P. 430 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 42901-43000   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	rmxyelxp 42901*	Lemma for frmx 42902 and frmy 42903. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (◡(𝑏 ∈ (ℕ0 × ℤ) ↦ ((1st ‘𝑏) + ((√‘((𝐴↑2) − 1)) · (2nd ‘𝑏))))‘((𝐴 + (√‘((𝐴↑2) − 1)))↑𝑁)) ∈ (ℕ0 × ℤ))
Theorem	frmx 42902	The X sequence is a nonnegative integer. See rmxnn 42940 for a strengthening. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Sep-2014.)
⊢ Xrm :((ℤ≥‘2) × ℤ)⟶ℕ0
Theorem	frmy 42903	The Y sequence is an integer. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Sep-2014.)
⊢ Yrm :((ℤ≥‘2) × ℤ)⟶ℤ
Theorem	rmxyval 42904	Main definition of the X and Y sequences. Compare definition 2.3 of [JonesMatijasevic] p. 694. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝐴 Xrm 𝑁) + ((√‘((𝐴↑2) − 1)) · (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁))) = ((𝐴 + (√‘((𝐴↑2) − 1)))↑𝑁))
Theorem	rmspecpos 42905	The discriminant used to define the X and Y sequences is a positive real. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) → ((𝐴↑2) − 1) ∈ ℝ+)
Theorem	rmxycomplete 42906*	The X and Y sequences taken together enumerate all solutions to the corresponding Pell equation in the right half-plane. This is Metamath 100 proof #39. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ℤ) → (((𝑋↑2) − (((𝐴↑2) − 1) · (𝑌↑2))) = 1 ↔ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℤ (𝑋 = (𝐴 Xrm 𝑛) ∧ 𝑌 = (𝐴 Yrm 𝑛))))
Theorem	rmxynorm 42907	The X and Y sequences define a solution to the corresponding Pell equation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (((𝐴 Xrm 𝑁)↑2) − (((𝐴↑2) − 1) · ((𝐴 Yrm 𝑁)↑2))) = 1)
Theorem	rmbaserp 42908	The base of exponentiation for the X and Y sequences is a positive real. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) → (𝐴 + (√‘((𝐴↑2) − 1))) ∈ ℝ+)
Theorem	rmxyneg 42909	Negation law for X and Y sequences. JonesMatijasevic is inconsistent on whether the X and Y sequences have domain ℕ0 or ℤ; we use ℤ consistently to avoid the need for a separate subtraction law. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝐴 Xrm -𝑁) = (𝐴 Xrm 𝑁) ∧ (𝐴 Yrm -𝑁) = -(𝐴 Yrm 𝑁)))
Theorem	rmxyadd 42910	Addition formula for X and Y sequences. See rmxadd 42916 and rmyadd 42920 for most uses. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝐴 Xrm (𝑀 + 𝑁)) = (((𝐴 Xrm 𝑀) · (𝐴 Xrm 𝑁)) + (((𝐴↑2) − 1) · ((𝐴 Yrm 𝑀) · (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁)))) ∧ (𝐴 Yrm (𝑀 + 𝑁)) = (((𝐴 Yrm 𝑀) · (𝐴 Xrm 𝑁)) + ((𝐴 Xrm 𝑀) · (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁)))))
Theorem	rmxy1 42911	Value of the X and Y sequences at 1. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) → ((𝐴 Xrm 1) = 𝐴 ∧ (𝐴 Yrm 1) = 1))
Theorem	rmxy0 42912	Value of the X and Y sequences at 0. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) → ((𝐴 Xrm 0) = 1 ∧ (𝐴 Yrm 0) = 0))
Theorem	rmxneg 42913	Negation law (even function) for the X sequence. The method of proof used for the previous four theorems rmxyneg 42909, rmxyadd 42910, rmxy0 42912, and rmxy1 42911 via qirropth 42896 results in two theorems at once, but typical use requires only one, so this group of theorems serves to separate the cases. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐴 Xrm -𝑁) = (𝐴 Xrm 𝑁))
Theorem	rmx0 42914	Value of X sequence at 0. Part 1 of equation 2.11 of [JonesMatijasevic] p. 695. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) → (𝐴 Xrm 0) = 1)
Theorem	rmx1 42915	Value of X sequence at 1. Part 2 of equation 2.11 of [JonesMatijasevic] p. 695. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) → (𝐴 Xrm 1) = 𝐴)
Theorem	rmxadd 42916	Addition formula for X sequence. Equation 2.7 of [JonesMatijasevic] p. 695. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐴 Xrm (𝑀 + 𝑁)) = (((𝐴 Xrm 𝑀) · (𝐴 Xrm 𝑁)) + (((𝐴↑2) − 1) · ((𝐴 Yrm 𝑀) · (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁)))))
Theorem	rmyneg 42917	Negation formula for Y sequence (odd function). (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐴 Yrm -𝑁) = -(𝐴 Yrm 𝑁))
Theorem	rmy0 42918	Value of Y sequence at 0. Part 1 of equation 2.12 of [JonesMatijasevic] p. 695. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) → (𝐴 Yrm 0) = 0)
Theorem	rmy1 42919	Value of Y sequence at 1. Part 2 of equation 2.12 of [JonesMatijasevic] p. 695. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) → (𝐴 Yrm 1) = 1)
Theorem	rmyadd 42920	Addition formula for Y sequence. Equation 2.8 of [JonesMatijasevic] p. 695. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐴 Yrm (𝑀 + 𝑁)) = (((𝐴 Yrm 𝑀) · (𝐴 Xrm 𝑁)) + ((𝐴 Xrm 𝑀) · (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁))))
Theorem	rmxp1 42921	Special addition-of-1 formula for X sequence. Part 1 of equation 2.9 of [JonesMatijasevic] p. 695. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐴 Xrm (𝑁 + 1)) = (((𝐴 Xrm 𝑁) · 𝐴) + (((𝐴↑2) − 1) · (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁))))
Theorem	rmyp1 42922	Special addition of 1 formula for Y sequence. Part 2 of equation 2.9 of [JonesMatijasevic] p. 695. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐴 Yrm (𝑁 + 1)) = (((𝐴 Yrm 𝑁) · 𝐴) + (𝐴 Xrm 𝑁)))
Theorem	rmxm1 42923	Subtraction of 1 formula for X sequence. Part 1 of equation 2.10 of [JonesMatijasevic] p. 695. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 14-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐴 Xrm (𝑁 − 1)) = ((𝐴 · (𝐴 Xrm 𝑁)) − (((𝐴↑2) − 1) · (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁))))
Theorem	rmym1 42924	Subtraction of 1 formula for Y sequence. Part 2 of equation 2.10 of [JonesMatijasevic] p. 695. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐴 Yrm (𝑁 − 1)) = (((𝐴 Yrm 𝑁) · 𝐴) − (𝐴 Xrm 𝑁)))
Theorem	rmxluc 42925	The X sequence is a Lucas (second-order integer recurrence) sequence. Part 3 of equation 2.11 of [JonesMatijasevic] p. 695. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 14-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐴 Xrm (𝑁 + 1)) = (((2 · 𝐴) · (𝐴 Xrm 𝑁)) − (𝐴 Xrm (𝑁 − 1))))
Theorem	rmyluc 42926	The Y sequence is a Lucas sequence, definable via this second-order recurrence with rmy0 42918 and rmy1 42919. Part 3 of equation 2.12 of [JonesMatijasevic] p. 695. JonesMatijasevic uses this theorem to redefine the X and Y sequences to have domain (ℤ × ℤ), which simplifies some later theorems. It may shorten the derivation to use this as our initial definition. Incidentally, the X sequence satisfies the exact same recurrence. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐴 Yrm (𝑁 + 1)) = ((2 · ((𝐴 Yrm 𝑁) · 𝐴)) − (𝐴 Yrm (𝑁 − 1))))
Theorem	rmyluc2 42927	Lucas sequence property of Y with better output ordering. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐴 Yrm (𝑁 + 1)) = (((2 · 𝐴) · (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁)) − (𝐴 Yrm (𝑁 − 1))))
Theorem	rmxdbl 42928	"Double-angle formula" for X-values. Equation 2.13 of [JonesMatijasevic] p. 695. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐴 Xrm (2 · 𝑁)) = ((2 · ((𝐴 Xrm 𝑁)↑2)) − 1))
Theorem	rmydbl 42929	"Double-angle formula" for Y-values. Equation 2.14 of [JonesMatijasevic] p. 695. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐴 Yrm (2 · 𝑁)) = ((2 · (𝐴 Xrm 𝑁)) · (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁)))
21.33.27  Ordering and induction lemmas for the integers
Theorem	monotuz 42930*	A function defined on an upper set of integers which increases at every adjacent pair is globally strictly monotonic by induction. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐻) → 𝐹 < 𝐺)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐻) → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (ℤ≥‘𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 + 1) → 𝐶 = 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐶 = 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → 𝐶 = 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐻 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐻)) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ 𝐷 < 𝐸))
