MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  oprabbid Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem oprabbid 7211
Description: Equivalent wff's yield equal operation class abstractions (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 21-Feb-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2014.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
oprabbid.1 𝑥𝜑
oprabbid.2 𝑦𝜑
oprabbid.3 𝑧𝜑
oprabbid.4 (𝜑 → (𝜓𝜒))
Assertion
Ref Expression
oprabbid (𝜑 → {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓} = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜒})
Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑧   𝑦,𝑧
Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)   𝜒(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)

Proof of Theorem oprabbid
Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 oprabbid.1 . . . 4 𝑥𝜑
2 oprabbid.2 . . . . 5 𝑦𝜑
3 oprabbid.3 . . . . . 6 𝑧𝜑
4 oprabbid.4 . . . . . . 7 (𝜑 → (𝜓𝜒))
54anbi2d 628 . . . . . 6 (𝜑 → ((𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜒)))
63, 5exbid 2218 . . . . 5 (𝜑 → (∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜒)))
72, 6exbid 2218 . . . 4 (𝜑 → (∃𝑦𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ∃𝑦𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜒)))
81, 7exbid 2218 . . 3 (𝜑 → (∃𝑥𝑦𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ∃𝑥𝑦𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜒)))
98abbidv 2890 . 2 (𝜑 → {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑦𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑦𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜒)})
10 df-oprab 7152 . 2 {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑦𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)}
11 df-oprab 7152 . 2 {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜒} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑦𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜒)}
129, 10, 113eqtr4g 2886 1 (𝜑 → {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓} = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜒})
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wb 207  wa 396   = wceq 1530  wex 1773  wnf 1777  {cab 2804  cop 4570  {coprab 7149
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1789  ax-4 1803  ax-5 1904  ax-6 1963  ax-7 2008  ax-9 2117  ax-12 2169  ax-ext 2798
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 208  df-an 397  df-ex 1774  df-nf 1778  df-sb 2063  df-clab 2805  df-cleq 2819  df-oprab 7152
This theorem is referenced by:  oprabbidv  7212  mpoeq123  7218
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator