Theorem rexnalim 2386

Description: Relationship between restricted universal and existential quantifiers. In classical logic this would be a biconditional. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Aug-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rexnalim	⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)

Proof of Theorem rexnalim

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-rex 2381	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝜑))
2		exanaliim 1594	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝜑) → ¬ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑))
3		df-ral 2380	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑))
4	2, 3	sylnibr 643	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝜑) → ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
5	1, 4	sylbi 120	1 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 103  ∀wal 1297  ∃wex 1436   ∈ wcel 1448  ∀wral 2375  ∃wrex 2376

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-in1 584  ax-in2 585  ax-5 1391  ax-gen 1393  ax-ie1 1437  ax-ie2 1438  ax-4 1455  ax-17 1474  ax-ial 1482

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-tru 1302  df-fal 1305  df-nf 1405  df-ral 2380  df-rex 2381

This theorem is referenced by:  ralexim  2388  iundif2ss  3825  ixp0  6555  alzdvds  11347  nninfsellemeq  12794