Theorem dvdemo1 5296

Description: Demonstration of a theorem that requires the setvar variables 𝑥 and 𝑦 to be disjoint (but without any other disjointness conditions, and in particular, none on 𝑧).

That theorem bundles the theorems (⊢ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) with 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 disjoint), often called its "principal instance", and the two "degenerate instances" (⊢ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑥) with 𝑥, 𝑦 disjoint) and (⊢ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) with 𝑥, 𝑦 disjoint).

Compare with dvdemo2 5297, which has the same principal instance and one common degenerate instance but crucially differs in the other degenerate instance.

See https://us.metamath.org/mpeuni/mmset.html#distinct 5297 for details on the "disjoint variable" mechanism. (The verb "bundle" to express this phenomenon was introduced by Raph Levien.)

Note that dvdemo1 5296 is partially bundled, in that the pairs of setvar variables 𝑥, 𝑧 and 𝑦, 𝑧 need not be disjoint, and in spite of that, its proof does not require ax-11 2154 nor ax-13 2372. (Contributed by NM, 1-Dec-2006.) (Revised by BJ, 13-Jan-2024.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dvdemo1	⊢ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Proof of Theorem dvdemo1

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dtruALT2 5293	. . 3 ⊢ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦
2		exnal 1829	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦)
3	1, 2	mpbir 230	. 2 ⊢ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦
4		pm2.21 123	. 2 ⊢ (¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥))
5	3, 4	eximii 1839	1 ⊢ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4  ∀wal 1537  ∃wex 1782

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-nul 5230  ax-pow 5288

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-ex 1783

This theorem is referenced by: (None)