Theorem	monotoddzzfi 42931*	A function which is odd and monotonic on ℕ0 is monotonic on ℤ. This proof is far too long. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 25-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐹‘-𝑥) = -(𝐹‘𝑥))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝑥 < 𝑦 → (𝐹‘𝑥) < (𝐹‘𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ (𝐹‘𝐴) < (𝐹‘𝐵)))
Theorem	monotoddzz 42932*	A function (given implicitly) which is odd and monotonic on ℕ0 is monotonic on ℤ. This proof is far too long. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 25-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝑥 < 𝑦 → 𝐸 < 𝐹))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℤ) → 𝐸 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℤ) → 𝐺 = -𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐸 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → 𝐸 = 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐸 = 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = -𝑦 → 𝐸 = 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ 𝐶 < 𝐷))
Theorem	oddcomabszz 42933*	An odd function which takes nonnegative values on nonnegative arguments commutes with abs. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 26-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℤ) → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑥) → 0 ≤ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℤ) → 𝐶 = -𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = -𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐷 → 𝐴 = 𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (abs‘𝐷) → 𝐴 = 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℤ) → (abs‘𝐸) = 𝐹)
Theorem	2nn0ind 42934*	Induction on nonnegative integers with two base cases, for use with Lucas-type sequences. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Oct-2014.)
⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ 𝜒    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ℕ → ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 0 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 1 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 − 1) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 + 1) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜂))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜌))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 → 𝜌)
Theorem	zindbi 42935*	Inductively transfer a property to the integers if it holds for zero and passes between adjacent integers in either direction. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ℤ → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 + 1) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 0 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℤ → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))
21.33.28  X and Y sequences 2: Order properties
Theorem	rmxypos 42936	For all nonnegative indices, X is positive and Y is nonnegative. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (0 < (𝐴 Xrm 𝑁) ∧ 0 ≤ (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁)))
Theorem	ltrmynn0 42937	The Y-sequence is strictly monotonic on ℕ0. Strengthened by ltrmy 42941. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝑀 < 𝑁 ↔ (𝐴 Yrm 𝑀) < (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁)))
Theorem	ltrmxnn0 42938	The X-sequence is strictly monotonic on ℕ0. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝑀 < 𝑁 ↔ (𝐴 Xrm 𝑀) < (𝐴 Xrm 𝑁)))
Theorem	lermxnn0 42939	The X-sequence is monotonic on ℕ0. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝑀 ≤ 𝑁 ↔ (𝐴 Xrm 𝑀) ≤ (𝐴 Xrm 𝑁)))
Theorem	rmxnn 42940	The X-sequence is defined to range over ℕ0 but never actually takes the value 0. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐴 Xrm 𝑁) ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	ltrmy 42941	The Y-sequence is strictly monotonic over ℤ. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 25-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 < 𝑁 ↔ (𝐴 Yrm 𝑀) < (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁)))
Theorem	rmyeq0 42942	Y is zero only at zero. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 26-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑁 = 0 ↔ (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁) = 0))
Theorem	rmyeq 42943	Y is one-to-one. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 = 𝑁 ↔ (𝐴 Yrm 𝑀) = (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁)))
Theorem	lermy 42944	Y is monotonic (non-strict). (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 ≤ 𝑁 ↔ (𝐴 Yrm 𝑀) ≤ (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁)))
Theorem	rmynn 42945	Yrm is positive for positive arguments. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁) ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	rmynn0 42946	Yrm is nonnegative for nonnegative arguments. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁) ∈ ℕ0)
Theorem	rmyabs 42947	Yrm commutes with abs. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 26-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → (abs‘(𝐴 Yrm 𝐵)) = (𝐴 Yrm (abs‘𝐵)))
Theorem	jm2.24nn 42948	X(n) is strictly greater than Y(n) + Y(n-1). Lemma 2.24 of [JonesMatijasevic] p. 697 restricted to ℕ. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → ((𝐴 Yrm (𝑁 − 1)) + (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁)) < (𝐴 Xrm 𝑁))
Theorem	jm2.17a 42949	First half of lemma 2.17 of [JonesMatijasevic] p. 696. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 14-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (((2 · 𝐴) − 1)↑𝑁) ≤ (𝐴 Yrm (𝑁 + 1)))
Theorem	jm2.17b 42950	Weak form of the second half of lemma 2.17 of [JonesMatijasevic] p. 696, allowing induction to start lower. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 15-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐴 Yrm (𝑁 + 1)) ≤ ((2 · 𝐴)↑𝑁))
Theorem	jm2.17c 42951	Second half of lemma 2.17 of [JonesMatijasevic] p. 696. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 15-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐴 Yrm ((𝑁 + 1) + 1)) < ((2 · 𝐴)↑(𝑁 + 1)))
Theorem	jm2.24 42952	Lemma 2.24 of [JonesMatijasevic] p. 697 extended to ℤ. Could be eliminated with a more careful proof of jm2.26lem3 42990. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝐴 Yrm (𝑁 − 1)) + (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁)) < (𝐴 Xrm 𝑁))
Theorem	rmygeid 42953	Y(n) increases faster than n. Used implicitly without proof or comment in lemma 2.27 of [JonesMatijasevic] p. 697. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → 𝑁 ≤ (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁))
21.33.29  Congruential equations
Theorem	congtr 42954	A wff of the form 𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − 𝐶) is interpreted as a congruential equation. This is similar to (𝐵 mod 𝐴) = (𝐶 mod 𝐴), but is defined such that behavior is regular for zero and negative values of 𝐴. To use this concept effectively, we need to show that congruential equations behave similarly to normal equations; first a transitivity law. Idea for the future: If there was a congruential equation symbol, it could incorporate type constraints, so that most of these would not need them. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − 𝐶) ∧ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐶 − 𝐷))) → 𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − 𝐷))
Theorem	congadd 42955	If two pairs of numbers are componentwise congruent, so are their sums. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐸 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − 𝐶) ∧ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐷 − 𝐸))) → 𝐴 ∥ ((𝐵 + 𝐷) − (𝐶 + 𝐸)))
Theorem	congmul 42956	If two pairs of numbers are componentwise congruent, so are their products. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐸 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − 𝐶) ∧ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐷 − 𝐸))) → 𝐴 ∥ ((𝐵 · 𝐷) − (𝐶 · 𝐸)))
Theorem	congsym 42957	Congruence mod 𝐴 is a symmetric/commutative relation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − 𝐶))) → 𝐴 ∥ (𝐶 − 𝐵))
Theorem	congneg 42958	If two integers are congruent mod 𝐴, so are their negatives. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − 𝐶))) → 𝐴 ∥ (-𝐵 − -𝐶))
Theorem	congsub 42959	If two pairs of numbers are componentwise congruent, so are their differences. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐸 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − 𝐶) ∧ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐷 − 𝐸))) → 𝐴 ∥ ((𝐵 − 𝐷) − (𝐶 − 𝐸)))
Theorem	congid 42960	Every integer is congruent to itself mod every base. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → 𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − 𝐵))
Theorem	mzpcong 42961*	Polynomials commute with congruences. (Does this characterize them?) (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ∧ 𝑌 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉)) ∧ (𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑉 𝑁 ∥ ((𝑋‘𝑘) − (𝑌‘𝑘)))) → 𝑁 ∥ ((𝐹‘𝑋) − (𝐹‘𝑌)))
Theorem	congrep 42962*	Every integer is congruent to some number in the fundamental domain. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ∃𝑎 ∈ (0...(𝐴 − 1))𝐴 ∥ (𝑎 − 𝑁))
Theorem	congabseq 42963	If two integers are congruent, they are either equal or separated by at least the congruence base. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℤ) ∧ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − 𝐶)) → ((abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐶)) < 𝐴 ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐶))
21.33.30  Alternating congruential equations
Theorem	acongid 42964	A wff like that in this theorem will be known as an "alternating congruence". A special symbol might be considered if more uses come up. They have many of the same properties as normal congruences, starting with reflexivity. JonesMatijasevic uses "a ≡ ± b (mod c)" for this construction. The disjunction of divisibility constraints seems to adequately capture the concept, but it's rather verbose and somewhat inelegant. Use of an explicit equivalence relation might also work. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − 𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − -𝐵)))
Theorem	acongsym 42965	Symmetry of alternating congruence. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − 𝐶) ∨ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − -𝐶))) → (𝐴 ∥ (𝐶 − 𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐶 − -𝐵)))
Theorem	acongneg2 42966	Negate right side of alternating congruence. Makes essential use of the "alternating" part. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − -𝐶) ∨ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − --𝐶))) → (𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − 𝐶) ∨ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − -𝐶)))
Theorem	acongtr 42967	Transitivity of alternating congruence. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℤ) ∧ ((𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − 𝐶) ∨ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − -𝐶)) ∧ (𝐴 ∥ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∨ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐶 − -𝐷)))) → (𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − 𝐷) ∨ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − -𝐷)))
Theorem	acongeq12d 42968	Substitution deduction for alternating congruence. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − 𝐷) ∨ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − -𝐷)) ↔ (𝐴 ∥ (𝐶 − 𝐸) ∨ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐶 − -𝐸))))
Theorem	acongrep 42969*	Every integer is alternating-congruent to some number in the first half of the fundamental domain. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ∃𝑎 ∈ (0...𝐴)((2 · 𝐴) ∥ (𝑎 − 𝑁) ∨ (2 · 𝐴) ∥ (𝑎 − -𝑁)))
Theorem	fzmaxdif 42970	Bound on the difference between two integers constrained to two possibly overlapping finite ranges. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐶 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝐵...𝐶)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝐸...𝐹)) ∧ (𝐶 − 𝐸) ≤ (𝐹 − 𝐵)) → (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐷)) ≤ (𝐹 − 𝐵))
Theorem	fzneg 42971	Reflection of a finite range of integers about 0. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵...𝐶) ↔ -𝐴 ∈ (-𝐶...-𝐵)))
Theorem	acongeq 42972	Two numbers in the fundamental domain are alternating-congruent iff they are equal. TODO: could be used to shorten jm2.26 42991. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (0...𝐴) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (0...𝐴)) → (𝐵 = 𝐶 ↔ ((2 · 𝐴) ∥ (𝐵 − 𝐶) ∨ (2 · 𝐴) ∥ (𝐵 − -𝐶))))
Theorem	dvdsacongtr 42973	Alternating congruence passes from a base to a dividing base. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐷 ∥ 𝐴 ∧ (𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − 𝐶) ∨ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − -𝐶)))) → (𝐷 ∥ (𝐵 − 𝐶) ∨ 𝐷 ∥ (𝐵 − -𝐶)))
21.33.31  Additional theorems on integer divisibility
Theorem	coprmdvdsb 42974	Multiplication by a coprime number does not affect divisibility. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 23-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ (𝐾 gcd 𝑀) = 1)) → (𝐾 ∥ 𝑁 ↔ 𝐾 ∥ (𝑀 · 𝑁)))
Theorem	modabsdifz 42975	Divisibility in terms of modular reduction by the absolute value of the base. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 26-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑀 ≠ 0) → ((𝑁 − (𝑁 mod (abs‘𝑀))) / 𝑀) ∈ ℤ)
Theorem	dvdsabsmod0 42976	Divisibility in terms of modular reduction by the absolute value of the base. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Sep-2014.) (Proof shortened by OpenAI, 3-Jul-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ≠ 0) → (𝑀 ∥ 𝑁 ↔ (𝑁 mod (abs‘𝑀)) = 0))
21.33.32  X and Y sequences 3: Divisibility properties
Theorem	jm2.18 42977	Theorem 2.18 of [JonesMatijasevic] p. 696. Direct relationship of the exponential function to X and Y sequences. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 14-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → ((((2 · 𝐴) · 𝐾) − (𝐾↑2)) − 1) ∥ (((𝐴 Xrm 𝑁) − ((𝐴 − 𝐾) · (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁))) − (𝐾↑𝑁)))
Theorem	jm2.19lem1 42978	Lemma for jm2.19 42982. X and Y values are coprime. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 23-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝐴 Xrm 𝑀) gcd (𝐴 Yrm 𝑀)) = 1)
Theorem	jm2.19lem2 42979	Lemma for jm2.19 42982. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 23-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝐴 Yrm 𝑀) ∥ (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁) ↔ (𝐴 Yrm 𝑀) ∥ (𝐴 Yrm (𝑁 + 𝑀))))
Theorem	jm2.19lem3 42980	Lemma for jm2.19 42982. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 26-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) ∧ 𝐼 ∈ ℕ0) → ((𝐴 Yrm 𝑀) ∥ (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁) ↔ (𝐴 Yrm 𝑀) ∥ (𝐴 Yrm (𝑁 + (𝐼 · 𝑀)))))
Theorem	jm2.19lem4 42981	Lemma for jm2.19 42982. Extend to ZZ by symmetry. TODO: use zindbi 42935. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 26-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) ∧ 𝐼 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝐴 Yrm 𝑀) ∥ (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁) ↔ (𝐴 Yrm 𝑀) ∥ (𝐴 Yrm (𝑁 + (𝐼 · 𝑀)))))
Theorem	jm2.19 42982	Lemma 2.19 of [JonesMatijasevic] p. 696. Transfer divisibility constraints between Y-values and their indices. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 ∥ 𝑁 ↔ (𝐴 Yrm 𝑀) ∥ (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁)))
Theorem	jm2.21 42983	Lemma for jm2.20nn 42986. Express X and Y values as a binomial. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 26-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐽 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝐴 Xrm (𝑁 · 𝐽)) + ((√‘((𝐴↑2) − 1)) · (𝐴 Yrm (𝑁 · 𝐽)))) = (((𝐴 Xrm 𝑁) + ((√‘((𝐴↑2) − 1)) · (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁)))↑𝐽))
Theorem	jm2.22 42984*	Lemma for jm2.20nn 42986. Applying binomial theorem and taking irrational part. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 26-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐽 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐴 Yrm (𝑁 · 𝐽)) = Σ𝑖 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ (0...𝐽) ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑥} ((𝐽C𝑖) · (((𝐴 Xrm 𝑁)↑(𝐽 − 𝑖)) · (((𝐴 Yrm 𝑁)↑𝑖) · (((𝐴↑2) − 1)↑((𝑖 − 1) / 2))))))
Theorem	jm2.23 42985	Lemma for jm2.20nn 42986. Truncate binomial expansion p-adicly. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 26-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐽 ∈ ℕ) → ((𝐴 Yrm 𝑁)↑3) ∥ ((𝐴 Yrm (𝑁 · 𝐽)) − (𝐽 · (((𝐴 Xrm 𝑁)↑(𝐽 − 1)) · (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁)))))
Theorem	jm2.20nn 42986	Lemma 2.20 of [JonesMatijasevic] p. 696, the "first step down lemma". (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 27-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → (((𝐴 Yrm 𝑁)↑2) ∥ (𝐴 Yrm 𝑀) ↔ (𝑁 · (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁)) ∥ 𝑀))
Theorem	jm2.25lem1 42987	Lemma for jm2.26 42991. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐴 ∥ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∨ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐶 − -𝐷))) → ((𝐴 ∥ (𝐷 − 𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐷 − -𝐵)) ↔ (𝐴 ∥ (𝐶 − 𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐶 − -𝐵))))
Theorem	jm2.25 42988	Lemma for jm2.26 42991. Remainders mod X(2n) are negaperiodic mod 2n. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) ∧ 𝐼 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝐴 Xrm 𝑁) ∥ ((𝐴 Yrm (𝑀 + (𝐼 · (2 · 𝑁)))) − (𝐴 Yrm 𝑀)) ∨ (𝐴 Xrm 𝑁) ∥ ((𝐴 Yrm (𝑀 + (𝐼 · (2 · 𝑁)))) − -(𝐴 Yrm 𝑀))))
Theorem	jm2.26a 42989	Lemma for jm2.26 42991. Reverse direction is required to prove forward direction, so do it separately. Induction on difference between K and M, together with the addition formula fact that adding 2N only inverts sign. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)) → (((2 · 𝑁) ∥ (𝐾 − 𝑀) ∨ (2 · 𝑁) ∥ (𝐾 − -𝑀)) → ((𝐴 Xrm 𝑁) ∥ ((𝐴 Yrm 𝐾) − (𝐴 Yrm 𝑀)) ∨ (𝐴 Xrm 𝑁) ∥ ((𝐴 Yrm 𝐾) − -(𝐴 Yrm 𝑀)))))
Theorem	jm2.26lem3 42990	Lemma for jm2.26 42991. Use acongrep 42969 to find K', M' ~ K, M in [ 0,N ]. Thus Y(K') ~ Y(M') and both are small; K' = M' on pain of contradicting 2.24, so K ~ M. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) ∧ (𝐾 ∈ (0...𝑁) ∧ 𝑀 ∈ (0...𝑁)) ∧ ((𝐴 Xrm 𝑁) ∥ ((𝐴 Yrm 𝐾) − (𝐴 Yrm 𝑀)) ∨ (𝐴 Xrm 𝑁) ∥ ((𝐴 Yrm 𝐾) − -(𝐴 Yrm 𝑀)))) → 𝐾 = 𝑀)
Theorem	jm2.26 42991	Lemma 2.26 of [JonesMatijasevic] p. 697, the "second step down lemma". (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) ∧ (𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)) → (((𝐴 Xrm 𝑁) ∥ ((𝐴 Yrm 𝐾) − (𝐴 Yrm 𝑀)) ∨ (𝐴 Xrm 𝑁) ∥ ((𝐴 Yrm 𝐾) − -(𝐴 Yrm 𝑀))) ↔ ((2 · 𝑁) ∥ (𝐾 − 𝑀) ∨ (2 · 𝑁) ∥ (𝐾 − -𝑀))))
Theorem	jm2.15nn0 42992	Lemma 2.15 of [JonesMatijasevic] p. 695. Yrm is a polynomial for fixed N, so has the expected congruence property. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∥ ((𝐴 Yrm 𝑁) − (𝐵 Yrm 𝑁)))
Theorem	jm2.16nn0 42993	Lemma 2.16 of [JonesMatijasevic] p. 695. This may be regarded as a special case of jm2.15nn0 42992 if Yrm is redefined as described in rmyluc 42926. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐴 − 1) ∥ ((𝐴 Yrm 𝑁) − 𝑁))
21.33.33  X and Y sequences 4: Diophantine representability of Y
Theorem	jm2.27a 42994	Lemma for jm2.27 42997. Reverse direction after existential quantifiers are expanded. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐷↑2) − (((𝐴↑2) − 1) · (𝐶↑2))) = 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹↑2) − (((𝐴↑2) − 1) · (𝐸↑2))) = 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐼↑2) − (((𝐺↑2) − 1) · (𝐻↑2))) = 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 = ((𝐽 + 1) · (2 · (𝐶↑2))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∥ (𝐺 − 𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (2 · 𝐶) ∥ (𝐺 − 1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∥ (𝐻 − 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (2 · 𝐶) ∥ (𝐻 − 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝐴 Xrm 𝑃))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (𝐴 Yrm 𝑃))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝐴 Xrm 𝑄))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 = (𝐴 Yrm 𝑄))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 = (𝐺 Xrm 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (𝐺 Yrm 𝑅))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (𝐴 Yrm 𝐵))
Theorem	jm2.27b 42995	Lemma for jm2.27 42997. Expand existential quantifiers for reverse direction. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐷↑2) − (((𝐴↑2) − 1) · (𝐶↑2))) = 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹↑2) − (((𝐴↑2) − 1) · (𝐸↑2))) = 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐼↑2) − (((𝐺↑2) − 1) · (𝐻↑2))) = 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 = ((𝐽 + 1) · (2 · (𝐶↑2))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∥ (𝐺 − 𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (2 · 𝐶) ∥ (𝐺 − 1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∥ (𝐻 − 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (2 · 𝐶) ∥ (𝐻 − 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (𝐴 Yrm 𝐵))
Theorem	jm2.27c 42996	Lemma for jm2.27 42997. Forward direction with substitutions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (𝐴 Yrm 𝐵))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝐴 Xrm 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝐵 · (𝐴 Yrm 𝐵))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝐴 Yrm (2 · 𝑄))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝐴 Xrm (2 · 𝑄))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝐴 + ((𝐹↑2) · ((𝐹↑2) − 𝐴)))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐺 Yrm 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (𝐺 Xrm 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = ((𝐸 / (2 · (𝐶↑2))) − 1)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐷 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ ℕ0) ∧ (𝐺 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐻 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐼 ∈ ℕ0)) ∧ (𝐽 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ (((((𝐷↑2) − (((𝐴↑2) − 1) · (𝐶↑2))) = 1 ∧ ((𝐹↑2) − (((𝐴↑2) − 1) · (𝐸↑2))) = 1 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) ∧ (((𝐼↑2) − (((𝐺↑2) − 1) · (𝐻↑2))) = 1 ∧ 𝐸 = ((𝐽 + 1) · (2 · (𝐶↑2))) ∧ 𝐹 ∥ (𝐺 − 𝐴))) ∧ (((2 · 𝐶) ∥ (𝐺 − 1) ∧ 𝐹 ∥ (𝐻 − 𝐶)) ∧ ((2 · 𝐶) ∥ (𝐻 − 𝐵) ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶))))))
Theorem	jm2.27 42997*	Lemma 2.27 of [JonesMatijasevic] p. 697; rmY is a diophantine relation. 0 was excluded from the range of B and the lower limit of G was imposed because the source proof does not seem to work otherwise; quite possible I'm just missing something. The source proof uses both i and I; i has been changed to j to avoid collision. This theorem is basically nothing but substitution instances, all the work is done in jm2.27a 42994 and jm2.27c 42996. Once Diophantine relations have been defined, the content of the theorem is "rmY is Diophantine". (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐶 = (𝐴 Yrm 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑒 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑓 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑔 ∈ ℕ0 ∃ℎ ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑖 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑗 ∈ ℕ0 (((((𝑑↑2) − (((𝐴↑2) − 1) · (𝐶↑2))) = 1 ∧ ((𝑓↑2) − (((𝐴↑2) − 1) · (𝑒↑2))) = 1 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) ∧ (((𝑖↑2) − (((𝑔↑2) − 1) · (ℎ↑2))) = 1 ∧ 𝑒 = ((𝑗 + 1) · (2 · (𝐶↑2))) ∧ 𝑓 ∥ (𝑔 − 𝐴))) ∧ (((2 · 𝐶) ∥ (𝑔 − 1) ∧ 𝑓 ∥ (ℎ − 𝐶)) ∧ ((2 · 𝐶) ∥ (ℎ − 𝐵) ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶)))))
Theorem	jm2.27dlem1 42998*	Lemma for rmydioph 43003. Substitution of a tuple restriction into a projection that doesn't care. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ (1...𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑎 = (𝑏 ↾ (1...𝐵)) → (𝑎‘𝐴) = (𝑏‘𝐴))
Theorem	jm2.27dlem2 42999	Lemma for rmydioph 43003. This theorem is used along with the next three to efficiently infer steps like 7 ∈ (1...;10). (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ (1...𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐵 + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ (1...𝐶)
Theorem	jm2.27dlem3 43000	Lemma for rmydioph 43003. Infer membership of the endpoint of a range. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ (1...𝐴)