Theorem elabg2 16486

Description: One implication of elabg 2953. (Contributed by BJ, 21-Nov-2019.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
elabg2.1	|- ( x = A -> ( ps -> ph ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
elabg2	|- ( A e. V -> ( ps -> A e. { x | ph } ) )

Distinct variable groups:   ps, x   x, A

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x)   V( x)

Proof of Theorem elabg2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfcv 2375	. 2 |- F/_ x A
2		nfv 1577	. 2 |- F/ x ps
3		elabg2.1	. 2 |- ( x = A -> ( ps -> ph ) )
4	1, 2, 3	elabgf2 16481	1 |- ( A e. V -> ( ps -> A e. { x | ph } ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   = wceq 1398   e. wcel 2202   {cab 2217

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 717  ax-5 1496  ax-7 1497  ax-gen 1498  ax-ie1 1542  ax-ie2 1543  ax-8 1553  ax-10 1554  ax-11 1555  ax-i12 1556  ax-bndl 1558  ax-4 1559  ax-17 1575  ax-i9 1579  ax-ial 1583  ax-i5r 1584  ax-ext 2213

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1401  df-nf 1510  df-sb 1811  df-clab 2218  df-cleq 2224  df-clel 2227  df-nfc 2364  df-v 2805

This theorem is referenced by: (None)