P. 75 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 7401-7500   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
2.3.20  Function operation
Syntax	cof 7401	Extend class notation to include mapping of an operation to a function operation.
class ∘f 𝑅
Syntax	cofr 7402	Extend class notation to include mapping of a binary relation to a function relation.
class ∘r 𝑅
Definition	df-of 7403*	Define the function operation map. The definition is designed so that if 𝑅 is a binary operation, then ∘f 𝑅 is the analogous operation on functions which corresponds to applying 𝑅 pointwise to the values of the functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ∘f 𝑅 = (𝑓 ∈ V, 𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 ∈ (dom 𝑓 ∩ dom 𝑔) ↦ ((𝑓‘𝑥)𝑅(𝑔‘𝑥))))
Definition	df-ofr 7404*	Define the function relation map. The definition is designed so that if 𝑅 is a binary relation, then ∘r 𝑅 is the analogous relation on functions which is true when each element of the left function relates to the corresponding element of the right function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ∘r 𝑅 = {⟨𝑓, 𝑔⟩ ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ (dom 𝑓 ∩ dom 𝑔)(𝑓‘𝑥)𝑅(𝑔‘𝑥)}
Theorem	ofeq 7405	Equality theorem for function operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → ∘f 𝑅 = ∘f 𝑆)
Theorem	ofreq 7406	Equality theorem for function relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → ∘r 𝑅 = ∘r 𝑆)
Theorem	ofexg 7407	A function operation restricted to a set is a set. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ( ∘f 𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ∈ V)
Theorem	nfof 7408	Hypothesis builder for function operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jul-2014.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 ∘f 𝑅
Theorem	nfofr 7409	Hypothesis builder for function relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 ∘r 𝑅
Theorem	ofrfvalg 7410*	Value of a relation applied to two functions. Originally part of ofrfval 7412, this version assumes the functions are sets rather than their domains, avoiding ax-rep 5154. (Contributed by SN, 5-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝑆    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐺‘𝑥) = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘r 𝑅𝐺 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 𝐶𝑅𝐷))
Theorem	offval 7411*	Value of an operation applied to two functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝑆    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐺‘𝑥) = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ↦ (𝐶𝑅𝐷)))
Theorem	ofrfval 7412*	Value of a relation applied to two functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝑆    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐺‘𝑥) = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘r 𝑅𝐺 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 𝐶𝑅𝐷))
Theorem	ofval 7413	Evaluate a function operation at a point. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝑆    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐺‘𝑋) = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺)‘𝑋) = (𝐶𝑅𝐷))
Theorem	ofrval 7414	Exhibit a function relation at a point. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝑆    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐺‘𝑋) = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐹 ∘r 𝑅𝐺 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝐶𝑅𝐷)
Theorem	offn 7415	The function operation produces a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝑆    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺) Fn 𝑆)
Theorem	offun 7416	The function operation produces a function. (Contributed by SN, 23-Jul-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺))
Theorem	offval2f 7417*	The function operation expressed as a mapping. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Jun-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐵𝑅𝐶)))
Theorem	ofmresval 7418	Value of a restriction of the function operation map. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹( ∘f 𝑅 ↾ (𝐴 × 𝐵))𝐺) = (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺))
Theorem	fnfvof 7419	Function value of a pointwise composition. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐺 Fn 𝐴) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺)‘𝑋) = ((𝐹‘𝑋)𝑅(𝐺‘𝑋)))
Theorem	off 7420*	The function operation produces a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇)) → (𝑥𝑅𝑦) ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺):𝐶⟶𝑈)
Theorem	ofres 7421	Restrict the operands of a function operation to the same domain as that of the operation itself. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺) = ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐶) ∘f 𝑅(𝐺 ↾ 𝐶)))
Theorem	offval2 7422*	The function operation expressed as a mapping. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐵𝑅𝐶)))
Theorem	ofrfval2 7423*	The function relation acting on maps. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘r 𝑅𝐺 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵𝑅𝐶))
Theorem	ofmpteq 7424*	Value of a pointwise operation on two functions defined using maps-to notation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) Fn 𝐴 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) Fn 𝐴) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∘f 𝑅(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶)) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐵𝑅𝐶)))
Theorem	ofco 7425	The composition of a function operation with another function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝐷⟶𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺) ∘ 𝐻) = ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻) ∘f 𝑅(𝐺 ∘ 𝐻)))
Theorem	offveq 7426*	Convert an identity of the operation to the analogous identity on the function operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 Fn 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐺‘𝑥) = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐵𝑅𝐶) = (𝐻‘𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺) = 𝐻)
Theorem	offveqb 7427*	Equivalent expressions for equality with a function operation. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 5-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 Fn 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐺‘𝑥) = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻 = (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐵𝑅𝐶)))
Theorem	ofc1 7428	Left operation by a constant. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (((𝐴 × {𝐵}) ∘f 𝑅𝐹)‘𝑋) = (𝐵𝑅𝐶))
Theorem	ofc2 7429	Right operation by a constant. (Contributed by NM, 7-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐹 ∘f 𝑅(𝐴 × {𝐵}))‘𝑋) = (𝐶𝑅𝐵))
Theorem	ofc12 7430	Function operation on two constant functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 × {𝐵}) ∘f 𝑅(𝐴 × {𝐶})) = (𝐴 × {(𝐵𝑅𝐶)}))
Theorem	caofref 7431*	Transfer a reflexive law to the function relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝑥𝑅𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∘r 𝑅𝐹)
Theorem	caofinvl 7432*	Transfer a left inverse law to the function operation. (Contributed by NM, 22-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁:𝑆⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝑁‘(𝐹‘𝑣))))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝑁‘𝑥)𝑅𝑥) = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘f 𝑅𝐹) = (𝐴 × {𝐵}))
Theorem	caofid0l 7433*	Transfer a left identity law to the function operation. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐵𝑅𝑥) = 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 × {𝐵}) ∘f 𝑅𝐹) = 𝐹)
Theorem	caofid0r 7434*	Transfer a right identity law to the function operation. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑥𝑅𝐵) = 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅(𝐴 × {𝐵})) = 𝐹)
Theorem	caofid1 7435*	Transfer a right absorption law to the function operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑥𝑅𝐵) = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅(𝐴 × {𝐵})) = (𝐴 × {𝐶}))
Theorem	caofid2 7436*	Transfer a right absorption law to the function operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐵𝑅𝑥) = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 × {𝐵}) ∘f 𝑅𝐹) = (𝐴 × {𝐶}))
Theorem	caofcom 7437*	Transfer a commutative law to the function operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝑅𝑦) = (𝑦𝑅𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺) = (𝐺 ∘f 𝑅𝐹))
Theorem	caofrss 7438*	Transfer a relation subset law to the function relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥𝑇𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘r 𝑅𝐺 → 𝐹 ∘r 𝑇𝐺))
Theorem	caofass 7439*	Transfer an associative law to the function operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝑅𝑦)𝑇𝑧) = (𝑥𝑂(𝑦𝑃𝑧)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺) ∘f 𝑇𝐻) = (𝐹 ∘f 𝑂(𝐺 ∘f 𝑃𝐻)))
Theorem	caoftrn 7440*	Transfer a transitivity law to the function relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑇𝑧) → 𝑥𝑈𝑧))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∘r 𝑅𝐺 ∧ 𝐺 ∘r 𝑇𝐻) → 𝐹 ∘r 𝑈𝐻))
Theorem	caofdi 7441*	Transfer a distributive law to the function operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝑇(𝑦𝑅𝑧)) = ((𝑥𝑇𝑦)𝑂(𝑥𝑇𝑧)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘f 𝑇(𝐺 ∘f 𝑅𝐻)) = ((𝐹 ∘f 𝑇𝐺) ∘f 𝑂(𝐹 ∘f 𝑇𝐻)))
Theorem	caofdir 7442*	Transfer a reverse distributive law to the function operation. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐾)) → ((𝑥𝑅𝑦)𝑇𝑧) = ((𝑥𝑇𝑧)𝑂(𝑦𝑇𝑧)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐺 ∘f 𝑅𝐻) ∘f 𝑇𝐹) = ((𝐺 ∘f 𝑇𝐹) ∘f 𝑂(𝐻 ∘f 𝑇𝐹)))
Theorem	caonncan 7443*	Transfer nncan 10943-shaped laws to vectors of numbers. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 27-Mar-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴:𝐼⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵:𝐼⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝑀(𝑥𝑀𝑦)) = 𝑦)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∘f 𝑀(𝐴 ∘f 𝑀𝐵)) = 𝐵)
2.3.21  Proper subset relation
Syntax	crpss 7444	Extend class notation to include the reified proper subset relation.
class [⊊]
Definition	df-rpss 7445*	Define a relation which corresponds to proper subsethood df-pss 3878 on sets. This allows us to use proper subsethood with general concepts that require relations, such as strict ordering, see sorpss 7450. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Nov-2014.)
⊢ [⊊] = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝑥 ⊊ 𝑦}
Theorem	relrpss 7446	The proper subset relation is a relation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Nov-2014.)
⊢ Rel [⊊]
Theorem	brrpssg 7447	The proper subset relation on sets is the same as class proper subsethood. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 [⊊] 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵))
Theorem	brrpss 7448	The proper subset relation on sets is the same as class proper subsethood. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 [⊊] 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵)
Theorem	porpss 7449	Every class is partially ordered by proper subsets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Nov-2014.)
⊢ [⊊] Po 𝐴
Theorem	sorpss 7450*	Express strict ordering under proper subsets, i.e. the notion of a chain of sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ( [⊊] Or 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥))
Theorem	sorpssi 7451	Property of a chain of sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (( [⊊] Or 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ∨ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵))
Theorem	sorpssun 7452	A chain of sets is closed under binary union. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-May-2015.)
⊢ (( [⊊] Or 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	sorpssin 7453	A chain of sets is closed under binary intersection. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-May-2015.)
⊢ (( [⊊] Or 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	sorpssuni 7454*	In a chain of sets, a maximal element is the union of the chain. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ( [⊊] Or 𝑌 → (∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑌 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑌 ¬ 𝑢 ⊊ 𝑣 ↔ ∪ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑌))
Theorem	sorpssint 7455*	In a chain of sets, a minimal element is the intersection of the chain. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ( [⊊] Or 𝑌 → (∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑌 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑌 ¬ 𝑣 ⊊ 𝑢 ↔ ∩ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑌))
Theorem	sorpsscmpl 7456*	The componentwise complement of a chain of sets is also a chain of sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ( [⊊] Or 𝑌 → [⊊] Or {𝑢 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ∣ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑢) ∈ 𝑌})
2.4  ZF Set Theory - add the Axiom of Union
2.4.1  Introduce the Axiom of Union
Axiom	ax-un 7457*	Axiom of Union. An axiom of Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory. It states that a set 𝑦 exists that includes the union of a given set 𝑥 i.e. the collection of all members of the members of 𝑥. The variant axun2 7459 states that the union itself exists. A version with the standard abbreviation for union is uniex2 7460. A version using class notation is uniex 7463. The union of a class df-uni 4797 should not be confused with the union of two classes df-un 3864. Their relationship is shown in unipr 4814. (Contributed by NM, 23-Dec-1993.)
⊢ ∃𝑦∀𝑧(∃𝑤(𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦)
Theorem	zfun 7458*	Axiom of Union expressed with the fewest number of different variables. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-2003.) Use ax-un 7457 instead. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ∃𝑥∀𝑦(∃𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)
Theorem	axun2 7459*	A variant of the Axiom of Union ax-un 7457. For any set 𝑥, there exists a set 𝑦 whose members are exactly the members of the members of 𝑥 i.e. the union of 𝑥. Axiom Union of [BellMachover] p. 466. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2006.)
⊢ ∃𝑦∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑤(𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥))
Theorem	uniex2 7460*	The Axiom of Union using the standard abbreviation for union. Given any set 𝑥, its union 𝑦 exists. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2006.)
⊢ ∃𝑦 𝑦 = ∪ 𝑥
Theorem	vuniex 7461	The union of a setvar is a set. (Contributed by BJ, 3-May-2021.) (Revised by BJ, 6-Apr-2024.)
⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ V
Theorem	uniexg 7462	The ZF Axiom of Union in class notation, in the form of a theorem instead of an inference. We use the antecedent 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 instead of 𝐴 ∈ V to make the theorem more general and thus shorten some proofs; obviously the universal class constant V is one possible substitution for class variable 𝑉. (Contributed by NM, 25-Nov-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	uniex 7463	The Axiom of Union in class notation. This says that if 𝐴 is a set i.e. 𝐴 ∈ V (see isset 3423), then the union of 𝐴 is also a set. Same as Axiom 3 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 16. (Contributed by NM, 11-Aug-1993.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ∪ 𝐴 ∈ V
Theorem	uniexd 7464	Deduction version of the ZF Axiom of Union in class notation. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 26-Jun-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	unex 7465	The union of two sets is a set. Corollary 5.8 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 16. (Contributed by NM, 1-Jul-1994.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ V
Theorem	tpex 7466	An unordered triple of classes exists. (Contributed by NM, 10-Apr-1994.)
⊢ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} ∈ V
Theorem	unexb 7467	Existence of union is equivalent to existence of its components. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-1998.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) ↔ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ V)
Theorem	unexg 7468	A union of two sets is a set. Corollary 5.8 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 16. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2006.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ V)
Theorem	xpexg 7469	The Cartesian product of two sets is a set. Proposition 6.2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 23. See also xpexgALT 7684. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1994.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∈ V)
Theorem	xpexd 7470	The Cartesian product of two sets is a set. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 26-Jun-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∈ V)
Theorem	3xpexg 7471	The Cartesian product of three sets is a set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 21-Feb-2018.)
⊢ (𝑉 ∈ 𝑊 → ((𝑉 × 𝑉) × 𝑉) ∈ V)
Theorem	xpex 7472	The Cartesian product of two sets is a set. Proposition 6.2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 23. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1994.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∈ V
Theorem	unexd 7473	The union of two sets is a set. (Contributed by SN, 16-Jul-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ V)
Theorem	sqxpexg 7474	The Cartesian square of a set is a set. (Contributed by AV, 13-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 × 𝐴) ∈ V)
Theorem	abnexg 7475*	Sufficient condition for a class abstraction to be a proper class. The class 𝐹 can be thought of as an expression in 𝑥 and the abstraction appearing in the statement as the class of values 𝐹 as 𝑥 varies through 𝐴. Assuming the antecedents, if that class is a set, then so is the "domain" 𝐴. The converse holds without antecedent, see abrexexg 7664. Note that the second antecedent ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝑥 ∈ 𝐹 cannot be translated to 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐹 since 𝐹 may depend on 𝑥. In applications, one may take 𝐹 = {𝑥} or 𝐹 = 𝒫 𝑥 (see snnex 7477 and pwnex 7478 respectively, proved from abnex 7476, which is a consequence of abnexg 7475 with 𝐴 = V). (Contributed by BJ, 2-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐹) → ({𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 = 𝐹} ∈ 𝑊 → 𝐴 ∈ V))
Theorem	abnex 7476*	Sufficient condition for a class abstraction to be a proper class. Lemma for snnex 7477 and pwnex 7478. See the comment of abnexg 7475. (Contributed by BJ, 2-May-2021.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐹) → ¬ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 𝑦 = 𝐹} ∈ V)
Theorem	snnex 7477*	The class of all singletons is a proper class. See also pwnex 7478. (Contributed by NM, 10-Oct-2008.) (Proof shortened by Eric Schmidt, 7-Dec-2008.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 5-Dec-2021.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦 𝑥 = {𝑦}} ∉ V
Theorem	pwnex 7478*	The class of all power sets is a proper class. See also snnex 7477. (Contributed by BJ, 2-May-2021.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦 𝑥 = 𝒫 𝑦} ∉ V
Theorem	difex2 7479	If the subtrahend of a class difference exists, then the minuend exists iff the difference exists. (Contributed by NM, 12-Nov-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 12-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∈ V))
Theorem	difsnexi 7480	If the difference of a class and a singleton is a set, the class itself is a set. (Contributed by AV, 15-Jan-2019.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∖ {𝐾}) ∈ V → 𝑁 ∈ V)
Theorem	uniuni 7481*	Expression for double union that moves union into a class abstraction. (Contributed by FL, 28-May-2007.)
