Theorem cbvrexdva 2667

Description: Rule used to change the bound variable in a restricted existential quantifier with implicit substitution. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
cbvraldva.1	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
cbvrexdva	⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))

Distinct variable groups:   𝜓,𝑦   𝜒,𝑥   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦   𝜑,𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜓(𝑥)   𝜒(𝑦)

Proof of Theorem cbvrexdva

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		cbvraldva.1	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
2		eqidd 2141	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐴 = 𝐴)
3	1, 2	cbvrexdva2 2665	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 103   ↔ wb 104  ∃wrex 2418

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-5 1424  ax-7 1425  ax-gen 1426  ax-ie1 1470  ax-ie2 1471  ax-8 1483  ax-4 1488  ax-17 1507  ax-i9 1511  ax-ial 1515  ax-ext 2122

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-nf 1438  df-cleq 2133  df-clel 2136  df-rex 2423

This theorem is referenced by:  tfrlem3ag  6214  tfrlem3a  6215  tfrlemi1  6237  tfr1onlem3ag  6242