MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  rmobida Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem rmobida 3391
Description: Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
rmobida.1 𝑥𝜑
rmobida.2 ((𝜑𝑥𝐴) → (𝜓𝜒))
Assertion
Ref Expression
rmobida (𝜑 → (∃*𝑥𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃*𝑥𝐴 𝜒))

Proof of Theorem rmobida
StepHypRef Expression
1 rmobida.1 . . 3 𝑥𝜑
2 rmobida.2 . . . 4 ((𝜑𝑥𝐴) → (𝜓𝜒))
32pm5.32da 589 . . 3 (𝜑 → ((𝑥𝐴𝜓) ↔ (𝑥𝐴𝜒)))
41, 3mobid 2577 . 2 (𝜑 → (∃*𝑥(𝑥𝐴𝜓) ↔ ∃*𝑥(𝑥𝐴𝜒)))
5 df-rmo 3368 . 2 (∃*𝑥𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃*𝑥(𝑥𝐴𝜓))
6 df-rmo 3368 . 2 (∃*𝑥𝐴 𝜒 ↔ ∃*𝑥(𝑥𝐴𝜒))
74, 5, 63bitr4g 317 1 (𝜑 → (∃*𝑥𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃*𝑥𝐴 𝜒))
Colors of variables:    wff setvar class
This proof depends on syntax axioms:  wi 4  wb 209  wa 400  wnf 1812  wcel 2142  ∃*wmo 2564  ∃*wrmo 3367
This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1824  ax-4 1838  ax-5 1939  ax-6 1996  ax-7 2037  ax-12 2212
This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-ex 1809  df-nf 1813  df-mo 2566  df-rmo 3368
This theorem is used by:  reuan  3849
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator