![]() |
Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 75 of 454) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Color key: | ![]() (1-28701) |
![]() (28702-30224) |
![]() (30225-45333) |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Theorem | offval2f 7401* | The function operation expressed as a mapping. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Jun-2017.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐵𝑅𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | ofmresval 7402 | Value of a restriction of the function operation map. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹( ∘f 𝑅 ↾ (𝐴 × 𝐵))𝐺) = (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺)) | ||
Theorem | fnfvof 7403 | Function value of a pointwise composition. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jun-2015.) |
⊢ (((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐺 Fn 𝐴) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺)‘𝑋) = ((𝐹‘𝑋)𝑅(𝐺‘𝑋))) | ||
Theorem | off 7404* | The function operation produces a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jul-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇)) → (𝑥𝑅𝑦) ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝑇) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺):𝐶⟶𝑈) | ||
Theorem | ofres 7405 | Restrict the operands of a function operation to the same domain as that of the operation itself. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺) = ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐶) ∘f 𝑅(𝐺 ↾ 𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | offval2 7406* | The function operation expressed as a mapping. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jul-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐵𝑅𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | ofrfval2 7407* | The function relation acting on maps. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jul-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘r 𝑅𝐺 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵𝑅𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | ofmpteq 7408* | Value of a pointwise operation on two functions defined using maps-to notation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) Fn 𝐴 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) Fn 𝐴) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∘f 𝑅(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶)) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐵𝑅𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | ofco 7409 | The composition of a function operation with another function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Dec-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝐷⟶𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺) ∘ 𝐻) = ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻) ∘f 𝑅(𝐺 ∘ 𝐻))) | ||
Theorem | offveq 7410* | Convert an identity of the operation to the analogous identity on the function operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jul-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 Fn 𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐺‘𝑥) = 𝐶) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐵𝑅𝐶) = (𝐻‘𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺) = 𝐻) | ||
Theorem | offveqb 7411* | Equivalent expressions for equality with a function operation. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 5-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 Fn 𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐺‘𝑥) = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻 = (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐵𝑅𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | ofc1 7412 | Left operation by a constant. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jul-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (((𝐴 × {𝐵}) ∘f 𝑅𝐹)‘𝑋) = (𝐵𝑅𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | ofc2 7413 | Right operation by a constant. (Contributed by NM, 7-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐹 ∘f 𝑅(𝐴 × {𝐵}))‘𝑋) = (𝐶𝑅𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | ofc12 7414 | Function operation on two constant functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 × {𝐵}) ∘f 𝑅(𝐴 × {𝐶})) = (𝐴 × {(𝐵𝑅𝐶)})) | ||
Theorem | caofref 7415* | Transfer a reflexive law to the function relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝑥𝑅𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∘r 𝑅𝐹) | ||
Theorem | caofinvl 7416* | Transfer a left inverse law to the function operation. (Contributed by NM, 22-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁:𝑆⟶𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝑁‘(𝐹‘𝑣)))) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝑁‘𝑥)𝑅𝑥) = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘f 𝑅𝐹) = (𝐴 × {𝐵})) | ||
Theorem | caofid0l 7417* | Transfer a left identity law to the function operation. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐵𝑅𝑥) = 𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 × {𝐵}) ∘f 𝑅𝐹) = 𝐹) | ||
Theorem | caofid0r 7418* | Transfer a right identity law to the function operation. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑥𝑅𝐵) = 𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅(𝐴 × {𝐵})) = 𝐹) | ||
Theorem | caofid1 7419* | Transfer a right absorption law to the function operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑥𝑅𝐵) = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅(𝐴 × {𝐵})) = (𝐴 × {𝐶})) | ||
Theorem | caofid2 7420* | Transfer a right absorption law to the function operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐵𝑅𝑥) = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 × {𝐵}) ∘f 𝑅𝐹) = (𝐴 × {𝐶})) | ||
Theorem | caofcom 7421* | Transfer a commutative law to the function operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jul-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝑅𝑦) = (𝑦𝑅𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺) = (𝐺 ∘f 𝑅𝐹)) | ||
Theorem | caofrss 7422* | Transfer a relation subset law to the function relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥𝑇𝑦)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘r 𝑅𝐺 → 𝐹 ∘r 𝑇𝐺)) | ||
Theorem | caofass 7423* | Transfer an associative law to the function operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jul-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝑅𝑦)𝑇𝑧) = (𝑥𝑂(𝑦𝑃𝑧))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺) ∘f 𝑇𝐻) = (𝐹 ∘f 𝑂(𝐺 ∘f 𝑃𝐻))) | ||
Theorem | caoftrn 7424* | Transfer a transitivity law to the function relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑇𝑧) → 𝑥𝑈𝑧)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∘r 𝑅𝐺 ∧ 𝐺 ∘r 𝑇𝐻) → 𝐹 ∘r 𝑈𝐻)) | ||
Theorem | caofdi 7425* | Transfer a distributive law to the function operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jul-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝑇(𝑦𝑅𝑧)) = ((𝑥𝑇𝑦)𝑂(𝑥𝑇𝑧))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘f 𝑇(𝐺 ∘f 𝑅𝐻)) = ((𝐹 ∘f 𝑇𝐺) ∘f 𝑂(𝐹 ∘f 𝑇𝐻))) | ||
Theorem | caofdir 7426* | Transfer a reverse distributive law to the function operation. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐾)) → ((𝑥𝑅𝑦)𝑇𝑧) = ((𝑥𝑇𝑧)𝑂(𝑦𝑇𝑧))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐺 ∘f 𝑅𝐻) ∘f 𝑇𝐹) = ((𝐺 ∘f 𝑇𝐹) ∘f 𝑂(𝐻 ∘f 𝑇𝐹))) | ||
Theorem | caonncan 7427* | Transfer nncan 10904-shaped laws to vectors of numbers. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 27-Mar-2015.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴:𝐼⟶𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵:𝐼⟶𝑆) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝑀(𝑥𝑀𝑦)) = 𝑦) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∘f 𝑀(𝐴 ∘f 𝑀𝐵)) = 𝐵) | ||
Syntax | crpss 7428 | Extend class notation to include the reified proper subset relation. |
class [⊊] | ||
Definition | df-rpss 7429* | Define a relation which corresponds to proper subsethood df-pss 3900 on sets. This allows us to use proper subsethood with general concepts that require relations, such as strict ordering, see sorpss 7434. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ [⊊] = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝑥 ⊊ 𝑦} | ||
Theorem | relrpss 7430 | The proper subset relation is a relation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ Rel [⊊] | ||
Theorem | brrpssg 7431 | The proper subset relation on sets is the same as class proper subsethood. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 [⊊] 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | brrpss 7432 | The proper subset relation on sets is the same as class proper subsethood. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 [⊊] 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | porpss 7433 | Every class is partially ordered by proper subsets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ [⊊] Po 𝐴 | ||
Theorem | sorpss 7434* | Express strict ordering under proper subsets, i.e. the notion of a chain of sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ ( [⊊] Or 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥)) | ||
Theorem | sorpssi 7435 | Property of a chain of sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ (( [⊊] Or 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ∨ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | sorpssun 7436 | A chain of sets is closed under binary union. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-May-2015.) |
⊢ (( [⊊] Or 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ∈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | sorpssin 7437 | A chain of sets is closed under binary intersection. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-May-2015.) |
⊢ (( [⊊] Or 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) ∈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | sorpssuni 7438* | In a chain of sets, a maximal element is the union of the chain. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ ( [⊊] Or 𝑌 → (∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑌 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑌 ¬ 𝑢 ⊊ 𝑣 ↔ ∪ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑌)) | ||
Theorem | sorpssint 7439* | In a chain of sets, a minimal element is the intersection of the chain. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ ( [⊊] Or 𝑌 → (∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑌 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑌 ¬ 𝑣 ⊊ 𝑢 ↔ ∩ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑌)) | ||
Theorem | sorpsscmpl 7440* | The componentwise complement of a chain of sets is also a chain of sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ ( [⊊] Or 𝑌 → [⊊] Or {𝑢 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ∣ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑢) ∈ 𝑌}) | ||
Axiom | ax-un 7441* |
Axiom of Union. An axiom of Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory. It states
that a set 𝑦 exists that includes the union of a
given set 𝑥
i.e. the collection of all members of the members of 𝑥. The
variant axun2 7443 states that the union itself exists. A
version with the
standard abbreviation for union is uniex2 7444. A version using class
notation is uniex 7447.
The union of a class df-uni 4801 should not be confused with the union of two classes df-un 3886. Their relationship is shown in unipr 4817. (Contributed by NM, 23-Dec-1993.) |
⊢ ∃𝑦∀𝑧(∃𝑤(𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦) | ||
Theorem | zfun 7442* | Axiom of Union expressed with the fewest number of different variables. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-2003.) Use ax-un 7441 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ∃𝑥∀𝑦(∃𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) | ||
Theorem | axun2 7443* | A variant of the Axiom of Union ax-un 7441. For any set 𝑥, there exists a set 𝑦 whose members are exactly the members of the members of 𝑥 i.e. the union of 𝑥. Axiom Union of [BellMachover] p. 466. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2006.) |
⊢ ∃𝑦∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑤(𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥)) | ||
Theorem | uniex2 7444* | The Axiom of Union using the standard abbreviation for union. Given any set 𝑥, its union 𝑦 exists. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2006.) |
⊢ ∃𝑦 𝑦 = ∪ 𝑥 | ||
Theorem | vuniex 7445 | The union of a setvar is a set. (Contributed by BJ, 3-May-2021.) (Revised by BJ, 6-Apr-2024.) |
⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ V | ||
Theorem | uniexg 7446 | The ZF Axiom of Union in class notation, in the form of a theorem instead of an inference. We use the antecedent 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 instead of 𝐴 ∈ V to make the theorem more general and thus shorten some proofs; obviously the universal class constant V is one possible substitution for class variable 𝑉. (Contributed by NM, 25-Nov-1994.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | uniex 7447 | The Axiom of Union in class notation. This says that if 𝐴 is a set i.e. 𝐴 ∈ V (see isset 3453), then the union of 𝐴 is also a set. Same as Axiom 3 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 16. (Contributed by NM, 11-Aug-1993.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ∪ 𝐴 ∈ V | ||
Theorem | uniexd 7448 | Deduction version of the ZF Axiom of Union in class notation. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 26-Jun-2021.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | unex 7449 | The union of two sets is a set. Corollary 5.8 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 16. (Contributed by NM, 1-Jul-1994.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ V | ||
Theorem | tpex 7450 | An unordered triple of classes exists. (Contributed by NM, 10-Apr-1994.) |
⊢ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} ∈ V | ||
Theorem | unexb 7451 | Existence of union is equivalent to existence of its components. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-1998.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) ↔ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | unexg 7452 | A union of two sets is a set. Corollary 5.8 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 16. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2006.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | xpexg 7453 | The Cartesian product of two sets is a set. Proposition 6.2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 23. See also xpexgALT 7664. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1994.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | xpexd 7454 | The Cartesian product of two sets is a set. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 26-Jun-2021.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | 3xpexg 7455 | The Cartesian product of three sets is a set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 21-Feb-2018.) |
⊢ (𝑉 ∈ 𝑊 → ((𝑉 × 𝑉) × 𝑉) ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | xpex 7456 | The Cartesian product of two sets is a set. Proposition 6.2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 23. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1994.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∈ V | ||
Theorem | sqxpexg 7457 | The Cartesian square of a set is a set. (Contributed by AV, 13-Jan-2020.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 × 𝐴) ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | abnexg 7458* | Sufficient condition for a class abstraction to be a proper class. The class 𝐹 can be thought of as an expression in 𝑥 and the abstraction appearing in the statement as the class of values 𝐹 as 𝑥 varies through 𝐴. Assuming the antecedents, if that class is a set, then so is the "domain" 𝐴. The converse holds without antecedent, see abrexexg 7644. Note that the second antecedent ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝑥 ∈ 𝐹 cannot be translated to 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐹 since 𝐹 may depend on 𝑥. In applications, one may take 𝐹 = {𝑥} or 𝐹 = 𝒫 𝑥 (see snnex 7460 and pwnex 7461 respectively, proved from abnex 7459, which is a consequence of abnexg 7458 with 𝐴 = V). (Contributed by BJ, 2-Dec-2021.) |
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐹) → ({𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 = 𝐹} ∈ 𝑊 → 𝐴 ∈ V)) | ||
Theorem | abnex 7459* | Sufficient condition for a class abstraction to be a proper class. Lemma for snnex 7460 and pwnex 7461. See the comment of abnexg 7458. (Contributed by BJ, 2-May-2021.) |
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐹) → ¬ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 𝑦 = 𝐹} ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | snnex 7460* | The class of all singletons is a proper class. See also pwnex 7461. (Contributed by NM, 10-Oct-2008.) (Proof shortened by Eric Schmidt, 7-Dec-2008.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 5-Dec-2021.) |
⊢ {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦 𝑥 = {𝑦}} ∉ V | ||
Theorem | pwnex 7461* | The class of all power sets is a proper class. See also snnex 7460. (Contributed by BJ, 2-May-2021.) |
⊢ {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦 𝑥 = 𝒫 𝑦} ∉ V | ||
Theorem | difex2 7462 | If the subtrahend of a class difference exists, then the minuend exists iff the difference exists. (Contributed by NM, 12-Nov-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 12-Aug-2011.) |
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∈ V)) | ||
Theorem | difsnexi 7463 | If the difference of a class and a singleton is a set, the class itself is a set. (Contributed by AV, 15-Jan-2019.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∖ {𝐾}) ∈ V → 𝑁 ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | uniuni 7464* | Expression for double union that moves union into a class abstraction. (Contributed by FL, 28-May-2007.) |
⊢ ∪ ∪ 𝐴 = ∪ {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑥 = ∪ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)} | ||
Theorem | uniexr 7465 | Converse of the Axiom of Union. Note that it does not require ax-un 7441. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-2003.) |
⊢ (∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | uniexb 7466 | The Axiom of Union and its converse. A class is a set iff its union is a set. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-2003.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ ∪ 𝐴 ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | pwexr 7467 | Converse of the Axiom of Power Sets. Note that it does not require ax-pow 5231. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-2003.) |
⊢ (𝒫 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | pwexb 7468 | The Axiom of Power Sets and its converse. A class is a set iff its power class is a set. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-2003.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ 𝒫 𝐴 ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | elpwpwel 7469 | A class belongs to a double power class if and only if its union belongs to the power class. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jan-2023.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 𝒫 𝐵 ↔ ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | eldifpw 7470 | Membership in a power class difference. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-2007.) |
⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐶) ∈ (𝒫 (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ∖ 𝒫 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | elpwun 7471 | Membership in the power class of a union. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-2007.) |
⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐶) ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | pwuncl 7472 | Power classes are closed under union. (Contributed by AV, 27-Feb-2024.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ 𝒫 𝑋) | ||
Theorem | iunpw 7473* | An indexed union of a power class in terms of the power class of the union of its index. Part of Exercise 24(b) of [Enderton] p. 33. (Contributed by NM, 29-Nov-2003.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = ∪ 𝐴 ↔ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐴 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝒫 𝑥) | ||
Theorem | fr3nr 7474 | A well-founded relation has no 3-cycle loops. Special case of Proposition 6.23 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 30. (Contributed by NM, 10-Apr-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jun-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → ¬ (𝐵𝑅𝐶 ∧ 𝐶𝑅𝐷 ∧ 𝐷𝑅𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | epne3 7475 | A well-founded class contains no 3-cycle loops. (Contributed by NM, 19-Apr-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jun-2015.) |
⊢ (( E Fr 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → ¬ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | dfwe2 7476* | Alternate definition of well-ordering. Definition 6.24(2) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 30. (Contributed by NM, 16-Mar-1997.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 12-Aug-2011.) |
⊢ (𝑅 We 𝐴 ↔ (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))) | ||
Theorem | epweon 7477 | The membership relation well-orders the class of ordinal numbers. This proof does not require the axiom of regularity. Proposition 4.8(g) of [Mendelson] p. 244. (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2003.) |
⊢ E We On | ||
Theorem | ordon 7478 | The class of all ordinal numbers is ordinal. Proposition 7.12 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 38, but without using the Axiom of Regularity. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1994.) |
⊢ Ord On | ||
Theorem | onprc 7479 | No set contains all ordinal numbers. Proposition 7.13 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 38, but without using the Axiom of Regularity. This is also known as the Burali-Forti paradox (remark in [Enderton] p. 194). In 1897, Cesare Burali-Forti noticed that since the "set" of all ordinal numbers is an ordinal class (ordon 7478), it must be both an element of the set of all ordinal numbers yet greater than every such element. ZF set theory resolves this paradox by not allowing the class of all ordinal numbers to be a set (so instead it is a proper class). Here we prove the denial of its existence. (Contributed by NM, 18-May-1994.) |
⊢ ¬ On ∈ V | ||
Theorem | ssorduni 7480 | The union of a class of ordinal numbers is ordinal. Proposition 7.19 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 40. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 12-Aug-2011.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ On → Ord ∪ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | ssonuni 7481 | The union of a set of ordinal numbers is an ordinal number. Theorem 9 of [Suppes] p. 132. (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2003.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ⊆ On → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ On)) | ||
Theorem | ssonunii 7482 | The union of a set of ordinal numbers is an ordinal number. Corollary 7N(d) of [Enderton] p. 193. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-2003.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ On → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ On) | ||
Theorem | ordeleqon 7483 | A way to express the ordinal property of a class in terms of the class of ordinal numbers. Corollary 7.14 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 38 and its converse. (Contributed by NM, 1-Jun-2003.) |
⊢ (Ord 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ On ∨ 𝐴 = On)) | ||
Theorem | ordsson 7484 | Any ordinal class is a subclass of the class of ordinal numbers. Corollary 7.15 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 38. (Contributed by NM, 18-May-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 12-Aug-2011.) |
⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → 𝐴 ⊆ On) | ||
Theorem | onss 7485 | An ordinal number is a subset of the class of ordinal numbers. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jun-1994.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → 𝐴 ⊆ On) | ||
Theorem | predon 7486 | The predecessor of an ordinal under E and On is itself. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 27-Mar-2011.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → Pred( E , On, 𝐴) = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | ssonprc 7487 | Two ways of saying a class of ordinals is unbounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Jun-2013.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ On → (𝐴 ∉ V ↔ ∪ 𝐴 = On)) | ||
Theorem | onuni 7488 | The union of an ordinal number is an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 29-Sep-2006.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ On) | ||
Theorem | orduni 7489 | The union of an ordinal class is ordinal. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-2003.) |
⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → Ord ∪ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | onint 7490 | The intersection (infimum) of a nonempty class of ordinal numbers belongs to the class. Compare Exercise 4 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 45. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jan-1997.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∩ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | onint0 7491 | The intersection of a class of ordinal numbers is zero iff the class contains zero. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2004.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ On → (∩ 𝐴 = ∅ ↔ ∅ ∈ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | onssmin 7492* | A nonempty class of ordinal numbers has the smallest member. Exercise 9 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 40. (Contributed by NM, 3-Oct-2003.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦) | ||
Theorem | onminesb 7493 | If a property is true for some ordinal number, it is true for a minimal ordinal number. This version uses explicit substitution. Theorem Schema 62 of [Suppes] p. 228. (Contributed by NM, 29-Sep-2003.) |
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝜑 → [∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ 𝜑} / 𝑥]𝜑) | ||
Theorem | onminsb 7494 | If a property is true for some ordinal number, it is true for a minimal ordinal number. This version uses implicit substitution. Theorem Schema 62 of [Suppes] p. 228. (Contributed by NM, 3-Oct-2003.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 & ⊢ (𝑥 = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ 𝜑} → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝜑 → 𝜓) | ||
Theorem | oninton 7495 | The intersection of a nonempty collection of ordinal numbers is an ordinal number. Compare Exercise 6 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 44. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-1997.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∩ 𝐴 ∈ On) | ||
Theorem | onintrab 7496 | The intersection of a class of ordinal numbers exists iff it is an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2003.) |
⊢ (∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V ↔ ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ 𝜑} ∈ On) | ||
Theorem | onintrab2 7497 | An existence condition equivalent to an intersection's being an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2003.) |
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝜑 ↔ ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ 𝜑} ∈ On) | ||
Theorem | onnmin 7498 | No member of a set of ordinal numbers belongs to its minimum. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-1997.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ ∩ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | onnminsb 7499* | An ordinal number smaller than the minimum of a set of ordinal numbers does not have the property determining that set. 𝜓 is the wff resulting from the substitution of 𝐴 for 𝑥 in wff 𝜑. (Contributed by NM, 9-Nov-2003.) |
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝐴 ∈ ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ 𝜑} → ¬ 𝜓)) | ||
Theorem | oneqmin 7500* | A way to show that an ordinal number equals the minimum of a nonempty collection of ordinal numbers: it must be in the collection, and it must not be larger than any member of the collection. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-2003.) |
⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) → (𝐴 = ∩ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))) |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |