Theorem wl-clabt 37958

Description: Using class abstraction in a context. For a version based on fewer axioms see wl-clabtv 37957. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 29-May-2023.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
wl-clabt.nf	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑

Assertion

Ref	Expression
wl-clabt	⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 → 𝜓)})

Proof of Theorem wl-clabt

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		wl-clabt.nf	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
2		biimt 361	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ (𝜑 → 𝜓)))
3	1, 2	sbbid 2258	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 → 𝜓)))
4		df-clab 2718	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓)
5		df-clab 2718	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 → 𝜓)} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 → 𝜓))
6	3, 4, 5	3bitr4g 315	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 → 𝜓)}))
7	6	eqrdv 2737	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 → 𝜓)})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   = wceq 1547  Ⅎwnf 1790  [wsb 2073   ∈ wcel 2119  {cab 2717

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1802  ax-4 1816  ax-5 1917  ax-6 1974  ax-7 2015  ax-9 2129  ax-12 2189  ax-ext 2711

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 208  df-an 397  df-ex 1787  df-nf 1791  df-sb 2074  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2731

This theorem is referenced by: (None)