Theorem rexnalim 2533

Description: Relationship between restricted universal and existential quantifiers. In classical logic this would be a biconditional. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Aug-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rexnalim	⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)

Proof of Theorem rexnalim

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-rex 2528	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝜑))
2		exanaliim 1696	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝜑) → ¬ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑))
3		df-ral 2527	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑))
4	2, 3	sylnibr 684	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝜑) → ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
5	1, 4	sylbi 121	1 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104  ∀wal 1396  ∃wex 1541   ∈ wcel 2205  ∀wral 2522  ∃wrex 2523

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 619  ax-in2 620  ax-5 1496  ax-gen 1498  ax-ie1 1542  ax-ie2 1543  ax-4 1559  ax-17 1575  ax-ial 1583

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1401  df-fal 1404  df-nf 1510  df-ral 2527  df-rex 2528

This theorem is referenced by:  nnral  2534  ralexim  2536  rexanaliim  2650  iundif2ss  4062  ixp0  6979  omniwomnimkv  7471  alzdvds  12565  pc2dvds  13053  ballotfilem4  13185  isnsgrp  13669  umgr2edg1  16330  umgr2edgneu  16333  nninfsellemeq  16918