| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > sbbid | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Deduction substituting both sides of a biconditional. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-1993.) Remove dependency on ax-10 2179 and ax-13 2406. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 24-Nov-2022.) Revise df-sb 2100. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 11-Jul-2023.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| sbbid.1 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 |
| sbbid.2 | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| sbbid | ⊢ (𝜑 → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜒)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | sbbid.1 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 | |
| 2 | sbbid.2 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) | |
| 3 | 1, 2 | alrimi 2252 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) |
| 4 | spsbbi 2110 | . 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜓 ↔ 𝜒) → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜒)) | |
| 5 | 3, 4 | syl 18 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜒)) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| This proof depends on syntax axioms: → wi 4 ↔ wb 209 ∀wal 1568 Ⅎwnf 1816 [wsb 2099 |
| This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1828 ax-4 1842 ax-5 1943 ax-6 2000 ax-7 2041 ax-12 2216 |
| This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 402 df-ex 1813 df-nf 1817 df-sb 2100 |
| This theorem is used by: 2sbbid 2285 sbcom3 2540 sbco3 2547 wl-sbcom2d-lem1 38247 wl-2spsbbi 38253 wl-clabt 38275 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |