| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 430 of 500) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-30900) |
(30901-32423) |
(32424-49930) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | 2sbcrex 42901* | Exchange an existential quantifier with two substitutions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by NM, 24-Aug-2018.) |
| ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑎][𝐵 / 𝑏]∃𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 [𝐴 / 𝑎][𝐵 / 𝑏]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | sbcrexgOLD 42902* | Interchange class substitution and restricted existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2005.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.) Obsolete as of 18-Aug-2018. Use sbcrex 3822 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | 2sbcrexOLD 42903* | Exchange an existential quantifier with two substitutions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) Obsolete as of 24-Aug-2018. Use csbov123 7396 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑎][𝐵 / 𝑏]∃𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 [𝐴 / 𝑎][𝐵 / 𝑏]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | sbc2rex 42904* | Exchange a substitution with two existentials. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by NM, 24-Aug-2018.) |
| ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑎]∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 [𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | sbc2rexgOLD 42905* | Exchange a substitution with two existentials. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) Obsolete as of 24-Aug-2018. Use csbov123 7396 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑎]∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 [𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | sbc4rex 42906* | Exchange a substitution with four existentials. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by NM, 24-Aug-2018.) |
| ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑎]∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐷 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐷 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 [𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | sbc4rexgOLD 42907* | Exchange a substitution with four existentials. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) Obsolete as of 24-Aug-2018. Use csbov123 7396 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑎]∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐷 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐷 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 [𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | sbcrot3 42908* | Rotate a sequence of three explicit substitutions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑎][𝐵 / 𝑏][𝐶 / 𝑐]𝜑 ↔ [𝐵 / 𝑏][𝐶 / 𝑐][𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | sbcrot5 42909* | Rotate a sequence of five explicit substitutions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑎][𝐵 / 𝑏][𝐶 / 𝑐][𝐷 / 𝑑][𝐸 / 𝑒]𝜑 ↔ [𝐵 / 𝑏][𝐶 / 𝑐][𝐷 / 𝑑][𝐸 / 𝑒][𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | sbccomieg 42910* | Commute two explicit substitutions, using an implicit substitution to rewrite the exiting substitution. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑎][𝐵 / 𝑏]𝜑 ↔ [𝐶 / 𝑏][𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | rexrabdioph 42911* | Diophantine set builder for existential quantification. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑁 + 1) & ⊢ (𝑣 = (𝑡‘𝑀) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑢 = (𝑡 ↾ (1...𝑁)) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜑)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑀)) ∣ 𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑀)) → {𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ ℕ0 𝜓} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | rexfrabdioph 42912* | Diophantine set builder for existential quantifier, explicit substitution. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑁 + 1) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑀)) ∣ [(𝑡 ↾ (1...𝑁)) / 𝑢][(𝑡‘𝑀) / 𝑣]𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑀)) → {𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ ℕ0 𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | 2rexfrabdioph 42913* | Diophantine set builder for existential quantifier, explicit substitution, two variables. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑁 + 1) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑀 + 1) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝐿)) ∣ [(𝑡 ↾ (1...𝑁)) / 𝑢][(𝑡‘𝑀) / 𝑣][(𝑡‘𝐿) / 𝑤]𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝐿)) → {𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑤 ∈ ℕ0 𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | 3rexfrabdioph 42914* | Diophantine set builder for existential quantifier, explicit substitution, two variables. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑁 + 1) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑀 + 1) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐿 + 1) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝐾)) ∣ [(𝑡 ↾ (1...𝑁)) / 𝑢][(𝑡‘𝑀) / 𝑣][(𝑡‘𝐿) / 𝑤][(𝑡‘𝐾) / 𝑥]𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝐾)) → {𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑤 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | 4rexfrabdioph 42915* | Diophantine set builder for existential quantifier, explicit substitution, four variables. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑁 + 1) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑀 + 1) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐿 + 1) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐾 + 1) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝐽)) ∣ [(𝑡 ↾ (1...𝑁)) / 𝑢][(𝑡‘𝑀) / 𝑣][(𝑡‘𝐿) / 𝑤][(𝑡‘𝐾) / 𝑥][(𝑡‘𝐽) / 𝑦]𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝐽)) → {𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑤 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | 6rexfrabdioph 42916* | Diophantine set builder for existential quantifier, explicit substitution, six variables. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑁 + 1) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑀 + 1) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐿 + 1) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐾 + 1) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (𝐽 + 1) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐼 + 1) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝐻)) ∣ [(𝑡 ↾ (1...𝑁)) / 𝑢][(𝑡‘𝑀) / 𝑣][(𝑡‘𝐿) / 𝑤][(𝑡‘𝐾) / 𝑥][(𝑡‘𝐽) / 𝑦][(𝑡‘𝐼) / 𝑧][(𝑡‘𝐻) / 𝑝]𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝐻)) → {𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑤 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑧 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑝 ∈ ℕ0 𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | 7rexfrabdioph 42917* | Diophantine set builder for existential quantifier, explicit substitution, seven variables. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑁 + 1) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑀 + 1) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐿 + 1) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐾 + 1) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (𝐽 + 1) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐼 + 1) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝐻 + 1) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝐺)) ∣ [(𝑡 ↾ (1...𝑁)) / 𝑢][(𝑡‘𝑀) / 𝑣][(𝑡‘𝐿) / 𝑤][(𝑡‘𝐾) / 𝑥][(𝑡‘𝐽) / 𝑦][(𝑡‘𝐼) / 𝑧][(𝑡‘𝐻) / 𝑝][(𝑡‘𝐺) / 𝑞]𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝐺)) → {𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑤 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑧 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑝 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑞 ∈ ℕ0 𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | rabdiophlem1 42918* | Lemma for arithmetic diophantine sets. Convert polynomial-ness of an expression into a constraint suitable for ralimi 3070. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁)) → ∀𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁))𝐴 ∈ ℤ) | ||
| Theorem | rabdiophlem2 42919* | Lemma for arithmetic diophantine sets. Reuse a polynomial expression under a new quantifier. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑁 + 1) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ (𝑢 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁))) → (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑀)) ↦ ⦋(𝑡 ↾ (1...𝑁)) / 𝑢⦌𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑀))) | ||
| Theorem | elnn0rabdioph 42920* | Diophantine set builder for nonnegativity constraints. The first builder which uses a witness variable internally; an expression is nonnegative if there is a nonnegative integer equal to it. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁))) → {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | rexzrexnn0 42921* | Rewrite an existential quantification restricted to integers into an existential quantification restricted to naturals. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = -𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | lerabdioph 42922* | Diophantine set builder for the "less than or equal to" relation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁)) ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐵) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁))) → {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | eluzrabdioph 42923* | Diophantine set builder for membership in a fixed upper set of integers. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁))) → {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | elnnrabdioph 42924* | Diophantine set builder for positivity. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁))) → {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | ltrabdioph 42925* | Diophantine set builder for the strict less than relation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁)) ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐵) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁))) → {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝐴 < 𝐵} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | nerabdioph 42926* | Diophantine set builder for inequality. This not quite trivial theorem touches on something important; Diophantine sets are not closed under negation, but they contain an important subclass that is, namely the recursive sets. With this theorem and De Morgan's laws, all quantifier-free formulas can be negated. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁)) ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐵) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁))) → {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | dvdsrabdioph 42927* | Divisibility is a Diophantine relation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁)) ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐵) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁))) → {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝐴 ∥ 𝐵} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | eldioph4b 42928* | Membership in Dioph expressed using a quantified union to add witness variables instead of a restriction to remove them. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑊 ∈ V & ⊢ ¬ 𝑊 ∈ Fin & ⊢ (𝑊 ∩ ℕ) = ∅ ⇒ ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁) ↔ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ ∃𝑝 ∈ (mzPoly‘(𝑊 ∪ (1...𝑁)))𝑆 = {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m 𝑊)(𝑝‘(𝑡 ∪ 𝑤)) = 0})) | ||
| Theorem | eldioph4i 42929* | Forward-only version of eldioph4b 42928. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑊 ∈ V & ⊢ ¬ 𝑊 ∈ Fin & ⊢ (𝑊 ∩ ℕ) = ∅ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ (mzPoly‘(𝑊 ∪ (1...𝑁)))) → {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m 𝑊)(𝑃‘(𝑡 ∪ 𝑤)) = 0} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | diophren 42930* | Change variables in a Diophantine set, using class notation. This allows already proved Diophantine sets to be reused in contexts with more variables. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐹:(1...𝑁)⟶(1...𝑀)) → {𝑎 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑀)) ∣ (𝑎 ∘ 𝐹) ∈ 𝑆} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑀)) | ||
| Theorem | rabrenfdioph 42931* | Change variable numbers in a Diophantine class abstraction using explicit substitution. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐹:(1...𝐴)⟶(1...𝐵) ∧ {𝑎 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝐴)) ∣ 𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝐴)) → {𝑏 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝐵)) ∣ [(𝑏 ∘ 𝐹) / 𝑎]𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | rabren3dioph 42932* | Change variable numbers in a 3-variable Diophantine class abstraction. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ (((𝑎‘1) = (𝑏‘𝑋) ∧ (𝑎‘2) = (𝑏‘𝑌) ∧ (𝑎‘3) = (𝑏‘𝑍)) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ (1...𝑁) & ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ (1...𝑁) & ⊢ 𝑍 ∈ (1...𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ {𝑎 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...3)) ∣ 𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘3)) → {𝑏 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝜓} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | fphpd 42933* | Pigeonhole principle expressed with implicit substitution. If the range is smaller than the domain, two inputs must be mapped to the same output. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≺ 𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ≠ 𝑦 ∧ 𝐶 = 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | fphpdo 42934* | Pigeonhole principle for sets of real numbers with implicit output reordering. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 12-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ V) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≺ 𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → 𝐶 = 𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ 𝐷 = 𝐸)) | ||
| Theorem | ctbnfien 42935 | An infinite subset of a countable set is countable, without using choice. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ (((𝑋 ≈ ω ∧ 𝑌 ≈ ω) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ Fin)) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝑌) | ||
| Theorem | fiphp3d 42936* | Infinite pigeonhole principle for partitioning an infinite set between finitely many buckets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐷 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝐷 = 𝑦} ≈ ℕ) | ||
| Theorem | rencldnfilem 42937* | Lemma for rencldnfi 42938. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (abs‘(𝑦 − 𝐵)) < 𝑥) → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | rencldnfi 42938* | A set of real numbers which comes arbitrarily close to some target yet excludes it is infinite. The work is done in rencldnfilem 42937 using infima; this theorem removes the requirement that A be nonempty. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (abs‘(𝑦 − 𝐵)) < 𝑥) → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | irrapxlem1 42939* | Lemma for irrapx1 42945. Divides the unit interval into 𝐵 half-open sections and using the pigeonhole principle fphpdo 42934 finds two multiples of 𝐴 in the same section mod 1. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 12-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → ∃𝑥 ∈ (0...𝐵)∃𝑦 ∈ (0...𝐵)(𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ (⌊‘(𝐵 · ((𝐴 · 𝑥) mod 1))) = (⌊‘(𝐵 · ((𝐴 · 𝑦) mod 1))))) | ||
| Theorem | irrapxlem2 42940* | Lemma for irrapx1 42945. Two multiples in the same bucket means they are very close mod 1. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 12-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → ∃𝑥 ∈ (0...𝐵)∃𝑦 ∈ (0...𝐵)(𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ (abs‘(((𝐴 · 𝑥) mod 1) − ((𝐴 · 𝑦) mod 1))) < (1 / 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | irrapxlem3 42941* | Lemma for irrapx1 42945. By subtraction, there is a multiple very close to an integer. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 13-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → ∃𝑥 ∈ (1...𝐵)∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 (abs‘((𝐴 · 𝑥) − 𝑦)) < (1 / 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | irrapxlem4 42942* | Lemma for irrapx1 42945. Eliminate ranges, use positivity of the input to force positivity of the output by increasing 𝐵 as needed. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 13-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ (abs‘((𝐴 · 𝑥) − 𝑦)) < (1 / if(𝑥 ≤ 𝐵, 𝐵, 𝑥))) | ||
| Theorem | irrapxlem5 42943* | Lemma for irrapx1 42945. Switching to real intervals and fraction syntax. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 13-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℚ (0 < 𝑥 ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝐴)) < 𝐵 ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝐴)) < ((denom‘𝑥)↑-2))) | ||
| Theorem | irrapxlem6 42944* | Lemma for irrapx1 42945. Explicit description of a non-closed set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 13-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+) → ∃𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ ℚ ∣ (0 < 𝑦 ∧ (abs‘(𝑦 − 𝐴)) < ((denom‘𝑦)↑-2))} (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝐴)) < 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | irrapx1 42945* | Dirichlet's approximation theorem. Every positive irrational number has infinitely many rational approximations which are closer than the inverse squares of their reduced denominators. Lemma 61 in [vandenDries] p. 42. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 14-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℝ+ ∖ ℚ) → {𝑦 ∈ ℚ ∣ (0 < 𝑦 ∧ (abs‘(𝑦 − 𝐴)) < ((denom‘𝑦)↑-2))} ≈ ℕ) | ||
| Theorem | pellexlem1 42946 | Lemma for pellex 42952. Arithmetical core of pellexlem3, norm lower bound. This begins Dirichlet's proof of the Pell equation solution existence; the proof here follows theorem 62 of [vandenDries] p. 43. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 14-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐷 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) ∧ ¬ (√‘𝐷) ∈ ℚ) → ((𝐴↑2) − (𝐷 · (𝐵↑2))) ≠ 0) | ||
| Theorem | pellexlem2 42947 | Lemma for pellex 42952. Arithmetical core of pellexlem3, norm upper bound. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 14-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐷 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) ∧ (abs‘((𝐴 / 𝐵) − (√‘𝐷))) < (𝐵↑-2)) → (abs‘((𝐴↑2) − (𝐷 · (𝐵↑2)))) < (1 + (2 · (√‘𝐷)))) | ||
| Theorem | pellexlem3 42948* | Lemma for pellex 42952. To each good rational approximation of (√‘𝐷), there exists a near-solution. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 14-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐷 ∈ ℕ ∧ ¬ (√‘𝐷) ∈ ℚ) → {𝑥 ∈ ℚ ∣ (0 < 𝑥 ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − (√‘𝐷))) < ((denom‘𝑥)↑-2))} ≼ {〈𝑦, 𝑧〉 ∣ ((𝑦 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ℕ) ∧ (((𝑦↑2) − (𝐷 · (𝑧↑2))) ≠ 0 ∧ (abs‘((𝑦↑2) − (𝐷 · (𝑧↑2)))) < (1 + (2 · (√‘𝐷)))))}) | ||
| Theorem | pellexlem4 42949* | Lemma for pellex 42952. Invoking irrapx1 42945, we have infinitely many near-solutions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 14-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐷 ∈ ℕ ∧ ¬ (√‘𝐷) ∈ ℚ) → {〈𝑦, 𝑧〉 ∣ ((𝑦 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ℕ) ∧ (((𝑦↑2) − (𝐷 · (𝑧↑2))) ≠ 0 ∧ (abs‘((𝑦↑2) − (𝐷 · (𝑧↑2)))) < (1 + (2 · (√‘𝐷)))))} ≈ ℕ) | ||
| Theorem | pellexlem5 42950* | Lemma for pellex 42952. Invoking fiphp3d 42936, we have infinitely many near-solutions for some specific norm. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐷 ∈ ℕ ∧ ¬ (√‘𝐷) ∈ ℚ) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ (𝑥 ≠ 0 ∧ {〈𝑦, 𝑧〉 ∣ ((𝑦 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ℕ) ∧ ((𝑦↑2) − (𝐷 · (𝑧↑2))) = 𝑥)} ≈ ℕ)) | ||
| Theorem | pellexlem6 42951* | Lemma for pellex 42952. Doing a field division between near solutions get us to norm 1, and the modularity constraint ensures we still have an integer. Returning NN guarantees that we are not returning the trivial solution (1,0). We are not explicitly defining the Pell-field, Pell-ring, and Pell-norm explicitly because after this construction is done we will never use them. This is mostly basic algebraic number theory and could be simplified if a generic framework for that were in place. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (√‘𝐷) ∈ ℚ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴 = 𝐸 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐹)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑2) − (𝐷 · (𝐵↑2))) = 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐸↑2) − (𝐷 · (𝐹↑2))) = 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 mod (abs‘𝐶)) = (𝐸 mod (abs‘𝐶))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 mod (abs‘𝐶)) = (𝐹 mod (abs‘𝐶))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑎 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑏 ∈ ℕ ((𝑎↑2) − (𝐷 · (𝑏↑2))) = 1) | ||
| Theorem | pellex 42952* | Every Pell equation has a nontrivial solution. Theorem 62 in [vandenDries] p. 43. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐷 ∈ ℕ ∧ ¬ (√‘𝐷) ∈ ℚ) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ ((𝑥↑2) − (𝐷 · (𝑦↑2))) = 1) | ||
| Syntax | csquarenn 42953 | Extend class notation to include the set of square positive integers. |
| class ◻NN | ||
| Syntax | cpell1qr 42954 | Extend class notation to include the class of quadrant-1 Pell solutions. |
| class Pell1QR | ||
| Syntax | cpell1234qr 42955 | Extend class notation to include the class of any-quadrant Pell solutions. |
| class Pell1234QR | ||
| Syntax | cpell14qr 42956 | Extend class notation to include the class of positive Pell solutions. |
| class Pell14QR | ||
| Syntax | cpellfund 42957 | Extend class notation to include the Pell-equation fundamental solution function. |
| class PellFund | ||
| Definition | df-squarenn 42958 | Define the set of square positive integers. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ ◻NN = {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ (√‘𝑥) ∈ ℚ} | ||
| Definition | df-pell1qr 42959* | Define the solutions of a Pell equation in the first quadrant. To avoid pair pain, we represent this via the canonical embedding into the reals. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ Pell1QR = (𝑥 ∈ (ℕ ∖ ◻NN) ↦ {𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑤 ∈ ℕ0 (𝑦 = (𝑧 + ((√‘𝑥) · 𝑤)) ∧ ((𝑧↑2) − (𝑥 · (𝑤↑2))) = 1)}) | ||
| Definition | df-pell14qr 42960* | Define the positive solutions of a Pell equation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ Pell14QR = (𝑥 ∈ (ℕ ∖ ◻NN) ↦ {𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ (𝑦 = (𝑧 + ((√‘𝑥) · 𝑤)) ∧ ((𝑧↑2) − (𝑥 · (𝑤↑2))) = 1)}) | ||
| Definition | df-pell1234qr 42961* | Define the general solutions of a Pell equation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ Pell1234QR = (𝑥 ∈ (ℕ ∖ ◻NN) ↦ {𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ (𝑦 = (𝑧 + ((√‘𝑥) · 𝑤)) ∧ ((𝑧↑2) − (𝑥 · (𝑤↑2))) = 1)}) | ||
| Definition | df-pellfund 42962* | A function mapping Pell discriminants to the corresponding fundamental solution. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Sep-2014.) (Revised by AV, 17-Sep-2020.) |
| ⊢ PellFund = (𝑥 ∈ (ℕ ∖ ◻NN) ↦ inf({𝑧 ∈ (Pell14QR‘𝑥) ∣ 1 < 𝑧}, ℝ, < )) | ||
| Theorem | pell1qrval 42963* | Value of the set of first-quadrant Pell solutions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (ℕ ∖ ◻NN) → (Pell1QR‘𝐷) = {𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑤 ∈ ℕ0 (𝑦 = (𝑧 + ((√‘𝐷) · 𝑤)) ∧ ((𝑧↑2) − (𝐷 · (𝑤↑2))) = 1)}) | ||
| Theorem | elpell1qr 42964* | Membership in a first-quadrant Pell solution set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (ℕ ∖ ◻NN) → (𝐴 ∈ (Pell1QR‘𝐷) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑤 ∈ ℕ0 (𝐴 = (𝑧 + ((√‘𝐷) · 𝑤)) ∧ ((𝑧↑2) − (𝐷 · (𝑤↑2))) = 1)))) | ||
| Theorem | pell14qrval 42965* | Value of the set of positive Pell solutions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (ℕ ∖ ◻NN) → (Pell14QR‘𝐷) = {𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ (𝑦 = (𝑧 + ((√‘𝐷) · 𝑤)) ∧ ((𝑧↑2) − (𝐷 · (𝑤↑2))) = 1)}) | ||
| Theorem | elpell14qr 42966* | Membership in the set of positive Pell solutions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (ℕ ∖ ◻NN) → (𝐴 ∈ (Pell14QR‘𝐷) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ (𝐴 = (𝑧 + ((√‘𝐷) · 𝑤)) ∧ ((𝑧↑2) − (𝐷 · (𝑤↑2))) = 1)))) | ||
| Theorem | pell1234qrval 42967* | Value of the set of general Pell solutions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (ℕ ∖ ◻NN) → (Pell1234QR‘𝐷) = {𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ (𝑦 = (𝑧 + ((√‘𝐷) · 𝑤)) ∧ ((𝑧↑2) − (𝐷 · (𝑤↑2))) = 1)}) | ||
| Theorem | elpell1234qr 42968* | Membership in the set of general Pell solutions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (ℕ ∖ ◻NN) → (𝐴 ∈ (Pell1234QR‘𝐷) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ (𝐴 = (𝑧 + ((√‘𝐷) · 𝑤)) ∧ ((𝑧↑2) − (𝐷 · (𝑤↑2))) = 1)))) | ||
| Theorem | pell1234qrre 42969 | General Pell solutions are (coded as) real numbers. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐷 ∈ (ℕ ∖ ◻NN) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (Pell1234QR‘𝐷)) → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) | ||
| Theorem | pell1234qrne0 42970 | No solution to a Pell equation is zero. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐷 ∈ (ℕ ∖ ◻NN) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (Pell1234QR‘𝐷)) → 𝐴 ≠ 0) | ||
| Theorem | pell1234qrreccl 42971 | General solutions of the Pell equation are closed under reciprocals. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐷 ∈ (ℕ ∖ ◻NN) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (Pell1234QR‘𝐷)) → (1 / 𝐴) ∈ (Pell1234QR‘𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | pell1234qrmulcl 42972 | General solutions of the Pell equation are closed under multiplication. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐷 ∈ (ℕ ∖ ◻NN) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (Pell1234QR‘𝐷) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (Pell1234QR‘𝐷)) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ (Pell1234QR‘𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | pell14qrss1234 42973 | A positive Pell solution is a general Pell solution. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (ℕ ∖ ◻NN) → (Pell14QR‘𝐷) ⊆ (Pell1234QR‘𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | pell14qrre 42974 | A positive Pell solution is a real number. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐷 ∈ (ℕ ∖ ◻NN) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (Pell14QR‘𝐷)) → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) | ||
| Theorem | pell14qrne0 42975 | A positive Pell solution is a nonzero number. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐷 ∈ (ℕ ∖ ◻NN) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (Pell14QR‘𝐷)) → 𝐴 ≠ 0) | ||
| Theorem | pell14qrgt0 42976 | A positive Pell solution is a positive number. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐷 ∈ (ℕ ∖ ◻NN) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (Pell14QR‘𝐷)) → 0 < 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | pell14qrrp 42977 | A positive Pell solution is a positive real. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐷 ∈ (ℕ ∖ ◻NN) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (Pell14QR‘𝐷)) → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+) | ||
| Theorem | pell1234qrdich 42978 | A general Pell solution is either a positive solution, or its negation is. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐷 ∈ (ℕ ∖ ◻NN) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (Pell1234QR‘𝐷)) → (𝐴 ∈ (Pell14QR‘𝐷) ∨ -𝐴 ∈ (Pell14QR‘𝐷))) | ||
| Theorem | elpell14qr2 42979 | A number is a positive Pell solution iff it is positive and a Pell solution, justifying our name choice. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (ℕ ∖ ◻NN) → (𝐴 ∈ (Pell14QR‘𝐷) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ (Pell1234QR‘𝐷) ∧ 0 < 𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | pell14qrmulcl 42980 | Positive Pell solutions are closed under multiplication. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐷 ∈ (ℕ ∖ ◻NN) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (Pell14QR‘𝐷) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (Pell14QR‘𝐷)) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ (Pell14QR‘𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | pell14qrreccl 42981 | Positive Pell solutions are closed under reciprocal. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐷 ∈ (ℕ ∖ ◻NN) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (Pell14QR‘𝐷)) → (1 / 𝐴) ∈ (Pell14QR‘𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | pell14qrdivcl 42982 | Positive Pell solutions are closed under division. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐷 ∈ (ℕ ∖ ◻NN) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (Pell14QR‘𝐷) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (Pell14QR‘𝐷)) → (𝐴 / 𝐵) ∈ (Pell14QR‘𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | pell14qrexpclnn0 42983 | Lemma for pell14qrexpcl 42984. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐷 ∈ (ℕ ∖ ◻NN) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (Pell14QR‘𝐷) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐴↑𝐵) ∈ (Pell14QR‘𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | pell14qrexpcl 42984 | Positive Pell solutions are closed under integer powers. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐷 ∈ (ℕ ∖ ◻NN) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (Pell14QR‘𝐷) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐴↑𝐵) ∈ (Pell14QR‘𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | pell1qrss14 42985 | First-quadrant Pell solutions are a subset of the positive solutions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (ℕ ∖ ◻NN) → (Pell1QR‘𝐷) ⊆ (Pell14QR‘𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | pell14qrdich 42986 | A positive Pell solution is either in the first quadrant, or its reciprocal is. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐷 ∈ (ℕ ∖ ◻NN) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (Pell14QR‘𝐷)) → (𝐴 ∈ (Pell1QR‘𝐷) ∨ (1 / 𝐴) ∈ (Pell1QR‘𝐷))) | ||
| Theorem | pell1qrge1 42987 | A Pell solution in the first quadrant is at least 1. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐷 ∈ (ℕ ∖ ◻NN) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (Pell1QR‘𝐷)) → 1 ≤ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | pell1qr1 42988 | 1 is a Pell solution and in the first quadrant as one. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (ℕ ∖ ◻NN) → 1 ∈ (Pell1QR‘𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | elpell1qr2 42989 | The first quadrant solutions are precisely the positive Pell solutions which are at least one. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (ℕ ∖ ◻NN) → (𝐴 ∈ (Pell1QR‘𝐷) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ (Pell14QR‘𝐷) ∧ 1 ≤ 𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | pell1qrgaplem 42990 | Lemma for pell1qrgap 42991. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐷 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0)) ∧ (1 < (𝐴 + ((√‘𝐷) · 𝐵)) ∧ ((𝐴↑2) − (𝐷 · (𝐵↑2))) = 1)) → ((√‘(𝐷 + 1)) + (√‘𝐷)) ≤ (𝐴 + ((√‘𝐷) · 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | pell1qrgap 42991 | First-quadrant Pell solutions are bounded away from 1. (This particular bound allows to prove exact values for the fundamental solution later.) (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐷 ∈ (ℕ ∖ ◻NN) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (Pell1QR‘𝐷) ∧ 1 < 𝐴) → ((√‘(𝐷 + 1)) + (√‘𝐷)) ≤ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | pell14qrgap 42992 | Positive Pell solutions are bounded away from 1. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐷 ∈ (ℕ ∖ ◻NN) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (Pell14QR‘𝐷) ∧ 1 < 𝐴) → ((√‘(𝐷 + 1)) + (√‘𝐷)) ≤ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | pell14qrgapw 42993 | Positive Pell solutions are bounded away from 1, with a friendlier bound. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐷 ∈ (ℕ ∖ ◻NN) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (Pell14QR‘𝐷) ∧ 1 < 𝐴) → 2 < 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | pellqrexplicit 42994 | Condition for a calculated real to be a Pell solution. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐷 ∈ (ℕ ∖ ◻NN) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0) ∧ ((𝐴↑2) − (𝐷 · (𝐵↑2))) = 1) → (𝐴 + ((√‘𝐷) · 𝐵)) ∈ (Pell1QR‘𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | infmrgelbi 42995* | Any lower bound of a nonempty set of real numbers is less than or equal to its infimum, one-direction version. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Sep-2013.) (Revised by AV, 17-Sep-2020.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ≤ 𝑥) → 𝐵 ≤ inf(𝐴, ℝ, < )) | ||
| Theorem | pellqrex 42996* | There is a nontrivial solution of a Pell equation in the first quadrant. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (ℕ ∖ ◻NN) → ∃𝑥 ∈ (Pell1QR‘𝐷)1 < 𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | pellfundval 42997* | Value of the fundamental solution of a Pell equation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Sep-2014.) (Revised by AV, 17-Sep-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (ℕ ∖ ◻NN) → (PellFund‘𝐷) = inf({𝑥 ∈ (Pell14QR‘𝐷) ∣ 1 < 𝑥}, ℝ, < )) | ||
| Theorem | pellfundre 42998 | The fundamental solution of a Pell equation exists as a real number. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (ℕ ∖ ◻NN) → (PellFund‘𝐷) ∈ ℝ) | ||
| Theorem | pellfundge 42999 | Lower bound on the fundamental solution of a Pell equation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (ℕ ∖ ◻NN) → ((√‘(𝐷 + 1)) + (√‘𝐷)) ≤ (PellFund‘𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | pellfundgt1 43000 | Weak lower bound on the Pell fundamental solution. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (ℕ ∖ ◻NN) → 1 < (PellFund‘𝐷)) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |