![]() |
Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 385 of 491) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Color key: | ![]() (1-30946) |
![]() (30947-32469) |
![]() (32470-49035) |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Theorem | cosscnvex 38401 | If 𝐴 is a set then the class of cosets by the converse of 𝐴 is a set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 18-Oct-2019.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ≀ ◡𝐴 ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | 1cosscnvepresex 38402 | Sufficient condition for a restricted converse epsilon coset to be a set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Sep-2021.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ≀ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴) ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | 1cossxrncnvepresex 38403 | Sufficient condition for a restricted converse epsilon range Cartesian product to be a set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Sep-2021.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊) → ≀ (𝑅 ⋉ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴)) ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | relcoss 38404 | Cosets by 𝑅 is a relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 27-Dec-2018.) |
⊢ Rel ≀ 𝑅 | ||
Theorem | relcoels 38405 | Coelements on 𝐴 is a relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Oct-2021.) |
⊢ Rel ∼ 𝐴 | ||
Theorem | cossss 38406 | Subclass theorem for the classes of cosets by 𝐴 and 𝐵. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 11-Nov-2019.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ≀ 𝐴 ⊆ ≀ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | cosseq 38407 | Equality theorem for the classes of cosets by 𝐴 and 𝐵. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 9-Jan-2018.) |
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ≀ 𝐴 = ≀ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | cosseqi 38408 | Equality theorem for the classes of cosets by 𝐴 and 𝐵, inference form. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 9-Jan-2018.) |
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ ≀ 𝐴 = ≀ 𝐵 | ||
Theorem | cosseqd 38409 | Equality theorem for the classes of cosets by 𝐴 and 𝐵, deduction form. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 4-Nov-2019.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ≀ 𝐴 = ≀ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | 1cossres 38410* | The class of cosets by a restriction. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 20-Apr-2019.) |
⊢ ≀ (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝑦)} | ||
Theorem | dfcoels 38411* | Alternate definition of the class of coelements on the class 𝐴. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 20-Apr-2019.) |
⊢ ∼ 𝐴 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑢)} | ||
Theorem | brcoss 38412* | 𝐴 and 𝐵 are cosets by 𝑅: a binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 27-Dec-2018.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ≀ 𝑅𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑢(𝑢𝑅𝐴 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | brcoss2 38413* | Alternate form of the 𝐴 and 𝐵 are cosets by 𝑅 binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ≀ 𝑅𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑢(𝐴 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅))) | ||
Theorem | brcoss3 38414 | Alternate form of the 𝐴 and 𝐵 are cosets by 𝑅 binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ≀ 𝑅𝐵 ↔ ([𝐴]◡𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]◡𝑅) ≠ ∅)) | ||
Theorem | brcosscnvcoss 38415 | For sets, the 𝐴 and 𝐵 cosets by 𝑅 binary relation and the 𝐵 and 𝐴 cosets by 𝑅 binary relation are the same. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 27-Dec-2018.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ≀ 𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 ≀ 𝑅𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | brcoels 38416* | 𝐵 and 𝐶 are coelements : a binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 14-Jan-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 5-Oct-2021.) |
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐵 ∼ 𝐴𝐶 ↔ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐵 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑢))) | ||
Theorem | cocossss 38417* | Two ways of saying that cosets by cosets by 𝑅 is a subclass. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 17-Sep-2021.) |
⊢ ( ≀ ≀ 𝑅 ⊆ 𝑆 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝑥 ≀ 𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ≀ 𝑅𝑧) → 𝑥𝑆𝑧)) | ||
Theorem | cnvcosseq 38418 | The converse of cosets by 𝑅 are cosets by 𝑅. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 3-May-2019.) |
⊢ ◡ ≀ 𝑅 = ≀ 𝑅 | ||
Theorem | br2coss 38419 | Cosets by ≀ 𝑅 binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Aug-2019.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ≀ ≀ 𝑅𝐵 ↔ ([𝐴] ≀ 𝑅 ∩ [𝐵] ≀ 𝑅) ≠ ∅)) | ||
Theorem | br1cossres 38420* | 𝐵 and 𝐶 are cosets by a restriction: a binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 30-Dec-2018.) |
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐵 ≀ (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴)𝐶 ↔ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | br1cossres2 38421* | 𝐵 and 𝐶 are cosets by a restriction: a binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 3-Jan-2018.) |
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐵 ≀ (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴)𝐶 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐵 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅))) | ||
Theorem | brressn 38422 | Binary relation on a restriction to a singleton. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 11-Jun-2024.) |
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐵(𝑅 ↾ {𝐴})𝐶 ↔ (𝐵 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | ressn2 38423* | A class ' R ' restricted to the singleton of the class ' A ' is the ordered pair class abstraction of the class ' A ' and the sets in relation ' R ' to ' A ' (and not in relation to the singleton ' { A } ' ). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Jun-2024.) |
⊢ (𝑅 ↾ {𝐴}) = {〈𝑎, 𝑢〉 ∣ (𝑎 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝑢)} | ||
Theorem | refressn 38424* | Any class ' R ' restricted to the singleton of the set ' A ' (see ressn2 38423) is reflexive, see also refrelressn 38505. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Jun-2024.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ∀𝑥 ∈ (dom (𝑅 ↾ {𝐴}) ∩ ran (𝑅 ↾ {𝐴}))𝑥(𝑅 ↾ {𝐴})𝑥) | ||
Theorem | antisymressn 38425 | Every class ' R ' restricted to the singleton of the class ' A ' (see ressn2 38423) is antisymmetric. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 11-Jun-2024.) |
⊢ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥(𝑅 ↾ {𝐴})𝑦 ∧ 𝑦(𝑅 ↾ {𝐴})𝑥) → 𝑥 = 𝑦) | ||
Theorem | trressn 38426 | Any class ' R ' restricted to the singleton of the class ' A ' (see ressn2 38423) is transitive, see also trrelressn 38564. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Jun-2024.) |
⊢ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝑥(𝑅 ↾ {𝐴})𝑦 ∧ 𝑦(𝑅 ↾ {𝐴})𝑧) → 𝑥(𝑅 ↾ {𝐴})𝑧) | ||
Theorem | relbrcoss 38427* | 𝐴 and 𝐵 are cosets by relation 𝑅: a binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Apr-2021.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (Rel 𝑅 → (𝐴 ≀ 𝑅𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅(𝐴 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅)))) | ||
Theorem | br1cossinres 38428* | 𝐵 and 𝐶 are cosets by an intersection with a restriction: a binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.) |
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐵 ≀ (𝑅 ∩ (𝑆 ↾ 𝐴))𝐶 ↔ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑢𝑆𝐵 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝐵) ∧ (𝑢𝑆𝐶 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝐶)))) | ||
Theorem | br1cossxrnres 38429* | 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 and 〈𝐷, 𝐸〉 are cosets by an range Cartesian product with a restriction: a binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 8-Jun-2021.) |
⊢ (((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑌)) → (〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ≀ (𝑅 ⋉ (𝑆 ↾ 𝐴))〈𝐷, 𝐸〉 ↔ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑢𝑆𝐶 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝐵) ∧ (𝑢𝑆𝐸 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝐷)))) | ||
Theorem | br1cossinidres 38430* | 𝐵 and 𝐶 are cosets by an intersection with the restricted identity class: a binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.) |
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐵 ≀ (𝑅 ∩ ( I ↾ 𝐴))𝐶 ↔ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑢 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝐵) ∧ (𝑢 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝐶)))) | ||
Theorem | br1cossincnvepres 38431* | 𝐵 and 𝐶 are cosets by an intersection with the restricted converse epsilon class: a binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.) |
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐵 ≀ (𝑅 ∩ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴))𝐶 ↔ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝐵) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝐶)))) | ||
Theorem | br1cossxrnidres 38432* | 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 and 〈𝐷, 𝐸〉 are cosets by a range Cartesian product with the restricted identity class: a binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 8-Jun-2021.) |
⊢ (((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑌)) → (〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ≀ (𝑅 ⋉ ( I ↾ 𝐴))〈𝐷, 𝐸〉 ↔ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑢 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝐵) ∧ (𝑢 = 𝐸 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝐷)))) | ||
Theorem | br1cossxrncnvepres 38433* | 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 and 〈𝐷, 𝐸〉 are cosets by a range Cartesian product with the restricted converse epsilon class: a binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-May-2021.) |
⊢ (((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑌)) → (〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ≀ (𝑅 ⋉ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴))〈𝐷, 𝐸〉 ↔ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝐶 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝐵) ∧ (𝐸 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝐷)))) | ||
Theorem | dmcoss3 38434 | The domain of cosets is the domain of converse. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 4-Jan-2019.) |
⊢ dom ≀ 𝑅 = dom ◡𝑅 | ||
Theorem | dmcoss2 38435 | The domain of cosets is the range. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 27-Dec-2018.) |
⊢ dom ≀ 𝑅 = ran 𝑅 | ||
Theorem | rncossdmcoss 38436 | The range of cosets is the domain of them (this should be rncoss 5988 but there exists a theorem with this name already). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ ran ≀ 𝑅 = dom ≀ 𝑅 | ||
Theorem | dm1cosscnvepres 38437 | The domain of cosets of the restricted converse epsilon relation is the union of the restriction. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 18-May-2019.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 26-Sep-2021.) |
⊢ dom ≀ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴) = ∪ 𝐴 | ||
Theorem | dmcoels 38438 | The domain of coelements in 𝐴 is the union of 𝐴. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 14-Oct-2010.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 5-Apr-2018.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 26-Sep-2021.) |
⊢ dom ∼ 𝐴 = ∪ 𝐴 | ||
Theorem | eldmcoss 38439* | Elementhood in the domain of cosets. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 29-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ dom ≀ 𝑅 ↔ ∃𝑢 𝑢𝑅𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | eldmcoss2 38440 | Elementhood in the domain of cosets. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 28-Dec-2018.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ dom ≀ 𝑅 ↔ 𝐴 ≀ 𝑅𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | eldm1cossres 38441* | Elementhood in the domain of restricted cosets. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 30-Dec-2018.) |
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵 ∈ dom ≀ (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ↔ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢𝑅𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | eldm1cossres2 38442* | Elementhood in the domain of restricted cosets. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 30-Dec-2018.) |
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵 ∈ dom ≀ (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅)) | ||
Theorem | refrelcosslem 38443 | Lemma for the left side of the refrelcoss3 38444 reflexivity theorem. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 1-Apr-2019.) |
⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ dom ≀ 𝑅𝑥 ≀ 𝑅𝑥 | ||
Theorem | refrelcoss3 38444* | The class of cosets by 𝑅 is reflexive, see dfrefrel3 38497. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 30-Jul-2019.) |
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ dom ≀ 𝑅∀𝑦 ∈ ran ≀ 𝑅(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥 ≀ 𝑅𝑦) ∧ Rel ≀ 𝑅) | ||
Theorem | refrelcoss2 38445 | The class of cosets by 𝑅 is reflexive, see dfrefrel2 38496. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 30-Jul-2019.) |
⊢ (( I ∩ (dom ≀ 𝑅 × ran ≀ 𝑅)) ⊆ ≀ 𝑅 ∧ Rel ≀ 𝑅) | ||
Theorem | symrelcoss3 38446 | The class of cosets by 𝑅 is symmetric, see dfsymrel3 38531. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 28-Mar-2019.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 17-Sep-2021.) |
⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥 ≀ 𝑅𝑦 → 𝑦 ≀ 𝑅𝑥) ∧ Rel ≀ 𝑅) | ||
Theorem | symrelcoss2 38447 | The class of cosets by 𝑅 is symmetric, see dfsymrel2 38530. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 27-Dec-2018.) |
⊢ (◡ ≀ 𝑅 ⊆ ≀ 𝑅 ∧ Rel ≀ 𝑅) | ||
Theorem | cossssid 38448 | Equivalent expressions for the class of cosets by 𝑅 to be a subset of the identity class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 27-Jul-2021.) |
⊢ ( ≀ 𝑅 ⊆ I ↔ ≀ 𝑅 ⊆ ( I ∩ (dom ≀ 𝑅 × ran ≀ 𝑅))) | ||
Theorem | cossssid2 38449* | Equivalent expressions for the class of cosets by 𝑅 to be a subset of the identity class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 10-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ ( ≀ 𝑅 ⊆ I ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(∃𝑢(𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝑦) → 𝑥 = 𝑦)) | ||
Theorem | cossssid3 38450* | Equivalent expressions for the class of cosets by 𝑅 to be a subset of the identity class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 10-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ ( ≀ 𝑅 ⊆ I ↔ ∀𝑢∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝑦) → 𝑥 = 𝑦)) | ||
Theorem | cossssid4 38451* | Equivalent expressions for the class of cosets by 𝑅 to be a subset of the identity class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Aug-2021.) |
⊢ ( ≀ 𝑅 ⊆ I ↔ ∀𝑢∃*𝑥 𝑢𝑅𝑥) | ||
Theorem | cossssid5 38452* | Equivalent expressions for the class of cosets by 𝑅 to be a subset of the identity class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Sep-2021.) |
⊢ ( ≀ 𝑅 ⊆ I ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ran 𝑅∀𝑦 ∈ ran 𝑅(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ ([𝑥]◡𝑅 ∩ [𝑦]◡𝑅) = ∅)) | ||
Theorem | brcosscnv 38453* | 𝐴 and 𝐵 are cosets by converse 𝑅: a binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Jan-2019.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ≀ ◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝐴𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑥))) | ||
Theorem | brcosscnv2 38454 | 𝐴 and 𝐵 are cosets by converse 𝑅: a binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ≀ ◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) ≠ ∅)) | ||
Theorem | br1cosscnvxrn 38455 | 𝐴 and 𝐵 are cosets by the converse range Cartesian product: a binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 19-Apr-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 21-Sep-2021.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ≀ ◡(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≀ ◡𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≀ ◡𝑆𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | 1cosscnvxrn 38456 | Cosets by the converse range Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 19-Apr-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 21-Sep-2021.) |
⊢ ≀ ◡(𝐴 ⋉ 𝐵) = ( ≀ ◡𝐴 ∩ ≀ ◡𝐵) | ||
Theorem | cosscnvssid3 38457* | Equivalent expressions for the class of cosets by the converse of 𝑅 to be a subset of the identity class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 28-Jul-2021.) |
⊢ ( ≀ ◡𝑅 ⊆ I ↔ ∀𝑢∀𝑣∀𝑥((𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑣𝑅𝑥) → 𝑢 = 𝑣)) | ||
Theorem | cosscnvssid4 38458* | Equivalent expressions for the class of cosets by the converse of 𝑅 to be a subset of the identity class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Aug-2021.) |
⊢ ( ≀ ◡𝑅 ⊆ I ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑢 𝑢𝑅𝑥) | ||
Theorem | cosscnvssid5 38459* | Equivalent expressions for the class of cosets by the converse of the relation 𝑅 to be a subset of the identity class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Sep-2021.) |
⊢ (( ≀ ◡𝑅 ⊆ I ∧ Rel 𝑅) ↔ (∀𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑅(𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) = ∅) ∧ Rel 𝑅)) | ||
Theorem | coss0 38460 | Cosets by the empty set are the empty set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Oct-2019.) |
⊢ ≀ ∅ = ∅ | ||
Theorem | cossid 38461 | Cosets by the identity relation are the identity relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Jan-2019.) |
⊢ ≀ I = I | ||
Theorem | cosscnvid 38462 | Cosets by the converse identity relation are the identity relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 27-Sep-2021.) |
⊢ ≀ ◡ I = I | ||
Theorem | trcoss 38463* | Sufficient condition for the transitivity of cosets by 𝑅. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Dec-2018.) |
⊢ (∀𝑦∃*𝑢 𝑢𝑅𝑦 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝑥 ≀ 𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ≀ 𝑅𝑧) → 𝑥 ≀ 𝑅𝑧)) | ||
Theorem | eleccossin 38464 | Two ways of saying that the coset of 𝐴 and the coset of 𝐶 have the common element 𝐵. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 15-Oct-2021.) |
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐵 ∈ ([𝐴] ≀ 𝑅 ∩ [𝐶] ≀ 𝑅) ↔ (𝐴 ≀ 𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≀ 𝑅𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | trcoss2 38465* | Equivalent expressions for the transitivity of cosets by 𝑅. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 4-Jul-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 16-Oct-2021.) |
⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝑥 ≀ 𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ≀ 𝑅𝑧) → 𝑥 ≀ 𝑅𝑧) ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑧(([𝑥] ≀ 𝑅 ∩ [𝑧] ≀ 𝑅) ≠ ∅ → ([𝑥]◡𝑅 ∩ [𝑧]◡𝑅) ≠ ∅)) | ||
Definition | df-rels 38466 |
Define the relations class. Proper class relations (like I, see
reli 5838) are not elements of it. The element of this
class and the
relation predicate are the same when 𝑅 is a set (see elrelsrel 38468).
The class of relations is a great tool we can use when we define classes of different relations as nullary class constants as required by the 2. point in our Guidelines https://us.metamath.org/mpeuni/mathbox.html 38468. When we want to define a specific class of relations as a nullary class constant, the appropriate method is the following: 1. We define the specific nullary class constant for general sets (see e.g. df-refs 38491), then 2. we get the required class of relations by the intersection of the class of general sets above with the class of relations df-rels 38466 (see df-refrels 38492 and the resulting dfrefrels2 38494 and dfrefrels3 38495). 3. Finally, in order to be able to work with proper classes (like iprc 7933) as well, we define the predicate of the relation (see df-refrel 38493) so that it is true for the relevant proper classes (see refrelid 38503), and that the element of the class of the required relations (e.g. elrefrels3 38500) and this predicate are the same in case of sets (see elrefrelsrel 38501). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 13-Jun-2018.) |
⊢ Rels = 𝒫 (V × V) | ||
Theorem | elrels2 38467 | The element of the relations class (df-rels 38466) and the relation predicate (df-rel 5695) are the same when 𝑅 is a set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 14-Jun-2018.) |
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑅 ∈ Rels ↔ 𝑅 ⊆ (V × V))) | ||
Theorem | elrelsrel 38468 | The element of the relations class (df-rels 38466) and the relation predicate are the same when 𝑅 is a set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Nov-2018.) |
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑅 ∈ Rels ↔ Rel 𝑅)) | ||
Theorem | elrelsrelim 38469 | The element of the relations class is a relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 20-Jul-2019.) |
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Rels → Rel 𝑅) | ||
Theorem | elrels5 38470 | Equivalent expressions for an element of the relations class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 21-Jul-2021.) |
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑅 ∈ Rels ↔ (𝑅 ↾ dom 𝑅) = 𝑅)) | ||
Theorem | elrels6 38471 | Equivalent expressions for an element of the relations class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 21-Jul-2021.) |
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑅 ∈ Rels ↔ (𝑅 ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) = 𝑅)) | ||
Theorem | elrelscnveq3 38472* | Two ways of saying a relation is symmetric. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Aug-2021.) |
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Rels → (𝑅 = ◡𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑦𝑅𝑥))) | ||
Theorem | elrelscnveq 38473 | Two ways of saying a relation is symmetric. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Aug-2021.) |
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Rels → (◡𝑅 ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ◡𝑅 = 𝑅)) | ||
Theorem | elrelscnveq2 38474* | Two ways of saying a relation is symmetric. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Aug-2021.) |
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Rels → (◡𝑅 = 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))) | ||
Theorem | elrelscnveq4 38475* | Two ways of saying a relation is symmetric. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Aug-2021.) |
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Rels → (◡𝑅 ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))) | ||
Theorem | cnvelrels 38476 | The converse of a set is an element of the class of relations. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 18-Aug-2019.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ◡𝐴 ∈ Rels ) | ||
Theorem | cosselrels 38477 | Cosets of sets are elements of the relations class. Implies ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Rels → ≀ 𝑅 ∈ Rels ). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Aug-2021.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ≀ 𝐴 ∈ Rels ) | ||
Theorem | cosscnvelrels 38478 | Cosets of converse sets are elements of the relations class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Aug-2021.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ≀ ◡𝐴 ∈ Rels ) | ||
Definition | df-ssr 38479* |
Define the subsets class or the class of subset relations. Similar to
definitions of epsilon relation (df-eprel 5588) and identity relation
(df-id 5582) classes. Subset relation class and Scott
Fenton's subset
class df-sset 35837 are the same: S = SSet (compare dfssr2 38480 with
df-sset 35837), the only reason we do not use dfssr2 38480 as the base
definition of the subsets class is the way we defined the epsilon
relation and the identity relation classes.
The binary relation on the class of subsets and the subclass relationship (df-ss 3979) are the same, that is, (𝐴 S 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) when 𝐵 is a set, see brssr 38482. Yet in general we use the subclass relation 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 both for classes and for sets, see the comment of df-ss 3979. The only exception (aside from directly investigating the class S e.g. in relssr 38481 or in extssr 38490) is when we have a specific purpose with its usage, like in case of df-refs 38491 versus df-cnvrefs 38506, where we need S to define the class of reflexive sets in order to be able to define the class of converse reflexive sets with the help of the converse of S. The subsets class S has another place in set.mm as well: if we define extensional relation based on the common property in extid 38291, extep 38264 and extssr 38490, then "extrelssr" " |- ExtRel S " is a theorem along with "extrelep" " |- ExtRel E " and "extrelid" " |- ExtRel I " . (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Jul-2019.) |
⊢ S = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦} | ||
Theorem | dfssr2 38480 | Alternate definition of the subset relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 9-Aug-2021.) |
⊢ S = ((V × V) ∖ ran ( E ⋉ (V ∖ E ))) | ||
Theorem | relssr 38481 | The subset relation is a relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 1-Aug-2019.) |
⊢ Rel S | ||
Theorem | brssr 38482 | The subset relation and subclass relationship (df-ss 3979) are the same, that is, (𝐴 S 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) when 𝐵 is a set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Jul-2019.) |
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 S 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | brssrid 38483 | Any set is a subset of itself. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 1-Aug-2019.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 S 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | issetssr 38484 | Two ways of expressing set existence. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 1-Aug-2019.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ 𝐴 S 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | brssrres 38485 | Restricted subset binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Nov-2019.) |
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵( S ↾ 𝐴)𝐶 ↔ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | br1cnvssrres 38486 | Restricted converse subset binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Nov-2019.) |
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵◡( S ↾ 𝐴)𝐶 ↔ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | brcnvssr 38487 | The converse of a subset relation swaps arguments. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 1-Aug-2019.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴◡ S 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | brcnvssrid 38488 | Any set is a converse subset of itself. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 9-Jun-2021.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴◡ S 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | br1cossxrncnvssrres 38489* | 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 and 〈𝐷, 𝐸〉 are cosets by range Cartesian product with restricted converse subsets class: a binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 9-Jun-2021.) |
⊢ (((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑌)) → (〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ≀ (𝑅 ⋉ (◡ S ↾ 𝐴))〈𝐷, 𝐸〉 ↔ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝐶 ⊆ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝐵) ∧ (𝐸 ⊆ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝐷)))) | ||
Theorem | extssr 38490 | Property of subset relation, see also extid 38291, extep 38264 and the comment of df-ssr 38479. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 10-Jul-2019.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ([𝐴]◡ S = [𝐵]◡ S ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) | ||
Definition | df-refs 38491 |
Define the class of all reflexive sets. It is used only by df-refrels 38492.
We use subset relation S (df-ssr 38479) here to be able to define
converse reflexivity (df-cnvrefs 38506), see also the comment of df-ssr 38479.
The elements of this class are not necessarily relations (versus
df-refrels 38492).
Note the similarity of Definitions df-refs 38491, df-syms 38523 and df-trs 38553, cf. comments of dfrefrels2 38494. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 19-Jul-2019.) |
⊢ Refs = {𝑥 ∣ ( I ∩ (dom 𝑥 × ran 𝑥)) S (𝑥 ∩ (dom 𝑥 × ran 𝑥))} | ||
Definition | df-refrels 38492 |
Define the class of reflexive relations. This is practically dfrefrels2 38494
(which reveals that RefRels can not include proper
classes like I
as is elements, see comments of dfrefrels2 38494).
Another alternative definition is dfrefrels3 38495. The element of this class and the reflexive relation predicate (df-refrel 38493) are the same, that is, (𝑅 ∈ RefRels ↔ RefRel 𝑅) when 𝐴 is a set, see elrefrelsrel 38501. This definition is similar to the definitions of the classes of symmetric (df-symrels 38524) and transitive (df-trrels 38554) relations. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 7-Jul-2019.) |
⊢ RefRels = ( Refs ∩ Rels ) | ||
Definition | df-refrel 38493 | Define the reflexive relation predicate. (Read: 𝑅 is a reflexive relation.) This is a surprising definition, see the comment of dfrefrel3 38497. Alternate definitions are dfrefrel2 38496 and dfrefrel3 38497. For sets, being an element of the class of reflexive relations (df-refrels 38492) is equivalent to satisfying the reflexive relation predicate, that is (𝑅 ∈ RefRels ↔ RefRel 𝑅) when 𝑅 is a set, see elrefrelsrel 38501. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Jul-2021.) |
⊢ ( RefRel 𝑅 ↔ (( I ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ⊆ (𝑅 ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ∧ Rel 𝑅)) | ||
Theorem | dfrefrels2 38494 |
Alternate definition of the class of reflexive relations. This is a 0-ary
class constant, which is recommended for definitions (see the 1.
Guideline at https://us.metamath.org/ileuni/mathbox.html).
Proper
classes (like I, see iprc 7933)
are not elements of this (or any)
class: if a class is an element of another class, it is not a proper class
but a set, see elex 3498. So if we use 0-ary constant classes as our
main
definitions, they are valid only for sets, not for proper classes. For
proper classes we use predicate-type definitions like df-refrel 38493. See
also the comment of df-rels 38466.
Note that while elementhood in the class of relations cancels restriction of 𝑟 in dfrefrels2 38494, it keeps restriction of I: this is why the very similar definitions df-refs 38491, df-syms 38523 and df-trs 38553 diverge when we switch from (general) sets to relations in dfrefrels2 38494, dfsymrels2 38526 and dftrrels2 38556. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 20-Jul-2019.) |
⊢ RefRels = {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ( I ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ⊆ 𝑟} | ||
Theorem | dfrefrels3 38495* | Alternate definition of the class of reflexive relations. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 8-Jul-2019.) |
⊢ RefRels = {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑟∀𝑦 ∈ ran 𝑟(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥𝑟𝑦)} | ||
Theorem | dfrefrel2 38496 | Alternate definition of the reflexive relation predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Jul-2021.) |
⊢ ( RefRel 𝑅 ↔ (( I ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅)) | ||
Theorem | dfrefrel3 38497* |
Alternate definition of the reflexive relation predicate. A relation is
reflexive iff: for all elements on its domain and range, if an element
of its domain is the same as an element of its range, then there is the
relation between them.
Note that this is definitely not the definition we are accustomed to, like e.g. idref 7165 / idrefALT 6133 or df-reflexive 48998 ⊢ (𝑅Reflexive𝐴 ↔ (𝑅 ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝑥𝑅𝑥)). It turns out that the not-surprising definition which contains ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑟𝑥𝑟𝑥 needs symmetry as well, see refsymrels3 38547. Only when this symmetry condition holds, like in case of equivalence relations, see dfeqvrels3 38570, can we write the traditional form ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑟𝑥𝑟𝑥 for reflexive relations. For the special case with square Cartesian product when the two forms are equivalent see idinxpssinxp4 38301 where ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥𝑅𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝑥𝑅𝑥). See also similar definition of the converse reflexive relations class dfcnvrefrel3 38512. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 8-Jul-2019.) |
⊢ ( RefRel 𝑅 ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑦 ∈ ran 𝑅(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥𝑅𝑦) ∧ Rel 𝑅)) | ||
Theorem | dfrefrel5 38498* | Alternate definition of the reflexive relation predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Dec-2023.) |
⊢ ( RefRel 𝑅 ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ (dom 𝑅 ∩ ran 𝑅)𝑥𝑅𝑥 ∧ Rel 𝑅)) | ||
Theorem | elrefrels2 38499 | Element of the class of reflexive relations. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Jul-2019.) |
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ RefRels ↔ (( I ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ Rels )) | ||
Theorem | elrefrels3 38500* | Element of the class of reflexive relations. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Jul-2019.) |
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ RefRels ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑦 ∈ ran 𝑅(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥𝑅𝑦) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ Rels )) |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |