P. 443 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 44201-44300   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
21.38.3  Shorter primitive equivalent of ax-groth
21.38.3.1  Grothendieck universes are closed under collection
Theorem	gru0eld 44201	A nonempty Grothendieck universe contains the empty set. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 11-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Univ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∅ ∈ 𝐺)
Theorem	grusucd 44202	Grothendieck universes are closed under ordinal successor. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 9-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Univ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → suc 𝐴 ∈ 𝐺)
Theorem	r1rankcld 44203	Any rank of the cumulative hierarchy is closed under the rank function. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 11-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝑅))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (rank‘𝐴) ∈ (𝑅1‘𝑅))
Theorem	grur1cld 44204	Grothendieck universes are closed under the cumulative hierarchy function. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 8-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Univ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅1‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐺)
Theorem	grurankcld 44205	Grothendieck universes are closed under the rank function. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 9-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Univ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (rank‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐺)
Theorem	grurankrcld 44206	If a Grothendieck universe contains a set's rank, it contains that set. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 9-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Univ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (rank‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐺)
Syntax	cscott 44207	Extend class notation with the Scott's trick operation.
class Scott 𝐴
Definition	df-scott 44208*	Define the Scott operation. This operation constructs a subset of the input class which is nonempty whenever its input is using Scott's trick. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 9-Aug-2023.)
⊢ Scott 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)}
Theorem	scotteqd 44209	Equality theorem for the Scott operation. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 9-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Scott 𝐴 = Scott 𝐵)
Theorem	scotteq 44210	Closed form of scotteqd 44209. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 9-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → Scott 𝐴 = Scott 𝐵)
Theorem	nfscott 44211	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for the Scott operation. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 11-Aug-2023.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥Scott 𝐴
Theorem	scottabf 44212*	Value of the Scott operation at a class abstraction. Variant of scottab 44213 with a nonfreeness hypothesis instead of a disjoint variable condition. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 14-Aug-2023.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ Scott {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦(𝜓 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))}
Theorem	scottab 44213*	Value of the Scott operation at a class abstraction. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 14-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ Scott {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦(𝜓 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))}
Theorem	scottabes 44214*	Value of the Scott operation at a class abstraction. Variant of scottab 44213 using explicit substitution. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 14-Aug-2023.)
⊢ Scott {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))}
Theorem	scottss 44215	Scott's trick produces a subset of the input class. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 11-Aug-2023.)
⊢ Scott 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐴
Theorem	elscottab 44216*	An element of the output of the Scott operation applied to a class abstraction satisfies the class abstraction's predicate. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 14-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ Scott {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} → 𝜓)
Theorem	scottex2 44217	scottex 9897 expressed using Scott. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 9-Aug-2023.)
⊢ Scott 𝐴 ∈ V
Theorem	scotteld 44218*	The Scott operation sends inhabited classes to inhabited sets. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 11-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ Scott 𝐴)
Theorem	scottelrankd 44219	Property of a Scott's trick set. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 11-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Scott 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Scott 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (rank‘𝐵) ⊆ (rank‘𝐶))
Theorem	scottrankd 44220	Rank of a nonempty Scott's trick set. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 11-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Scott 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (rank‘Scott 𝐴) = suc (rank‘𝐵))
Theorem	gruscottcld 44221	If a Grothendieck universe contains an element of a Scott's trick set, it contains the Scott's trick set. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 11-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Univ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Scott 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Scott 𝐴 ∈ 𝐺)
Syntax	ccoll 44222	Extend class notation with the collection operation.
class (𝐹 Coll 𝐴)
Definition	df-coll 44223*	Define the collection operation. This is similar to the image set operation “, but it uses Scott's trick to ensure the output is always a set. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 11-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝐹 Coll 𝐴) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Scott (𝐹 “ {𝑥})
Theorem	dfcoll2 44224*	Alternate definition of the collection operation. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 11-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝐹 Coll 𝐴) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Scott {𝑦 ∣ 𝑥𝐹𝑦}
Theorem	colleq12d 44225	Equality theorem for the collection operation. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 11-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 Coll 𝐴) = (𝐺 Coll 𝐵))
Theorem	colleq1 44226	Equality theorem for the collection operation. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 11-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝐹 = 𝐺 → (𝐹 Coll 𝐴) = (𝐺 Coll 𝐴))
Theorem	colleq2 44227	Equality theorem for the collection operation. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 11-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐹 Coll 𝐴) = (𝐹 Coll 𝐵))
Theorem	nfcoll 44228	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for the collection operation. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 11-Aug-2023.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐹 Coll 𝐴)
Theorem	collexd 44229	The output of the collection operation is a set if the second input is. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 11-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 Coll 𝐴) ∈ V)
Theorem	cpcolld 44230*	Property of the collection operation. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 11-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑥𝐹𝑦)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝐹 Coll 𝐴)𝑥𝐹𝑦)
Theorem	cpcoll2d 44231*	cpcolld 44230 with an extra existential quantifier. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 12-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 𝑥𝐹𝑦)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝐹 Coll 𝐴)𝑥𝐹𝑦)
Theorem	grucollcld 44232	A Grothendieck universe contains the output of a collection operation whenever its left input is a relation on the universe, and its right input is in the universe. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 11-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Univ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⊆ (𝐺 × 𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 Coll 𝐴) ∈ 𝐺)
21.38.3.2  Minimal universes
Theorem	ismnu 44233*	The hypothesis of this theorem defines a class M of sets that we temporarily call "minimal universes", and which will turn out in grumnueq 44259 to be exactly Grothendicek universes. Minimal universes are sets which satisfy the predicate on 𝑦 in rr-groth 44271, except for the 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 clause. A minimal universe is closed under subsets (mnussd 44235), powersets (mnupwd 44239), and an operation which is similar to a combination of collection and union (mnuop3d 44243), from which closure under pairing (mnuprd 44248), unions (mnuunid 44249), and function ranges (mnurnd 44255) can be deduced, from which equivalence with Grothendieck universes (grumnueq 44259) can be deduced. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑈 ∈ 𝑀 ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 (𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ 𝑈 ∧ ∀𝑓∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑈 (𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ 𝑤 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝑧 (∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑈 (𝑖 ∈ 𝑣 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑓) → ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑓 (𝑖 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ ∪ 𝑢 ⊆ 𝑤))))))
Theorem	mnuop123d 44234*	Operations of a minimal universe. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑈 ∧ ∀𝑓∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑈 (𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑤 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝐴 (∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑈 (𝑖 ∈ 𝑣 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑓) → ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑓 (𝑖 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ ∪ 𝑢 ⊆ 𝑤)))))
Theorem	mnussd 44235*	Minimal universes are closed under subsets. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	mnuss2d 44236*	mnussd 44235 with arguments provided with an existential quantifier. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	mnu0eld 44237*	A nonempty minimal universe contains the empty set. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∅ ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	mnuop23d 44238*	Second and third operations of a minimal universe. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑈 (𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑤 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝐴 (∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑈 (𝑖 ∈ 𝑣 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝐹) → ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐹 (𝑖 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ ∪ 𝑢 ⊆ 𝑤))))
Theorem	mnupwd 44239*	Minimal universes are closed under powersets. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝒫 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	mnusnd 44240*	Minimal universes are closed under singletons. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐴} ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	mnuprssd 44241*	A minimal universe contains pairs of subsets of an element of the universe. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	mnuprss2d 44242*	Special case of mnuprssd 44241. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	mnuop3d 44243*	Third operation of a minimal universe. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⊆ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑈 ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝐴 (∃𝑣 ∈ 𝐹 𝑖 ∈ 𝑣 → ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐹 (𝑖 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ ∪ 𝑢 ⊆ 𝑤)))
Theorem	mnuprdlem1 44244*	Lemma for mnuprd 44248. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 11-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝐹 = {{∅, {𝐴}}, {{∅}, {𝐵}}}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑖 ∈ {∅, {∅}}∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐹 (𝑖 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ ∪ 𝑢 ⊆ 𝑤))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑤)
Theorem	mnuprdlem2 44245*	Lemma for mnuprd 44248. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 11-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝐹 = {{∅, {𝐴}}, {{∅}, {𝐵}}}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 = ∅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑖 ∈ {∅, {∅}}∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐹 (𝑖 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ ∪ 𝑢 ⊆ 𝑤))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑤)
Theorem	mnuprdlem3 44246*	Lemma for mnuprd 44248. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 11-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝐹 = {{∅, {𝐴}}, {{∅}, {𝐵}}}    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑖𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑖 ∈ {∅, {∅}}∃𝑣 ∈ 𝐹 𝑖 ∈ 𝑣)
Theorem	mnuprdlem4 44247*	Lemma for mnuprd 44248. General case. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {{∅, {𝐴}}, {{∅}, {𝐵}}}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 = ∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	mnuprd 44248*	Minimal universes are closed under pairing. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	mnuunid 44249*	Minimal universes are closed under union. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	mnuund 44250*	Minimal universes are closed under binary unions. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	mnutrcld 44251*	Minimal universes contain the elements of their elements. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	mnutrd 44252*	Minimal universes are transitive. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Tr 𝑈)
Theorem	mnurndlem1 44253*	Lemma for mnurnd 44255. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 12-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝐴 (∃𝑣 ∈ ran (𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ {𝑎, {(𝐹‘𝑎), 𝐴}})𝑖 ∈ 𝑣 → ∃𝑢 ∈ ran (𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ {𝑎, {(𝐹‘𝑎), 𝐴}})(𝑖 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ ∪ 𝑢 ⊆ 𝑤)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ran 𝐹 ⊆ 𝑤)
Theorem	mnurndlem2 44254*	Lemma for mnurnd 44255. Deduction theorem input. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ran 𝐹 ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	mnurnd 44255*	Minimal universes contain ranges of functions from an element of the universe to the universe. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ran 𝐹 ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	mnugrud 44256*	Minimal universes are Grothendieck universes. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ Univ)
Theorem	grumnudlem 44257*	Lemma for grumnud 44258. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Univ)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ({⟨𝑏, 𝑐⟩ ∣ ∃𝑑(∪ 𝑑 = 𝑐 ∧ 𝑑 ∈ 𝑓 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑑)} ∩ (𝐺 × 𝐺))    &   ⊢ ((𝑖 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝐺) → (𝑖𝐹ℎ ↔ ∃𝑗(∪ 𝑗 = ℎ ∧ 𝑗 ∈ 𝑓 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑗)))    &   ⊢ ((ℎ ∈ (𝐹 Coll 𝑧) ∧ (∪ 𝑗 = ℎ ∧ 𝑗 ∈ 𝑓 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑗)) → ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑓 (𝑖 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ ∪ 𝑢 ∈ (𝐹 Coll 𝑧)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑀)
Theorem	grumnud 44258*	Grothendieck universes are minimal universes. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 12-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Univ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑀)
Theorem	grumnueq 44259*	The class of Grothendieck universes is equal to the class of minimal universes. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ Univ = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))}
21.38.3.3  Primitive equivalent of ax-groth
Theorem	expandan 44260	Expand conjunction to primitives. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ ¬ (𝜓 → ¬ 𝜃))
Theorem	expandexn 44261	Expand an existential quantifier to primitives while contracting a double negation. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥𝜓)
Theorem	expandral 44262	Expand a restricted universal quantifier to primitives. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜓))
Theorem	expandrexn 44263	Expand a restricted existential quantifier to primitives while contracting a double negation. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜓))
Theorem	expandrex 44264	Expand a restricted existential quantifier to primitives. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ¬ 𝜓))
Theorem	expanduniss 44265*	Expand ∪ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 to primitives. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (∪ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)))
Theorem	ismnuprim 44266*	Express the predicate on 𝑈 in ismnu 44233 using only primitives. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 (𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ 𝑈 ∧ ∀𝑓∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑈 (𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ 𝑤 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝑧 (∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑈 (𝑖 ∈ 𝑣 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑓) → ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑓 (𝑖 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ ∪ 𝑢 ⊆ 𝑤)))) ↔ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 → ∀𝑓 ¬ ∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑈 → ¬ ∀𝑣 ¬ ((∀𝑡(𝑡 ∈ 𝑣 → 𝑡 ∈ 𝑧) → ¬ (𝑣 ∈ 𝑈 → ¬ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑤)) → ¬ ∀𝑖(𝑖 ∈ 𝑧 → (𝑣 ∈ 𝑈 → (𝑖 ∈ 𝑣 → (𝑣 ∈ 𝑓 → ¬ ∀𝑢(𝑢 ∈ 𝑓 → (𝑖 ∈ 𝑢 → ¬ ∀𝑜(𝑜 ∈ 𝑢 → ∀𝑠(𝑠 ∈ 𝑜 → 𝑠 ∈ 𝑤))))))))))))
Theorem	rr-grothprimbi 44267*	Express "every set is contained in a Grothendieck universe" using only primitives. The right side (without the outermost universal quantifier) is proven as rr-grothprim 44272. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (∀𝑥∃𝑦 ∈ Univ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∀𝑥 ¬ ∀𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ¬ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ∀𝑓 ¬ ∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 → ¬ ∀𝑣 ¬ ((∀𝑡(𝑡 ∈ 𝑣 → 𝑡 ∈ 𝑧) → ¬ (𝑣 ∈ 𝑦 → ¬ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑤)) → ¬ ∀𝑖(𝑖 ∈ 𝑧 → (𝑣 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝑖 ∈ 𝑣 → (𝑣 ∈ 𝑓 → ¬ ∀𝑢(𝑢 ∈ 𝑓 → (𝑖 ∈ 𝑢 → ¬ ∀𝑜(𝑜 ∈ 𝑢 → ∀𝑠(𝑠 ∈ 𝑜 → 𝑠 ∈ 𝑤)))))))))))))
Theorem	inagrud 44268	Inaccessible levels of the cumulative hierarchy are Grothendieck universes. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ Inacc)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅1‘𝐼) ∈ Univ)
Theorem	inaex 44269*	Assuming the Tarski-Grothendieck axiom, every ordinal is contained in an inaccessible ordinal. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ∃𝑥 ∈ Inacc 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥)
Theorem	gruex 44270*	Assuming the Tarski-Grothendieck axiom, every set is contained in a Grothendieck universe. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ ∃𝑦 ∈ Univ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
Theorem	rr-groth 44271*	An equivalent of ax-groth 10835 using only simple defined symbols. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 (𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑓∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 (𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ 𝑤 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝑧 (∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑦 (𝑖 ∈ 𝑣 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑓) → ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑓 (𝑖 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ ∪ 𝑢 ⊆ 𝑤)))))
Theorem	rr-grothprim 44272*	An equivalent of ax-groth 10835 using only primitives. This uses only 123 symbols, which is significantly less than the previous record of 163 established by grothprim 10846 (which uses some defined symbols, and requires 229 symbols if expanded to primitives). (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ ¬ ∀𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ¬ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ∀𝑓 ¬ ∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 → ¬ ∀𝑣 ¬ ((∀𝑡(𝑡 ∈ 𝑣 → 𝑡 ∈ 𝑧) → ¬ (𝑣 ∈ 𝑦 → ¬ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑤)) → ¬ ∀𝑖(𝑖 ∈ 𝑧 → (𝑣 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝑖 ∈ 𝑣 → (𝑣 ∈ 𝑓 → ¬ ∀𝑢(𝑢 ∈ 𝑓 → (𝑖 ∈ 𝑢 → ¬ ∀𝑜(𝑜 ∈ 𝑢 → ∀𝑠(𝑠 ∈ 𝑜 → 𝑠 ∈ 𝑤))))))))))))
Theorem	ismnushort 44273*	Express the predicate on 𝑈 and 𝑧 in ismnu 44233 in a shorter form while avoiding complicated definitions. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 10-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (∀𝑓 ∈ 𝒫 𝑈∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑈 (𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ (𝑈 ∩ 𝑤) ∧ (𝑧 ∩ ∪ 𝑓) ⊆ ∪ (𝑓 ∩ 𝒫 𝒫 𝑤)) ↔ (𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ 𝑈 ∧ ∀𝑓∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑈 (𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ 𝑤 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝑧 (∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑈 (𝑖 ∈ 𝑣 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑓) → ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑓 (𝑖 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ ∪ 𝑢 ⊆ 𝑤)))))
Theorem	dfuniv2 44274*	Alternative definition of Univ using only simple defined symbols. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 10-Oct-2024.)
⊢ Univ = {𝑦 ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝒫 𝑦∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 (𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ (𝑦 ∩ 𝑤) ∧ (𝑧 ∩ ∪ 𝑓) ⊆ ∪ (𝑓 ∩ 𝒫 𝒫 𝑤))}
Theorem	rr-grothshortbi 44275*	Express "every set is contained in a Grothendieck universe" in a short form while avoiding complicated definitions. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 8-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (∀𝑥∃𝑦 ∈ Univ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∀𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝒫 𝑦∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 (𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ (𝑦 ∩ 𝑤) ∧ (𝑧 ∩ ∪ 𝑓) ⊆ ∪ (𝑓 ∩ 𝒫 𝒫 𝑤))))
Theorem	rr-grothshort 44276*	A shorter equivalent of ax-groth 10835 than rr-groth 44271 using a few more simple defined symbols. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 8-Oct-2024.)
⊢ ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝒫 𝑦∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 (𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ (𝑦 ∩ 𝑤) ∧ (𝑧 ∩ ∪ 𝑓) ⊆ ∪ (𝑓 ∩ 𝒫 𝒫 𝑤)))
21.39  Mathbox for Steve Rodriguez
21.39.1  Miscellanea
Theorem	nanorxor 44277	'nand' is equivalent to the equivalence of inclusive and exclusive or. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 28-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ⊼ 𝜓) ↔ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓)))
Theorem	undisjrab 44278	Union of two disjoint restricted class abstractions; compare unrab 4290. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 28-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) = ∅ ↔ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓)})
Theorem	iso0 44279	The empty set is an 𝑅, 𝑆 isomorphism from the empty set to the empty set. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 24-Oct-2015.)
⊢ ∅ Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (∅, ∅)
Theorem	ssrecnpr 44280	ℝ is a subset of both ℝ and ℂ. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (𝑆 ∈ {ℝ, ℂ} → ℝ ⊆ 𝑆)
Theorem	seff 44281	Let set 𝑆 be the real or complex numbers. Then the exponential function restricted to 𝑆 is a mapping from 𝑆 to 𝑆. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 6-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ {ℝ, ℂ})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (exp ↾ 𝑆):𝑆⟶𝑆)
Theorem	sblpnf 44282	The infinity ball in the absolute value metric is just the whole space. 𝑆 analogue of blpnf 24334. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 8-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ {ℝ, ℂ})    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((abs ∘ − ) ↾ (𝑆 × 𝑆))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑃(ball‘𝐷)+∞) = 𝑆)
Theorem	prmunb2 44283*	The primes are unbounded. This generalizes prmunb 16932 to real 𝐴 with arch 12496 and lttrd 11394: every real is less than some positive integer, itself less than some prime. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ 𝐴 < 𝑝)
21.39.2  Ratio test for infinite series convergence and divergence
Theorem	dvgrat 44284*	Ratio test for divergence of a complex infinite series. See e.g. remark "if (abs‘((𝑎‘(𝑛 + 1)) / (𝑎‘𝑛))) ≥ 1 for all large n..." in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ratio_test#The_test. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 28-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (ℤ≥‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ≠ 0)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑊) → (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) ≤ (abs‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ∉ dom ⇝ )
Theorem	cvgdvgrat 44285*	Ratio test for convergence and divergence of a complex infinite series. If the ratio 𝑅 of the absolute values of successive terms in an infinite sequence 𝐹 converges to less than one, then the infinite sum of the terms of 𝐹 converges to a complex number; and if 𝑅 converges greater then the sum diverges. This combined form of cvgrat 15897 and dvgrat 44284 directly uses the limit of the ratio. (It also demonstrates how to use climi2 15525 and absltd 15446 to transform a limit to an inequality cf. https://math.stackexchange.com/q/2215191 15446, and how to use r19.29a 3148 in a similar fashion to Mario Carneiro's proof sketch with rexlimdva 3141 at https://groups.google.com/g/metamath/c/2RPikOiXLMo 3141.) (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 28-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (ℤ≥‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ≠ 0)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (𝑘 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (abs‘((𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1)) / (𝐹‘𝑘))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ⇝ 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ≠ 1)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐿 < 1 ↔ seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝ ))
Theorem	radcnvrat 44286*	Let 𝐿 be the limit, if one exists, of the ratio (abs‘((𝐴‘(𝑘 + 1)) / (𝐴‘𝑘))) (as in the ratio test cvgdvgrat 44285) as 𝑘 increases. Then the radius of convergence of power series Σ𝑛 ∈ ℕ0((𝐴‘𝑛) · (𝑥↑𝑛)) is (1 / 𝐿) if 𝐿 is nonzero. Proof "The limit involved in the ratio test..." in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radius_of_convergence 44285 —a few lines that evidently hide quite an involved process to confirm. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 8-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝐴‘𝑛) · (𝑥↑𝑛))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴:ℕ0⟶ℂ)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = sup({𝑟 ∈ ℝ ∣ seq0( + , (𝐺‘𝑟)) ∈ dom ⇝ }, ℝ*, < )    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (abs‘((𝐴‘(𝑘 + 1)) / (𝐴‘𝑘))))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐴‘𝑘) ≠ 0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ⇝ 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ≠ 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 = (1 / 𝐿))
21.39.3  Multiples
Theorem	reldvds 44287	The divides relation is in fact a relation. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
⊢ Rel ∥
Theorem	nznngen 44288	All positive integers in the set of multiples of n, nℤ, are the absolute value of n or greater. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (( ∥ “ {𝑁}) ∩ ℕ) ⊆ (ℤ≥‘(abs‘𝑁)))
Theorem	nzss 44289	The set of multiples of m, mℤ, is a subset of those of n, nℤ, iff n divides m. Lemma 2.1(a) of https://www.mscs.dal.ca/~selinger/3343/handouts/ideals.pdf p. 5, with mℤ and nℤ as images of the divides relation under m and n. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (( ∥ “ {𝑀}) ⊆ ( ∥ “ {𝑁}) ↔ 𝑁 ∥ 𝑀))
Theorem	nzin 44290	The intersection of the set of multiples of m, mℤ, and those of n, nℤ, is the set of multiples of their least common multiple. Roughly Lemma 2.1(c) of https://www.mscs.dal.ca/~selinger/3343/handouts/ideals.pdf p. 5 and Problem 1(b) of https://people.math.binghamton.edu/mazur/teach/40107/40107h16sol.pdf p. 1, with mℤ and nℤ as images of the divides relation under m and n. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (( ∥ “ {𝑀}) ∩ ( ∥ “ {𝑁})) = ( ∥ “ {(𝑀 lcm 𝑁)}))
Theorem	nzprmdif 44291	Subtract one prime's multiples from an unequal prime's. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ≠ 𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (( ∥ “ {𝑀}) ∖ ( ∥ “ {𝑁})) = (( ∥ “ {𝑀}) ∖ ( ∥ “ {(𝑀 · 𝑁)})))
Theorem	hashnzfz 44292	Special case of hashdvds 16792: the count of multiples in nℤ restricted to an interval. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐽 − 1)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘(( ∥ “ {𝑁}) ∩ (𝐽...𝐾))) = ((⌊‘(𝐾 / 𝑁)) − (⌊‘((𝐽 − 1) / 𝑁))))
Theorem	hashnzfz2 44293	Special case of hashnzfz 44292: the count of multiples in nℤ, n greater than one, restricted to an interval starting at two. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘(( ∥ “ {𝑁}) ∩ (2...𝐾))) = (⌊‘(𝐾 / 𝑁)))
Theorem	hashnzfzclim 44294*	As the upper bound 𝐾 of the constraint interval (𝐽...𝐾) in hashnzfz 44292 increases, the resulting count of multiples tends to (𝐾 / 𝑀) —that is, there are approximately (𝐾 / 𝑀) multiples of 𝑀 in a finite interval of integers. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ ℤ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐽 − 1)) ↦ ((♯‘(( ∥ “ {𝑀}) ∩ (𝐽...𝑘))) / 𝑘)) ⇝ (1 / 𝑀))
21.39.4  Function operations
Theorem	caofcan 44295*	Transfer a cancellation law like mulcan 11872 to the function operation. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 16-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝑅𝑦) = (𝑥𝑅𝑧) ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑧))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺) = (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐻) ↔ 𝐺 = 𝐻))
Theorem	ofsubid 44296	Function analogue of subid 11500. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 5-Nov-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ) → (𝐹 ∘f − 𝐹) = (𝐴 × {0}))
Theorem	ofmul12 44297	Function analogue of mul12 11398. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 13-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ) ∧ (𝐺:𝐴⟶ℂ ∧ 𝐻:𝐴⟶ℂ)) → (𝐹 ∘f · (𝐺 ∘f · 𝐻)) = (𝐺 ∘f · (𝐹 ∘f · 𝐻)))
Theorem	ofdivrec 44298	Function analogue of divrec 11910, a division analogue of ofnegsub 12236. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 3-Nov-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ ∧ 𝐺:𝐴⟶(ℂ ∖ {0})) → (𝐹 ∘f · ((𝐴 × {1}) ∘f / 𝐺)) = (𝐹 ∘f / 𝐺))
Theorem	ofdivcan4 44299	Function analogue of divcan4 11921. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 4-Nov-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ ∧ 𝐺:𝐴⟶(ℂ ∖ {0})) → ((𝐹 ∘f · 𝐺) ∘f / 𝐺) = 𝐹)
Theorem	ofdivdiv2 44300	Function analogue of divdiv2 11951. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 23-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ) ∧ (𝐺:𝐴⟶(ℂ ∖ {0}) ∧ 𝐻:𝐴⟶(ℂ ∖ {0}))) → (𝐹 ∘f / (𝐺 ∘f / 𝐻)) = ((𝐹 ∘f · 𝐻) ∘f / 𝐺))