| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > rmobida | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| rmobida.1 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 |
| rmobida.2 | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| rmobida | ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | rmobida.1 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 | |
| 2 | rmobida.2 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) | |
| 3 | 2 | pm5.32da 579 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒))) |
| 4 | 1, 3 | mobid 2550 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃*𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ∃*𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒))) |
| 5 | df-rmo 3364 | . 2 ⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃*𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)) | |
| 6 | df-rmo 3364 | . 2 ⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒 ↔ ∃*𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒)) | |
| 7 | 4, 5, 6 | 3bitr4g 314 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒)) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 206 ∧ wa 395 Ⅎwnf 1783 ∈ wcel 2109 ∃*wmo 2538 ∃*wrmo 3363 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1795 ax-4 1809 ax-5 1910 ax-6 1967 ax-7 2008 ax-12 2178 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-ex 1780 df-nf 1784 df-mo 2540 df-rmo 3364 |
| This theorem is referenced by: rmobidvaOLD 3392 reuan 3876 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |