Theorem dvdemo1 5371

Description: Demonstration of a theorem that requires the setvar variables 𝑥 and 𝑦 to be disjoint (but without any other disjointness conditions, and in particular, none on 𝑧).

That theorem bundles the theorems (⊢ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) with 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 disjoint), often called its "principal instance", and the two "degenerate instances" (⊢ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑥) with 𝑥, 𝑦 disjoint) and (⊢ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) with 𝑥, 𝑦 disjoint).

Compare with dvdemo2 5372, which has the same principal instance and one common degenerate instance but crucially differs in the other degenerate instance.

See https://us.metamath.org/mpeuni/mmset.html#distinct 5372 for details on the "disjoint variable" mechanism. (The verb "bundle" to express this phenomenon was introduced by Raph Levien.)

Note that dvdemo1 5371 is partially bundled, in that the pairs of setvar variables 𝑥, 𝑧 and 𝑦, 𝑧 need not be disjoint, and in spite of that, its proof does not require ax-11 2153 nor ax-13 2370. (Contributed by NM, 1-Dec-2006.) (Revised by BJ, 13-Jan-2024.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dvdemo1	⊢ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Proof of Theorem dvdemo1

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dtruALT2 5368	. . 3 ⊢ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦
2		exnal 1828	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦)
3	1, 2	mpbir 230	. 2 ⊢ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦
4		pm2.21 123	. 2 ⊢ (¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥))
5	3, 4	eximii 1838	1 ⊢ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4  ∀wal 1538  ∃wex 1780

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2107  ax-9 2115  ax-nul 5306  ax-pow 5363

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-ex 1781

This theorem is referenced by: (None)