⊢ ∪ ∪ 𝐴 = ∪ {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑥 = ∪ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)}
Theorem	uniexr 7482	Converse of the Axiom of Union. Note that it does not require ax-un 7457. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-2003.)
⊢ (∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	uniexb 7483	The Axiom of Union and its converse. A class is a set iff its union is a set. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ ∪ 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	pwexr 7484	Converse of the Axiom of Power Sets. Note that it does not require ax-pow 5232. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-2003.)
⊢ (𝒫 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	pwexb 7485	The Axiom of Power Sets and its converse. A class is a set iff its power class is a set. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ 𝒫 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	elpwpwel 7486	A class belongs to a double power class if and only if its union belongs to the power class. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jan-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 𝒫 𝐵 ↔ ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵)
Theorem	eldifpw 7487	Membership in a power class difference. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-2007.)
⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐶) ∈ (𝒫 (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ∖ 𝒫 𝐵))
Theorem	elpwun 7488	Membership in the power class of a union. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-2007.)
⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐶) ∈ 𝒫 𝐵)
Theorem	pwuncl 7489	Power classes are closed under union. (Contributed by AV, 27-Feb-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ 𝒫 𝑋)
Theorem	iunpw 7490*	An indexed union of a power class in terms of the power class of the union of its index. Part of Exercise 24(b) of [Enderton] p. 33. (Contributed by NM, 29-Nov-2003.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = ∪ 𝐴 ↔ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐴 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝒫 𝑥)
Theorem	fr3nr 7491	A well-founded relation has no 3-cycle loops. Special case of Proposition 6.23 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 30. (Contributed by NM, 10-Apr-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jun-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → ¬ (𝐵𝑅𝐶 ∧ 𝐶𝑅𝐷 ∧ 𝐷𝑅𝐵))
Theorem	epne3 7492	A well-founded class contains no 3-cycle loops. (Contributed by NM, 19-Apr-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (( E Fr 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → ¬ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	dfwe2 7493*	Alternate definition of well-ordering. Definition 6.24(2) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 30. (Contributed by NM, 16-Mar-1997.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 12-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (𝑅 We 𝐴 ↔ (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)))
2.4.2  Ordinals (continued)
Theorem	epweon 7494	The membership relation well-orders the class of ordinal numbers. This proof does not require the axiom of regularity. Proposition 4.8(g) of [Mendelson] p. 244. (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2003.)
⊢ E We On
Theorem	ordon 7495	The class of all ordinal numbers is ordinal. Proposition 7.12 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 38, but without using the Axiom of Regularity. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1994.)
⊢ Ord On
Theorem	onprc 7496	No set contains all ordinal numbers. Proposition 7.13 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 38, but without using the Axiom of Regularity. This is also known as the Burali-Forti paradox (remark in [Enderton] p. 194). In 1897, Cesare Burali-Forti noticed that since the "set" of all ordinal numbers is an ordinal class (ordon 7495), it must be both an element of the set of all ordinal numbers yet greater than every such element. ZF set theory resolves this paradox by not allowing the class of all ordinal numbers to be a set (so instead it is a proper class). Here we prove the denial of its existence. (Contributed by NM, 18-May-1994.)
⊢ ¬ On ∈ V
Theorem	ssorduni 7497	The union of a class of ordinal numbers is ordinal. Proposition 7.19 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 40. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 12-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ On → Ord ∪ 𝐴)
Theorem	ssonuni 7498	The union of a set of ordinal numbers is an ordinal number. Theorem 9 of [Suppes] p. 132. (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ⊆ On → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ On))
Theorem	ssonunii 7499	The union of a set of ordinal numbers is an ordinal number. Corollary 7N(d) of [Enderton] p. 193. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-2003.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ On → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ On)
Theorem	ordeleqon 7500	A way to express the ordinal property of a class in terms of the class of ordinal numbers. Corollary 7.14 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 38 and its converse. (Contributed by NM, 1-Jun-2003.)
⊢ (Ord 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ On ∨ 𝐴 = On))