Theorem tfrlem3a 6363

Description: Lemma for transfinite recursion. Let 𝐴 be the class of "acceptable" functions. The final thing we're interested in is the union of all these acceptable functions. This lemma just changes some bound variables in 𝐴 for later use. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-1995.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
tfrlem3.1	⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))}
tfrlem3.2	⊢ 𝐺 ∈ V

Assertion

Ref	Expression
tfrlem3a	⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ On (𝐺 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝐺‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝐺 ↾ 𝑤))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑤,𝑓,𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝐹   𝑓,𝐺,𝑤,𝑥,𝑦,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐴(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤,𝑓)

Proof of Theorem tfrlem3a

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		tfrlem3.2	. 2 ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ V
2		fneq12 5347	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑓 = 𝐺 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) → (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ↔ 𝐺 Fn 𝑧))
3		simpll 527	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝑓 = 𝐺 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → 𝑓 = 𝐺)
4		simpr 110	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝑓 = 𝐺 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → 𝑦 = 𝑤)
5	3, 4	fveq12d 5561	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝑓 = 𝐺 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐺‘𝑤))
6	3, 4	reseq12d 4943	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝑓 = 𝐺 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → (𝑓 ↾ 𝑦) = (𝐺 ↾ 𝑤))
7	6	fveq2d 5558	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝑓 = 𝐺 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)) = (𝐹‘(𝐺 ↾ 𝑤)))
8	5, 7	eqeq12d 2208	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑓 = 𝐺 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → ((𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)) ↔ (𝐺‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝐺 ↾ 𝑤))))
9		simpr 110	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑓 = 𝐺 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) → 𝑥 = 𝑧)
10	9	adantr 276	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑓 = 𝐺 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → 𝑥 = 𝑧)
11	8, 10	cbvraldva2 2733	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑓 = 𝐺 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)) ↔ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝐺‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝐺 ↾ 𝑤))))
12	2, 11	anbi12d 473	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑓 = 𝐺 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) → ((𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦))) ↔ (𝐺 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝐺‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝐺 ↾ 𝑤)))))
13	12	cbvrexdva 2736	. 2 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐺 → (∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦))) ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ On (𝐺 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝐺‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝐺 ↾ 𝑤)))))
14		tfrlem3.1	. 2 ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))}
15	1, 13, 14	elab2 2908	1 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ On (𝐺 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝐺‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝐺 ↾ 𝑤))))

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 104   ↔ wb 105   = wceq 1364   ∈ wcel 2164  {cab 2179  ∀wral 2472  ∃wrex 2473  Vcvv 2760  Oncon0 4394   ↾ cres 4661   Fn wfn 5249  ‘cfv 5254

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 710  ax-5 1458  ax-7 1459  ax-gen 1460  ax-ie1 1504  ax-ie2 1505  ax-8 1515  ax-10 1516  ax-11 1517  ax-i12 1518  ax-bndl 1520  ax-4 1521  ax-17 1537  ax-i9 1541  ax-ial 1545  ax-i5r 1546  ax-ext 2175

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 982  df-tru 1367  df-nf 1472  df-sb 1774  df-clab 2180  df-cleq 2186  df-clel 2189  df-nfc 2325  df-ral 2477  df-rex 2478  df-v 2762  df-un 3157  df-in 3159  df-ss 3166  df-sn 3624  df-pr 3625  df-op 3627  df-uni 3836  df-br 4030  df-opab 4091  df-xp 4665  df-rel 4666  df-cnv 4667  df-co 4668  df-dm 4669  df-res 4671  df-iota 5215  df-fun 5256  df-fn 5257  df-fv 5262

This theorem is referenced by:  tfrlem3  6364  tfrlem5  6367  tfrlemisucaccv  6378  tfrlemibxssdm  6380  tfrlemi14d  6386  tfrexlem  6387