P. 34 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 3301-3400   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	rexeqtrdv 3301*	Substitution of equal classes into a restricted existential quantifier. (Contributed by Matthew House, 21-Jul-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
Theorem	raleqtrrdv 3302*	Substitution of equal classes into a restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by Matthew House, 21-Jul-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
Theorem	rexeqtrrdv 3303*	Substitution of equal classes into a restricted existential quantifier. (Contributed by Matthew House, 21-Jul-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
Theorem	raleqbidva 3304*	Equality deduction for restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
Theorem	rexeqbidva 3305*	Equality deduction for restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
Theorem	raleqbidvv 3306*	Version of raleqbidv 3314 with additional disjoint variable conditions, not requiring ax-8 2121 nor df-clel 2815. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
Theorem	rexeqbidvv 3307*	Version of rexeqbidv 3315 with additional disjoint variable conditions, not requiring ax-8 2121 nor df-clel 2815. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 25-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
Theorem	raleqbi1dv 3308*	Equality deduction for restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 16-Nov-1995.) (Proof shortened by Steven Nguyen, 5-May-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))
Theorem	rexeqbi1dv 3309*	Equality deduction for restricted existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-1997.) (Proof shortened by Steven Nguyen, 5-May-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))
Theorem	raleleq 3310*	All elements of a class are elements of a class equal to this class. (Contributed by AV, 30-Oct-2020.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 18-Jul-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	raleleqOLD 3311*	Obsolete version of raleleq 3310 as of 18-Jul-2025. (Contributed by AV, 30-Oct-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	raleqbii 3312	Equality deduction for restricted universal quantifier, changing both formula and quantifier domain. Inference form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒)
Theorem	rexeqbii 3313	Equality deduction for restricted existential quantifier, changing both formula and quantifier domain. Inference form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒)
Theorem	raleqbidv 3314*	Equality deduction for restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2007.) Remove usage of ax-10 2152, ax-11 2168, and ax-12 2189 and reduce distinct variable conditions. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 30-Apr-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
Theorem	rexeqbidv 3315*	Equality deduction for restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2007.) Remove usage of ax-10 2152, ax-11 2168, and ax-12 2189 and reduce distinct variable conditions. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 30-Apr-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
Theorem	cbvraldva2 3316*	Rule used to change the bound variable in a restricted universal quantifier with implicit substitution which also changes the quantifier domain. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
Theorem	cbvrexdva2 3317*	Rule used to change the bound variable in a restricted existential quantifier with implicit substitution which also changes the quantifier domain. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 8-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
Theorem	sbralie 3318*	Implicit to explicit substitution that swaps variables in a restrictedly universally quantified expression. (Contributed by NM, 5-Sep-2004.) Avoid ax-ext 2712, df-cleq 2732, df-clel 2815. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 10-Mar-2025.) Avoid ax-10 2152, ax-12 2189. (Revised by SN, 13-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜓)
Theorem	sbralieALT 3319*	Alternative shorter proof of sbralie 3318 dependent on ax-ext 2712, df-cleq 2732, df-clel 2815. (Contributed by NM, 5-Sep-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜓)
Theorem	sbralieOLD 3320*	Obsolete version of sbralie 3318 as of 13-Nov-2025. (Contributed by NM, 5-Sep-2004.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜓)
Theorem	raleqf 3321	Equality theorem for restricted universal quantifier, with bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable restrictions. See raleq 3295 for a version based on fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 7-Mar-2004.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑))
Theorem	rexeqf 3322	Equality theorem for restricted existential quantifier, with bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable restrictions. See rexeq 3294 for a version based on fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 9-Mar-2025.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑))
Theorem	raleqbid 3323	Equality deduction for restricted universal quantifier. See raleqbidv 3314 for a version based on fewer axioms. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Mar-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
Theorem	rexeqbid 3324	Equality deduction for restricted existential quantifier. See rexeqbidv 3315 for a version based on fewer axioms. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Mar-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
