Theorem ceq12 88

Description: Equality theorem for combination. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2014.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ceq12.1	⊢ F:(α → β)
ceq12.2	⊢ A:α
ceq12.3	⊢ R⊧[F = T]
ceq12.4	⊢ R⊧[A = B]

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ceq12	⊢ R⊧[(FA) = (TB)]

Proof of Theorem ceq12

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		weq 41	. 2 ⊢ = :(β → (β → ∗))
2		ceq12.1	. . 3 ⊢ F:(α → β)
3		ceq12.2	. . 3 ⊢ A:α
4	2, 3	wc 50	. 2 ⊢ (FA):β
5		ceq12.3	. . . 4 ⊢ R⊧[F = T]
6	2, 5	eqtypi 78	. . 3 ⊢ T:(α → β)
7		ceq12.4	. . . 4 ⊢ R⊧[A = B]
8	3, 7	eqtypi 78	. . 3 ⊢ B:α
9	6, 8	wc 50	. 2 ⊢ (TB):β
10		weq 41	. . . 4 ⊢ = :((α → β) → ((α → β) → ∗))
11	10, 2, 6, 5	dfov1 74	. . 3 ⊢ R⊧(( = F)T)
12		weq 41	. . . 4 ⊢ = :(α → (α → ∗))
13	12, 3, 8, 7	dfov1 74	. . 3 ⊢ R⊧(( = A)B)
14	2, 6, 3, 8	ax-ceq 51	. . 3 ⊢ ((( = F)T), (( = A)B))⊧(( = (FA))(TB))
15	11, 13, 14	syl2anc 19	. 2 ⊢ R⊧(( = (FA))(TB))
16	1, 4, 9, 15	dfov2 75	1 ⊢ R⊧[(FA) = (TB)]

Syntax hints:   → ht 2  kc 5   = ke 7  [kbr 9  ⊧wffMMJ2 11  wffMMJ2t 12

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-syl 15  ax-jca 17  ax-trud 26  ax-cb1 29  ax-cb2 30  ax-weq 40  ax-refl 42  ax-eqmp 45  ax-wc 49  ax-ceq 51  ax-wov 71  ax-eqtypi 77

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-ov 73

This theorem is referenced by:  ceq1  89  ceq2  90  oveq123  98  hbc  110  ac  197