Theorem frege65b 44664

Description: A kind of Aristotelian inference. This judgement replaces the mode of inference barbara 2689 when the minor premise has a general context. Proposition 65 of [Frege1879] p. 53.

In Frege care is taken to point out that the variables in the first clauses are independent of each other and of the final term so another valid translation could be : ⊢ (∀𝑥([𝑥 / 𝑎]𝜑 → [𝑥 / 𝑏]𝜓) → (∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑏]𝜓 → [𝑦 / 𝑐]𝜒) → ([𝑧 / 𝑎]𝜑 → [𝑧 / 𝑐]𝜒))). But that is perhaps too pedantic a translation for this exploration. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
frege65b	⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∀𝑥(𝜓 → 𝜒) → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜒)))

Proof of Theorem frege65b

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sbim 2337	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓))
2		frege64b 44663	. . 3 ⊢ (([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓) → (∀𝑥(𝜓 → 𝜒) → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜒)))
3	1, 2	sylbi 220	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∀𝑥(𝜓 → 𝜒) → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜒)))
4		frege61b 44660	. 2 ⊢ (([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∀𝑥(𝜓 → 𝜒) → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜒))) → (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∀𝑥(𝜓 → 𝜒) → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜒))))
5	3, 4	ax-mp 5	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∀𝑥(𝜓 → 𝜒) → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜒)))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4  ∀wal 1567  [wsb 2095

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1824  ax-4 1838  ax-5 1939  ax-6 1996  ax-7 2037  ax-10 2175  ax-12 2212  ax-frege1 44544  ax-frege2 44545  ax-frege8 44563  ax-frege58b 44655

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-ex 1809  df-nf 1813  df-sb 2096

This theorem is used by:  frege66b  44665