Theorem	cbvralf 3325	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2380. Use the weaker cbvralfw 3280 when possible. (Contributed by NM, 7-Mar-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Oct-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	cbvrexf 3326	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2380. Use the weaker cbvrexfw 3281 when possible. (Contributed by FL, 27-Apr-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Oct-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	cbvral 3327*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2380. Use the weaker cbvralw 3282 when possible. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-2003.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	cbvrex 3328*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2380. Use the weaker cbvrexw 3283 when possible. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 8-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	cbvralv 3329*	Change the bound variable of a restricted universal quantifier using implicit substitution. See cbvralvw 3218 based on fewer axioms , but extra disjoint variables. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2380. Use the weaker cbvralvw 3218 when possible. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jan-1997.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	cbvrexv 3330*	Change the bound variable of a restricted existential quantifier using implicit substitution. See cbvrexvw 3219 based on fewer axioms , but extra disjoint variables. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2380. Use the weaker cbvrexvw 3219 when possible. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jun-1998.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	cbvralsv 3331*	Change bound variable by using a substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2380. Use the weaker cbvralsvw 3291 when possible. (Contributed by NM, 20-Nov-2005.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
Theorem	cbvrexsv 3332*	Change bound variable by using a substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2380. Use the weaker cbvrexsvw 3292 when possible. (Contributed by NM, 2-Mar-2008.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
Theorem	cbvral2v 3333*	Change bound variables of double restricted universal quantification, using implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2380. Use the weaker cbvral2vw 3222 when possible. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
Theorem	cbvrex2v 3334*	Change bound variables of double restricted universal quantification, using implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2380. Use the weaker cbvrex2vw 3223 when possible. (Contributed by FL, 2-Jul-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
Theorem	cbvral3v 3335*	Change bound variables of triple restricted universal quantification, using implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2380. Use the weaker cbvral3vw 3224 when possible. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑤 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑣 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑢 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐶 𝜓)
Theorem	rgen2a 3336*	Generalization rule for restricted quantification. Note that 𝑥 and 𝑦 are not required to be disjoint. This proof illustrates the use of dvelim 2459. This theorem relies on the full set of axioms up to ax-ext 2712 and it should no longer be used. Usage of rgen2 3180 is highly encouraged. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 1-Jan-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑
Theorem	nfrald 3337	Deduction version of nfral 3339. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2380. Use the weaker nfraldw 3285 when possible. (Contributed by NM, 15-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	nfrexd 3338	Deduction version of nfrex 3340. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2380. See nfrexdw 3286 for a version with a disjoint variable condition, but not requiring ax-13 2380. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	nfral 3339	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for restricted quantification. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2380. Use the weaker nfralw 3287 when possible. (Contributed by NM, 1-Sep-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑
Theorem	nfrex 3340	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for restricted quantification. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2380. See nfrexw 3288 for a version with a disjoint variable condition, but not requiring ax-13 2380. (Contributed by NM, 1-Sep-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 30-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑
Theorem	nfra2 3341*	Similar to Lemma 24 of [Monk2] p. 114, except the quantification of the antecedent is restricted. Derived automatically from hbra2VD 45310. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2380. Use the weaker nfra2w 3276 when possible. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑
Theorem	ralcom2 3342*	Commutation of restricted universal quantifiers. Note that 𝑥 and 𝑦 need not be disjoint (this makes the proof longer). This theorem relies on the full set of axioms up to ax-ext 2712 and it should no longer be used. Usage of ralcom 3268 is highly encouraged. (Contributed by NM, 24-Nov-1994.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 17-Oct-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
2.1.5.2  Restricted existential uniqueness and at-most-one quantifier
Syntax	wreu 3343	Extend wff notation to include restricted existential uniqueness.
wff ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑
Syntax	wrmo 3344	Extend wff notation to include restricted "at most one".
wff ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑
Definition	df-rmo 3345	Define restricted "at most one". Note: This notation is most often used to express that 𝜑 holds for at most one element of a given class 𝐴. For this reading Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 is required, though, for example, asserted when 𝑥 and 𝐴 are disjoint. Should instead 𝐴 depend on 𝑥, you rather assert at most one 𝑥 fulfilling 𝜑 happens to be contained in the corresponding 𝐴(𝑥). This interpretation is rarely needed (see also df-ral 3055). (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
Definition	df-reu 3346	Define restricted existential uniqueness. Note: This notation is most often used to express that 𝜑 holds for exactly one element of a given class 𝐴. For this reading Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 is required, though, for example, asserted when 𝑥 and 𝐴 are disjoint. Should instead 𝐴 depend on 𝑥, you rather assert exactly one 𝑥 fulfilling 𝜑 happens to be contained in the corresponding 𝐴(𝑥). This interpretation is rarely needed (see also df-ral 3055). (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	reu5 3347	Restricted uniqueness in terms of "at most one". (Contributed by NM, 23-May-1999.) (Revised by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑))
Theorem	reurmo 3348	Restricted existential uniqueness implies restricted "at most one." (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	reurex 3349	Restricted unique existence implies restricted existence. (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-1999.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	mormo 3350	Unrestricted "at most one" implies restricted "at most one". (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (∃*𝑥𝜑 → ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	rmobiia 3351	Formula-building rule for restricted at-most-one quantifier (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	reubiia 3352	Formula-building rule for restricted existential uniqueness quantifier (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-2004.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	rmobii 3353	Formula-building rule for restricted at-most-one quantifier (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	reubii 3354	Formula-building rule for restricted existential uniqueness quantifier (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 22-Oct-1999.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	rmoanid 3355	Cancellation law for restricted at-most-one quantification. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-May-2018.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 12-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	reuanid 3356	Cancellation law for restricted unique existential quantification. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Feb-2018.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 12-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	2reu2rex 3357	Double restricted existential uniqueness, analogous to 2eu2ex 2647. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)
Theorem	rmobidva 3358*	Formula-building rule for restricted at-most-one quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.) Avoid ax-12 2189. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 23-Nov-2024.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	reubidva 3359*	Formula-building rule for restricted existential uniqueness quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 13-Nov-2004.) Reduce axiom usage. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 14-Jan-2023.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	rmobidv 3360*	Formula-building rule for restricted at-most-one quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	reubidv 3361*	Formula-building rule for restricted existential uniqueness quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 17-Oct-1996.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	reueubd 3362*	Restricted existential uniqueness is equivalent to existential uniqueness if the unique element is in the restricting class. (Contributed by AV, 4-Jan-2021.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 𝜓 ↔ ∃!𝑥𝜓))
Theorem	rmo5 3363	Restricted "at most one" in term of uniqueness. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑))
Theorem	nrexrmo 3364	Nonexistence implies restricted "at most one". (Contributed by NM, 17-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	moel 3365*	"At most one" element in a set. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Jul-2018.) Avoid ax-11 2168. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 23-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (∃*𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = 𝑦)
Theorem	cbvrmovw 3366*	Change the bound variable of a restricted at-most-one quantifier using implicit substitution. Version of cbvrmov 3386 with a disjoint variable condition, which requires fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.) (Revised by GG, 30-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	cbvreuvw 3367*	Change the bound variable of a restricted unique existential quantifier using implicit substitution. Version of cbvreuv 3387 with a disjoint variable condition, which requires fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2004.) (Revised by GG, 30-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	rmobida 3368	Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	reubida 3369	Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Nov-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	cbvrmow 3370*	Change the bound variable of a restricted at-most-one quantifier using implicit substitution. Version of cbvrmo 3385 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-10 2152, ax-13 2380. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.) Avoid ax-10 2152, ax-13 2380. (Revised by GG, 23-May-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	cbvreuw 3371*	Change the bound variable of a restricted unique existential quantifier using implicit substitution. Version of cbvreu 3384 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2380. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) Avoid ax-13 2380. (Revised by GG, 10-Jan-2024.) Avoid ax-10 2152. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 10-Dec-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	nfrmo1 3372	The setvar 𝑥 is not free in ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑
Theorem	nfreu1 3373	The setvar 𝑥 is not free in ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-1997.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑
Theorem	nfrmow 3374*	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for restricted uniqueness. Version of nfrmo 3390 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2380. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.) Avoid ax-13 2380. (Revised by GG, 10-Jan-2024.) Avoid ax-9 2129, ax-ext 2712. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 21-Nov-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑
Theorem	nfreuw 3375*	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for restricted unique existence. Version of nfreu 3391 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2380. (Contributed by NM, 30-Oct-2010.) Avoid ax-13 2380. (Revised by GG, 10-Jan-2024.) Avoid ax-9 2129, ax-ext 2712. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 21-Nov-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑
Theorem	rmoeq1 3376*	Equality theorem for restricted at-most-one quantifier. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Jun-2017.) Remove usage of ax-10 2152, ax-11 2168, and ax-12 2189. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 30-Apr-2023.) Avoid ax-8 2121. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 12-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑))
Theorem	reueq1 3377*	Equality theorem for restricted unique existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2004.) Remove usage of ax-10 2152, ax-11 2168, and ax-12 2189. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 30-Apr-2023.) Avoid ax-8 2121. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 12-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑))
Theorem	rmoeqd 3378*	Equality deduction for restricted at-most-one quantifier. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))
Theorem	reueqd 3379*	Equality deduction for restricted unique existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))
Theorem	reueqdv 3380*	Formula-building rule for restricted existential uniqueness quantifier. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 1-Sep-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))
Theorem	reueqbidv 3381*	Formula-building rule for restricted existential uniqueness quantifier. Deduction form. General version of reubidv 3361. (Contributed by GG, 1-Sep-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
Theorem	rmoeq1f 3382	Equality theorem for restricted at-most-one quantifier, with bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable restrictions. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Jun-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑))
Theorem	reueq1f 3383	Equality theorem for restricted unique existential quantifier, with bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2004.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑))
Theorem	cbvreu 3384*	Change the bound variable of a restricted unique existential quantifier using implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2380. Use the weaker cbvreuw 3371 when possible. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	cbvrmo 3385*	Change the bound variable of a restricted at-most-one quantifier using implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2380. Use the weaker cbvrmow 3370, cbvrmovw 3366 when possible. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	cbvrmov 3386*	Change the bound variable of a restricted at-most-one quantifier using implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2380. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Jun-2017.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	cbvreuv 3387*	Change the bound variable of a restricted unique existential quantifier using implicit substitution. See cbvreuvw 3367 for a version without ax-13 2380, but extra disjoint variables. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2380. Use the weaker cbvreuvw 3367 when possible. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	nfrmod 3388	Deduction version of nfrmo 3390. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2380. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jun-2017.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	nfreud 3389	Deduction version of nfreu 3391. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2380. (Contributed by NM, 15-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Oct-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	nfrmo 3390	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for restricted uniqueness. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2380. Use the weaker nfrmow 3374 when possible. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑
Theorem	nfreu 3391	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for restricted unique existence. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2380. Use the weaker nfreuw 3375 when possible. (Contributed by NM, 30-Oct-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Oct-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑
2.1.5.3  Restricted class abstraction
Syntax	crab 3392	Extend class notation to include the restricted class abstraction (class builder).
class {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}
Definition	df-rab 3393	Define a restricted class abstraction (class builder): {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} is the class of all sets 𝑥 in 𝐴 such that 𝜑(𝑥) is true. Definition of [TakeutiZaring] p. 20. For the interpretation given in the previous paragraph to be correct, we need to assume Ⅎ𝑥𝐴, which is the case as soon as 𝑥 and 𝐴 are disjoint, which is generally the case. If 𝐴 were to depend on 𝑥, then the interpretation would be less obvious (think of the two extreme cases 𝐴 = {𝑥} and 𝐴 = 𝑥, for instance). See also df-ral 3055. (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)}
Theorem	rabbidva2 3394*	Equivalent wff's yield equal restricted class abstractions. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Feb-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜒})
Theorem	rabbia2 3395	Equivalent wff's yield equal restricted class abstractions. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 26-Jun-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜒}
Theorem	rabbiia 3396	Equivalent formulas yield equal restricted class abstractions (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 22-May-1999.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 12-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	rabbii 3397	Equivalent wff's correspond to equal restricted class abstractions. Inference form of rabbidv 3399. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 1-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	rabbidva 3398*	Equivalent wff's yield equal restricted class abstractions (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 28-Nov-2003.) (Proof shortened by SN, 3-Dec-2023.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜒})
Theorem	rabbidv 3399*	Equivalent wff's yield equal restricted class abstractions (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1995.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜒})
Theorem	rabbieq 3400	Equivalent wff's correspond to restricted class abstractions which are equal with the same class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 8-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}