Theorem strcollnf 16348

Description: Version of ax-strcoll 16345 with one disjoint variable condition removed, the other disjoint variable condition replaced with a nonfreeness hypothesis, and without initial universal quantifier. Version of strcoll2 16346 with the disjoint variable condition on b , ph replaced with a nonfreeness hypothesis.

This proof aims to demonstrate a standard technique, but strcoll2 16346 will generally suffice: since the theorem asserts the existence of a set b, supposing that that setvar does not occur in the already defined ph is not a big constraint. (Contributed by BJ, 21-Oct-2019.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
strcollnf.nf	|- F/ b ph

Assertion

Ref	Expression
strcollnf	|- ( A. x e. a E. y ph -> E. b ( A. x e. a E. y e. b ph /\ A. y e. b E. x e. a ph ) )

Distinct variable group:   a, b, x, y

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x, y, a, b)

Proof of Theorem strcollnf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		strcollnft 16347	. 2 |- ( A. x A. y F/ b ph -> ( A. x e. a E. y ph -> E. b ( A. x e. a E. y e. b ph /\ A. y e. b E. x e. a ph ) ) )
2		strcollnf.nf	. . 3 |- F/ b ph
3	2	ax-gen 1495	. 2 |- A. y F/ b ph
4	1, 3	mpg 1497	1 |- ( A. x e. a E. y ph -> E. b ( A. x e. a E. y e. b ph /\ A. y e. b E. x e. a ph ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   A.wal 1393   F/wnf 1506   E.wex 1538   A.wral 2508   E.wrex 2509

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 714  ax-5 1493  ax-7 1494  ax-gen 1495  ax-ie1 1539  ax-ie2 1540  ax-8 1550  ax-10 1551  ax-11 1552  ax-i12 1553  ax-bndl 1555  ax-4 1556  ax-17 1572  ax-i9 1576  ax-ial 1580  ax-i5r 1581  ax-ext 2211  ax-strcoll 16345

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1398  df-nf 1507  df-sb 1809  df-cleq 2222  df-clel 2225  df-nfc 2361  df-ral 2513  df-rex 2514

This theorem is referenced by: (None)