Theorem frforeq1 4390

Description: Equality theorem for the well-founded predicate. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Sep-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
frforeq1	⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → ( FrFor 𝑅𝐴𝑇 ↔ FrFor 𝑆𝐴𝑇))

Proof of Theorem frforeq1

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		breq 4046	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → (𝑦𝑅𝑥 ↔ 𝑦𝑆𝑥))
2	1	imbi1d 231	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → ((𝑦𝑅𝑥 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇) ↔ (𝑦𝑆𝑥 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇)))
3	2	ralbidv 2506	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑆𝑥 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇)))
4	3	imbi1d 231	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → ((∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑇) ↔ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑆𝑥 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑇)))
5	4	ralbidv 2506	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑇) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑆𝑥 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑇)))
6	5	imbi1d 231	. 2 ⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → ((∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑇) → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑇) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑆𝑥 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑇) → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑇)))
7		df-frfor 4378	. 2 ⊢ ( FrFor 𝑅𝐴𝑇 ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑇) → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑇))
8		df-frfor 4378	. 2 ⊢ ( FrFor 𝑆𝐴𝑇 ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑆𝑥 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑇) → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑇))
9	6, 7, 8	3bitr4g 223	1 ⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → ( FrFor 𝑅𝐴𝑇 ↔ FrFor 𝑆𝐴𝑇))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 105   = wceq 1373   ∈ wcel 2176  ∀wral 2484   ⊆ wss 3166   class class class wbr 4044   FrFor wfrfor 4374

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-5 1470  ax-gen 1472  ax-ie1 1516  ax-ie2 1517  ax-4 1533  ax-17 1549  ax-ial 1557  ax-ext 2187

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-nf 1484  df-cleq 2198  df-clel 2201  df-ral 2489  df-br 4045  df-frfor 4378

This theorem is referenced by:  freq1  4391