Theorem cbvrexdva2 2633

Description: Rule used to change the bound variable in a restricted existential quantifier with implicit substitution which also changes the quantifier domain. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
cbvraldva2.1	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
cbvraldva2.2	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
cbvrexdva2	⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑦,𝐴   𝜓,𝑦   𝑥,𝐵   𝜒,𝑥   𝜑,𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜓(𝑥)   𝜒(𝑦)   𝐴(𝑥)   𝐵(𝑦)

Proof of Theorem cbvrexdva2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simpr 109	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝑥 = 𝑦)
2		cbvraldva2.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
3	1, 2	eleq12d 2185	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵))
4		cbvraldva2.1	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
5	3, 4	anbi12d 462	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒)))
6	5	cbvexdva 1879	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒)))
7		df-rex 2396	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓))
8		df-rex 2396	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒 ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒))
9	6, 7, 8	3bitr4g 222	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 103   ↔ wb 104   = wceq 1314  ∃wex 1451   ∈ wcel 1463  ∃wrex 2391

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-5 1406  ax-7 1407  ax-gen 1408  ax-ie1 1452  ax-ie2 1453  ax-8 1465  ax-4 1470  ax-17 1489  ax-i9 1493  ax-ial 1497  ax-ext 2097

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-nf 1420  df-cleq 2108  df-clel 2111  df-rex 2396

This theorem is referenced by:  cbvrexdva  2635  acexmid  5727