P. 443 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 44201-44300   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	grur1cld 44201	Grothendieck universes are closed under the cumulative hierarchy function. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 8-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Univ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅1‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐺)
Theorem	grurankcld 44202	Grothendieck universes are closed under the rank function. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 9-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Univ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (rank‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐺)
Theorem	grurankrcld 44203	If a Grothendieck universe contains a set's rank, it contains that set. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 9-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Univ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (rank‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐺)
Syntax	cscott 44204	Extend class notation with the Scott's trick operation.
class Scott 𝐴
Definition	df-scott 44205*	Define the Scott operation. This operation constructs a subset of the input class which is nonempty whenever its input is using Scott's trick. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 9-Aug-2023.)
⊢ Scott 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)}
Theorem	scotteqd 44206	Equality theorem for the Scott operation. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 9-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Scott 𝐴 = Scott 𝐵)
Theorem	scotteq 44207	Closed form of scotteqd 44206. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 9-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → Scott 𝐴 = Scott 𝐵)
Theorem	nfscott 44208	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for the Scott operation. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 11-Aug-2023.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥Scott 𝐴
Theorem	scottabf 44209*	Value of the Scott operation at a class abstraction. Variant of scottab 44210 with a nonfreeness hypothesis instead of a disjoint variable condition. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 14-Aug-2023.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ Scott {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦(𝜓 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))}
Theorem	scottab 44210*	Value of the Scott operation at a class abstraction. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 14-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ Scott {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦(𝜓 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))}
Theorem	scottabes 44211*	Value of the Scott operation at a class abstraction. Variant of scottab 44210 using explicit substitution. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 14-Aug-2023.)
⊢ Scott {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))}
Theorem	scottss 44212	Scott's trick produces a subset of the input class. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 11-Aug-2023.)
⊢ Scott 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐴
Theorem	elscottab 44213*	An element of the output of the Scott operation applied to a class abstraction satisfies the class abstraction's predicate. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 14-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ Scott {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} → 𝜓)
Theorem	scottex2 44214	scottex 9954 expressed using Scott. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 9-Aug-2023.)
⊢ Scott 𝐴 ∈ V
Theorem	scotteld 44215*	The Scott operation sends inhabited classes to inhabited sets. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 11-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ Scott 𝐴)
Theorem	scottelrankd 44216	Property of a Scott's trick set. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 11-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Scott 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Scott 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (rank‘𝐵) ⊆ (rank‘𝐶))
Theorem	scottrankd 44217	Rank of a nonempty Scott's trick set. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 11-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Scott 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (rank‘Scott 𝐴) = suc (rank‘𝐵))
Theorem	gruscottcld 44218	If a Grothendieck universe contains an element of a Scott's trick set, it contains the Scott's trick set. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 11-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Univ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Scott 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Scott 𝐴 ∈ 𝐺)
Syntax	ccoll 44219	Extend class notation with the collection operation.
class (𝐹 Coll 𝐴)
Definition	df-coll 44220*	Define the collection operation. This is similar to the image set operation “, but it uses Scott's trick to ensure the output is always a set. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 11-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝐹 Coll 𝐴) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Scott (𝐹 “ {𝑥})
Theorem	dfcoll2 44221*	Alternate definition of the collection operation. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 11-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝐹 Coll 𝐴) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Scott {𝑦 ∣ 𝑥𝐹𝑦}
Theorem	colleq12d 44222	Equality theorem for the collection operation. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 11-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 Coll 𝐴) = (𝐺 Coll 𝐵))
Theorem	colleq1 44223	Equality theorem for the collection operation. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 11-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝐹 = 𝐺 → (𝐹 Coll 𝐴) = (𝐺 Coll 𝐴))
Theorem	colleq2 44224	Equality theorem for the collection operation. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 11-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐹 Coll 𝐴) = (𝐹 Coll 𝐵))
Theorem	nfcoll 44225	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for the collection operation. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 11-Aug-2023.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐹 Coll 𝐴)
Theorem	collexd 44226	The output of the collection operation is a set if the second input is. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 11-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 Coll 𝐴) ∈ V)
Theorem	cpcolld 44227*	Property of the collection operation. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 11-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑥𝐹𝑦)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝐹 Coll 𝐴)𝑥𝐹𝑦)
Theorem	cpcoll2d 44228*	cpcolld 44227 with an extra existential quantifier. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 12-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 𝑥𝐹𝑦)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝐹 Coll 𝐴)𝑥𝐹𝑦)
Theorem	grucollcld 44229	A Grothendieck universe contains the output of a collection operation whenever its left input is a relation on the universe, and its right input is in the universe. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 11-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Univ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⊆ (𝐺 × 𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 Coll 𝐴) ∈ 𝐺)
21.38.3.2  Minimal universes
Theorem	ismnu 44230*	The hypothesis of this theorem defines a class M of sets that we temporarily call "minimal universes", and which will turn out in grumnueq 44256 to be exactly Grothendicek universes. Minimal universes are sets which satisfy the predicate on 𝑦 in rr-groth 44268, except for the 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 clause. A minimal universe is closed under subsets (mnussd 44232), powersets (mnupwd 44236), and an operation which is similar to a combination of collection and union (mnuop3d 44240), from which closure under pairing (mnuprd 44245), unions (mnuunid 44246), and function ranges (mnurnd 44252) can be deduced, from which equivalence with Grothendieck universes (grumnueq 44256) can be deduced. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑈 ∈ 𝑀 ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 (𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ 𝑈 ∧ ∀𝑓∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑈 (𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ 𝑤 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝑧 (∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑈 (𝑖 ∈ 𝑣 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑓) → ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑓 (𝑖 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ ∪ 𝑢 ⊆ 𝑤))))))
Theorem	mnuop123d 44231*	Operations of a minimal universe. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑈 ∧ ∀𝑓∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑈 (𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑤 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝐴 (∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑈 (𝑖 ∈ 𝑣 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑓) → ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑓 (𝑖 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ ∪ 𝑢 ⊆ 𝑤)))))
Theorem	mnussd 44232*	Minimal universes are closed under subsets. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	mnuss2d 44233*	mnussd 44232 with arguments provided with an existential quantifier. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	mnu0eld 44234*	A nonempty minimal universe contains the empty set. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∅ ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	mnuop23d 44235*	Second and third operations of a minimal universe. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑈 (𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑤 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝐴 (∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑈 (𝑖 ∈ 𝑣 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝐹) → ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐹 (𝑖 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ ∪ 𝑢 ⊆ 𝑤))))
Theorem	mnupwd 44236*	Minimal universes are closed under powersets. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝒫 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	mnusnd 44237*	Minimal universes are closed under singletons. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐴} ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	mnuprssd 44238*	A minimal universe contains pairs of subsets of an element of the universe. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	mnuprss2d 44239*	Special case of mnuprssd 44238. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	mnuop3d 44240*	Third operation of a minimal universe. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⊆ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑈 ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝐴 (∃𝑣 ∈ 𝐹 𝑖 ∈ 𝑣 → ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐹 (𝑖 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ ∪ 𝑢 ⊆ 𝑤)))
Theorem	mnuprdlem1 44241*	Lemma for mnuprd 44245. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 11-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝐹 = {{∅, {𝐴}}, {{∅}, {𝐵}}}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑖 ∈ {∅, {∅}}∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐹 (𝑖 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ ∪ 𝑢 ⊆ 𝑤))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑤)
Theorem	mnuprdlem2 44242*	Lemma for mnuprd 44245. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 11-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝐹 = {{∅, {𝐴}}, {{∅}, {𝐵}}}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 = ∅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑖 ∈ {∅, {∅}}∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐹 (𝑖 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ ∪ 𝑢 ⊆ 𝑤))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑤)
Theorem	mnuprdlem3 44243*	Lemma for mnuprd 44245. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 11-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝐹 = {{∅, {𝐴}}, {{∅}, {𝐵}}}    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑖𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑖 ∈ {∅, {∅}}∃𝑣 ∈ 𝐹 𝑖 ∈ 𝑣)
Theorem	mnuprdlem4 44244*	Lemma for mnuprd 44245. General case. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {{∅, {𝐴}}, {{∅}, {𝐵}}}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 = ∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	mnuprd 44245*	Minimal universes are closed under pairing. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	mnuunid 44246*	Minimal universes are closed under union. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	mnuund 44247*	Minimal universes are closed under binary unions. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	mnutrcld 44248*	Minimal universes contain the elements of their elements. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	mnutrd 44249*	Minimal universes are transitive. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Tr 𝑈)
Theorem	mnurndlem1 44250*	Lemma for mnurnd 44252. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 12-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝐴 (∃𝑣 ∈ ran (𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ {𝑎, {(𝐹‘𝑎), 𝐴}})𝑖 ∈ 𝑣 → ∃𝑢 ∈ ran (𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ {𝑎, {(𝐹‘𝑎), 𝐴}})(𝑖 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ ∪ 𝑢 ⊆ 𝑤)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ran 𝐹 ⊆ 𝑤)
Theorem	mnurndlem2 44251*	Lemma for mnurnd 44252. Deduction theorem input. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ran 𝐹 ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	mnurnd 44252*	Minimal universes contain ranges of functions from an element of the universe to the universe. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ran 𝐹 ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	mnugrud 44253*	Minimal universes are Grothendieck universes. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ Univ)
Theorem	grumnudlem 44254*	Lemma for grumnud 44255. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Univ)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ({⟨𝑏, 𝑐⟩ ∣ ∃𝑑(∪ 𝑑 = 𝑐 ∧ 𝑑 ∈ 𝑓 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑑)} ∩ (𝐺 × 𝐺))    &   ⊢ ((𝑖 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝐺) → (𝑖𝐹ℎ ↔ ∃𝑗(∪ 𝑗 = ℎ ∧ 𝑗 ∈ 𝑓 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑗)))    &   ⊢ ((ℎ ∈ (𝐹 Coll 𝑧) ∧ (∪ 𝑗 = ℎ ∧ 𝑗 ∈ 𝑓 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑗)) → ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑓 (𝑖 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ ∪ 𝑢 ∈ (𝐹 Coll 𝑧)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑀)
Theorem	grumnud 44255*	Grothendieck universes are minimal universes. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 12-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Univ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑀)
Theorem	grumnueq 44256*	The class of Grothendieck universes is equal to the class of minimal universes. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ Univ = {𝑘 ∣ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 (𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛))))}
21.38.3.3  Primitive equivalent of ax-groth
Theorem	expandan 44257	Expand conjunction to primitives. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ ¬ (𝜓 → ¬ 𝜃))
Theorem	expandexn 44258	Expand an existential quantifier to primitives while contracting a double negation. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥𝜓)
