P. 480 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 47901-48000   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	sbgoldbwt 47901*	If the strong binary Goldbach conjecture is valid, then the (weak) ternary Goldbach conjecture holds, too. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (∀𝑛 ∈ Even (4 < 𝑛 → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachEven ) → ∀𝑚 ∈ Odd (5 < 𝑚 → 𝑚 ∈ GoldbachOddW ))
Theorem	sbgoldbst 47902*	If the strong binary Goldbach conjecture is valid, then the (strong) ternary Goldbach conjecture holds, too. (Contributed by AV, 26-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (∀𝑛 ∈ Even (4 < 𝑛 → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachEven ) → ∀𝑚 ∈ Odd (7 < 𝑚 → 𝑚 ∈ GoldbachOdd ))
Theorem	sbgoldbaltlem1 47903	Lemma 1 for sbgoldbalt 47905: If an even number greater than 4 is the sum of two primes, one of the prime summands must be odd, i.e. not 2. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jul-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑄 ∈ ℙ) → ((𝑁 ∈ Even ∧ 4 < 𝑁 ∧ 𝑁 = (𝑃 + 𝑄)) → 𝑄 ∈ Odd ))
Theorem	sbgoldbaltlem2 47904	Lemma 2 for sbgoldbalt 47905: If an even number greater than 4 is the sum of two primes, the primes must be odd, i.e. not 2. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jul-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑄 ∈ ℙ) → ((𝑁 ∈ Even ∧ 4 < 𝑁 ∧ 𝑁 = (𝑃 + 𝑄)) → (𝑃 ∈ Odd ∧ 𝑄 ∈ Odd )))
Theorem	sbgoldbalt 47905*	An alternate (related to the original) formulation of the binary Goldbach conjecture: Every even integer greater than 2 can be expressed as the sum of two primes. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (∀𝑛 ∈ Even (4 < 𝑛 → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachEven ) ↔ ∀𝑛 ∈ Even (2 < 𝑛 → ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℙ 𝑛 = (𝑝 + 𝑞)))
Theorem	sbgoldbb 47906*	If the strong binary Goldbach conjecture is valid, the binary Goldbach conjecture is valid. (Contributed by AV, 23-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (∀𝑛 ∈ Even (4 < 𝑛 → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachEven ) → ∀𝑛 ∈ Even (2 < 𝑛 → ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℙ 𝑛 = (𝑝 + 𝑞)))
Theorem	sgoldbeven3prm 47907*	If the binary Goldbach conjecture is valid, then an even integer greater than 5 can be expressed as the sum of three primes: Since (𝑁 − 2) is even iff 𝑁 is even, there would be primes 𝑝 and 𝑞 with (𝑁 − 2) = (𝑝 + 𝑞), and therefore 𝑁 = ((𝑝 + 𝑞) + 2). (Contributed by AV, 24-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (∀𝑛 ∈ Even (4 < 𝑛 → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachEven ) → ((𝑁 ∈ Even ∧ 6 ≤ 𝑁) → ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℙ 𝑁 = ((𝑝 + 𝑞) + 𝑟)))
Theorem	sbgoldbm 47908*	If the strong binary Goldbach conjecture is valid, the modern version of the original formulation of the Goldbach conjecture also holds: Every integer greater than 5 can be expressed as the sum of three primes. (Contributed by AV, 24-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (∀𝑛 ∈ Even (4 < 𝑛 → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachEven ) → ∀𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘6)∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℙ 𝑛 = ((𝑝 + 𝑞) + 𝑟))
Theorem	mogoldbb 47909*	If the modern version of the original formulation of the Goldbach conjecture is valid, the (weak) binary Goldbach conjecture also holds. (Contributed by AV, 26-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (∀𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘6)∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℙ 𝑛 = ((𝑝 + 𝑞) + 𝑟) → ∀𝑛 ∈ Even (2 < 𝑛 → ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℙ 𝑛 = (𝑝 + 𝑞)))
Theorem	sbgoldbmb 47910*	The strong binary Goldbach conjecture and the modern version of the original formulation of the Goldbach conjecture are equivalent. (Contributed by AV, 26-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (∀𝑛 ∈ Even (4 < 𝑛 → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachEven ) ↔ ∀𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘6)∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℙ 𝑛 = ((𝑝 + 𝑞) + 𝑟))
Theorem	sbgoldbo 47911*	If the strong binary Goldbach conjecture is valid, the original formulation of the Goldbach conjecture also holds: Every integer greater than 2 can be expressed as the sum of three "primes" with regarding 1 to be a prime (as Goldbach did). Original text: "Es scheint wenigstens, dass eine jede Zahl, die groesser ist als 2, ein aggregatum trium numerorum primorum sey." (Goldbach, 1742). (Contributed by AV, 25-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ({1} ∪ ℙ)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑛 ∈ Even (4 < 𝑛 → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachEven ) → ∀𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3)∃𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑃 𝑛 = ((𝑝 + 𝑞) + 𝑟))
Theorem	nnsum3primes4 47912*	4 is the sum of at most 3 (actually 2) primes. (Contributed by AV, 2-Aug-2020.)
⊢ ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑m (1...𝑑))(𝑑 ≤ 3 ∧ 4 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑑)(𝑓‘𝑘))
Theorem	nnsum4primes4 47913*	4 is the sum of at most 4 (actually 2) primes. (Contributed by AV, 23-Jul-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 2-Aug-2020.)
⊢ ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑m (1...𝑑))(𝑑 ≤ 4 ∧ 4 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑑)(𝑓‘𝑘))
Theorem	nnsum3primesprm 47914*	Every prime is "the sum of at most 3" (actually one - the prime itself) primes. (Contributed by AV, 2-Aug-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 17-Apr-2021.)
⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑m (1...𝑑))(𝑑 ≤ 3 ∧ 𝑃 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑑)(𝑓‘𝑘)))
Theorem	nnsum4primesprm 47915*	Every prime is "the sum of at most 4" (actually one - the prime itself) primes. (Contributed by AV, 23-Jul-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 2-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑m (1...𝑑))(𝑑 ≤ 4 ∧ 𝑃 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑑)(𝑓‘𝑘)))
Theorem	nnsum3primesgbe 47916*	Any even Goldbach number is the sum of at most 3 (actually 2) primes. (Contributed by AV, 2-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ GoldbachEven → ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑m (1...𝑑))(𝑑 ≤ 3 ∧ 𝑁 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑑)(𝑓‘𝑘)))
Theorem	nnsum4primesgbe 47917*	Any even Goldbach number is the sum of at most 4 (actually 2) primes. (Contributed by AV, 23-Jul-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 2-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ GoldbachEven → ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑m (1...𝑑))(𝑑 ≤ 4 ∧ 𝑁 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑑)(𝑓‘𝑘)))
Theorem	nnsum3primesle9 47918*	Every integer greater than 1 and less than or equal to 8 is the sum of at most 3 primes. (Contributed by AV, 2-Aug-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ≤ 8) → ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑m (1...𝑑))(𝑑 ≤ 3 ∧ 𝑁 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑑)(𝑓‘𝑘)))
Theorem	nnsum4primesle9 47919*	Every integer greater than 1 and less than or equal to 8 is the sum of at most 4 primes. (Contributed by AV, 24-Jul-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 2-Aug-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ≤ 8) → ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑m (1...𝑑))(𝑑 ≤ 4 ∧ 𝑁 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑑)(𝑓‘𝑘)))
Theorem	nnsum4primesodd 47920*	If the (weak) ternary Goldbach conjecture is valid, then every odd integer greater than 5 is the sum of 3 primes. (Contributed by AV, 2-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (∀𝑚 ∈ Odd (5 < 𝑚 → 𝑚 ∈ GoldbachOddW ) → ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘6) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ Odd ) → ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑m (1...3))𝑁 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...3)(𝑓‘𝑘)))
Theorem	nnsum4primesoddALTV 47921*	If the (strong) ternary Goldbach conjecture is valid, then every odd integer greater than 7 is the sum of 3 primes. (Contributed by AV, 26-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (∀𝑚 ∈ Odd (7 < 𝑚 → 𝑚 ∈ GoldbachOdd ) → ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘8) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ Odd ) → ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑m (1...3))𝑁 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...3)(𝑓‘𝑘)))
Theorem	evengpop3 47922*	If the (weak) ternary Goldbach conjecture is valid, then every even integer greater than 8 is the sum of an odd Goldbach number and 3. (Contributed by AV, 24-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (∀𝑚 ∈ Odd (5 < 𝑚 → 𝑚 ∈ GoldbachOddW ) → ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘9) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ Even ) → ∃𝑜 ∈ GoldbachOddW 𝑁 = (𝑜 + 3)))
Theorem	evengpoap3 47923*	If the (strong) ternary Goldbach conjecture is valid, then every even integer greater than 10 is the sum of an odd Goldbach number and 3. (Contributed by AV, 27-Jul-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 15-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (∀𝑚 ∈ Odd (7 < 𝑚 → 𝑚 ∈ GoldbachOdd ) → ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘;12) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ Even ) → ∃𝑜 ∈ GoldbachOdd 𝑁 = (𝑜 + 3)))
Theorem	nnsum4primeseven 47924*	If the (weak) ternary Goldbach conjecture is valid, then every even integer greater than 8 is the sum of 4 primes. (Contributed by AV, 25-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (∀𝑚 ∈ Odd (5 < 𝑚 → 𝑚 ∈ GoldbachOddW ) → ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘9) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ Even ) → ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑m (1...4))𝑁 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...4)(𝑓‘𝑘)))
Theorem	nnsum4primesevenALTV 47925*	If the (strong) ternary Goldbach conjecture is valid, then every even integer greater than 10 is the sum of 4 primes. (Contributed by AV, 27-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (∀𝑚 ∈ Odd (7 < 𝑚 → 𝑚 ∈ GoldbachOdd ) → ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘;12) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ Even ) → ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑m (1...4))𝑁 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...4)(𝑓‘𝑘)))
Theorem	wtgoldbnnsum4prm 47926*	If the (weak) ternary Goldbach conjecture is valid, then every integer greater than 1 is the sum of at most 4 primes, showing that Schnirelmann's constant would be less than or equal to 4. See corollary 1.1 in [Helfgott] p. 4. (Contributed by AV, 25-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (∀𝑚 ∈ Odd (5 < 𝑚 → 𝑚 ∈ GoldbachOddW ) → ∀𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑m (1...𝑑))(𝑑 ≤ 4 ∧ 𝑛 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑑)(𝑓‘𝑘)))
Theorem	stgoldbnnsum4prm 47927*	If the (strong) ternary Goldbach conjecture is valid, then every integer greater than 1 is the sum of at most 4 primes. (Contributed by AV, 27-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (∀𝑚 ∈ Odd (7 < 𝑚 → 𝑚 ∈ GoldbachOdd ) → ∀𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑m (1...𝑑))(𝑑 ≤ 4 ∧ 𝑛 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑑)(𝑓‘𝑘)))
Theorem	bgoldbnnsum3prm 47928*	If the binary Goldbach conjecture is valid, then every integer greater than 1 is the sum of at most 3 primes, showing that Schnirelmann's constant would be equal to 3. (Contributed by AV, 2-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (∀𝑚 ∈ Even (4 < 𝑚 → 𝑚 ∈ GoldbachEven ) → ∀𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑m (1...𝑑))(𝑑 ≤ 3 ∧ 𝑛 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑑)(𝑓‘𝑘)))
Theorem	bgoldbtbndlem1 47929	Lemma 1 for bgoldbtbnd 47933: the odd numbers between 7 and 13 (exclusive) are odd Goldbach numbers. (Contributed by AV, 29-Jul-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ Odd ∧ 7 < 𝑁 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (7[,);13)) → 𝑁 ∈ GoldbachOdd )
Theorem	bgoldbtbndlem2 47930*	Lemma 2 for bgoldbtbnd 47933. (Contributed by AV, 1-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘;11))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘;11))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ Even ((4 < 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 < 𝑁) → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachEven ))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (RePart‘𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^𝐷)((𝐹‘𝑖) ∈ (ℙ ∖ {2}) ∧ ((𝐹‘(𝑖 + 1)) − (𝐹‘𝑖)) < (𝑁 − 4) ∧ 4 < ((𝐹‘(𝑖 + 1)) − (𝐹‘𝑖))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘0) = 7)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘1) = ;13)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 < (𝐹‘𝐷))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑋 − (𝐹‘(𝐼 − 1)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ Odd ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (1..^𝐷)) → ((𝑋 ∈ ((𝐹‘𝐼)[,)(𝐹‘(𝐼 + 1))) ∧ (𝑋 − (𝐹‘𝐼)) ≤ 4) → (𝑆 ∈ Even ∧ 𝑆 < 𝑁 ∧ 4 < 𝑆)))
Theorem	bgoldbtbndlem3 47931*	Lemma 3 for bgoldbtbnd 47933. (Contributed by AV, 1-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘;11))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘;11))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ Even ((4 < 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 < 𝑁) → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachEven ))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (RePart‘𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^𝐷)((𝐹‘𝑖) ∈ (ℙ ∖ {2}) ∧ ((𝐹‘(𝑖 + 1)) − (𝐹‘𝑖)) < (𝑁 − 4) ∧ 4 < ((𝐹‘(𝑖 + 1)) − (𝐹‘𝑖))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘0) = 7)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘1) = ;13)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 < (𝐹‘𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐷) ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑋 − (𝐹‘𝐼))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ Odd ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (1..^𝐷)) → ((𝑋 ∈ ((𝐹‘𝐼)[,)(𝐹‘(𝐼 + 1))) ∧ 4 < 𝑆) → (𝑆 ∈ Even ∧ 𝑆 < 𝑁 ∧ 4 < 𝑆)))
Theorem	bgoldbtbndlem4 47932*	Lemma 4 for bgoldbtbnd 47933. (Contributed by AV, 1-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘;11))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘;11))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ Even ((4 < 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 < 𝑁) → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachEven ))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (RePart‘𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^𝐷)((𝐹‘𝑖) ∈ (ℙ ∖ {2}) ∧ ((𝐹‘(𝑖 + 1)) − (𝐹‘𝑖)) < (𝑁 − 4) ∧ 4 < ((𝐹‘(𝑖 + 1)) − (𝐹‘𝑖))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘0) = 7)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘1) = ;13)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 < (𝐹‘𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐷) ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (1..^𝐷)) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ Odd ) → ((𝑋 ∈ ((𝐹‘𝐼)[,)(𝐹‘(𝐼 + 1))) ∧ (𝑋 − (𝐹‘𝐼)) ≤ 4) → ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℙ ((𝑝 ∈ Odd ∧ 𝑞 ∈ Odd ∧ 𝑟 ∈ Odd ) ∧ 𝑋 = ((𝑝 + 𝑞) + 𝑟))))
Theorem	bgoldbtbnd 47933*	If the binary Goldbach conjecture is valid up to an integer 𝑁, and there is a series ("ladder") of primes with a difference of at most 𝑁 up to an integer 𝑀, then the strong ternary Goldbach conjecture is valid up to 𝑀, see section 1.2.2 in [Helfgott] p. 4 with N = 4 x 10^18, taken from [OeSilva], and M = 8.875 x 10^30. (Contributed by AV, 1-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘;11))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘;11))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ Even ((4 < 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 < 𝑁) → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachEven ))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (RePart‘𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^𝐷)((𝐹‘𝑖) ∈ (ℙ ∖ {2}) ∧ ((𝐹‘(𝑖 + 1)) − (𝐹‘𝑖)) < (𝑁 − 4) ∧ 4 < ((𝐹‘(𝑖 + 1)) − (𝐹‘𝑖))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘0) = 7)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘1) = ;13)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 < (𝐹‘𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐷) ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ Odd ((7 < 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 < 𝑀) → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachOdd ))
Axiom	ax-bgbltosilva 47934	The binary Goldbach conjecture is valid for all even numbers less than or equal to 4x10^18, see section 2 in [OeSilva] p. 2042. Temporarily provided as "axiom". (Contributed by AV, 3-Aug-2020.) (Revised by AV, 9-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ Even ∧ 4 < 𝑁 ∧ 𝑁 ≤ (4 · (;10↑;18))) → 𝑁 ∈ GoldbachEven )
Axiom	ax-tgoldbachgt 47935*	Temporary duplicate of tgoldbachgt 34697, provided as "axiom" as long as this theorem is in the mathbox of Thierry Arnoux: Odd integers greater than (;10↑;27) have at least a representation as a sum of three odd primes. Final statement in section 7.4 of [Helfgott] p. 70 , expressed using the set 𝐺 of odd numbers which can be written as a sum of three odd primes. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑂 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑧}    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = {𝑧 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℙ ((𝑝 ∈ 𝑂 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑂 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ 𝑂) ∧ 𝑧 = ((𝑝 + 𝑞) + 𝑟))}    ⇒   ⊢ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ (𝑚 ≤ (;10↑;27) ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑂 (𝑚 < 𝑛 → 𝑛 ∈ 𝐺))
Theorem	tgoldbachgtALTV 47936*	Variant of Thierry Arnoux's tgoldbachgt 34697 using the symbols Odd and GoldbachOdd: The ternary Goldbach conjecture is valid for large odd numbers (i.e. for all odd numbers greater than a fixed 𝑚). This is proven by Helfgott (see section 7.4 in [Helfgott] p. 70) for 𝑚 = 10^27. (Contributed by AV, 2-Aug-2020.) (Revised by AV, 15-Jan-2022.)
⊢ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ (𝑚 ≤ (;10↑;27) ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ Odd (𝑚 < 𝑛 → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachOdd ))
Theorem	bgoldbachlt 47937*	The binary Goldbach conjecture is valid for small even numbers (i.e. for all even numbers less than or equal to a fixed big 𝑚). This is verified for m = 4 x 10^18 by Oliveira e Silva, see ax-bgbltosilva 47934. (Contributed by AV, 3-Aug-2020.) (Revised by AV, 9-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ ((4 · (;10↑;18)) ≤ 𝑚 ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ Even ((4 < 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 < 𝑚) → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachEven ))
Axiom	ax-hgprmladder 47938	There is a partition ("ladder") of primes from 7 to 8.8 x 10^30 with parts ("rungs") having lengths of at least 4 and at most N - 4, see section 1.2.2 in [Helfgott] p. 4. Temporarily provided as "axiom". (Contributed by AV, 3-Aug-2020.) (Revised by AV, 9-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ∃𝑑 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3)∃𝑓 ∈ (RePart‘𝑑)(((𝑓‘0) = 7 ∧ (𝑓‘1) = ;13 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑑) = (;89 · (;10↑;29))) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^𝑑)((𝑓‘𝑖) ∈ (ℙ ∖ {2}) ∧ ((𝑓‘(𝑖 + 1)) − (𝑓‘𝑖)) < ((4 · (;10↑;18)) − 4) ∧ 4 < ((𝑓‘(𝑖 + 1)) − (𝑓‘𝑖))))
Theorem	tgblthelfgott 47939	The ternary Goldbach conjecture is valid for all odd numbers less than 8.8 x 10^30 (actually 8.875694 x 10^30, see section 1.2.2 in [Helfgott] p. 4, using bgoldbachlt 47937, ax-hgprmladder 47938 and bgoldbtbnd 47933. (Contributed by AV, 4-Aug-2020.) (Revised by AV, 9-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ Odd ∧ 7 < 𝑁 ∧ 𝑁 < (;88 · (;10↑;29))) → 𝑁 ∈ GoldbachOdd )
Theorem	tgoldbachlt 47940*	The ternary Goldbach conjecture is valid for small odd numbers (i.e. for all odd numbers less than a fixed big 𝑚 greater than 8 x 10^30). This is verified for m = 8.875694 x 10^30 by Helfgott, see tgblthelfgott 47939. (Contributed by AV, 4-Aug-2020.) (Revised by AV, 9-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ ((8 · (;10↑;30)) < 𝑚 ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ Odd ((7 < 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 < 𝑚) → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachOdd ))
Theorem	tgoldbach 47941	The ternary Goldbach conjecture is valid. Main theorem in [Helfgott] p. 2. This follows from tgoldbachlt 47940 and ax-tgoldbachgt 47935. (Contributed by AV, 2-Aug-2020.) (Revised by AV, 9-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ∀𝑛 ∈ Odd (7 < 𝑛 → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachOdd )
21.48.15  Graph theory (extension)
21.48.15.1  Closed neighborhood of a vertex
Syntax	cclnbgr 47942	Extend class notation with closed neighborhoods (of a vertex in a graph).
class ClNeighbVtx
Definition	df-clnbgr 47943*	Define the closed neighborhood resp. the class of all neighbors of a vertex (in a graph) and the vertex itself, see definition in section I.1 of [Bollobas] p. 3. The closed neighborhood of a vertex is the set of all vertices which are connected with this vertex by an edge and the vertex itself (in contrast to an open neighborhood, see df-nbgr 29313). Alternatively, a closed neighborhood of a vertex could have been defined as its open neighborhood enhanced by the vertex itself, see dfclnbgr4 47948. This definition is applicable even for arbitrary hypergraphs. (Contributed by AV, 7-May-2025.)
⊢ ClNeighbVtx = (𝑔 ∈ V, 𝑣 ∈ (Vtx‘𝑔) ↦ ({𝑣} ∪ {𝑛 ∈ (Vtx‘𝑔) ∣ ∃𝑒 ∈ (Edg‘𝑔){𝑣, 𝑛} ⊆ 𝑒}))
Theorem	clnbgrprc0 47944	The closed neighborhood is empty if the graph 𝐺 or the vertex 𝑁 are proper classes. (Contributed by AV, 7-May-2025.)
⊢ (¬ (𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑁 ∈ V) → (𝐺 ClNeighbVtx 𝑁) = ∅)
Theorem	clnbgrcl 47945	If a class 𝑋 has at least one element in its closed neighborhood, this class must be a vertex. (Contributed by AV, 7-May-2025.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (𝐺 ClNeighbVtx 𝑋) → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)
Theorem	clnbgrval 47946*	The closed neighborhood of a vertex 𝑉 in a graph 𝐺. (Contributed by AV, 7-May-2025.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐺 ClNeighbVtx 𝑁) = ({𝑁} ∪ {𝑛 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 {𝑁, 𝑛} ⊆ 𝑒}))
Theorem	dfclnbgr2 47947*	Alternate definition of the closed neighborhood of a vertex breaking up the subset relationship of an unordered pair. (Contributed by AV, 7-May-2025.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐺 ClNeighbVtx 𝑁) = ({𝑁} ∪ {𝑛 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 (𝑁 ∈ 𝑒 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑒)}))
Theorem	dfclnbgr4 47948	Alternate definition of the closed neighborhood of a vertex as union of the vertex with its open neighborhood. (Contributed by AV, 8-May-2025.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐺 ClNeighbVtx 𝑁) = ({𝑁} ∪ (𝐺 NeighbVtx 𝑁)))
Theorem	elclnbgrelnbgr 47949	An element of the closed neighborhood of a vertex which is not the vertex itself is an element of the open neighborhood of the vertex. (Contributed by AV, 24-Sep-2025.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ (𝐺 ClNeighbVtx 𝑁) ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑁) → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐺 NeighbVtx 𝑁))
Theorem	dfclnbgr3 47950*	Alternate definition of the closed neighborhood of a vertex using the edge function instead of the edges themselves (see also clnbgrval 47946). (Contributed by AV, 8-May-2025.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Fun 𝐼) → (𝐺 ClNeighbVtx 𝑁) = ({𝑁} ∪ {𝑛 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ ∃𝑖 ∈ dom 𝐼{𝑁, 𝑛} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝑖)}))
Theorem	clnbgrnvtx0 47951	If a class 𝑋 is not a vertex of a graph 𝐺, then it has an empty closed neighborhood in 𝐺. (Contributed by AV, 8-May-2025.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∉ 𝑉 → (𝐺 ClNeighbVtx 𝑋) = ∅)
Theorem	clnbgrel 47952*	Characterization of a member 𝑁 of the closed neighborhood of a vertex 𝑋 in a graph 𝐺. (Contributed by AV, 9-May-2025.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (𝐺 ClNeighbVtx 𝑋) ↔ ((𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑁 = 𝑋 ∨ ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 {𝑋, 𝑁} ⊆ 𝑒)))
Theorem	clnbgrvtxel 47953	Every vertex 𝐾 is a member of its closed neighborhood. (Contributed by AV, 10-May-2025.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝐺 ClNeighbVtx 𝐾))
Theorem	clnbgrisvtx 47954	Every member 𝑁 of the closed neighborhood of a vertex 𝐾 is a vertex. (Contributed by AV, 9-May-2025.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (𝐺 ClNeighbVtx 𝐾) → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉)
Theorem	clnbgrssvtx 47955	The closed neighborhood of a vertex 𝐾 in a graph is a subset of all vertices of the graph. (Contributed by AV, 9-May-2025.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ClNeighbVtx 𝐾) ⊆ 𝑉
Theorem	clnbgrn0 47956	The closed neighborhood of a vertex is never empty. (Contributed by AV, 16-May-2025.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐺 ClNeighbVtx 𝑁) ≠ ∅)
Theorem	clnbupgr 47957*	The closed neighborhood of a vertex in a pseudograph. (Contributed by AV, 10-May-2025.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐺 ClNeighbVtx 𝑁) = ({𝑁} ∪ {𝑛 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ {𝑁, 𝑛} ∈ 𝐸}))
Theorem	clnbupgrel 47958	A member of the closed neighborhood of a vertex in a pseudograph. (Contributed by AV, 10-May-2025.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑁 ∈ (𝐺 ClNeighbVtx 𝐾) ↔ (𝑁 = 𝐾 ∨ {𝑁, 𝐾} ∈ 𝐸)))
Theorem	clnbupgreli 47959	A member of the closed neighborhood of a vertex in a pseudograph. (Contributed by AV, 28-Dec-2025.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (𝐺 ClNeighbVtx 𝐾)) → (𝑁 = 𝐾 ∨ {𝑁, 𝐾} ∈ 𝐸))
Theorem	clnbgr0vtx 47960	In a null graph (with no vertices), all closed neighborhoods are empty. (Contributed by AV, 15-Nov-2020.)
⊢ ((Vtx‘𝐺) = ∅ → (𝐺 ClNeighbVtx 𝐾) = ∅)
Theorem	clnbgr0edg 47961	In an empty graph (with no edges), all closed neighborhoods consists of a single vertex. (Contributed by AV, 10-May-2025.)
⊢ (((Edg‘𝐺) = ∅ ∧ 𝐾 ∈ (Vtx‘𝐺)) → (𝐺 ClNeighbVtx 𝐾) = {𝐾})
Theorem	clnbgrsym 47962	In a graph, the closed neighborhood relation is symmetric: a vertex 𝑁 in a graph 𝐺 is a neighbor of a second vertex 𝐾 iff the second vertex 𝐾 is a neighbor of the first vertex 𝑁. (Contributed by AV, 10-May-2025.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (𝐺 ClNeighbVtx 𝐾) ↔ 𝐾 ∈ (𝐺 ClNeighbVtx 𝑁))
Theorem	predgclnbgrel 47963	If a (not necessarily proper) unordered pair containing a vertex is an edge, the other vertex is in the closed neighborhood of the first vertex. (Contributed by AV, 23-Aug-2025.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ {𝑋, 𝑁} ∈ 𝐸) → 𝑁 ∈ (𝐺 ClNeighbVtx 𝑋))
Theorem	clnbgredg 47964	A vertex connected by an edge with another vertex is a neighbor of that vertex. (Contributed by AV, 24-Aug-2025.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝐺 ClNeighbVtx 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UHGraph ∧ (𝐾 ∈ 𝐸 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐾)) → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑁)
Theorem	clnbgrssedg 47965	The vertices connected by an edge are a subset of the neighborhood of each of these vertices. (Contributed by AV, 26-May-2025.) (Proof shortened by AV, 24-Aug-2025.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝐺 ClNeighbVtx 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UHGraph ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 𝐸 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐾) → 𝐾 ⊆ 𝑁)
Theorem	edgusgrclnbfin 47966*	The size of the closed neighborhood of a vertex in a simple graph is finite iff the number of edges having this vertex as endpoint is finite. (Contributed by AV, 10-May-2025.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) → ((𝐺 ClNeighbVtx 𝑈) ∈ Fin ↔ {𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 ∣ 𝑈 ∈ 𝑒} ∈ Fin))
Theorem	clnbusgrfi 47967	The closed neighborhood of a vertex in a simple graph with a finite number of edges is a finite set. (Contributed by AV, 10-May-2025.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ 𝐸 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐺 ClNeighbVtx 𝑈) ∈ Fin)
Theorem	clnbfiusgrfi 47968	The closed neighborhood of a vertex in a finite simple graph is a finite set. (Contributed by AV, 10-May-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ FinUSGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (Vtx‘𝐺)) → (𝐺 ClNeighbVtx 𝑁) ∈ Fin)
Theorem	clnbgrlevtx 47969	The size of the closed neighborhood of a vertex is at most the number of vertices of a graph. (Contributed by AV, 10-May-2025.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (♯‘(𝐺 ClNeighbVtx 𝑈)) ≤ (♯‘𝑉)
21.48.15.2  Semiclosed and semiopen neighborhoods (experimental) We have already definitions for open and closed neighborhoods of a vertex, which differs only in the fact that the first never contains the vertex, and the latter always contains the vertex. One of these definitions, however, cannot be simply derived from the other. This would be possible if a definition of a semiclosed neighborhood was available, see dfsclnbgr2 47970. The definitions for open and closed neighborhoods could be derived from such a more simple, but otherwise probably useless definition, see dfnbgr5 47975 and dfclnbgr5 47974. Depending on the existence of certain edges, a vertex belongs to its semiclosed neighborhood or not. An alternate approach is to introduce semiopen neighborhoods, see dfvopnbgr2 47977. The definitions for open and closed neighborhoods could also be derived from such a definition, see dfnbgr6 47981 and dfclnbgr6 47980. Like with semiclosed neighborhood, depending on the existence of certain edges, a vertex belongs to its semiopen neighborhood or not. It is unclear if either definition is/will be useful, and in contrast to dfsclnbgr2 47970, the definition of semiopen neighborhoods is much more complex.
Theorem	dfsclnbgr2 47970*	Alternate definition of the semiclosed neighborhood of a vertex breaking up the subset relationship of an unordered pair. A semiclosed neighborhood 𝑆 of a vertex 𝑁 is the set of all vertices incident with edges which join the vertex 𝑁 with a vertex. Therefore, a vertex is contained in its semiclosed neighborhood if it is connected with any vertex by an edge (see sclnbgrelself 47972), even only with itself (i.e., by a loop). (Contributed by AV, 16-May-2025.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 {𝑁, 𝑛} ⊆ 𝑒}    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 (𝑁 ∈ 𝑒 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑒)})
Theorem	sclnbgrel 47971*	Characterization of a member 𝑋 of the semiclosed neighborhood of a vertex 𝑁 in a graph 𝐺. (Contributed by AV, 16-May-2025.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 {𝑁, 𝑛} ⊆ 𝑒}    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑆 ↔ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 {𝑁, 𝑋} ⊆ 𝑒))
Theorem	sclnbgrelself 47972*	A vertex 𝑁 is a member of its semiclosed neighborhood iff there is an edge joining the vertex with a vertex. (Contributed by AV, 16-May-2025.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 {𝑁, 𝑛} ⊆ 𝑒}    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ 𝑆 ↔ (𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 𝑁 ∈ 𝑒))
Theorem	sclnbgrisvtx 47973*	Every member 𝑋 of the semiclosed neighborhood of a vertex 𝑁 is a vertex. (Contributed by AV, 16-May-2025.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 {𝑁, 𝑛} ⊆ 𝑒}    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑆 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)
Theorem	dfclnbgr5 47974*	Alternate definition of the closed neighborhood of a vertex as union of the vertex with its semiclosed neighborhood. (Contributed by AV, 16-May-2025.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 {𝑁, 𝑛} ⊆ 𝑒}    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐺 ClNeighbVtx 𝑁) = ({𝑁} ∪ 𝑆))
Theorem	dfnbgr5 47975*	Alternate definition of the (open) neighborhood of a vertex as a semiclosed neighborhood without itself. (Contributed by AV, 16-May-2025.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 {𝑁, 𝑛} ⊆ 𝑒}    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐺 NeighbVtx 𝑁) = (𝑆 ∖ {𝑁}))
Theorem	dfnbgrss 47976*	Subset chain for different kinds of neighborhoods of a vertex. (Contributed by AV, 16-May-2025.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 {𝑁, 𝑛} ⊆ 𝑒}    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 → ((𝐺 NeighbVtx 𝑁) ⊆ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ (𝐺 ClNeighbVtx 𝑁)))
Theorem	dfvopnbgr2 47977*	Alternate definition of the semiopen neighborhood of a vertex breaking up the subset relationship of an unordered pair. A semiopen neighborhood 𝑈 of a vertex 𝑁 is its open neighborhood together with itself if there is a loop at this vertex. (Contributed by AV, 15-May-2025.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑛 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ (𝑛 ∈ (𝐺 NeighbVtx 𝑁) ∨ ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 (𝑁 = 𝑛 ∧ 𝑒 = {𝑁}))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝑈 = {𝑛 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 ((𝑛 ≠ 𝑁 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑒 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑒) ∨ (𝑛 = 𝑁 ∧ 𝑒 = {𝑛}))})
Theorem	vopnbgrel 47978*	Characterization of a member 𝑋 of the semiopen neighborhood of a vertex 𝑁 in a graph 𝐺. (Contributed by AV, 16-May-2025.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑛 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ (𝑛 ∈ (𝐺 NeighbVtx 𝑁) ∨ ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 (𝑁 = 𝑛 ∧ 𝑒 = {𝑁}))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 ↔ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 ((𝑋 ≠ 𝑁 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑒 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑒) ∨ (𝑋 = 𝑁 ∧ 𝑒 = {𝑋})))))
Theorem	vopnbgrelself 47979*	A vertex 𝑁 is a member of its semiopen neighborhood iff there is a loop joining the vertex with itself. (Contributed by AV, 16-May-2025.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑛 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ (𝑛 ∈ (𝐺 NeighbVtx 𝑁) ∨ ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 (𝑁 = 𝑛 ∧ 𝑒 = {𝑁}))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑁 ∈ 𝑈 ↔ ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 𝑒 = {𝑁}))
Theorem	dfclnbgr6 47980*	Alternate definition of the closed neighborhood of a vertex as union of the vertex with its semiopen neighborhood. (Contributed by AV, 17-May-2025.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑛 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ (𝑛 ∈ (𝐺 NeighbVtx 𝑁) ∨ ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 (𝑁 = 𝑛 ∧ 𝑒 = {𝑁}))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐺 ClNeighbVtx 𝑁) = ({𝑁} ∪ 𝑈))
Theorem	dfnbgr6 47981*	Alternate definition of the (open) neighborhood of a vertex as a difference of its semiopen neighborhood and the singleton of itself. (Contributed by AV, 17-May-2025.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑛 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ (𝑛 ∈ (𝐺 NeighbVtx 𝑁) ∨ ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 (𝑁 = 𝑛 ∧ 𝑒 = {𝑁}))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐺 NeighbVtx 𝑁) = (𝑈 ∖ {𝑁}))
Theorem	dfsclnbgr6 47982*	Alternate definition of a semiclosed neighborhood of a vertex as a union of a semiopen neighborhood and the vertex itself if there is a loop at this vertex. (Contributed by AV, 17-May-2025.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑛 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ (𝑛 ∈ (𝐺 NeighbVtx 𝑁) ∨ ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 (𝑁 = 𝑛 ∧ 𝑒 = {𝑁}))}    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 {𝑁, 𝑛} ⊆ 𝑒}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝑆 = (𝑈 ∪ {𝑛 ∈ {𝑁} ∣ ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 𝑛 ∈ 𝑒}))
Theorem	dfnbgrss2 47983*	Subset chain for different kinds of neighborhoods of a vertex. (Contributed by AV, 16-May-2025.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑛 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ (𝑛 ∈ (𝐺 NeighbVtx 𝑁) ∨ ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 (𝑁 = 𝑛 ∧ 𝑒 = {𝑁}))}    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 {𝑁, 𝑛} ⊆ 𝑒}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 → ((𝐺 NeighbVtx 𝑁) ⊆ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ (𝐺 ClNeighbVtx 𝑁)))
21.48.15.3  Induced subgraphs
Syntax	cisubgr 47984	Extend class notation with induced subgraphs.
class ISubGr
Definition	df-isubgr 47985*	Define the function mapping graphs and subsets of their vertices to their induced subgraphs. A subgraph induced by a subset of vertices of a graph is a subgraph of the graph which contains all edges of the graph that join vertices of the subgraph (see section I.1 in [Bollobas] p. 2 or section 1.1 in [Diestel] p. 4). Although a graph may be given in any meaningful representation, its induced subgraphs are always ordered pairs of vertices and edges. (Contributed by AV, 27-Apr-2025.)
⊢ ISubGr = (𝑔 ∈ V, 𝑣 ∈ 𝒫 (Vtx‘𝑔) ↦ ⟨𝑣, ⦋(iEdg‘𝑔) / 𝑒⦌(𝑒 ↾ {𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑒 ∣ (𝑒‘𝑥) ⊆ 𝑣})⟩)
Theorem	isisubgr 47986*	The subgraph induced by a subset of vertices. (Contributed by AV, 12-May-2025.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑉) → (𝐺 ISubGr 𝑆) = ⟨𝑆, (𝐸 ↾ {𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐸 ∣ (𝐸‘𝑥) ⊆ 𝑆})⟩)
Theorem	isubgriedg 47987*	The edges of an induced subgraph. (Contributed by AV, 12-May-2025.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑉) → (iEdg‘(𝐺 ISubGr 𝑆)) = (𝐸 ↾ {𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐸 ∣ (𝐸‘𝑥) ⊆ 𝑆}))
Theorem	isubgrvtxuhgr 47988	The subgraph induced by the full set of vertices of a hypergraph. (Contributed by AV, 12-May-2025.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → (𝐺 ISubGr 𝑉) = ⟨𝑉, 𝐸⟩)
Theorem	isubgredgss 47989	The edges of an induced subgraph of a graph are edges of the graph. (Contributed by AV, 24-Sep-2025.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐺 ISubGr 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Edg‘𝐻)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑉) → 𝐼 ⊆ 𝐸)
Theorem	isubgredg 47990	An edge of an induced subgraph of a hypergraph is an edge of the hypergraph connecting vertices of the subgraph. (Contributed by AV, 24-Sep-2025.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐺 ISubGr 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Edg‘𝐻)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UHGraph ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑉) → (𝐾 ∈ 𝐼 ↔ (𝐾 ∈ 𝐸 ∧ 𝐾 ⊆ 𝑆)))
Theorem	isubgrvtx 47991	The vertices of an induced subgraph. (Contributed by AV, 12-May-2025.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑉) → (Vtx‘(𝐺 ISubGr 𝑆)) = 𝑆)
Theorem	isubgruhgr 47992	An induced subgraph of a hypergraph is a hypergraph. (Contributed by AV, 13-May-2025.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UHGraph ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑉) → (𝐺 ISubGr 𝑆) ∈ UHGraph)
Theorem	isubgrsubgr 47993	An induced subgraph of a hypergraph is a subgraph of the hypergraph. (Contributed by AV, 14-May-2025.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UHGraph ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑉) → (𝐺 ISubGr 𝑆) SubGraph 𝐺)
Theorem	isubgrupgr 47994	An induced subgraph of a pseudograph is a pseudograph. (Contributed by AV, 14-May-2025.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑉) → (𝐺 ISubGr 𝑆) ∈ UPGraph)
Theorem	isubgrumgr 47995	An induced subgraph of a multigraph is a multigraph. (Contributed by AV, 15-May-2025.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UMGraph ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑉) → (𝐺 ISubGr 𝑆) ∈ UMGraph)
Theorem	isubgrusgr 47996	An induced subgraph of a simple graph is a simple graph. (Contributed by AV, 15-May-2025.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑉) → (𝐺 ISubGr 𝑆) ∈ USGraph)
Theorem	isubgr0uhgr 47997	The subgraph induced by an empty set of vertices of a hypergraph. (Contributed by AV, 13-May-2025.)
⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → (𝐺 ISubGr ∅) = ⟨∅, ∅⟩)
21.48.15.4  Isomorphisms of graphs This section is about isomorphisms of graphs, whereby the term "isomorphism" is used in both of its meanings (according to the Meriam-Webster dictionary, see https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/isomorphism): "1: the quality or state of being isomorphic." and "2: a one-to-one correspondence between two mathematical sets". At first, an operation GraphIso is defined (see df-grim 48002) which provides the graph isomorphisms (as "one-to-one correspondence") between two given graphs. This definition, however, is applicable for any two sets, but is meaningful only if these sets have "vertices" and "edges". Afterwards, a binary relation ≃𝑔𝑟 is defined (see df-gric 48005) which is true for two graphs iff there is a graph isomorphisms between these graphs. Then these graphs are called "isomorphic". Therefore, this relation is also called "is isomorphic to" relation. More formally, 𝐴 ≃𝑔𝑟 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑓𝑓 ∈ (𝐴 GraphIso 𝐵) resp. 𝐴 ≃𝑔𝑟 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 GraphIso 𝐵) ≠ ∅. Notice that there can be multiple isomorphisms between two graphs. For example, let ⟨{𝐴, 𝐵}, {{𝐴, 𝐵}}⟩ and ⟨{{𝑀, 𝑁}, {{𝑀, 𝑁}}⟩ be two graphs with two vertices and one edge, then 𝐴 ↦ 𝑀, 𝐵 ↦ 𝑁 and 𝐴 ↦ 𝑁, 𝐵 ↦ 𝑀 are two different isomorphisms between these graphs. The names and symbols are chosen analogously to group isomorphisms GrpIso (see df-gim 19173) resp. isomorphism between groups ≃𝑔 (see df-gic 19174). The general definition of graph isomorphisms and the relation "is isomorphic to" for graphs is specialized for simple hypergraphs (gricushgr 48041) and simple pseudographs (gricuspgr 48042). The latter corresponds to the definition in [Bollobas] p. 3. It is shown that the relation "is isomorphic to" for graphs is an equivalence relation, see gricer 48048. Finally, isomorphic graphs with different representations are studied (opstrgric 48050, ushggricedg 48051). Another approach could be to define a category of graphs (there are maybe multiple ones), where graph morphisms are couples consisting of a function on vertices and a function on edges with required compatibilities, as used in the definition of GraphIso. And then, a graph isomorphism is defined as an isomorphism in the category of graphs (something like "GraphIsom = ( Iso ` GraphCat )" ). Then general category theory theorems could be used, e.g., to show that graph isomorphism is an equivalence relation.
Syntax	cgrisom 47998	Extend class notation to include the graph ispmorphisms as pair.
class GraphIsom
Syntax	cgrim 47999	Extend class notation to include the graph ispmorphisms.
class GraphIso
Syntax	cgric 48000	Extend class notation to include the "is isomorphic to" relation for graphs.
class ≃𝑔𝑟