Theorem alimp-no-surprise 50444

Description: There is no "surprise" in a for-all with implication if there exists a value where the antecedent is true. This is one way to prevent for-all with implication from allowing anything. For a contrast, see alimp-surprise 50443. The allsome quantifier also counters this problem, see df-als 50451. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 27-Oct-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
alimp-no-surprise	⊢ ¬ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓) ∧ ∃𝑥𝜑)

Proof of Theorem alimp-no-surprise

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		pm4.82 1039	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓)) ↔ ¬ 𝜑)
2	1	albii 1846	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓)) ↔ ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑)
3		alnex 1808	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥𝜑)
4	2, 3	sylbb 222	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓)) → ¬ ∃𝑥𝜑)
5		imnan 404	. . 3 ⊢ ((∀𝑥((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓)) → ¬ ∃𝑥𝜑) ↔ ¬ (∀𝑥((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓)) ∧ ∃𝑥𝜑))
6	4, 5	mpbi 233	. 2 ⊢ ¬ (∀𝑥((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓)) ∧ ∃𝑥𝜑)
7		19.26 1897	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓)) ↔ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓)))
8	7	anbi2ci 636	. . 3 ⊢ ((∀𝑥((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓)) ∧ ∃𝑥𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑥𝜑 ∧ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓))))
9		3anass 1109	. . 3 ⊢ ((∃𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓)) ↔ (∃𝑥𝜑 ∧ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓))))
10		3anrot 1115	. . 3 ⊢ ((∃𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓)) ↔ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓) ∧ ∃𝑥𝜑))
11	8, 9, 10	3bitr2i 302	. 2 ⊢ ((∀𝑥((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓)) ∧ ∃𝑥𝜑) ↔ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓) ∧ ∃𝑥𝜑))
12	6, 11	mtbi 325	1 ⊢ ¬ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓) ∧ ∃𝑥𝜑)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 400   ∧ w3a 1101  ∀wal 1565  ∃wex 1806

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1822  ax-4 1836

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-3an 1103  df-ex 1807

This theorem is referenced by:  als-no-surprise  50469