Theorem axc11-o 36079

Description: Show that ax-c11 36015 can be derived from ax-c11n 36016 and ax-12 2170. An open problem is whether this theorem can be derived from ax-c11n 36016 and the others when ax-12 2170 is replaced with ax-c15 36017 or ax12v 2171. See theorem axc11nfromc11 36054 for the rederivation of ax-c11n 36016 from axc11 2446.

Normally, axc11 2446 should be used rather than ax-c11 36015 or axc11-o 36079, except by theorems specifically studying the latter's properties. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-2008.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
axc11-o	⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜑))

Proof of Theorem axc11-o

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ax-c11n 36016	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥)
2		ax12 2439	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑥 → 𝜑)))
3	2	equcoms 2021	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑥 → 𝜑)))
4	3	sps-o 36036	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑥 → 𝜑)))
5		pm2.27 42	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → ((𝑦 = 𝑥 → 𝜑) → 𝜑))
6	5	al2imi 1810	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥 → (∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑥 → 𝜑) → ∀𝑦𝜑))
7	1, 4, 6	sylsyld 61	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜑))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4  ∀wal 1529

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1790  ax-4 1804  ax-5 1905  ax-6 1964  ax-7 2009  ax-10 2139  ax-12 2170  ax-13 2384  ax-c5 36011  ax-c11n 36016

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-ex 1775  df-nf 1779

This theorem is referenced by: (None)