44351 | Derivative of the exponential function on the real or complex numbers. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 12-Nov-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ {ℝ, ℂ} → (𝑆 D (exp ↾ 𝑆)) = (exp ↾ 𝑆)) | ||
| Theorem | expgrowthi 44352* | Exponential growth and decay model. See expgrowth 44354 for more information. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 4-Nov-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ {ℝ, ℂ}) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ 𝑌 = (𝑡 ∈ 𝑆 ↦ (𝐶 · (exp‘(𝐾 · 𝑡)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 D 𝑌) = ((𝑆 × {𝐾}) ∘f · 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | dvconstbi 44353* | The derivative of a function on 𝑆 is zero iff it is a constant function. Roughly a biconditional 𝑆 analogue of dvconst 25952 and dveq0 26039. Corresponds to integration formula "∫0 d𝑥 = 𝐶 " in section 4.1 of [LarsonHostetlerEdwards] p. 278. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 11-Nov-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ {ℝ, ℂ}) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌:𝑆⟶ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → dom (𝑆 D 𝑌) = 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑆 D 𝑌) = (𝑆 × {0}) ↔ ∃𝑐 ∈ ℂ 𝑌 = (𝑆 × {𝑐}))) | ||
| Theorem | expgrowth 44354* |
Exponential growth and decay model. The derivative of a function y of
variable t equals a constant k times y itself, iff
y equals some
constant C times the exponential of kt. This theorem and
expgrowthi 44352 illustrate one of the simplest and most
crucial classes of
differential equations, equations that relate functions to their
derivatives.
Section 6.3 of [Strang] p. 242 calls y' = ky "the most important differential equation in applied mathematics". In the field of population ecology it is known as the Malthusian growth model or exponential law, and C, k, and t correspond to initial population size, growth rate, and time respectively (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malthusian_growth_model 44352); and in finance, the model appears in a similar role in continuous compounding with C as the initial amount of money. In exponential decay models, k is often expressed as the negative of a positive constant λ. Here y' is given as (𝑆 D 𝑌), C as 𝑐, and ky as ((𝑆 × {𝐾}) ∘f · 𝑌). (𝑆 × {𝐾}) is the constant function that maps any real or complex input to k and ∘f · is multiplication as a function operation. The leftward direction of the biconditional is as given in http://www.saylor.org/site/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/MA221-2.1.1.pdf 44352 pp. 1-2, which also notes the reverse direction ("While we will not prove this here, it turns out that these are the only functions that satisfy this equation."). The rightward direction is Theorem 5.1 of [LarsonHostetlerEdwards] p. 375 (which notes " C is the initial value of y, and k is the proportionality constant. Exponential growth occurs when k > 0, and exponential decay occurs when k < 0."); its proof here closely follows the proof of y' = y in https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Exponential_Growth_Equation/Special_Case 44352. Statements for this and expgrowthi 44352 formulated by Mario Carneiro. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 24-Nov-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ {ℝ, ℂ}) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌:𝑆⟶ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → dom (𝑆 D 𝑌) = 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑆 D 𝑌) = ((𝑆 × {𝐾}) ∘f · 𝑌) ↔ ∃𝑐 ∈ ℂ 𝑌 = (𝑡 ∈ 𝑆 ↦ (𝑐 · (exp‘(𝐾 · 𝑡)))))) | ||
| Syntax | cbcc 44355 | Extend class notation to include the generalized binomial coefficient operation. |
| class C𝑐 | ||
| Definition | df-bcc 44356* | Define a generalized binomial coefficient operation, which unlike df-bc 14342 allows complex numbers for the first argument. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ C𝑐 = (𝑐 ∈ ℂ, 𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝑐 FallFac 𝑘) / (!‘𝑘))) | ||
| Theorem | bccval 44357 | Value of the generalized binomial coefficient, 𝐶 choose 𝐾. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶C𝑐𝐾) = ((𝐶 FallFac 𝐾) / (!‘𝐾))) | ||
| Theorem | bcccl 44358 | Closure of the generalized binomial coefficient. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶C𝑐𝐾) ∈ ℂ) | ||
| Theorem | bcc0 44359 | The generalized binomial coefficient 𝐶 choose 𝐾 is zero iff 𝐶 is an integer between zero and (𝐾 − 1) inclusive. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶C𝑐𝐾) = 0 ↔ 𝐶 ∈ (0...(𝐾 − 1)))) | ||
| Theorem | bccp1k 44360 | Generalized binomial coefficient: 𝐶 choose (𝐾 + 1). (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶C𝑐(𝐾 + 1)) = ((𝐶C𝑐𝐾) · ((𝐶 − 𝐾) / (𝐾 + 1)))) | ||
| Theorem | bccm1k 44361 | Generalized binomial coefficient: 𝐶 choose (𝐾 − 1), when 𝐶 is not (𝐾 − 1). (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {(𝐾 − 1)})) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶C𝑐(𝐾 − 1)) = ((𝐶C𝑐𝐾) / ((𝐶 − (𝐾 − 1)) / 𝐾))) | ||
| Theorem | bccn0 44362 | Generalized binomial coefficient: 𝐶 choose 0. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶C𝑐0) = 1) | ||
| Theorem | bccn1 44363 | Generalized binomial coefficient: 𝐶 choose 1. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶C𝑐1) = 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | bccbc 44364 | The binomial coefficient and generalized binomial coefficient are equal when their arguments are nonnegative integers. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁C𝑐𝐾) = (𝑁C𝐾)) | ||
| Theorem | uzmptshftfval 44365* | When 𝐹 is a maps-to function on some set of upper integers 𝑍 that returns a set 𝐵, (𝐹 shift 𝑁) is another maps-to function on the shifted set of upper integers 𝑊. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ 𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 − 𝑁) → 𝐵 = 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑊 = (ℤ≥‘(𝑀 + 𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 shift 𝑁) = (𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | dvradcnv2 44366* | The radius of convergence of the (formal) derivative 𝐻 of the power series 𝐺 is (at least) as large as the radius of convergence of 𝐺. This version of dvradcnv 26464 uses a shifted version of 𝐻 to match the sum form of (ℂ D 𝐹) in pserdv2 26474 (and shows how to use uzmptshftfval 44365 to shift a maps-to function on a set of upper integers). (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝐴‘𝑛) · (𝑥↑𝑛)))) & ⊢ 𝑅 = sup({𝑟 ∈ ℝ ∣ seq0( + , (𝐺‘𝑟)) ∈ dom ⇝ }, ℝ*, < ) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑛 · (𝐴‘𝑛)) · (𝑋↑(𝑛 − 1)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴:ℕ0⟶ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝑋) < 𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝐻) ∈ dom ⇝ ) | ||
| Theorem | binomcxplemwb 44367 | Lemma for binomcxp 44376. The lemma in the Wikibooks proof. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐶 − 𝐾) · (𝐶C𝑐𝐾)) + ((𝐶 − (𝐾 − 1)) · (𝐶C𝑐(𝐾 − 1)))) = (𝐶 · (𝐶C𝑐𝐾))) | ||
| Theorem | binomcxplemnn0 44368* | Lemma for binomcxp 44376. When 𝐶 is a nonnegative integer, the binomial's finite sum value by the standard binomial theorem binom 15866 equals this generalized infinite sum: the generalized binomial coefficient and exponentiation operators give exactly the same values in the standard index set (0...𝐶), and when the index set is widened beyond 𝐶 the additional values are just zeroes. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐵) < (abs‘𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵)↑𝑐𝐶) = Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ((𝐶C𝑐𝑘) · ((𝐴↑𝑐(𝐶 − 𝑘)) · (𝐵↑𝑘)))) | ||
| Theorem | binomcxplemrat 44369* | Lemma for binomcxp 44376. As 𝑘 increases, this ratio's absolute value converges to one. Part of equation "Since continuity of the absolute value..." in the Wikibooks proof (proven for the inverse ratio, which we later show is no problem). (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐵) < (abs‘𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (abs‘((𝐶 − 𝑘) / (𝑘 + 1)))) ⇝ 1) | ||
| Theorem | binomcxplemfrat 44370* | Lemma for binomcxp 44376. binomcxplemrat 44369 implies that when 𝐶 is not a nonnegative integer, the absolute value of the ratio ((𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1)) / (𝐹‘𝑘)) converges to one. The rest of equation "Since continuity of the absolute value..." in the Wikibooks proof. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐵) < (abs‘𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑗 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝐶C𝑐𝑗)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (abs‘((𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1)) / (𝐹‘𝑘)))) ⇝ 1) | ||
| Theorem | binomcxplemradcnv 44371* | Lemma for binomcxp 44376. By binomcxplemfrat 44370 and radcnvrat 44333 the radius of convergence of power series Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ0((𝐹‘𝑘) · (𝑏↑𝑘)) is one. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐵) < (abs‘𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑗 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝐶C𝑐𝑗)) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑏 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝐹‘𝑘) · (𝑏↑𝑘)))) & ⊢ 𝑅 = sup({𝑟 ∈ ℝ ∣ seq0( + , (𝑆‘𝑟)) ∈ dom ⇝ }, ℝ*, < ) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0) → 𝑅 = 1) | ||
| Theorem | binomcxplemdvbinom 44372* | Lemma for binomcxp 44376. By the power and chain rules, calculate the derivative of ((1 + 𝑏)↑𝑐-𝐶), with respect to 𝑏 in the disk of convergence 𝐷. We later multiply the derivative in the later binomcxplemdvsum 44374 by this derivative to show that ((1 + 𝑏)↑𝑐𝐶) (with a nonnegated 𝐶) and the later sum, since both at 𝑏 = 0 equal one, are the same. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐵) < (abs‘𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑗 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝐶C𝑐𝑗)) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑏 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝐹‘𝑘) · (𝑏↑𝑘)))) & ⊢ 𝑅 = sup({𝑟 ∈ ℝ ∣ seq0( + , (𝑆‘𝑟)) ∈ dom ⇝ }, ℝ*, < ) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑏 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑘 · (𝐹‘𝑘)) · (𝑏↑(𝑘 − 1))))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (◡abs “ (0[,)𝑅)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0) → (ℂ D (𝑏 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ ((1 + 𝑏)↑𝑐-𝐶))) = (𝑏 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ (-𝐶 · ((1 + 𝑏)↑𝑐(-𝐶 − 1))))) | ||
| Theorem | binomcxplemcvg 44373* | Lemma for binomcxp 44376. The sum in binomcxplemnn0 44368 and its derivative (see the next theorem, binomcxplemdvsum 44374) converge, as long as their base 𝐽 is within the disk of convergence. Part of remark "This convergence allows us to apply term-by-term differentiation..." in the Wikibooks proof. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐵) < (abs‘𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑗 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝐶C𝑐𝑗)) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑏 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝐹‘𝑘) · (𝑏↑𝑘)))) & ⊢ 𝑅 = sup({𝑟 ∈ ℝ ∣ seq0( + , (𝑆‘𝑟)) ∈ dom ⇝ }, ℝ*, < ) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑏 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑘 · (𝐹‘𝑘)) · (𝑏↑(𝑘 − 1))))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (◡abs “ (0[,)𝑅)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐽 ∈ 𝐷) → (seq0( + , (𝑆‘𝐽)) ∈ dom ⇝ ∧ seq1( + , (𝐸‘𝐽)) ∈ dom ⇝ )) | ||
| Theorem | binomcxplemdvsum 44374* | Lemma for binomcxp 44376. The derivative of the generalized sum in binomcxplemnn0 44368. Part of remark "This convergence allows to apply term-by-term differentiation..." in the Wikibooks proof. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐵) < (abs‘𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑗 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝐶C𝑐𝑗)) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑏 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝐹‘𝑘) · (𝑏↑𝑘)))) & ⊢ 𝑅 = sup({𝑟 ∈ ℝ ∣ seq0( + , (𝑆‘𝑟)) ∈ dom ⇝ }, ℝ*, < ) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑏 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑘 · (𝐹‘𝑘)) · (𝑏↑(𝑘 − 1))))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (◡abs “ (0[,)𝑅)) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝑏 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ((𝑆‘𝑏)‘𝑘)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (ℂ D 𝑃) = (𝑏 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ ((𝐸‘𝑏)‘𝑘))) | ||
| Theorem | binomcxplemnotnn0 44375* |
Lemma for binomcxp 44376. When 𝐶 is not a nonnegative integer, the
generalized sum in binomcxplemnn0 44368 —which we will call 𝑃
—is a convergent power series: its base 𝑏 is always of
smaller absolute value than the radius of convergence.
pserdv2 26474 gives the derivative of 𝑃, which by dvradcnv 26464 also converges in that radius. When 𝐴 is fixed at one, (𝐴 + 𝑏) times that derivative equals (𝐶 · 𝑃) and fraction (𝑃 / ((𝐴 + 𝑏)↑𝑐𝐶)) is always defined with derivative zero, so the fraction is a constant—specifically one, because ((1 + 0)↑𝑐𝐶) = 1. Thus ((1 + 𝑏)↑𝑐𝐶) = (𝑃‘𝑏). Finally, let 𝑏 be (𝐵 / 𝐴), and multiply both the binomial ((1 + (𝐵 / 𝐴))↑𝑐𝐶) and the sum (𝑃‘(𝐵 / 𝐴)) by (𝐴↑𝑐𝐶) to get the result. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐵) < (abs‘𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑗 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝐶C𝑐𝑗)) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑏 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝐹‘𝑘) · (𝑏↑𝑘)))) & ⊢ 𝑅 = sup({𝑟 ∈ ℝ ∣ seq0( + , (𝑆‘𝑟)) ∈ dom ⇝ }, ℝ*, < ) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑏 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑘 · (𝐹‘𝑘)) · (𝑏↑(𝑘 − 1))))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (◡abs “ (0[,)𝑅)) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝑏 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ((𝑆‘𝑏)‘𝑘)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵)↑𝑐𝐶) = Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ((𝐶C𝑐𝑘) · ((𝐴↑𝑐(𝐶 − 𝑘)) · (𝐵↑𝑘)))) | ||
| Theorem | binomcxp 44376* | Generalize the binomial theorem binom 15866 to positive real summand 𝐴, real summand 𝐵, and complex exponent 𝐶. Proof in https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Advanced_Calculus 15866; see also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binomial_series 15866, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binomial_theorem 15866 (sections "Newton's generalized binomial theorem" and "Future generalizations"), and proof "General Binomial Theorem" in https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Binomial_Theorem 15866. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐵) < (abs‘𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 𝐵)↑𝑐𝐶) = Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ((𝐶C𝑐𝑘) · ((𝐴↑𝑐(𝐶 − 𝑘)) · (𝐵↑𝑘)))) | ||
| Theorem | pm10.12 44377* | Theorem *10.12 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 146. In *10, this is treated as an axiom, and the proofs in *10 are based on this theorem. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 17-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → (𝜑 ∨ ∀𝑥𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | pm10.14 44378 | Theorem *10.14 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 146. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 17-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((∀𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥𝜓) → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | pm10.251 44379 | Theorem *10.251 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 149. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 17-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ∀𝑥𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | pm10.252 44380 | Theorem *10.252 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 149. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 17-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | pm10.253 44381 | Theorem *10.253 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 149. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 17-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | albitr 44382 | Theorem *10.301 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 151. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) → ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | pm10.42 44383 | Theorem *10.42 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 155. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 17-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((∃𝑥𝜑 ∨ ∃𝑥𝜓) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | pm10.52 44384* | Theorem *10.52 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 155. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∃𝑥𝜑 → (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | pm10.53 44385 | Theorem *10.53 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 155. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | pm10.541 44386* | Theorem *10.541 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 155. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓)) ↔ (𝜒 ∨ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | pm10.542 44387* | Theorem *10.542 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 156. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜓)) ↔ (𝜒 → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | pm10.55 44388 | Theorem *10.55 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 156. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)) ↔ (∃𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | pm10.56 44389 | Theorem *10.56 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 156. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)) → ∃𝑥(𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | pm10.57 44390 | Theorem *10.57 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 156. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)) → (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) ∨ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜒))) | ||
| Theorem | 2alanimi 44391 | Removes two universal quantifiers from a statement. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜓) → ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | 2al2imi 44392 | Removes two universal quantifiers from a statement. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑 → (∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜓 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | pm11.11 44393 | Theorem *11.11 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 159. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 17-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ ∀𝑧∀𝑤[𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑 | ||
| Theorem | pm11.12 44394* | Theorem *11.12 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 159. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 17-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → (𝜑 ∨ ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | 19.21vv 44395* | Compare Theorem *11.3 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 161. Special case of theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90 with two quantifiers. See 19.21v 1939. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜓 → 𝜑) ↔ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | 2alim 44396 | Theorem *11.32 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 162. Theorem 19.20 of [Margaris] p. 90 with 2 quantifiers. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | 2albi 44397 | Theorem *11.33 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 162. Theorem 19.15 of [Margaris] p. 90 with 2 quantifiers. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | 2exim 44398 | Theorem *11.34 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 162. Theorem 19.22 of [Margaris] p. 90 with 2 quantifiers. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | 2exbi 44399 | Theorem *11.341 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 162. Theorem 19.18 of [Margaris] p. 90 with 2 quantifiers. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | spsbce-2 44400 | Theorem *11.36 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 162. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |