![]() |
Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > oprabbid | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Equivalent wff's yield equal operation class abstractions (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 21-Feb-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2014.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
oprabbid.1 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 |
oprabbid.2 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 |
oprabbid.3 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑 |
oprabbid.4 | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
oprabbid | ⊢ (𝜑 → {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} = {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜒}) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | oprabbid.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 | |
2 | oprabbid.2 | . . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 | |
3 | oprabbid.3 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑 | |
4 | oprabbid.4 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) | |
5 | 4 | anbi2d 631 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑤 = 〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑤 = 〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∧ 𝜒))) |
6 | 3, 5 | exbid 2223 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑧(𝑤 = 〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ∃𝑧(𝑤 = 〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∧ 𝜒))) |
7 | 2, 6 | exbid 2223 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = 〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = 〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∧ 𝜒))) |
8 | 1, 7 | exbid 2223 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = 〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = 〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∧ 𝜒))) |
9 | 8 | abbidv 2862 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = 〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∧ 𝜓)} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = 〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∧ 𝜒)}) |
10 | df-oprab 7139 | . 2 ⊢ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = 〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∧ 𝜓)} | |
11 | df-oprab 7139 | . 2 ⊢ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜒} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = 〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∧ 𝜒)} | |
12 | 9, 10, 11 | 3eqtr4g 2858 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} = {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜒}) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 209 ∧ wa 399 = wceq 1538 ∃wex 1781 Ⅎwnf 1785 {cab 2776 〈cop 4531 {coprab 7136 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1797 ax-4 1811 ax-5 1911 ax-6 1970 ax-7 2015 ax-9 2121 ax-12 2175 ax-ext 2770 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 400 df-ex 1782 df-nf 1786 df-sb 2070 df-clab 2777 df-cleq 2791 df-oprab 7139 |
This theorem is referenced by: oprabbidv 7199 mpoeq123 7205 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |