Theorem ax12a2-o 39457

Description: Derive ax-c15 39396 from a hypothesis in the form of ax-12 2191, without using ax-12 2191 or ax-c15 39396. The hypothesis is weaker than ax-12 2191, with 𝑧 both distinct from 𝑥 and not occurring in 𝜑. Thus, the hypothesis provides an alternate axiom that can be used in place of ax-12 2191, if we also have ax-c11 39394, which this proof uses. As Theorem ax12 2433 shows, the distinct variable conditions are optional. An open problem is whether we can derive this with ax-c11n 39395 instead of ax-c11 39394. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2007.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
ax12a2-o.1	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (∀𝑧𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 → 𝜑)))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ax12a2-o	⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑧   𝑦,𝑧   𝜑,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem ax12a2-o

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ax-5 1918	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧𝜑)
2		ax12a2-o.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (∀𝑧𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 → 𝜑)))
3	1, 2	syl5 34	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 → 𝜑)))
4	3	ax12v2-o 39456	1 ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4  ∀wal 1546

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1803  ax-4 1817  ax-5 1918  ax-6 1975  ax-7 2016  ax-10 2154  ax-11 2170  ax-12 2191  ax-13 2382  ax-c5 39390  ax-c4 39391  ax-c7 39392  ax-c10 39393  ax-c11 39394  ax-c9 39397

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 398  df-or 855  df-tru 1551  df-ex 1788  df-nf 1792

This theorem is referenced by: (None)