Theorem nssr 3264

Description: Negation of subclass relationship. One direction of Exercise 13 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 18. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nssr	⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → ¬ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵

Proof of Theorem nssr

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		exanaliim 1673	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → ¬ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
2		ssalel 3192	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
3	1, 2	sylnibr 681	1 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → ¬ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104  ∀wal 1373  ∃wex 1518   ∈ wcel 2180   ⊆ wss 3177

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 617  ax-in2 618  ax-5 1473  ax-7 1474  ax-gen 1475  ax-ie1 1519  ax-ie2 1520  ax-8 1530  ax-11 1532  ax-4 1536  ax-17 1552  ax-i9 1556  ax-ial 1560  ax-i5r 1561  ax-ext 2191

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1378  df-fal 1381  df-nf 1487  df-sb 1789  df-clab 2196  df-cleq 2202  df-clel 2205  df-in 3183  df-ss 3190

This theorem is referenced by: (None)