P. 480 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 47901-48000   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	goldbachth 47901	Goldbach's theorem: Two different Fermat numbers are coprime. See ProofWiki "Goldbach's theorem", 31-Jul-2021, https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Goldbach%27s_Theorem or Wikipedia "Fermat number", 31-Jul-2021, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermat_number#Basic_properties. (Contributed by AV, 1-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑁 ≠ 𝑀) → ((FermatNo‘𝑁) gcd (FermatNo‘𝑀)) = 1)
Theorem	fmtnorec3 47902*	The third recurrence relation for Fermat numbers, see Wikipedia "Fermat number", 31-Jul-2021, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermat_number#Basic_properties. (Contributed by AV, 2-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) → (FermatNo‘𝑁) = ((FermatNo‘(𝑁 − 1)) + ((2↑(2↑(𝑁 − 1))) · ∏𝑛 ∈ (0...(𝑁 − 2))(FermatNo‘𝑛))))
Theorem	fmtnorec4 47903	The fourth recurrence relation for Fermat numbers, see Wikipedia "Fermat number", 31-Jul-2021, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermat_number#Basic_properties. (Contributed by AV, 31-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) → (FermatNo‘𝑁) = (((FermatNo‘(𝑁 − 1))↑2) − (2 · (((FermatNo‘(𝑁 − 2)) − 1)↑2))))
Theorem	fmtno2 47904	The 2 nd Fermat number, see remark in [ApostolNT] p. 7. (Contributed by AV, 13-Jun-2021.)
⊢ (FermatNo‘2) = ;17
Theorem	fmtno3 47905	The 3 rd Fermat number, see remark in [ApostolNT] p. 7. (Contributed by AV, 13-Jun-2021.)
⊢ (FermatNo‘3) = ;;257
Theorem	fmtno4 47906	The 4 th Fermat number, see remark in [ApostolNT] p. 7. (Contributed by AV, 13-Jun-2021.)
⊢ (FermatNo‘4) = ;;;;65537
Theorem	fmtno5lem1 47907	Lemma 1 for fmtno5 47911. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (;;;;65536 · 6) = ;;;;;393216
Theorem	fmtno5lem2 47908	Lemma 2 for fmtno5 47911. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (;;;;65536 · 5) = ;;;;;327680
Theorem	fmtno5lem3 47909	Lemma 3 for fmtno5 47911. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (;;;;65536 · 3) = ;;;;;196608
Theorem	fmtno5lem4 47910	Lemma 4 for fmtno5 47911. (Contributed by AV, 30-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (;;;;65536↑2) = ;;;;;;;;;4294967296
Theorem	fmtno5 47911	The 5 th Fermat number. (Contributed by AV, 30-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (FermatNo‘5) = ;;;;;;;;;4294967297
Theorem	fmtno0prm 47912	The 0 th Fermat number is a prime (first Fermat prime). (Contributed by AV, 13-Jun-2021.)
⊢ (FermatNo‘0) ∈ ℙ
Theorem	fmtno1prm 47913	The 1 st Fermat number is a prime (second Fermat prime). (Contributed by AV, 13-Jun-2021.)
⊢ (FermatNo‘1) ∈ ℙ
Theorem	fmtno2prm 47914	The 2 nd Fermat number is a prime (third Fermat prime). (Contributed by AV, 13-Jun-2021.)
⊢ (FermatNo‘2) ∈ ℙ
Theorem	257prm 47915	257 is a prime number (the fourth Fermat prime). (Contributed by AV, 15-Jun-2021.)
⊢ ;;257 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	fmtno3prm 47916	The 3 rd Fermat number is a prime (fourth Fermat prime). (Contributed by AV, 15-Jun-2021.)
⊢ (FermatNo‘3) ∈ ℙ
Theorem	odz2prm2pw 47917	Any power of two is coprime to any prime not being two. (Contributed by AV, 25-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑃 ∈ (ℙ ∖ {2})) ∧ (((2↑(2↑𝑁)) mod 𝑃) ≠ 1 ∧ ((2↑(2↑(𝑁 + 1))) mod 𝑃) = 1)) → ((odℤ‘𝑃)‘2) = (2↑(𝑁 + 1)))
Theorem	fmtnoprmfac1lem 47918	Lemma for fmtnoprmfac1 47919: The order of 2 modulo a prime that divides the n-th Fermat number is 2^(n+1). (Contributed by AV, 25-Jul-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 18-Mar-2022.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑃 ∈ (ℙ ∖ {2}) ∧ 𝑃 ∥ (FermatNo‘𝑁)) → ((odℤ‘𝑃)‘2) = (2↑(𝑁 + 1)))
Theorem	fmtnoprmfac1 47919*	Divisor of Fermat number (special form of Euler's result, see fmtnofac1 47924): Let Fn be a Fermat number. Let p be a prime divisor of Fn. Then p is in the form: k*2^(n+1)+1 where k is a positive integer. (Contributed by AV, 25-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑃 ∥ (FermatNo‘𝑁)) → ∃𝑘 ∈ ℕ 𝑃 = ((𝑘 · (2↑(𝑁 + 1))) + 1))
Theorem	fmtnoprmfac2lem1 47920	Lemma for fmtnoprmfac2 47921. (Contributed by AV, 26-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑃 ∈ (ℙ ∖ {2}) ∧ 𝑃 ∥ (FermatNo‘𝑁)) → ((2↑((𝑃 − 1) / 2)) mod 𝑃) = 1)
Theorem	fmtnoprmfac2 47921*	Divisor of Fermat number (special form of Lucas' result, see fmtnofac2 47923): Let Fn be a Fermat number. Let p be a prime divisor of Fn. Then p is in the form: k*2^(n+2)+1 where k is a positive integer. (Contributed by AV, 26-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑃 ∥ (FermatNo‘𝑁)) → ∃𝑘 ∈ ℕ 𝑃 = ((𝑘 · (2↑(𝑁 + 2))) + 1))
Theorem	fmtnofac2lem 47922*	Lemma for fmtnofac2 47923 (Induction step). (Contributed by AV, 30-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) → ((((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑦 ∥ (FermatNo‘𝑁)) → ∃𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 𝑦 = ((𝑘 · (2↑(𝑁 + 2))) + 1)) ∧ ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑧 ∥ (FermatNo‘𝑁)) → ∃𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 𝑧 = ((𝑘 · (2↑(𝑁 + 2))) + 1))) → ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ (𝑦 · 𝑧) ∥ (FermatNo‘𝑁)) → ∃𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 (𝑦 · 𝑧) = ((𝑘 · (2↑(𝑁 + 2))) + 1))))
Theorem	fmtnofac2 47923*	Divisor of Fermat number (Euler's Result refined by François Édouard Anatole Lucas), see fmtnofac1 47924: Let Fn be a Fermat number. Let m be divisor of Fn. Then m is in the form: k*2^(n+2)+1 where k is a nonnegative integer. (Contributed by AV, 30-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑀 ∥ (FermatNo‘𝑁)) → ∃𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 𝑀 = ((𝑘 · (2↑(𝑁 + 2))) + 1))
Theorem	fmtnofac1 47924*	Divisor of Fermat number (Euler's Result), see ProofWiki "Divisor of Fermat Number/Euler's Result", 24-Jul-2021, https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Divisor_of_Fermat_Number/Euler's_Result): "Let Fn be a Fermat number. Let m be divisor of Fn. Then m is in the form: k*2^(n+1)+1 where k is a positive integer." Here, however, k must be a nonnegative integer, because k must be 0 to represent 1 (which is a divisor of Fn ). Historical Note: In 1747, Leonhard Paul Euler proved that a divisor of a Fermat number Fn is always in the form kx2^(n+1)+1. This was later refined to k*2^(n+2)+1 by François Édouard Anatole Lucas, see fmtnofac2 47923. (Contributed by AV, 30-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑀 ∥ (FermatNo‘𝑁)) → ∃𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 𝑀 = ((𝑘 · (2↑(𝑁 + 1))) + 1))
Theorem	fmtno4sqrt 47925	The floor of the square root of the fourth Fermat number is 256. (Contributed by AV, 28-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (⌊‘(√‘(FermatNo‘4))) = ;;256
Theorem	fmtno4prmfac 47926	If P was a (prime) factor of the fourth Fermat number less than the square root of the fourth Fermat number, it would be either 65 or 129 or 193. (Contributed by AV, 28-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑃 ∥ (FermatNo‘4) ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (⌊‘(√‘(FermatNo‘4)))) → (𝑃 = ;65 ∨ 𝑃 = ;;129 ∨ 𝑃 = ;;193))
Theorem	fmtno4prmfac193 47927	If P was a (prime) factor of the fourth Fermat number, it would be 193. (Contributed by AV, 28-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑃 ∥ (FermatNo‘4) ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (⌊‘(√‘(FermatNo‘4)))) → 𝑃 = ;;193)
Theorem	fmtno4nprmfac193 47928	193 is not a (prime) factor of the fourth Fermat number. (Contributed by AV, 24-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ¬ ;;193 ∥ (FermatNo‘4)
Theorem	fmtno4prm 47929	The 4-th Fermat number (65537) is a prime (the fifth Fermat prime). (Contributed by AV, 28-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (FermatNo‘4) ∈ ℙ
Theorem	65537prm 47930	65537 is a prime number (the fifth Fermat prime). (Contributed by AV, 28-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ;;;;65537 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	fmtnofz04prm 47931	The first five Fermat numbers are prime, see remark in [ApostolNT] p. 7. (Contributed by AV, 28-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (0...4) → (FermatNo‘𝑁) ∈ ℙ)
Theorem	fmtnole4prm 47932	The first five Fermat numbers are prime. (Contributed by AV, 28-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑁 ≤ 4) → (FermatNo‘𝑁) ∈ ℙ)
Theorem	fmtno5faclem1 47933	Lemma 1 for fmtno5fac 47936. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (;;;;;;6700417 · 4) = ;;;;;;;26801668
Theorem	fmtno5faclem2 47934	Lemma 2 for fmtno5fac 47936. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (;;;;;;6700417 · 6) = ;;;;;;;40202502
Theorem	fmtno5faclem3 47935	Lemma 3 for fmtno5fac 47936. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (;;;;;;;;402025020 + ;;;;;;;26801668) = ;;;;;;;;428826688
Theorem	fmtno5fac 47936	The factorization of the 5 th Fermat number, see remark in [ApostolNT] p. 7. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (FermatNo‘5) = (;;;;;;6700417 · ;;641)
Theorem	fmtno5nprm 47937	The 5 th Fermat number is a not a prime. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (FermatNo‘5) ∉ ℙ
Theorem	prmdvdsfmtnof1lem1 47938*	Lemma 1 for prmdvdsfmtnof1 47941. (Contributed by AV, 3-Aug-2021.)
⊢ 𝐼 = inf({𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∣ 𝑝 ∥ 𝐹}, ℝ, < )    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = inf({𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∣ 𝑝 ∥ 𝐺}, ℝ, < )    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) → (𝐼 = 𝐽 → (𝐼 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝐼 ∥ 𝐹 ∧ 𝐼 ∥ 𝐺)))
Theorem	prmdvdsfmtnof1lem2 47939	Lemma 2 for prmdvdsfmtnof1 47941. (Contributed by AV, 3-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ ran FermatNo ∧ 𝐺 ∈ ran FermatNo) → ((𝐼 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝐼 ∥ 𝐹 ∧ 𝐼 ∥ 𝐺) → 𝐹 = 𝐺))
Theorem	prmdvdsfmtnof 47940*	The mapping of a Fermat number to its smallest prime factor is a function. (Contributed by AV, 4-Aug-2021.) (Proof shortened by II, 16-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑓 ∈ ran FermatNo ↦ inf({𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∣ 𝑝 ∥ 𝑓}, ℝ, < ))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹:ran FermatNo⟶ℙ
Theorem	prmdvdsfmtnof1 47941*	The mapping of a Fermat number to its smallest prime factor is a one-to-one function. (Contributed by AV, 4-Aug-2021.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑓 ∈ ran FermatNo ↦ inf({𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∣ 𝑝 ∥ 𝑓}, ℝ, < ))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹:ran FermatNo–1-1→ℙ
Theorem	prminf2 47942	The set of prime numbers is infinite. The proof of this variant of prminf 16855 is based on Goldbach's theorem goldbachth 47901 (via prmdvdsfmtnof1 47941 and prmdvdsfmtnof1lem2 47939), see Wikipedia "Fermat number", 4-Aug-2021, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermat_number#Basic_properties 47939. (Contributed by AV, 4-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ℙ ∉ Fin
Theorem	2pwp1prm 47943*	For ((2↑𝑘) + 1) to be prime, 𝑘 must be a power of 2, see Wikipedia "Fermat number", section "Other theorems about Fermat numbers", https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermat_number, 5-Aug-2021. (Contributed by AV, 7-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℕ ∧ ((2↑𝐾) + 1) ∈ ℙ) → ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 𝐾 = (2↑𝑛))
Theorem	2pwp1prmfmtno 47944*	Every prime number of the form ((2↑𝑘) + 1) must be a Fermat number. (Contributed by AV, 7-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑃 = ((2↑𝐾) + 1) ∧ 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) → ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 𝑃 = (FermatNo‘𝑛))
21.48.12.2  Mersenne primes "In mathematics, a Mersenne prime is a prime number that is one less than a power of two. That is, it is a prime number of the form Mn = 2^n-1 for some integer n. They are named after Marin Mersenne ... If n is a composite number then so is 2^n-1. Therefore, an equivalent definition of the Mersenne primes is that they are the prime numbers of the form Mp = 2^p-1 for some prime p.", see Wikipedia "Mersenne prime", 16-Aug-2021, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mersenne_prime. See also definition in [ApostolNT] p. 4. This means that if Mn = 2^n-1 is prime, than n must be prime, too, see mersenne 27206. The reverse direction is not generally valid: If p is prime, then Mp = 2^p-1 needs not be prime, e.g. M11 = 2047 = 23 x 89, see m11nprm 47955. This is an example of sgprmdvdsmersenne 47958, stating that if p with p = 3 modulo 4 (here 11) and q=2p+1 (here 23) are prime, then q divides Mp. "In number theory, a prime number p is a Sophie Germain prime if 2p+1 is also prime. The number 2p+1 associated with a Sophie Germain prime is called a safe prime.", see Wikipedia "Safe and Sophie Germain primes", 21-Aug-2021, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Safe_and_Sophie_Germain_primes 47958. Hence, 11 is a Sophie Germain prime and 2x11+1=23 is its associated safe prime. By sfprmdvdsmersenne 47957, it is shown that if a safe prime q is congruent to 7 modulo 8, then it is a divisor of the Mersenne number with its matching Sophie Germain prime as exponent. The main result of this section, however, is the formal proof of a theorem of S. Ligh and L. Neal in "A note on Mersenne numbers", see lighneal 47965.
Theorem	m2prm 47945	The second Mersenne number M2 = 3 is a prime number. (Contributed by AV, 16-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ((2↑2) − 1) ∈ ℙ
Theorem	m3prm 47946	The third Mersenne number M3 = 7 is a prime number. (Contributed by AV, 16-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ((2↑3) − 1) ∈ ℙ
Theorem	flsqrt 47947	A condition equivalent to the floor of a square root. (Contributed by AV, 17-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 ≤ 𝐴) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0) → ((⌊‘(√‘𝐴)) = 𝐵 ↔ ((𝐵↑2) ≤ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 < ((𝐵 + 1)↑2))))
Theorem	flsqrt5 47948	The floor of the square root of a nonnegative number is 5 iff the number is between 25 and 35. (Contributed by AV, 17-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑋) → ((;25 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑋 < ;36) ↔ (⌊‘(√‘𝑋)) = 5))
Theorem	3ndvds4 47949	3 does not divide 4. (Contributed by AV, 18-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ¬ 3 ∥ 4
Theorem	139prmALT 47950	139 is a prime number. In contrast to 139prm 17063, the proof of this theorem uses 3dvds2dec 16272 for checking the divisibility by 3. Although the proof using 3dvds2dec 16272 is longer (regarding size: 1849 characters compared with 1809 for 139prm 17063), the number of essential steps is smaller (301 compared with 327 for 139prm 17063). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Feb-2014.) (Revised by AV, 18-Aug-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ;;139 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	31prm 47951	31 is a prime number. In contrast to 37prm 17060, the proof of this theorem is not based on the "blanket" prmlem2 17059, but on isprm7 16647. Although the checks for non-divisibility by the primes 7 to 23 are not needed, the proof is much longer (regarding size) than the proof of 37prm 17060 (1810 characters compared with 1213 for 37prm 17060). The number of essential steps, however, is much smaller (138 compared with 213 for 37prm 17060). (Contributed by AV, 17-Aug-2021.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ;31 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	m5prm 47952	The fifth Mersenne number M5 = 31 is a prime number. (Contributed by AV, 17-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ((2↑5) − 1) ∈ ℙ
Theorem	127prm 47953	127 is a prime number. (Contributed by AV, 16-Aug-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ;;127 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	m7prm 47954	The seventh Mersenne number M7 = 127 is a prime number. (Contributed by AV, 18-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ((2↑7) − 1) ∈ ℙ
Theorem	m11nprm 47955	The eleventh Mersenne number M11 = 2047 is not a prime number. (Contributed by AV, 18-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ((2↑;11) − 1) = (;89 · ;23)
Theorem	mod42tp1mod8 47956	If a number is 3 modulo 4, twice the number plus 1 is 7 modulo 8. (Contributed by AV, 19-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ (𝑁 mod 4) = 3) → (((2 · 𝑁) + 1) mod 8) = 7)
Theorem	sfprmdvdsmersenne 47957	If 𝑄 is a safe prime (i.e. 𝑄 = ((2 · 𝑃) + 1) for a prime 𝑃) with 𝑄≡7 (mod 8), then 𝑄 divides the 𝑃-th Mersenne number MP. (Contributed by AV, 20-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑄 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑄 mod 8) = 7 ∧ 𝑄 = ((2 · 𝑃) + 1))) → 𝑄 ∥ ((2↑𝑃) − 1))
Theorem	sgprmdvdsmersenne 47958	If 𝑃 is a Sophie Germain prime (i.e. 𝑄 = ((2 · 𝑃) + 1) is also prime) with 𝑃≡3 (mod 4), then 𝑄 divides the 𝑃-th Mersenne number MP. (Contributed by AV, 20-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ (𝑃 mod 4) = 3) ∧ (𝑄 = ((2 · 𝑃) + 1) ∧ 𝑄 ∈ ℙ)) → 𝑄 ∥ ((2↑𝑃) − 1))
Theorem	lighneallem1 47959	Lemma 1 for lighneal 47965. (Contributed by AV, 11-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑃 = 2 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → ((2↑𝑁) − 1) ≠ (𝑃↑𝑀))
Theorem	lighneallem2 47960	Lemma 2 for lighneal 47965. (Contributed by AV, 13-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (((𝑃 ∈ (ℙ ∖ {2}) ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) ∧ 2 ∥ 𝑁 ∧ ((2↑𝑁) − 1) = (𝑃↑𝑀)) → 𝑀 = 1)
Theorem	lighneallem3 47961	Lemma 3 for lighneal 47965. (Contributed by AV, 11-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (((𝑃 ∈ (ℙ ∖ {2}) ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) ∧ (¬ 2 ∥ 𝑁 ∧ 2 ∥ 𝑀) ∧ ((2↑𝑁) − 1) = (𝑃↑𝑀)) → 𝑀 = 1)
Theorem	lighneallem4a 47962	Lemma 1 for lighneallem4 47964. (Contributed by AV, 16-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3) ∧ 𝑆 = (((𝐴↑𝑀) + 1) / (𝐴 + 1))) → 2 ≤ 𝑆)
Theorem	lighneallem4b 47963*	Lemma 2 for lighneallem4 47964. (Contributed by AV, 16-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑀) → Σ𝑘 ∈ (0...(𝑀 − 1))((-1↑𝑘) · (𝐴↑𝑘)) ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))
Theorem	lighneallem4 47964	Lemma 3 for lighneal 47965. (Contributed by AV, 16-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (((𝑃 ∈ (ℙ ∖ {2}) ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) ∧ (¬ 2 ∥ 𝑁 ∧ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑀) ∧ ((2↑𝑁) − 1) = (𝑃↑𝑀)) → 𝑀 = 1)
Theorem	lighneal 47965	If a power of a prime 𝑃 (i.e. 𝑃↑𝑀) is of the form 2↑𝑁 − 1, then 𝑁 must be prime and 𝑀 must be 1. Generalization of mersenne 27206 (where 𝑀 = 1 is a prerequisite). Theorem of S. Ligh and L. Neal (1974) "A note on Mersenne mumbers", Mathematics Magazine, 47:4, 231-233. (Contributed by AV, 16-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) ∧ ((2↑𝑁) − 1) = (𝑃↑𝑀)) → (𝑀 = 1 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℙ))
21.48.12.3  Proth's theorem
Theorem	modexp2m1d 47966	The square of an integer which is -1 modulo a number greater than 1 is 1 modulo the same modulus. (Contributed by AV, 5-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 < 𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 mod 𝐸) = (-1 mod 𝐸))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑2) mod 𝐸) = 1)
Theorem	proththdlem 47967	Lemma for proththd 47968. (Contributed by AV, 4-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = ((𝐾 · (2↑𝑁)) + 1))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃 ∈ ℕ ∧ 1 < 𝑃 ∧ ((𝑃 − 1) / 2) ∈ ℕ))
Theorem	proththd 47968*	Proth's theorem (1878). If P is a Proth number, i.e. a number of the form k2^n+1 with k less than 2^n, and if there exists an integer x for which x^((P-1)/2) is -1 modulo P, then P is prime. Such a prime is called a Proth prime. Like Pocklington's theorem (see pockthg 16846), Proth's theorem allows for a convenient method for verifying large primes. (Contributed by AV, 5-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = ((𝐾 · (2↑𝑁)) + 1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 < (2↑𝑁))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ((𝑥↑((𝑃 − 1) / 2)) mod 𝑃) = (-1 mod 𝑃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ)
Theorem	5tcu2e40 47969	5 times the cube of 2 is 40. (Contributed by AV, 4-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (5 · (2↑3)) = ;40
Theorem	3exp4mod41 47970	3 to the fourth power is -1 modulo 41. (Contributed by AV, 5-Jul-2020.)
⊢ ((3↑4) mod ;41) = (-1 mod ;41)
Theorem	41prothprmlem1 47971	Lemma 1 for 41prothprm 47973. (Contributed by AV, 4-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ;41    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑃 − 1) / 2) = ;20
Theorem	41prothprmlem2 47972	Lemma 2 for 41prothprm 47973. (Contributed by AV, 5-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ;41    ⇒   ⊢ ((3↑((𝑃 − 1) / 2)) mod 𝑃) = (-1 mod 𝑃)
Theorem	41prothprm 47973	41 is a Proth prime. (Contributed by AV, 5-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ;41    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑃 = ((5 · (2↑3)) + 1) ∧ 𝑃 ∈ ℙ)
21.48.12.4  Solutions of quadratic equations
Theorem	quad1 47974*	A condition for a quadratic equation with complex coefficients to have (exactly) one complex solution. (Contributed by AV, 23-Jan-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = ((𝐵↑2) − (4 · (𝐴 · 𝐶))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ ℂ ((𝐴 · (𝑥↑2)) + ((𝐵 · 𝑥) + 𝐶)) = 0 ↔ 𝐷 = 0))
Theorem	requad01 47975*	A condition for a quadratic equation with real coefficients to have (at least) one real solution. (Contributed by AV, 23-Jan-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = ((𝐵↑2) − (4 · (𝐴 · 𝐶))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ((𝐴 · (𝑥↑2)) + ((𝐵 · 𝑥) + 𝐶)) = 0 ↔ 0 ≤ 𝐷))
Theorem	requad1 47976*	A condition for a quadratic equation with real coefficients to have (exactly) one real solution. (Contributed by AV, 26-Jan-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = ((𝐵↑2) − (4 · (𝐴 · 𝐶))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ ℝ ((𝐴 · (𝑥↑2)) + ((𝐵 · 𝑥) + 𝐶)) = 0 ↔ 𝐷 = 0))
Theorem	requad2 47977*	A condition for a quadratic equation with real coefficients to have (exactly) two different real solutions. (Contributed by AV, 28-Jan-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = ((𝐵↑2) − (4 · (𝐴 · 𝐶))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃!𝑝 ∈ 𝒫 ℝ((♯‘𝑝) = 2 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑝 ((𝐴 · (𝑥↑2)) + ((𝐵 · 𝑥) + 𝐶)) = 0) ↔ 0 < 𝐷))
21.48.13  Even and odd numbers Even and odd numbers can be characterized in many different ways. In the following, the definition of even and odd numbers is based on the fact that dividing an even number (resp. an odd number increased by 1) by 2 is an integer, see df-even 47980 and df-odd 47981. Alternate definitions resp. characterizations are provided in dfeven2 48003, dfeven3 48012, dfeven4 47992 and in dfodd2 47990, dfodd3 48004, dfodd4 48013, dfodd5 48014, dfodd6 47991. Each characterization can be useful (and used) in an appropriate context, e.g. dfodd6 47991 in opoeALTV 48037 and dfodd3 48004 in oddprmALTV 48041. Having a fixed definition for even and odd numbers, and alternate characterizations as theorems, advanced theorems about even and/or odd numbers can be expressed more explicitly, and the appropriate characterization can be chosen for their proof, which may become clearer and sometimes also shorter (see, for example, divgcdoddALTV 48036 and divgcdodd 16649).
21.48.13.1  Definitions and basic properties
Syntax	ceven 47978	Extend the definition of a class to include the set of even numbers.
class Even
Syntax	codd 47979	Extend the definition of a class to include the set of odd numbers.
class Odd
Definition	df-even 47980	Define the set of even numbers. (Contributed by AV, 14-Jun-2020.)
⊢ Even = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑧 / 2) ∈ ℤ}
Definition	df-odd 47981	Define the set of odd numbers. (Contributed by AV, 14-Jun-2020.)
⊢ Odd = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ((𝑧 + 1) / 2) ∈ ℤ}
Theorem	iseven 47982	The predicate "is an even number". An even number is an integer which is divisible by 2, i.e. the result of dividing the even integer by 2 is still an integer. (Contributed by AV, 14-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (𝑍 ∈ Even ↔ (𝑍 ∈ ℤ ∧ (𝑍 / 2) ∈ ℤ))
Theorem	isodd 47983	The predicate "is an odd number". An odd number is an integer which is not divisible by 2, i.e. the result of dividing the odd integer increased by 1 and then divided by 2 is still an integer. (Contributed by AV, 14-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (𝑍 ∈ Odd ↔ (𝑍 ∈ ℤ ∧ ((𝑍 + 1) / 2) ∈ ℤ))
Theorem	evenz 47984	An even number is an integer. (Contributed by AV, 14-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (𝑍 ∈ Even → 𝑍 ∈ ℤ)
Theorem	oddz 47985	An odd number is an integer. (Contributed by AV, 14-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (𝑍 ∈ Odd → 𝑍 ∈ ℤ)
Theorem	evendiv2z 47986	The result of dividing an even number by 2 is an integer. (Contributed by AV, 15-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (𝑍 ∈ Even → (𝑍 / 2) ∈ ℤ)
Theorem	oddp1div2z 47987	The result of dividing an odd number increased by 1 and then divided by 2 is an integer. (Contributed by AV, 15-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (𝑍 ∈ Odd → ((𝑍 + 1) / 2) ∈ ℤ)
Theorem	oddm1div2z 47988	The result of dividing an odd number decreased by 1 and then divided by 2 is an integer. (Contributed by AV, 15-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (𝑍 ∈ Odd → ((𝑍 − 1) / 2) ∈ ℤ)
Theorem	isodd2 47989	The predicate "is an odd number". An odd number is an integer which is not divisible by 2, i.e. the result of dividing the odd number decreased by 1 and then divided by 2 is still an integer. (Contributed by AV, 15-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (𝑍 ∈ Odd ↔ (𝑍 ∈ ℤ ∧ ((𝑍 − 1) / 2) ∈ ℤ))
Theorem	dfodd2 47990	Alternate definition for odd numbers. (Contributed by AV, 15-Jun-2020.)
⊢ Odd = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ((𝑧 − 1) / 2) ∈ ℤ}
Theorem	dfodd6 47991*	Alternate definition for odd numbers. (Contributed by AV, 18-Jun-2020.)
⊢ Odd = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ∃𝑖 ∈ ℤ 𝑧 = ((2 · 𝑖) + 1)}
Theorem	dfeven4 47992*	Alternate definition for even numbers. (Contributed by AV, 18-Jun-2020.)
⊢ Even = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ∃𝑖 ∈ ℤ 𝑧 = (2 · 𝑖)}
Theorem	evenm1odd 47993	The predecessor of an even number is odd. (Contributed by AV, 16-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (𝑍 ∈ Even → (𝑍 − 1) ∈ Odd )
Theorem	evenp1odd 47994	The successor of an even number is odd. (Contributed by AV, 16-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (𝑍 ∈ Even → (𝑍 + 1) ∈ Odd )
Theorem	oddp1eveni 47995	The successor of an odd number is even. (Contributed by AV, 16-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (𝑍 ∈ Odd → (𝑍 + 1) ∈ Even )
Theorem	oddm1eveni 47996	The predecessor of an odd number is even. (Contributed by AV, 6-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝑍 ∈ Odd → (𝑍 − 1) ∈ Even )
Theorem	evennodd 47997	An even number is not an odd number. (Contributed by AV, 16-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (𝑍 ∈ Even → ¬ 𝑍 ∈ Odd )
Theorem	oddneven 47998	An odd number is not an even number. (Contributed by AV, 16-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (𝑍 ∈ Odd → ¬ 𝑍 ∈ Even )
Theorem	enege 47999	The negative of an even number is even. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Even → -𝐴 ∈ Even )
Theorem	onego 48000	The negative of an odd number is odd. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Odd → -𝐴 ∈ Odd )