Theorem ssrabdv 3100

Description: Subclass of a restricted class abstraction (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 31-Aug-2006.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ssrabdv.1	|- ( ph -> B C_ A )
ssrabdv.2	|- ( ( ph /\ x e. B ) -> ps )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ssrabdv	|- ( ph -> B C_ { x e. A | ps } )

Distinct variable groups:   x, A   x, B   ph, x

Allowed substitution hint:   ps( x)

Proof of Theorem ssrabdv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ssrabdv.1	. 2 |- ( ph -> B C_ A )
2		ssrabdv.2	. . 3 |- ( ( ph /\ x e. B ) -> ps )
3	2	ralrimiva 2446	. 2 |- ( ph -> A. x e. B ps )
4		ssrab 3099	. 2 |- ( B C_ { x e. A | ps } <-> ( B C_ A /\ A. x e. B ps ) )
5	1, 3, 4	sylanbrc 408	1 |- ( ph -> B C_ { x e. A | ps } )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 102   e. wcel 1438   A.wral 2359   {crab 2363   C_ wss 2999

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-io 665  ax-5 1381  ax-7 1382  ax-gen 1383  ax-ie1 1427  ax-ie2 1428  ax-8 1440  ax-10 1441  ax-11 1442  ax-i12 1443  ax-bndl 1444  ax-4 1445  ax-17 1464  ax-i9 1468  ax-ial 1472  ax-i5r 1473  ax-ext 2070

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-nf 1395  df-sb 1693  df-clab 2075  df-cleq 2081  df-clel 2084  df-nfc 2217  df-ral 2364  df-rab 2368  df-in 3005  df-ss 3012

This theorem is referenced by: (None)