Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > rmobida | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
rmobida.1 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 |
rmobida.2 | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
rmobida | ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | rmobida.1 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 | |
2 | rmobida.2 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) | |
3 | 2 | pm5.32da 582 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒))) |
4 | 1, 3 | mobid 2549 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃*𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ∃*𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒))) |
5 | df-rmo 3069 | . 2 ⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃*𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)) | |
6 | df-rmo 3069 | . 2 ⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒 ↔ ∃*𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒)) | |
7 | 4, 5, 6 | 3bitr4g 317 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒)) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 209 ∧ wa 399 Ⅎwnf 1791 ∈ wcel 2110 ∃*wmo 2537 ∃*wrmo 3064 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1803 ax-4 1817 ax-5 1918 ax-6 1976 ax-7 2016 ax-12 2175 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 400 df-ex 1788 df-nf 1792 df-mo 2539 df-rmo 3069 |
This theorem is referenced by: rmobidva 3305 reuan 3808 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |