Theorem ax12a2-o 40101

Description: Derive ax-c15 40040 from a hypothesis in the form of ax-12 2212, without using ax-12 2212 or ax-c15 40040. The hypothesis is weaker than ax-12 2212, with 𝑧 both distinct from 𝑥 and not occurring in 𝜑. Thus, the hypothesis provides an alternate axiom that can be used in place of ax-12 2212, if we also have ax-c11 40038, which this proof uses. As Theorem ax12 2452 shows, the distinct variable conditions are optional. An open problem is whether we can derive this with ax-c11n 40039 instead of ax-c11 40038. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2007.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
ax12a2-o.1	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (∀𝑧𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 → 𝜑)))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ax12a2-o	⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑧   𝑦,𝑧   𝜑,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥, 𝑦)

Proof of Theorem ax12a2-o

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ax-5 1942	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧𝜑)
2		ax12a2-o.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (∀𝑧𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 → 𝜑)))
3	1, 2	syl5 35	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 → 𝜑)))
4	3	ax12v2-o 40100	1 ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4  ∀wal 1567

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-10 2177  ax-11 2193  ax-12 2212  ax-13 2401  ax-c5 40034  ax-c4 40035  ax-c7 40036  ax-c10 40037  ax-c11 40038  ax-c9 40041

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-tru 1572  df-ex 1812  df-nf 1816

This theorem is used by: (None)