P. 40 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 3901-4000   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	cbvcsbv 3901*	Change the bound variable of a proper substitution into a class using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑦⦌𝐶
Theorem	csbid 3902	Analogue of sbid 2240 for proper substitution into a class. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2005.)
⊢ ⦋𝑥 / 𝑥⦌𝐴 = 𝐴
Theorem	csbeq1a 3903	Equality theorem for proper substitution into a class. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2005.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)
Theorem	csbcow 3904*	Composition law for chained substitutions into a class. Version of csbco 3905 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2366. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2005.) Avoid ax-13 2366. (Revised by Gino Giotto, 10-Jan-2024.)
⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑦⦌⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵
Theorem	csbco 3905*	Composition law for chained substitutions into a class. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2366. Use the weaker csbcow 3904 when possible. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑦⦌⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵
Theorem	csbtt 3906	Substitution doesn't affect a constant 𝐵 (in which 𝑥 is not free). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵) → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐵)
Theorem	csbconstgf 3907	Substitution doesn't affect a constant 𝐵 (in which 𝑥 is not free). (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2005.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐵)
Theorem	csbconstg 3908*	Substitution doesn't affect a constant 𝐵 (in which 𝑥 does not occur). csbconstgf 3907 with distinct variable requirement. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) Avoid ax-12 2164. (Revised by Gino Giotto, 15-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐵)
Theorem	csbconstgOLD 3909*	Obsolete version of csbconstg 3908 as of 15-Oct-2024. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐵)
Theorem	csbgfi 3910	Substitution for a variable not free in a class does not affect it, in inference form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 4-Jun-2019.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐵
Theorem	csbconstgi 3911*	The proper substitution of a class for a variable in another variable does not modify it, in inference form. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 30-May-2019.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑦 = 𝑦
Theorem	nfcsb1d 3912	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for substitution into a class. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Oct-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)
Theorem	nfcsb1 3913	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for substitution into a class. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵
Theorem	nfcsb1v 3914*	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for substitution into a class. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵
Theorem	nfcsbd 3915	Deduction version of nfcsb 3917. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2366. (Contributed by NM, 21-Nov-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Oct-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥⦋𝐴 / 𝑦⦌𝐵)
Theorem	nfcsbw 3916*	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for substitution into a class. Version of nfcsb 3917 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2366. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Oct-2016.) Avoid ax-13 2366. (Revised by Gino Giotto, 10-Jan-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥⦋𝐴 / 𝑦⦌𝐵
Theorem	nfcsb 3917	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for substitution into a class. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2366. Use the weaker nfcsbw 3916 when possible. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Oct-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥⦋𝐴 / 𝑦⦌𝐵
Theorem	csbhypf 3918*	Introduce an explicit substitution into an implicit substitution hypothesis. See sbhypf 3534 for class substitution version. (Contributed by NM, 19-Dec-2008.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐶    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶)
Theorem	csbiebt 3919*	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit substitution into a class. (Closed theorem version of csbiegf 3923.) (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝐶) → (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶))
Theorem	csbiedf 3920*	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit substitution into a class. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶)
Theorem	csbieb 3921*	Bidirectional conversion between an implicit class substitution hypothesis 𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶 and its explicit substitution equivalent. (Contributed by NM, 2-Mar-2008.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶)
Theorem	csbiebg 3922*	Bidirectional conversion between an implicit class substitution hypothesis 𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶 and its explicit substitution equivalent. (Contributed by NM, 24-Mar-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶))
Theorem	csbiegf 3923*	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit substitution into a class. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶)
Theorem	csbief 3924*	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit substitution into a class. (Contributed by NM, 26-Nov-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐶    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶
Theorem	csbie 3925*	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit substitution into a class. (Contributed by AV, 2-Dec-2019.) Reduce axiom usage. (Revised by Gino Giotto, 15-Oct-2024.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶
Theorem	csbieOLD 3926*	Obsolete version of csbie 3925 as of 15-Oct-2024. (Contributed by AV, 2-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶
Theorem	csbied 3927*	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit substitution into a class. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Dec-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.) Reduce axiom usage. (Revised by Gino Giotto, 15-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶)
Theorem	csbiedOLD 3928*	Obsolete version of csbied 3927 as of 15-Oct-2024. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Dec-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶)
Theorem	csbied2 3929*	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit class substitution, deduction form. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐵) → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 = 𝐷)
Theorem	csbie2t 3930*	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit substitution into a class (closed form of csbie2 3931). (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → 𝐶 = 𝐷) → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌⦋𝐵 / 𝑦⦌𝐶 = 𝐷)
Theorem	csbie2 3931*	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit substitution into a class. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-2007.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌⦋𝐵 / 𝑦⦌𝐶 = 𝐷
Theorem	csbie2g 3932*	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit class substitution. This version of csbie 3925 avoids a disjointness condition on 𝑥, 𝐴 and 𝑥, 𝐷 by substituting twice. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Nov-2016.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐷)
Theorem	cbvrabcsfw 3933*	Version of cbvrabcsf 3937 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2366. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 13-Jul-2011.) (Revised by Gino Giotto, 26-Jan-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	cbvralcsf 3934	A more general version of cbvralf 3351 that doesn't require 𝐴 and 𝐵 to be distinct from 𝑥 or 𝑦. Changes bound variables using implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2366. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 13-Jul-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
Theorem	cbvrexcsf 3935	A more general version of cbvrexf 3352 that has no distinct variable restrictions. Changes bound variables using implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2366. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 13-Jul-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 7-Dec-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
Theorem	cbvreucsf 3936	A more general version of cbvreuv 3422 that has no distinct variable restrictions. Changes bound variables using implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2366. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 13-Jul-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
Theorem	cbvrabcsf 3937	A more general version of cbvrab 3468 with no distinct variable restrictions. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2366. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 13-Jul-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	cbvralv2 3938*	Rule used to change the bound variable in a restricted universal quantifier with implicit substitution which also changes the quantifier domain. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2366. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒)
Theorem	cbvrexv2 3939*	Rule used to change the bound variable in a restricted existential quantifier with implicit substitution which also changes the quantifier domain. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2366. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒)
Theorem	rspc2vd 3940*	Deduction version of 2-variable restricted specialization, using implicit substitution. Notice that the class 𝐷 for the second set variable 𝑦 may depend on the first set variable 𝑥. (Contributed by AV, 29-Mar-2021.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → 𝐷 = 𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 𝜃 → 𝜓))
2.1.11  Define basic set operations and relations
Syntax	cdif 3941	Extend class notation to include class difference (read: "𝐴 minus 𝐵").
class (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵)
Syntax	cun 3942	Extend class notation to include union of two classes (read: "𝐴 union 𝐵").
class (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)
Syntax	cin 3943	Extend class notation to include the intersection of two classes (read: "𝐴 intersect 𝐵").
class (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)
Syntax	wss 3944	Extend wff notation to include the subclass relation. This is read "𝐴 is a subclass of 𝐵 " or "𝐵 includes 𝐴". When 𝐴 exists as a set, it is also read "𝐴 is a subset of 𝐵".
wff 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵
Syntax	wpss 3945	Extend wff notation with proper subclass relation.
wff 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵
Theorem	difjust 3946*	Soundness justification theorem for df-dif 3947. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 27-Apr-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jul-2011.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)}
Definition	df-dif 3947*	Define class difference, also called relative complement. Definition 5.12 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 20. For example, ({1, 3} ∖ {1, 8}) = {3} (ex-dif 30207). Contrast this operation with union (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) (df-un 3949) and intersection (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) (df-in 3951). Several notations are used in the literature; we chose the ∖ convention used in Definition 5.3 of [Eisenberg] p. 67 instead of the more common minus sign to reserve the latter for later use in, e.g., arithmetic. We will use the terminology "𝐴 excludes 𝐵 " to mean 𝐴 ∖ 𝐵. We will use "𝐵 is removed from 𝐴 " to mean 𝐴 ∖ {𝐵} i.e. the removal of an element or equivalently the exclusion of a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)}
Theorem	unjust 3948*	Soundness justification theorem for df-un 3949. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 28-Apr-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jul-2011.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)}
Definition	df-un 3949*	Define the union of two classes. Definition 5.6 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 16. For example, ({1, 3} ∪ {1, 8}) = {1, 3, 8} (ex-un 30208). Contrast this operation with difference (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) (df-dif 3947) and intersection (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) (df-in 3951). For an alternate definition in terms of class difference, requiring no dummy variables, see dfun2 4255. For union defined in terms of intersection, see dfun3 4261. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-1993.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)}
Theorem	injust 3950*	Soundness justification theorem for df-in 3951. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 28-Apr-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jul-2011.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)}
Definition	df-in 3951*	Define the intersection of two classes. Definition 5.6 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 16. For example, ({1, 3} ∩ {1, 8}) = {1} (ex-in 30209). Contrast this operation with union (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) (df-un 3949) and difference (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) (df-dif 3947). For alternate definitions in terms of class difference, requiring no dummy variables, see dfin2 4256 and dfin4 4263. For intersection defined in terms of union, see dfin3 4262. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)}
Theorem	dfin5 3952*	Alternate definition for the intersection of two classes. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jul-2005.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵}
Theorem	dfdif2 3953*	Alternate definition of class difference. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵}
Theorem	eldif 3954	Expansion of membership in a class difference. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶))
Theorem	eldifd 3955	If a class is in one class and not another, it is also in their difference. One-way deduction form of eldif 3954. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶))
Theorem	eldifad 3956	If a class is in the difference of two classes, it is also in the minuend. One-way deduction form of eldif 3954. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	eldifbd 3957	If a class is in the difference of two classes, it is not in the subtrahend. One-way deduction form of eldif 3954. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	elneeldif 3958	The elements of a set difference and the minuend are not equal. (Contributed by AV, 21-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴)) → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)
Theorem	velcomp 3959	Characterization of setvar elements of the complement of a class. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 15-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (V ∖ 𝐴) ↔ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	elin 3960	Expansion of membership in an intersection of two classes. Theorem 12 of [Suppes] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶))
2.1.12  Subclasses and subsets
Definition	df-ss 3961	Define the subclass relationship. Exercise 9 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 18. For example, {1, 2} ⊆ {1, 2, 3} (ex-ss 30211). Note that 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐴 (proved in ssid 4000). Contrast this relationship with the relationship 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 (as will be defined in df-pss 3963). For a more traditional definition, but requiring a dummy variable, see dfss2 3964. Other possible definitions are given by dfss3 3966, dfss4 4254, sspss 4095, ssequn1 4176, ssequn2 4179, sseqin2 4211, and ssdif0 4359. We prefer the label "ss" ("subset") for ⊆, despite the fact that it applies to classes. It is much more common to refer to this as the subset relation than subclass, especially since most of the time the arguments are in fact sets (and for pragmatic reasons we don't want to need to use different operations for sets). The way set.mm is set up, many things are technically classes despite morally (and provably) being sets, like 1 (cf. df-1 11132 and 1ex 11226) or ℝ ( cf. df-r 11134 and reex 11215). This has to do with the fact that there are no "set expressions": classes are expressions but there are only set variables in set.mm (cf. https://us.metamath.org/downloads/grammar-ambiguity.txt 11215). This is why we use ⊆ both for subclass relations and for subset relations and call it "subset". (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐴)
Theorem	dfss 3962	Variant of subclass definition df-ss 3961. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))
Definition	df-pss 3963	Define proper subclass (or strict subclass) relationship between two classes. Definition 5.9 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 17. For example, {1, 2} ⊊ {1, 2, 3} (ex-pss 30212). Note that ¬ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐴 (proved in pssirr 4096). Contrast this relationship with the relationship 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 (as defined in df-ss 3961). Other possible definitions are given by dfpss2 4081 and dfpss3 4082. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-1996.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵))
Theorem	dfss2 3964*	Alternate definition of the subclass relationship between two classes. Definition 5.9 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 17. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2002.) Avoid ax-10 2130, ax-11 2147, ax-12 2164. (Revised by SN, 16-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	dfss2OLD 3965*	Obsolete version of dfss2 3964 as of 16-May-2024. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2002.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	dfss3 3966*	Alternate definition of subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-1999.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	dfss6 3967*	Alternate definition of subclass relationship. (Contributed by RP, 16-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	dfss2f 3968	Equivalence for subclass relation, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jul-1994.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) Avoid ax-13 2366. (Revised by Gino Giotto, 19-May-2023.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	dfss3f 3969	Equivalence for subclass relation, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 20-Mar-2004.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	nfss 3970	If 𝑥 is not free in 𝐴 and 𝐵, it is not free in 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵. (Contributed by NM, 27-Dec-1996.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵
Theorem	ssel 3971	Membership relationships follow from a subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) Avoid ax-12 2164. (Revised by SN, 27-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	sselOLD 3972	Obsolete version of ssel 3971 as of 27-May-2024. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	ssel2 3973	Membership relationships follow from a subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jun-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	sseli 3974	Membership implication from subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	sselii 3975	Membership inference from subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 31-May-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵
Theorem	sselid 3976	Membership inference from subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	sseld 3977	Membership deduction from subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-1995.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	sselda 3978	Membership deduction from subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jun-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	sseldd 3979	Membership inference from subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2004.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	ssneld 3980	If a class is not in another class, it is also not in a subclass of that class. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵 → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	ssneldd 3981	If an element is not in a class, it is also not in a subclass of that class. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	ssriv 3982*	Inference based on subclass definition. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵
Theorem	ssrd 3983	Deduction based on subclass definition. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Mar-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)
Theorem	ssrdv 3984*	Deduction based on subclass definition. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-1995.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)
Theorem	sstr2 3985	Transitivity of subclass relationship. Exercise 5 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 17. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶))
Theorem	sstr 3986	Transitivity of subclass relationship. Theorem 6 of [Suppes] p. 23. (Contributed by NM, 5-Sep-2003.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶)
Theorem	sstri 3987	Subclass transitivity inference. (Contributed by NM, 5-May-2000.)
⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶
Theorem	sstrd 3988	Subclass transitivity deduction. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jun-2004.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶)
Theorem	sstrid 3989	Subclass transitivity deduction. (Contributed by NM, 6-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶)
Theorem	sstrdi 3990	Subclass transitivity deduction. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶)
Theorem	sylan9ss 3991	A subclass transitivity deduction. (Contributed by NM, 27-Sep-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶)
Theorem	sylan9ssr 3992	A subclass transitivity deduction. (Contributed by NM, 27-Sep-2004.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶)
Theorem	eqss 3993	The subclass relationship is antisymmetric. Compare Theorem 4 of [Suppes] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 21-May-1993.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴))
Theorem	eqssi 3994	Infer equality from two subclass relationships. Compare Theorem 4 of [Suppes] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-1993.)
⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵
Theorem	eqssd 3995	Equality deduction from two subclass relationships. Compare Theorem 4 of [Suppes] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jun-2004.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	sssseq 3996	If a class is a subclass of another class, then the classes are equal if and only if the other class is a subclass of the first class. (Contributed by AV, 23-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	eqrd 3997	Deduce equality of classes from equivalence of membership. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Mar-2017.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 1-Dec-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	eqri 3998	Infer equality of classes from equivalence of membership. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Oct-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵
Theorem	eqelssd 3999*	Equality deduction from subclass relationship and membership. (Contributed by AV, 21-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	ssid 4000	Any class is a subclass of itself. Exercise 10 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 18. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jun-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐴