Theorem tfrlem3a 6260

Description: Lemma for transfinite recursion. Let 𝐴 be the class of "acceptable" functions. The final thing we're interested in is the union of all these acceptable functions. This lemma just changes some bound variables in 𝐴 for later use. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-1995.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
tfrlem3.1	⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))}
tfrlem3.2	⊢ 𝐺 ∈ V

Assertion

Ref	Expression
tfrlem3a	⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ On (𝐺 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝐺‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝐺 ↾ 𝑤))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑤,𝑓,𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝐹   𝑓,𝐺,𝑤,𝑥,𝑦,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐴(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤,𝑓)

Proof of Theorem tfrlem3a

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		tfrlem3.2	. 2 ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ V
2		fneq12 5266	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑓 = 𝐺 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) → (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ↔ 𝐺 Fn 𝑧))
3		simpll 519	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝑓 = 𝐺 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → 𝑓 = 𝐺)
4		simpr 109	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝑓 = 𝐺 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → 𝑦 = 𝑤)
5	3, 4	fveq12d 5478	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝑓 = 𝐺 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐺‘𝑤))
6	3, 4	reseq12d 4870	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝑓 = 𝐺 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → (𝑓 ↾ 𝑦) = (𝐺 ↾ 𝑤))
7	6	fveq2d 5475	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝑓 = 𝐺 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)) = (𝐹‘(𝐺 ↾ 𝑤)))
8	5, 7	eqeq12d 2172	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑓 = 𝐺 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → ((𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)) ↔ (𝐺‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝐺 ↾ 𝑤))))
9		simpr 109	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑓 = 𝐺 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) → 𝑥 = 𝑧)
10	9	adantr 274	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑓 = 𝐺 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → 𝑥 = 𝑧)
11	8, 10	cbvraldva2 2687	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑓 = 𝐺 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)) ↔ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝐺‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝐺 ↾ 𝑤))))
12	2, 11	anbi12d 465	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑓 = 𝐺 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) → ((𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦))) ↔ (𝐺 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝐺‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝐺 ↾ 𝑤)))))
13	12	cbvrexdva 2690	. 2 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐺 → (∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦))) ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ On (𝐺 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝐺‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝐺 ↾ 𝑤)))))
14		tfrlem3.1	. 2 ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))}
15	1, 13, 14	elab2 2860	1 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ On (𝐺 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝐺‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝐺 ↾ 𝑤))))

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 103   ↔ wb 104   = wceq 1335   ∈ wcel 2128  {cab 2143  ∀wral 2435  ∃wrex 2436  Vcvv 2712  Oncon0 4326   ↾ cres 4591   Fn wfn 5168  ‘cfv 5173

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 699  ax-5 1427  ax-7 1428  ax-gen 1429  ax-ie1 1473  ax-ie2 1474  ax-8 1484  ax-10 1485  ax-11 1486  ax-i12 1487  ax-bndl 1489  ax-4 1490  ax-17 1506  ax-i9 1510  ax-ial 1514  ax-i5r 1515  ax-ext 2139

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 965  df-tru 1338  df-nf 1441  df-sb 1743  df-clab 2144  df-cleq 2150  df-clel 2153  df-nfc 2288  df-ral 2440  df-rex 2441  df-v 2714  df-un 3106  df-in 3108  df-ss 3115  df-sn 3567  df-pr 3568  df-op 3570  df-uni 3775  df-br 3968  df-opab 4029  df-xp 4595  df-rel 4596  df-cnv 4597  df-co 4598  df-dm 4599  df-res 4601  df-iota 5138  df-fun 5175  df-fn 5176  df-fv 5181

This theorem is referenced by:  tfrlem3  6261  tfrlem5  6264  tfrlemisucaccv  6275  tfrlemibxssdm  6277  tfrlemi14d  6283  tfrexlem  6284