Theorem unjust 3900

Description: Soundness justification theorem for df-un 3901. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 28-Apr-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jul-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
unjust	⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)}

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝑦,𝐴   𝑦,𝐵

Proof of Theorem unjust

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eleq1w 2819	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴))
2		eleq1w 2819	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵))
3	1, 2	orbi12d 916	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵)))
4	3	cbvabv 2809	. 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)} = {𝑧 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵)}
5		eleq1w 2819	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴))
6		eleq1w 2819	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵))
7	5, 6	orbi12d 916	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)))
8	7	cbvabv 2809	. 2 ⊢ {𝑧 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵)} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)}
9	4, 8	eqtri 2764	1 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)}

Syntax hints:   ∨ wo 844   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2105  {cab 2713

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2107  ax-9 2115  ax-ext 2707

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 845  df-ex 1781  df-sb 2067  df-clab 2714  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2814

This theorem is referenced by: (None)