Theorem eujust 2599

Description: Soundness justification theorem for eu6 2602 when this was the definition of the unique existential quantifier (note that 𝑦 and 𝑧 need not be disjoint, although the weaker theorem with that disjoint variable condition added would be enough to justify the soundness of the definition). See eujustALT 2600 for a proof that provides an example of how it can be achieved through the use of dvelim 2483. (Contributed by NM, 11-Mar-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jul-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
eujust	⊢ (∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ↔ ∃𝑧∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑧))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦   𝑥,𝑧   𝜑,𝑦   𝜑,𝑧

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜑(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem eujust

Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		equequ2 2060	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑤))
2	1	bibi2d 345	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → ((𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ↔ (𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑤)))
3	2	albidv 1954	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑤)))
4	3	cbvexvw 2071	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ↔ ∃𝑤∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑤))
5		equequ2 2060	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑧 → (𝑥 = 𝑤 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑧))
6	5	bibi2d 345	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑧 → ((𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑤) ↔ (𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑧)))
7	6	albidv 1954	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑧 → (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑤) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑧)))
8	7	cbvexvw 2071	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑤∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑤) ↔ ∃𝑧∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑧))
9	4, 8	bitri 278	1 ⊢ (∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ↔ ∃𝑧∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑧))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ↔ wb 209  ∀wal 1567  ∃wex 1811

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1944  ax-6 2001  ax-7 2042

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-ex 1812

This theorem is used by: (None)