Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > rmobida | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
rmobida.1 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 |
rmobida.2 | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
rmobida | ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | rmobida.1 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 | |
2 | rmobida.2 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) | |
3 | 2 | pm5.32da 579 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒))) |
4 | 1, 3 | mobid 2550 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃*𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ∃*𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒))) |
5 | df-rmo 3071 | . 2 ⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃*𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)) | |
6 | df-rmo 3071 | . 2 ⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒 ↔ ∃*𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒)) | |
7 | 4, 5, 6 | 3bitr4g 314 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒)) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 205 ∧ wa 396 Ⅎwnf 1786 ∈ wcel 2106 ∃*wmo 2538 ∃*wrmo 3067 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1798 ax-4 1812 ax-5 1913 ax-6 1971 ax-7 2011 ax-12 2171 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 397 df-ex 1783 df-nf 1787 df-mo 2540 df-rmo 3071 |
This theorem is referenced by: rmobidvaOLD 3328 reuan 3829 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |