P. 40 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 3901-4000   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Syntax	wpss 3901	Extend wff notation with proper subclass relation.
wff 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵
Theorem	difjust 3902*	Soundness justification theorem for df-dif 3903. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 27-Apr-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jul-2011.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)}
Definition	df-dif 3903*	Define class difference, also called relative complement. Definition 5.12 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 20. For example, ({1, 3} ∖ {1, 8}) = {3} (ex-dif 30393). Contrast this operation with union (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) (df-un 3905) and intersection (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) (df-in 3907). Several notations are used in the literature; we chose the ∖ convention used in Definition 5.3 of [Eisenberg] p. 67 instead of the more common minus sign to reserve the latter for later use in, e.g., arithmetic. We will use the terminology "𝐴 excludes 𝐵 " to mean 𝐴 ∖ 𝐵. We will use "𝐵 is removed from 𝐴 " to mean 𝐴 ∖ {𝐵} i.e. the removal of an element or equivalently the exclusion of a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)}
Theorem	unjust 3904*	Soundness justification theorem for df-un 3905. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 28-Apr-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jul-2011.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)}
Definition	df-un 3905*	Define the union of two classes. Definition 5.6 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 16. For example, ({1, 3} ∪ {1, 8}) = {1, 3, 8} (ex-un 30394). Contrast this operation with difference (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) (df-dif 3903) and intersection (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) (df-in 3907). For an alternate definition in terms of class difference, requiring no dummy variables, see dfun2 4218. For union defined in terms of intersection, see dfun3 4224. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-1993.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)}
Theorem	injust 3906*	Soundness justification theorem for df-in 3907. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 28-Apr-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jul-2011.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)}
Definition	df-in 3907*	Define the intersection of two classes. Definition 5.6 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 16. For example, ({1, 3} ∩ {1, 8}) = {1} (ex-in 30395). Contrast this operation with union (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) (df-un 3905) and difference (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) (df-dif 3903). For alternate definitions in terms of class difference, requiring no dummy variables, see dfin2 4219 and dfin4 4226. For intersection defined in terms of union, see dfin3 4225. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)}
Theorem	dfin5 3908*	Alternate definition for the intersection of two classes. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jul-2005.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵}
Theorem	dfdif2 3909*	Alternate definition of class difference. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵}
Theorem	eldif 3910	Expansion of membership in a class difference. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶))
Theorem	eldifd 3911	If a class is in one class and not another, it is also in their difference. One-way deduction form of eldif 3910. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶))
Theorem	eldifad 3912	If a class is in the difference of two classes, it is also in the minuend. One-way deduction form of eldif 3910. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	eldifbd 3913	If a class is in the difference of two classes, it is not in the subtrahend. One-way deduction form of eldif 3910. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	elneeldif 3914	The elements of a set difference and the minuend are not equal. (Contributed by AV, 21-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴)) → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)
Theorem	velcomp 3915	Characterization of setvar elements of the complement of a class. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 15-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (V ∖ 𝐴) ↔ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	elin 3916	Expansion of membership in an intersection of two classes. Theorem 12 of [Suppes] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶))
2.1.12  Subclasses and subsets
Definition	df-ss 3917*	Define the subclass relationship. Definition 5.9 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 17. For example, {1, 2} ⊆ {1, 2, 3} (ex-ss 30397). Note that 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐴 (proved in ssid 3955). Contrast this relationship with the relationship 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 (as will be defined in df-pss 3920). For an alternative definition, not requiring a dummy variable, see dfss2 3918. Other possible definitions are given by dfss3 3921, dfss4 4217, sspss 4050, ssequn1 4134, ssequn2 4137, sseqin2 4171, and ssdif0 4314. We prefer the label "ss" ("subset") for ⊆, despite the fact that it applies to classes. It is much more common to refer to this as the subset relation than subclass, especially since most of the time the arguments are in fact sets (and for pragmatic reasons we don't want to need to use different operations for sets). The way set.mm is set up, many things are technically classes despite morally (and provably) being sets, like 1 (cf. df-1 11006 and 1ex 11100) or ℝ ( cf. df-r 11008 and reex 11089). This has to do with the fact that there are no "set expressions": classes are expressions but there are only set variables in set.mm (cf. https://us.metamath.org/downloads/grammar-ambiguity.txt 11089). This is why we use ⊆ both for subclass relations and for subset relations and call it "subset". (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2002.) Revised from the original definition dfss2 3918. (Revised by GG, 15-May-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	dfss2 3918	Alternate definition of the subclass relationship between two classes. Exercise 9 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 18. This was the original definition before df-ss 3917. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-1994.) Revise df-ss 3917. (Revised by GG, 15-May-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐴)
Theorem	dfss 3919	Variant of subclass definition dfss2 3918. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))
