Theorem rabbida2 46289

Description: Equivalent wff's yield equal restricted class abstractions. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rabbida2.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
rabbida2.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
rabbida2.3	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rabbida2	⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜒})

Proof of Theorem rabbida2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rabbida2.1	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
2		rabbida2.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
3	2	eleq2d 2850	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
4		rabbida2.3	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
5	3, 4	anbi12d 644	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒)))
6	1, 5	abbid 2831	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒)})
7		df-rab 3417	. 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)}
8		df-rab 3417	. 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜒} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒)}
9	6, 7, 8	3eqtr4g 2823	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜒})

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1569  Ⅎwnf 1815   ∈ wcel 2146  {cab 2741  {crab 3416

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1944  ax-6 2001  ax-7 2042  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-12 2215  ax-ext 2735

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-ex 1812  df-nf 1816  df-sb 2101  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-rab 3417

This theorem is used by:  smflimmpt  47962