P. 34 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 3301-3400   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	rexeqtrrdv 3301*	Substitution of equal classes into a restricted existential quantifier. (Contributed by Matthew House, 21-Jul-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
Theorem	raleqbidva 3302*	Equality deduction for restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
Theorem	rexeqbidva 3303*	Equality deduction for restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
Theorem	raleqbidvv 3304*	Version of raleqbidv 3316 with additional disjoint variable conditions, not requiring ax-8 2115 nor df-clel 2811. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
Theorem	raleqbidvvOLD 3305*	Obsolete version of raleqbidvv 3304 as of 9-Mar-2025. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Sep-2024.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
Theorem	rexeqbidvv 3306*	Version of rexeqbidv 3317 with additional disjoint variable conditions, not requiring ax-8 2115 nor df-clel 2811. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 25-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
Theorem	rexeqbidvvOLD 3307*	Obsolete version of rexeqbidvv 3306 as of 9-Mar-2025. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 25-Sep-2024.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
Theorem	raleqbi1dv 3308*	Equality deduction for restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 16-Nov-1995.) (Proof shortened by Steven Nguyen, 5-May-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))
Theorem	rexeqbi1dv 3309*	Equality deduction for restricted existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-1997.) (Proof shortened by Steven Nguyen, 5-May-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))
Theorem	raleqOLD 3310*	Obsolete version of raleq 3293 as of 9-Mar-2025. (Contributed by NM, 16-Nov-1995.) Remove usage of ax-10 2146, ax-11 2162, and ax-12 2184. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 30-Apr-2023.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑))
Theorem	rexeqOLD 3311*	Obsolete version of raleq 3293 as of 9-Mar-2025. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-1995.) Remove usage of ax-10 2146, ax-11 2162, and ax-12 2184. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 30-Apr-2023.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑))
Theorem	raleleq 3312*	All elements of a class are elements of a class equal to this class. (Contributed by AV, 30-Oct-2020.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 18-Jul-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	raleleqOLD 3313*	Obsolete version of raleleq 3312 as of 18-Jul-2025. (Contributed by AV, 30-Oct-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	raleqbii 3314	Equality deduction for restricted universal quantifier, changing both formula and quantifier domain. Inference form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒)
Theorem	rexeqbii 3315	Equality deduction for restricted existential quantifier, changing both formula and quantifier domain. Inference form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒)
Theorem	raleqbidv 3316*	Equality deduction for restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2007.) Remove usage of ax-10 2146, ax-11 2162, and ax-12 2184 and reduce distinct variable conditions. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 30-Apr-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
Theorem	rexeqbidv 3317*	Equality deduction for restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2007.) Remove usage of ax-10 2146, ax-11 2162, and ax-12 2184 and reduce distinct variable conditions. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 30-Apr-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
Theorem	cbvraldva2 3318*	Rule used to change the bound variable in a restricted universal quantifier with implicit substitution which also changes the quantifier domain. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
Theorem	cbvrexdva2 3319*	Rule used to change the bound variable in a restricted existential quantifier with implicit substitution which also changes the quantifier domain. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 8-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
Theorem	cbvraldvaOLD 3320*	Obsolete version of cbvraldva 3216 as of 9-Mar-2025. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	cbvrexdvaOLD 3321*	Obsolete version of cbvrexdva 3217 as of 9-Mar-2025. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	sbralie 3322*	Implicit to explicit substitution that swaps variables in a restrictedly universally quantified expression. (Contributed by NM, 5-Sep-2004.) Avoid ax-ext 2708, df-cleq 2728, df-clel 2811. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 10-Mar-2025.) Avoid ax-10 2146, ax-12 2184. (Revised by SN, 13-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜓)
Theorem	sbralieALT 3323*	Alternative shorter proof of sbralie 3322 dependent on ax-ext 2708, df-cleq 2728, df-clel 2811. (Contributed by NM, 5-Sep-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜓)
Theorem	sbralieOLD 3324*	Obsolete version of sbralie 3322 as of 13-Nov-2025. (Contributed by NM, 5-Sep-2004.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜓)
Theorem	raleqf 3325	Equality theorem for restricted universal quantifier, with bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable restrictions. See raleq 3293 for a version based on fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 7-Mar-2004.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑))
Theorem	rexeqf 3326	Equality theorem for restricted existential quantifier, with bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable restrictions. See rexeq 3292 for a version based on fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 9-Mar-2025.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑))
Theorem	rexeqfOLD 3327	Obsolete version of rexeqf 3326 as of 9-Mar-2025. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑))
Theorem	raleqbid 3328	Equality deduction for restricted universal quantifier. See raleqbidv 3316 for a version based on fewer axioms. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Mar-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
Theorem	rexeqbid 3329	Equality deduction for restricted existential quantifier. See rexeqbidv 3317 for a version based on fewer axioms. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Mar-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
Theorem	cbvralf 3330	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2376. Use the weaker cbvralfw 3276 when possible. (Contributed by NM, 7-Mar-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Oct-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	cbvrexf 3331	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2376. Use the weaker cbvrexfw 3277 when possible. (Contributed by FL, 27-Apr-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Oct-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	cbvral 3332*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2376. Use the weaker cbvralw 3278 when possible. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-2003.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	cbvrex 3333*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2376. Use the weaker cbvrexw 3279 when possible. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 8-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	cbvralv 3334*	Change the bound variable of a restricted universal quantifier using implicit substitution. See cbvralvw 3214 based on fewer axioms , but extra disjoint variables. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2376. Use the weaker cbvralvw 3214 when possible. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jan-1997.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	cbvrexv 3335*	Change the bound variable of a restricted existential quantifier using implicit substitution. See cbvrexvw 3215 based on fewer axioms , but extra disjoint variables. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2376. Use the weaker cbvrexvw 3215 when possible. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jun-1998.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	cbvralsv 3336*	Change bound variable by using a substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2376. Use the weaker cbvralsvw 3287 when possible. (Contributed by NM, 20-Nov-2005.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
Theorem	cbvrexsv 3337*	Change bound variable by using a substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2376. Use the weaker cbvrexsvw 3288 when possible. (Contributed by NM, 2-Mar-2008.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
Theorem	cbvral2v 3338*	Change bound variables of double restricted universal quantification, using implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2376. Use the weaker cbvral2vw 3218 when possible. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
Theorem	cbvrex2v 3339*	Change bound variables of double restricted universal quantification, using implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2376. Use the weaker cbvrex2vw 3219 when possible. (Contributed by FL, 2-Jul-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
Theorem	cbvral3v 3340*	Change bound variables of triple restricted universal quantification, using implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2376. Use the weaker cbvral3vw 3220 when possible. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑤 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑣 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑢 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐶 𝜓)
Theorem	rgen2a 3341*	Generalization rule for restricted quantification. Note that 𝑥 and 𝑦 are not required to be disjoint. This proof illustrates the use of dvelim 2455. This theorem relies on the full set of axioms up to ax-ext 2708 and it should no longer be used. Usage of rgen2 3176 is highly encouraged. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 1-Jan-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑
Theorem	nfrald 3342	Deduction version of nfral 3344. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2376. Use the weaker nfraldw 3281 when possible. (Contributed by NM, 15-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	nfrexd 3343	Deduction version of nfrex 3345. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2376. See nfrexdw 3282 for a version with a disjoint variable condition, but not requiring ax-13 2376. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	nfral 3344	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for restricted quantification. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2376. Use the weaker nfralw 3283 when possible. (Contributed by NM, 1-Sep-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑
Theorem	nfrex 3345	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for restricted quantification. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2376. See nfrexw 3284 for a version with a disjoint variable condition, but not requiring ax-13 2376. (Contributed by NM, 1-Sep-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 30-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑
Theorem	nfra2 3346*	Similar to Lemma 24 of [Monk2] p. 114, except the quantification of the antecedent is restricted. Derived automatically from hbra2VD 45096. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2376. Use the weaker nfra2w 3272 when possible. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑
Theorem	ralcom2 3347*	Commutation of restricted universal quantifiers. Note that 𝑥 and 𝑦 need not be disjoint (this makes the proof longer). This theorem relies on the full set of axioms up to ax-ext 2708 and it should no longer be used. Usage of ralcom 3264 is highly encouraged. (Contributed by NM, 24-Nov-1994.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 17-Oct-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
2.1.5.2  Restricted existential uniqueness and at-most-one quantifier
Syntax	wreu 3348	Extend wff notation to include restricted existential uniqueness.
wff ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑
Syntax	wrmo 3349	Extend wff notation to include restricted "at most one".
wff ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑
Definition	df-rmo 3350	Define restricted "at most one". Note: This notation is most often used to express that 𝜑 holds for at most one element of a given class 𝐴. For this reading Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 is required, though, for example, asserted when 𝑥 and 𝐴 are disjoint. Should instead 𝐴 depend on 𝑥, you rather assert at most one 𝑥 fulfilling 𝜑 happens to be contained in the corresponding 𝐴(𝑥). This interpretation is rarely needed (see also df-ral 3052). (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
Definition	df-reu 3351	Define restricted existential uniqueness. Note: This notation is most often used to express that 𝜑 holds for exactly one element of a given class 𝐴. For this reading Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 is required, though, for example, asserted when 𝑥 and 𝐴 are disjoint. Should instead 𝐴 depend on 𝑥, you rather assert exactly one 𝑥 fulfilling 𝜑 happens to be contained in the corresponding 𝐴(𝑥). This interpretation is rarely needed (see also df-ral 3052). (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	reu5 3352	Restricted uniqueness in terms of "at most one". (Contributed by NM, 23-May-1999.) (Revised by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑))
Theorem	reurmo 3353	Restricted existential uniqueness implies restricted "at most one." (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	reurex 3354	Restricted unique existence implies restricted existence. (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-1999.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	mormo 3355	Unrestricted "at most one" implies restricted "at most one". (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (∃*𝑥𝜑 → ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	rmobiia 3356	Formula-building rule for restricted at-most-one quantifier (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	reubiia 3357	Formula-building rule for restricted existential uniqueness quantifier (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-2004.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	rmobii 3358	Formula-building rule for restricted at-most-one quantifier (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	reubii 3359	Formula-building rule for restricted existential uniqueness quantifier (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 22-Oct-1999.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	rmoanid 3360	Cancellation law for restricted at-most-one quantification. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-May-2018.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 12-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	reuanid 3361	Cancellation law for restricted unique existential quantification. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Feb-2018.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 12-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	2reu2rex 3362	Double restricted existential uniqueness, analogous to 2eu2ex 2643. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)
Theorem	rmobidva 3363*	Formula-building rule for restricted at-most-one quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.) Avoid ax-12 2184. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 23-Nov-2024.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	reubidva 3364*	Formula-building rule for restricted existential uniqueness quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 13-Nov-2004.) Reduce axiom usage. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 14-Jan-2023.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	rmobidv 3365*	Formula-building rule for restricted at-most-one quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	reubidv 3366*	Formula-building rule for restricted existential uniqueness quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 17-Oct-1996.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	reueubd 3367*	Restricted existential uniqueness is equivalent to existential uniqueness if the unique element is in the restricting class. (Contributed by AV, 4-Jan-2021.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 𝜓 ↔ ∃!𝑥𝜓))
Theorem	rmo5 3368	Restricted "at most one" in term of uniqueness. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑))
Theorem	nrexrmo 3369	Nonexistence implies restricted "at most one". (Contributed by NM, 17-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	moel 3370*	"At most one" element in a set. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Jul-2018.) Avoid ax-11 2162. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 23-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (∃*𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = 𝑦)
Theorem	cbvrmovw 3371*	Change the bound variable of a restricted at-most-one quantifier using implicit substitution. Version of cbvrmov 3393 with a disjoint variable condition, which requires fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.) (Revised by GG, 30-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	cbvreuvw 3372*	Change the bound variable of a restricted unique existential quantifier using implicit substitution. Version of cbvreuv 3394 with a disjoint variable condition, which requires fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2004.) (Revised by GG, 30-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	rmobida 3373	Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	reubida 3374	Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Nov-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	cbvrmow 3375*	Change the bound variable of a restricted at-most-one quantifier using implicit substitution. Version of cbvrmo 3392 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-10 2146, ax-13 2376. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.) Avoid ax-10 2146, ax-13 2376. (Revised by GG, 23-May-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	cbvreuw 3376*	Change the bound variable of a restricted unique existential quantifier using implicit substitution. Version of cbvreu 3391 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2376. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) Avoid ax-13 2376. (Revised by GG, 10-Jan-2024.) Avoid ax-10 2146. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 10-Dec-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	nfrmo1 3377	The setvar 𝑥 is not free in ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑
Theorem	nfreu1 3378	The setvar 𝑥 is not free in ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-1997.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑
Theorem	nfrmow 3379*	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for restricted uniqueness. Version of nfrmo 3397 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2376. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.) Avoid ax-13 2376. (Revised by GG, 10-Jan-2024.) Avoid ax-9 2123, ax-ext 2708. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 21-Nov-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑
Theorem	nfreuw 3380*	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for restricted unique existence. Version of nfreu 3398 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2376. (Contributed by NM, 30-Oct-2010.) Avoid ax-13 2376. (Revised by GG, 10-Jan-2024.) Avoid ax-9 2123, ax-ext 2708. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 21-Nov-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑
Theorem	rmoeq1 3381*	Equality theorem for restricted at-most-one quantifier. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Jun-2017.) Remove usage of ax-10 2146, ax-11 2162, and ax-12 2184. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 30-Apr-2023.) Avoid ax-8 2115. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 12-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑))
Theorem	reueq1 3382*	Equality theorem for restricted unique existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2004.) Remove usage of ax-10 2146, ax-11 2162, and ax-12 2184. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 30-Apr-2023.) Avoid ax-8 2115. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 12-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑))
Theorem	rmoeq1OLD 3383*	Obsolete version of rmoeq1 3381 as of 12-Mar-2025. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Jun-2017.) Remove usage of ax-10 2146, ax-11 2162, and ax-12 2184. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 30-Apr-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑))
Theorem	reueq1OLD 3384*	Obsolete version of reueq1 3382 as of 12-Mar-2025. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2004.) Remove usage of ax-10 2146, ax-11 2162, and ax-12 2184. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 30-Apr-2023.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑))
Theorem	rmoeqd 3385*	Equality deduction for restricted at-most-one quantifier. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))
Theorem	reueqd 3386*	Equality deduction for restricted unique existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))
Theorem	reueqdv 3387*	Formula-building rule for restricted existential uniqueness quantifier. Deduction form. (Contributed by GG, 1-Sep-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))
Theorem	reueqbidv 3388*	Formula-building rule for restricted existential uniqueness quantifier. Deduction form. General version of reubidv 3366. (Contributed by GG, 1-Sep-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
Theorem	rmoeq1f 3389	Equality theorem for restricted at-most-one quantifier, with bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable restrictions. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Jun-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑))
Theorem	reueq1f 3390	Equality theorem for restricted unique existential quantifier, with bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2004.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑))
Theorem	cbvreu 3391*	Change the bound variable of a restricted unique existential quantifier using implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2376. Use the weaker cbvreuw 3376 when possible. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	cbvrmo 3392*	Change the bound variable of a restricted at-most-one quantifier using implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2376. Use the weaker cbvrmow 3375, cbvrmovw 3371 when possible. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	cbvrmov 3393*	Change the bound variable of a restricted at-most-one quantifier using implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2376. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Jun-2017.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	cbvreuv 3394*	Change the bound variable of a restricted unique existential quantifier using implicit substitution. See cbvreuvw 3372 for a version without ax-13 2376, but extra disjoint variables. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2376. Use the weaker cbvreuvw 3372 when possible. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	nfrmod 3395	Deduction version of nfrmo 3397. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2376. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jun-2017.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	nfreud 3396	Deduction version of nfreu 3398. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2376. (Contributed by NM, 15-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Oct-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	nfrmo 3397	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for restricted uniqueness. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2376. Use the weaker nfrmow 3379 when possible. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑
Theorem	nfreu 3398	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for restricted unique existence. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2376. Use the weaker nfreuw 3380 when possible. (Contributed by NM, 30-Oct-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Oct-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑
2.1.5.3  Restricted class abstraction
Syntax	crab 3399	Extend class notation to include the restricted class abstraction (class builder).
class {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}
Definition	df-rab 3400	Define a restricted class abstraction (class builder): {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} is the class of all sets 𝑥 in 𝐴 such that 𝜑(𝑥) is true. Definition of [TakeutiZaring] p. 20. For the interpretation given in the previous paragraph to be correct, we need to assume Ⅎ𝑥𝐴, which is the case as soon as 𝑥 and 𝐴 are disjoint, which is generally the case. If 𝐴 were to depend on 𝑥, then the interpretation would be less obvious (think of the two extreme cases 𝐴 = {𝑥} and 𝐴 = 𝑥, for instance). See also df-ral 3052. (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)}