Theorem	expandral 44259	Expand a restricted universal quantifier to primitives. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜓))
Theorem	expandrexn 44260	Expand a restricted existential quantifier to primitives while contracting a double negation. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜓))
Theorem	expandrex 44261	Expand a restricted existential quantifier to primitives. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ¬ 𝜓))
Theorem	expanduniss 44262*	Expand ∪ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 to primitives. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (∪ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)))
Theorem	ismnuprim 44263*	Express the predicate on 𝑈 in ismnu 44230 using only primitives. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 (𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ 𝑈 ∧ ∀𝑓∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑈 (𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ 𝑤 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝑧 (∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑈 (𝑖 ∈ 𝑣 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑓) → ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑓 (𝑖 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ ∪ 𝑢 ⊆ 𝑤)))) ↔ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 → ∀𝑓 ¬ ∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑈 → ¬ ∀𝑣 ¬ ((∀𝑡(𝑡 ∈ 𝑣 → 𝑡 ∈ 𝑧) → ¬ (𝑣 ∈ 𝑈 → ¬ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑤)) → ¬ ∀𝑖(𝑖 ∈ 𝑧 → (𝑣 ∈ 𝑈 → (𝑖 ∈ 𝑣 → (𝑣 ∈ 𝑓 → ¬ ∀𝑢(𝑢 ∈ 𝑓 → (𝑖 ∈ 𝑢 → ¬ ∀𝑜(𝑜 ∈ 𝑢 → ∀𝑠(𝑠 ∈ 𝑜 → 𝑠 ∈ 𝑤))))))))))))
Theorem	rr-grothprimbi 44264*	Express "every set is contained in a Grothendieck universe" using only primitives. The right side (without the outermost universal quantifier) is proven as rr-grothprim 44269. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (∀𝑥∃𝑦 ∈ Univ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∀𝑥 ¬ ∀𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ¬ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ∀𝑓 ¬ ∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 → ¬ ∀𝑣 ¬ ((∀𝑡(𝑡 ∈ 𝑣 → 𝑡 ∈ 𝑧) → ¬ (𝑣 ∈ 𝑦 → ¬ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑤)) → ¬ ∀𝑖(𝑖 ∈ 𝑧 → (𝑣 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝑖 ∈ 𝑣 → (𝑣 ∈ 𝑓 → ¬ ∀𝑢(𝑢 ∈ 𝑓 → (𝑖 ∈ 𝑢 → ¬ ∀𝑜(𝑜 ∈ 𝑢 → ∀𝑠(𝑠 ∈ 𝑜 → 𝑠 ∈ 𝑤)))))))))))))
Theorem	inagrud 44265	Inaccessible levels of the cumulative hierarchy are Grothendieck universes. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ Inacc)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅1‘𝐼) ∈ Univ)
Theorem	inaex 44266*	Assuming the Tarski-Grothendieck axiom, every ordinal is contained in an inaccessible ordinal. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ∃𝑥 ∈ Inacc 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥)
Theorem	gruex 44267*	Assuming the Tarski-Grothendieck axiom, every set is contained in a Grothendieck universe. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ ∃𝑦 ∈ Univ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
Theorem	rr-groth 44268*	An equivalent of ax-groth 10892 using only simple defined symbols. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 (𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑓∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 (𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ 𝑤 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝑧 (∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑦 (𝑖 ∈ 𝑣 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑓) → ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑓 (𝑖 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ ∪ 𝑢 ⊆ 𝑤)))))
Theorem	rr-grothprim 44269*	An equivalent of ax-groth 10892 using only primitives. This uses only 123 symbols, which is significantly less than the previous record of 163 established by grothprim 10903 (which uses some defined symbols, and requires 229 symbols if expanded to primitives). (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ ¬ ∀𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ¬ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ∀𝑓 ¬ ∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 → ¬ ∀𝑣 ¬ ((∀𝑡(𝑡 ∈ 𝑣 → 𝑡 ∈ 𝑧) → ¬ (𝑣 ∈ 𝑦 → ¬ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑤)) → ¬ ∀𝑖(𝑖 ∈ 𝑧 → (𝑣 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝑖 ∈ 𝑣 → (𝑣 ∈ 𝑓 → ¬ ∀𝑢(𝑢 ∈ 𝑓 → (𝑖 ∈ 𝑢 → ¬ ∀𝑜(𝑜 ∈ 𝑢 → ∀𝑠(𝑠 ∈ 𝑜 → 𝑠 ∈ 𝑤))))))))))))
Theorem	ismnushort 44270*	Express the predicate on 𝑈 and 𝑧 in ismnu 44230 in a shorter form while avoiding complicated definitions. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 10-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (∀𝑓 ∈ 𝒫 𝑈∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑈 (𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ (𝑈 ∩ 𝑤) ∧ (𝑧 ∩ ∪ 𝑓) ⊆ ∪ (𝑓 ∩ 𝒫 𝒫 𝑤)) ↔ (𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ 𝑈 ∧ ∀𝑓∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑈 (𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ 𝑤 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝑧 (∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑈 (𝑖 ∈ 𝑣 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑓) → ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑓 (𝑖 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ ∪ 𝑢 ⊆ 𝑤)))))
Theorem	dfuniv2 44271*	Alternative definition of Univ using only simple defined symbols. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 10-Oct-2024.)
⊢ Univ = {𝑦 ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝒫 𝑦∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 (𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ (𝑦 ∩ 𝑤) ∧ (𝑧 ∩ ∪ 𝑓) ⊆ ∪ (𝑓 ∩ 𝒫 𝒫 𝑤))}
Theorem	rr-grothshortbi 44272*	Express "every set is contained in a Grothendieck universe" in a short form while avoiding complicated definitions. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 8-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (∀𝑥∃𝑦 ∈ Univ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∀𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝒫 𝑦∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 (𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ (𝑦 ∩ 𝑤) ∧ (𝑧 ∩ ∪ 𝑓) ⊆ ∪ (𝑓 ∩ 𝒫 𝒫 𝑤))))
Theorem	rr-grothshort 44273*	A shorter equivalent of ax-groth 10892 than rr-groth 44268 using a few more simple defined symbols. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 8-Oct-2024.)
⊢ ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝒫 𝑦∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 (𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ (𝑦 ∩ 𝑤) ∧ (𝑧 ∩ ∪ 𝑓) ⊆ ∪ (𝑓 ∩ 𝒫 𝒫 𝑤)))
21.39  Mathbox for Steve Rodriguez
21.39.1  Miscellanea
Theorem	nanorxor 44274	'nand' is equivalent to the equivalence of inclusive and exclusive or. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 28-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ⊼ 𝜓) ↔ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓)))
Theorem	undisjrab 44275	Union of two disjoint restricted class abstractions; compare unrab 4334. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 28-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) = ∅ ↔ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓)})
Theorem	iso0 44276	The empty set is an 𝑅, 𝑆 isomorphism from the empty set to the empty set. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 24-Oct-2015.)
⊢ ∅ Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (∅, ∅)
Theorem	ssrecnpr 44277	ℝ is a subset of both ℝ and ℂ. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 22-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (𝑆 ∈ {ℝ, ℂ} → ℝ ⊆ 𝑆)
Theorem	seff 44278	Let set 𝑆 be the real or complex numbers. Then the exponential function restricted to 𝑆 is a mapping from 𝑆 to 𝑆. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 6-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ {ℝ, ℂ})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (exp ↾ 𝑆):𝑆⟶𝑆)
Theorem	sblpnf 44279	The infinity ball in the absolute value metric is just the whole space. 𝑆 analogue of blpnf 24428. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 8-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ {ℝ, ℂ})    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((abs ∘ − ) ↾ (𝑆 × 𝑆))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑃(ball‘𝐷)+∞) = 𝑆)
Theorem	prmunb2 44280*	The primes are unbounded. This generalizes prmunb 16961 to real 𝐴 with arch 12550 and lttrd 11451: every real is less than some positive integer, itself less than some prime. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ 𝐴 < 𝑝)
21.39.2  Ratio test for infinite series convergence and divergence
Theorem	dvgrat 44281*	Ratio test for divergence of a complex infinite series. See e.g. remark "if (abs‘((𝑎‘(𝑛 + 1)) / (𝑎‘𝑛))) ≥ 1 for all large n..." in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ratio_test#The_test. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 28-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (ℤ≥‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ≠ 0)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑊) → (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) ≤ (abs‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ∉ dom ⇝ )
Theorem	cvgdvgrat 44282*	Ratio test for convergence and divergence of a complex infinite series. If the ratio 𝑅 of the absolute values of successive terms in an infinite sequence 𝐹 converges to less than one, then the infinite sum of the terms of 𝐹 converges to a complex number; and if 𝑅 converges greater then the sum diverges. This combined form of cvgrat 15931 and dvgrat 44281 directly uses the limit of the ratio. (It also demonstrates how to use climi2 15557 and absltd 15478 to transform a limit to an inequality cf. https://math.stackexchange.com/q/2215191 15478, and how to use r19.29a 3168 in a similar fashion to Mario Carneiro's proof sketch with rexlimdva 3161 at https://groups.google.com/g/metamath/c/2RPikOiXLMo 3161.) (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 28-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (ℤ≥‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ≠ 0)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (𝑘 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ (abs‘((𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1)) / (𝐹‘𝑘))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ⇝ 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ≠ 1)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐿 < 1 ↔ seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝ ))
Theorem	radcnvrat 44283*	Let 𝐿 be the limit, if one exists, of the ratio (abs‘((𝐴‘(𝑘 + 1)) / (𝐴‘𝑘))) (as in the ratio test cvgdvgrat 44282) as 𝑘 increases. Then the radius of convergence of power series Σ𝑛 ∈ ℕ0((𝐴‘𝑛) · (𝑥↑𝑛)) is (1 / 𝐿) if 𝐿 is nonzero. Proof "The limit involved in the ratio test..." in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radius_of_convergence 44282 —a few lines that evidently hide quite an involved process to confirm. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 8-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝐴‘𝑛) · (𝑥↑𝑛))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴:ℕ0⟶ℂ)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = sup({𝑟 ∈ ℝ ∣ seq0( + , (𝐺‘𝑟)) ∈ dom ⇝ }, ℝ*, < )    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (abs‘((𝐴‘(𝑘 + 1)) / (𝐴‘𝑘))))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐴‘𝑘) ≠ 0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ⇝ 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ≠ 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 = (1 / 𝐿))
21.39.3  Multiples
Theorem	reldvds 44284	The divides relation is in fact a relation. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
⊢ Rel ∥
Theorem	nznngen 44285	All positive integers in the set of multiples of n, nℤ, are the absolute value of n or greater. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (( ∥ “ {𝑁}) ∩ ℕ) ⊆ (ℤ≥‘(abs‘𝑁)))
Theorem	nzss 44286	The set of multiples of m, mℤ, is a subset of those of n, nℤ, iff n divides m. Lemma 2.1(a) of https://www.mscs.dal.ca/~selinger/3343/handouts/ideals.pdf p. 5, with mℤ and nℤ as images of the divides relation under m and n. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (( ∥ “ {𝑀}) ⊆ ( ∥ “ {𝑁}) ↔ 𝑁 ∥ 𝑀))
Theorem	nzin 44287	The intersection of the set of multiples of m, mℤ, and those of n, nℤ, is the set of multiples of their least common multiple. Roughly Lemma 2.1(c) of https://www.mscs.dal.ca/~selinger/3343/handouts/ideals.pdf p. 5 and Problem 1(b) of https://people.math.binghamton.edu/mazur/teach/40107/40107h16sol.pdf p. 1, with mℤ and nℤ as images of the divides relation under m and n. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (( ∥ “ {𝑀}) ∩ ( ∥ “ {𝑁})) = ( ∥ “ {(𝑀 lcm 𝑁)}))
Theorem	nzprmdif 44288	Subtract one prime's multiples from an unequal prime's. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ≠ 𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (( ∥ “ {𝑀}) ∖ ( ∥ “ {𝑁})) = (( ∥ “ {𝑀}) ∖ ( ∥ “ {(𝑀 · 𝑁)})))
Theorem	hashnzfz 44289	Special case of hashdvds 16822: the count of multiples in nℤ restricted to an interval. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐽 − 1)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘(( ∥ “ {𝑁}) ∩ (𝐽...𝐾))) = ((⌊‘(𝐾 / 𝑁)) − (⌊‘((𝐽 − 1) / 𝑁))))
Theorem	hashnzfz2 44290	Special case of hashnzfz 44289: the count of multiples in nℤ, n greater than one, restricted to an interval starting at two. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘(( ∥ “ {𝑁}) ∩ (2...𝐾))) = (⌊‘(𝐾 / 𝑁)))
Theorem	hashnzfzclim 44291*	As the upper bound 𝐾 of the constraint interval (𝐽...𝐾) in hashnzfz 44289 increases, the resulting count of multiples tends to (𝐾 / 𝑀) —that is, there are approximately (𝐾 / 𝑀) multiples of 𝑀 in a finite interval of integers. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ ℤ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐽 − 1)) ↦ ((♯‘(( ∥ “ {𝑀}) ∩ (𝐽...𝑘))) / 𝑘)) ⇝ (1 / 𝑀))
21.39.4  Function operations
Theorem	caofcan 44292*	Transfer a cancellation law like mulcan 11927 to the function operation. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 16-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝑅𝑦) = (𝑥𝑅𝑧) ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑧))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺) = (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐻) ↔ 𝐺 = 𝐻))
Theorem	ofsubid 44293	Function analogue of subid 11555. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 5-Nov-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ) → (𝐹 ∘f − 𝐹) = (𝐴 × {0}))
Theorem	ofmul12 44294	Function analogue of mul12 11455. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 13-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ) ∧ (𝐺:𝐴⟶ℂ ∧ 𝐻:𝐴⟶ℂ)) → (𝐹 ∘f · (𝐺 ∘f · 𝐻)) = (𝐺 ∘f · (𝐹 ∘f · 𝐻)))
Theorem	ofdivrec 44295	Function analogue of divrec 11965, a division analogue of ofnegsub 12291. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 3-Nov-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ ∧ 𝐺:𝐴⟶(ℂ ∖ {0})) → (𝐹 ∘f · ((𝐴 × {1}) ∘f / 𝐺)) = (𝐹 ∘f / 𝐺))
Theorem	ofdivcan4 44296	Function analogue of divcan4 11976. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 4-Nov-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ ∧ 𝐺:𝐴⟶(ℂ ∖ {0})) → ((𝐹 ∘f · 𝐺) ∘f / 𝐺) = 𝐹)
Theorem	ofdivdiv2 44297	Function analogue of divdiv2 12006. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 23-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ) ∧ (𝐺:𝐴⟶(ℂ ∖ {0}) ∧ 𝐻:𝐴⟶(ℂ ∖ {0}))) → (𝐹 ∘f / (𝐺 ∘f / 𝐻)) = ((𝐹 ∘f · 𝐻) ∘f / 𝐺))
21.39.5  Calculus
Theorem	lhe4.4ex1a 44298	Example of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, part two (ftc2 26105): ∫(1(,)2)((𝑥↑2) − 3) d𝑥 = -(2 / 3). Section 4.4 example 1a of [LarsonHostetlerEdwards] p. 311. (The book teaches ftc2 26105 as simply the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus", then ftc1 26103 as the "Second Fundamental Theorem of Calculus".) (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 28-Oct-2015.) (Revised by Steve Rodriguez, 31-Oct-2015.)
⊢ ∫(1(,)2)((𝑥↑2) − 3) d𝑥 = -(2 / 3)
Theorem	dvsconst 44299	Derivative of a constant function on the real or complex numbers. The function may return a complex 𝐴 even if 𝑆 is ℝ. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 11-Nov-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ {ℝ, ℂ} ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) → (𝑆 D (𝑆 × {𝐴})) = (𝑆 × {0}))
Theorem	dvsid 44300	Derivative of the identity function on the real or complex numbers. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 11-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (𝑆 ∈ {ℝ, ℂ} → (𝑆 D ( I ↾ 𝑆)) = (𝑆 × {1}))