Definition	df-pss 3920	Define proper subclass (or strict subclass) relationship between two classes. Definition 5.9 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 17. For example, {1, 2} ⊊ {1, 2, 3} (ex-pss 30398). Note that ¬ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐴 (proved in pssirr 4051). Contrast this relationship with the relationship 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 (as defined in df-ss 3917). Other possible definitions are given by dfpss2 4036 and dfpss3 4037. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-1996.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵))
Theorem	dfss3 3921*	Alternate definition of subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-1999.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	dfss6 3922*	Alternate definition of subclass relationship. (Contributed by RP, 16-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	dfssf 3923	Equivalence for subclass relation, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jul-1994.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) Avoid ax-13 2371. (Revised by GG, 19-May-2023.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	dfss3f 3924	Equivalence for subclass relation, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 20-Mar-2004.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	nfss 3925	If 𝑥 is not free in 𝐴 and 𝐵, it is not free in 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵. (Contributed by NM, 27-Dec-1996.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵
Theorem	ssel 3926	Membership relationships follow from a subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) Avoid ax-12 2179. (Revised by SN, 27-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	ssel2 3927	Membership relationships follow from a subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jun-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	sseli 3928	Membership implication from subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	sselii 3929	Membership inference from subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 31-May-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵
Theorem	sselid 3930	Membership inference from subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	sseld 3931	Membership deduction from subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-1995.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	sselda 3932	Membership deduction from subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jun-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	sseldd 3933	Membership inference from subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2004.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	ssneld 3934	If a class is not in another class, it is also not in a subclass of that class. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵 → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	ssneldd 3935	If an element is not in a class, it is also not in a subclass of that class. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	ssriv 3936*	Inference based on subclass definition. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵
Theorem	ssrd 3937	Deduction based on subclass definition. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Mar-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)
Theorem	ssrdv 3938*	Deduction based on subclass definition. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-1995.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)
Theorem	sstr2 3939	Transitivity of subclass relationship. Exercise 5 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 17. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jun-2011.) Avoid axioms. (Revised by GG, 19-May-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶))
Theorem	sstr2OLD 3940	Obsolete version of sstr2 3939 as of 19-May-2025. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶))
Theorem	sstr 3941	Transitivity of subclass relationship. Theorem 6 of [Suppes] p. 23. (Contributed by NM, 5-Sep-2003.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶)
Theorem	sstri 3942	Subclass transitivity inference. (Contributed by NM, 5-May-2000.)
⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶
Theorem	sstrd 3943	Subclass transitivity deduction. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jun-2004.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶)
Theorem	sstrid 3944	Subclass transitivity deduction. (Contributed by NM, 6-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶)
Theorem	sstrdi 3945	Subclass transitivity deduction. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶)
Theorem	sylan9ss 3946	A subclass transitivity deduction. (Contributed by NM, 27-Sep-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶)
Theorem	sylan9ssr 3947	A subclass transitivity deduction. (Contributed by NM, 27-Sep-2004.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶)
Theorem	eqss 3948	The subclass relationship is antisymmetric. Compare Theorem 4 of [Suppes] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 21-May-1993.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴))
Theorem	eqssi 3949	Infer equality from two subclass relationships. Compare Theorem 4 of [Suppes] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-1993.)
⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵
Theorem	eqssd 3950	Equality deduction from two subclass relationships. Compare Theorem 4 of [Suppes] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jun-2004.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	sssseq 3951	If a class is a subclass of another class, then the classes are equal if and only if the other class is a subclass of the first class. (Contributed by AV, 23-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	eqrd 3952	Deduce equality of classes from equivalence of membership. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Mar-2017.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 1-Dec-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	eqri 3953	Infer equality of classes from equivalence of membership. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Oct-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵
Theorem	eqelssd 3954*	Equality deduction from subclass relationship and membership. (Contributed by AV, 21-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	ssid 3955	Any class is a subclass of itself. Exercise 10 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 18. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jun-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐴
Theorem	ssidd 3956	Weakening of ssid 3955. (Contributed by BJ, 1-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	ssv 3957	Any class is a subclass of the universal class. (Contributed by NM, 31-Oct-1995.)
⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ V
Theorem	sseq1 3958	Equality theorem for subclasses. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 21-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶))
Theorem	sseq2 3959	Equality theorem for the subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jun-1998.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵))
Theorem	sseq12 3960	Equality theorem for the subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 31-May-1999.)
⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 = 𝐷) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐷))
Theorem	sseq1i 3961	An equality inference for the subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶)
Theorem	sseq2i 3962	An equality inference for the subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-1993.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵)
Theorem	sseq12i 3963	An equality inference for the subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 31-May-1999.) (Proof shortened by Eric Schmidt, 26-Jan-2007.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐷    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐷)
Theorem	sseq1d 3964	An equality deduction for the subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶))
Theorem	sseq2d 3965	An equality deduction for the subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵))
Theorem	sseq12d 3966	An equality deduction for the subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 31-May-1999.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐷))
Theorem	eqsstrd 3967	Substitution of equality into a subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 25-Apr-2004.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶)
Theorem	eqsstrrd 3968	Substitution of equality into a subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 25-Apr-2004.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶)
Theorem	sseqtrd 3969	Substitution of equality into a subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 25-Apr-2004.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶)
Theorem	sseqtrrd 3970	Substitution of equality into a subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 25-Apr-2004.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶)
Theorem	eqsstrid 3971	A chained subclass and equality deduction. (Contributed by NM, 25-Apr-2004.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶)
Theorem	eqsstrrid 3972	A chained subclass and equality deduction. (Contributed by NM, 25-Apr-2004.)
⊢ 𝐵 = 𝐴    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶)
Theorem	sseqtrdi 3973	A chained subclass and equality deduction. (Contributed by NM, 25-Apr-2004.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶)
Theorem	sseqtrrdi 3974	A chained subclass and equality deduction. (Contributed by NM, 25-Apr-2004.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶)
Theorem	sseqtrid 3975	Subclass transitivity deduction. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶)
Theorem	sseqtrrid 3976	Subclass transitivity deduction. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶)
Theorem	eqsstrdi 3977	A chained subclass and equality deduction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶)
Theorem	eqsstrrdi 3978	A chained subclass and equality deduction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶)
Theorem	eqsstri 3979	Substitution of equality into a subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jul-1995.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶
Theorem	eqsstrri 3980	Substitution of equality into a subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.)
⊢ 𝐵 = 𝐴    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶
Theorem	sseqtri 3981	Substitution of equality into a subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jul-1995.)
⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶
Theorem	sseqtrri 3982	Substitution of equality into a subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 4-Apr-1995.)
⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶
Theorem	3sstr3i 3983	Substitution of equality in both sides of a subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jan-1996.) (Proof shortened by Eric Schmidt, 26-Jan-2007.)
⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐶    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = 𝐷    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷
Theorem	3sstr4i 3984	Substitution of equality in both sides of a subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jan-1996.) (Proof shortened by Eric Schmidt, 26-Jan-2007.)
⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐴    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷
Theorem	3sstr3g 3985	Substitution of equality into both sides of a subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 1-Oct-2000.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐶    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = 𝐷    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷)
Theorem	3sstr4g 3986	Substitution of equality into both sides of a subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-1994.) (Proof shortened by Eric Schmidt, 26-Jan-2007.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐴    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷)
Theorem	3sstr3d 3987	Substitution of equality into both sides of a subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 1-Oct-2000.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷)
Theorem	3sstr4d 3988	Substitution of equality into both sides of a subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 30-Nov-1995.) (Proof shortened by Eric Schmidt, 26-Jan-2007.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷)
Theorem	eqimssd 3989	Equality implies inclusion, deduction version. (Contributed by SN, 6-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)
Theorem	eqimsscd 3990	Equality implies inclusion, deduction version. (Contributed by SN, 15-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	eqimss 3991	Equality implies inclusion. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 21-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)
Theorem	eqimss2 3992	Equality implies inclusion. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-2003.)
⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐴 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)
Theorem	eqimssi 3993	Infer subclass relationship from equality. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jan-2007.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵
Theorem	eqimss2i 3994	Infer subclass relationship from equality. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jan-2007.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴
Theorem	nssne1 3995	Two classes are different if they don't include the same class. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶) → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)
Theorem	nssne2 3996	Two classes are different if they are not subclasses of the same class. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	nss 3997*	Negation of subclass relationship. Exercise 13 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 18. (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-1996.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 21-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	nelss 3998	Demonstrate by witnesses that two classes lack a subclass relation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Feb-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) → ¬ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶)
Theorem	ssrexf 3999	Restricted existential quantification follows from a subclass relationship. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 20-Apr-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑))
Theorem	ssrmof 4000	"At most one" existential quantification restricted to a subclass. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Oct-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 → ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑))