P. 385 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 38401-38500   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
21.26.2  Preparatory theorems
Theorem	el2v1 38401	New way (elv 3446, and the theorems beginning with "el2v" or "el3v") to shorten some proofs. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Oct-2018.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	el3v1 38402	New way (elv 3446, and the theorems beginning with "el2v" or "el3v") to shorten some proofs. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Oct-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)
Theorem	el3v2 38403	New way (elv 3446, and the theorems beginning with "el2v" or "el3v") to shorten some proofs. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Oct-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)
Theorem	el3v12 38404	New way (elv 3446, and the theorems beginning with "el2v" or "el3v") to shorten some proofs. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 11-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝜃)
Theorem	el3v13 38405	New way (elv 3446, and the theorems beginning with "el2v" or "el3v") to shorten some proofs. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 11-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ V) → 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜃)
Theorem	el3v23 38406	New way (elv 3446, and the theorems beginning with "el2v" or "el3v") to shorten some proofs. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 11-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V ∧ 𝑧 ∈ V) → 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃)
Theorem	anan 38407	Multiple commutations in conjunction. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 7-Mar-2020.)
⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏)) ↔ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜏))))
Theorem	triantru3 38408	A wff is equivalent to its conjunctions with truths. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 30-Nov-2018.)
⊢ 𝜑    &   ⊢ 𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))
Theorem	biorfd 38409	A wff is equivalent to its disjunction with falsehood, deduction form. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)))
Theorem	eqbrtr 38410	Substitution of equal classes in binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 14-Jun-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐶) → 𝐴𝑅𝐶)
Theorem	eqbrb 38411	Substitution of equal classes in a binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 14-Jun-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐶))
Theorem	eqeltr 38412	Substitution of equal classes into element relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Jul-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	eqelb 38413	Substitution of equal classes into element relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 17-Jul-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶))
Theorem	eqeqan2d 38414	Implication of introducing a new equality. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 17-Apr-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝐴 = 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐷))
Theorem	disjresin 38415	The restriction to a disjoint is the empty class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Jul-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ → (𝑅 ↾ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) = ∅)
Theorem	disjresdisj 38416	The intersection of restrictions to disjoint is the empty class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Jul-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ → ((𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ∩ (𝑅 ↾ 𝐵)) = ∅)
Theorem	disjresdif 38417	The difference between restrictions to disjoint is the first restriction. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Jul-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ → ((𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ∖ (𝑅 ↾ 𝐵)) = (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴))
Theorem	disjresundif 38418	Lemma for ressucdifsn2 38659. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Jul-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ → ((𝑅 ↾ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∖ (𝑅 ↾ 𝐵)) = (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴))
Theorem	inres2 38419	Two ways of expressing the restriction of an intersection. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Jun-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ∩ 𝑆) = ((𝑅 ∩ 𝑆) ↾ 𝐴)
Theorem	coideq 38420	Equality theorem for composition of two classes. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∘ 𝐴) = (𝐵 ∘ 𝐵))
Theorem	nexmo1 38421	If there is no case where wff is true, it is true for at most one case. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 27-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥𝜑 → ∃*𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	eqab2 38422	Implication of a class abstraction. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Apr-2019.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝜑) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	r2alan 38423*	Double restricted universal quantification, special case. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 17-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	ssrabi 38424	Inference of restricted abstraction subclass from implication. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Oct-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	rabimbieq 38425	Restricted equivalent wff's correspond to restricted class abstractions which are equal with the same class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Jul-2021.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	abeqin 38426*	Intersection with class abstraction. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 21-Jul-2021.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	abeqinbi 38427*	Intersection with class abstraction and equivalent wff's. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 21-Jul-2021.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	rabeqel 38428*	Class element of a restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Jul-2021.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐶 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	eqrabi 38429*	Class element of a restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	eqrelf 38430*	The equality connective between relations. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Jun-2019.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ Rel 𝐵) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵)))
Theorem	br1cnvinxp 38431	Binary relation on the converse of an intersection with a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 27-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (𝐶◡(𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵))𝐷 ↔ ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝐷𝑅𝐶))
Theorem	releleccnv 38432	Elementhood in a converse 𝑅-coset when 𝑅 is a relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 9-Dec-2018.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝐴 ∈ [𝐵]◡𝑅 ↔ 𝐴𝑅𝐵))
Theorem	releccnveq 38433*	Equality of converse 𝑅-coset and converse 𝑆-coset when 𝑅 and 𝑆 are relations. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 27-Jul-2019.)
⊢ ((Rel 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑆) → ([𝐴]◡𝑅 = [𝐵]◡𝑆 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥𝑅𝐴 ↔ 𝑥𝑆𝐵)))
Theorem	xpv 38434*	Cartesian product of a class and the universe. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 6-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 × V) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴}
Theorem	vxp 38435*	Cartesian product of the universe and a class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 3-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (V × 𝐴) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴}
Theorem	opelvvdif 38436	Negated elementhood of ordered pair. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 14-Jan-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ ((V × V) ∖ 𝑅) ↔ ¬ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝑅))
Theorem	vvdifopab 38437*	Ordered-pair class abstraction defined by a negation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ((V × V) ∖ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ¬ 𝜑}
Theorem	brvdif 38438	Binary relation with universal complement is the negation of the relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 1-Jul-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴(V ∖ 𝑅)𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐴𝑅𝐵)
Theorem	brvdif2 38439	Binary relation with universal complement. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 14-Jul-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴(V ∖ 𝑅)𝐵 ↔ ¬ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝑅)
Theorem	brvvdif 38440	Binary relation with the complement under the universal class of ordered pairs. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 9-Nov-2018.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴((V × V) ∖ 𝑅)𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐴𝑅𝐵))
Theorem	brvbrvvdif 38441	Binary relation with the complement under the universal class of ordered pairs is the same as with universal complement. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 28-Nov-2018.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴((V × V) ∖ 𝑅)𝐵 ↔ 𝐴(V ∖ 𝑅)𝐵))
Theorem	brcnvep 38442	The converse of the binary epsilon relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 30-Jan-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴◡ E 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	elecALTV 38443	Elementhood in the 𝑅-coset of 𝐴. Theorem 72 of [Suppes] p. 82. (I think we should replace elecg 8682 with this original form of Suppes. Peter Mazsa). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐵 ∈ [𝐴]𝑅 ↔ 𝐴𝑅𝐵))
Theorem	brcnvepres 38444	Restricted converse epsilon binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 10-Feb-2018.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐵(◡ E ↾ 𝐴)𝐶 ↔ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)))
Theorem	brres2 38445	Binary relation on a restriction. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 2-Jan-2019.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 16-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝐵(𝑅 ↾ 𝐴)𝐶 ↔ 𝐵(𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × ran (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴)))𝐶)
Theorem	br1cnvres 38446	Binary relation on the converse of a restriction. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 27-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵◡(𝑅 ↾ 𝐴)𝐶 ↔ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶𝑅𝐵)))
Theorem	elec1cnvres 38447	Elementhood in the converse restricted coset of 𝐵. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 21-Sep-2018.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐶 ∈ [𝐵]◡(𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶𝑅𝐵)))
Theorem	ec1cnvres 38448*	Converse restricted coset of 𝐵. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Mar-2019.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 21-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → [𝐵]◡(𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑥𝑅𝐵})
Theorem	eldmres 38449*	Elementhood in the domain of a restriction. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 9-Jan-2019.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵 ∈ dom (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ↔ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑦 𝐵𝑅𝑦)))
Theorem	elrnres 38450*	Element of the range of a restriction. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Dec-2018.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵 ∈ ran (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥𝑅𝐵))
Theorem	eldmressnALTV 38451	Element of the domain of a restriction to a singleton. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Jun-2024.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵 ∈ dom (𝑅 ↾ {𝐴}) ↔ (𝐵 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅)))
Theorem	elrnressn 38452	Element of the range of a restriction to a singleton. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Jun-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐵 ∈ ran (𝑅 ↾ {𝐴}) ↔ 𝐴𝑅𝐵))
Theorem	eldm4 38453*	Elementhood in a domain. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Oct-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅 ↔ ∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ [𝐴]𝑅))
Theorem	eldmres2 38454*	Elementhood in the domain of a restriction. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 21-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵 ∈ dom (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ↔ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ [𝐵]𝑅)))
Theorem	eldmres3 38455	Elementhood in the domain of a restriction. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵 ∈ dom (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ↔ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ [𝐵]𝑅 ≠ ∅)))
Theorem	eceq1i 38456	Equality theorem for 𝐶-coset of 𝐴 and 𝐶-coset of 𝐵, inference version. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 11-May-2021.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ [𝐴]𝐶 = [𝐵]𝐶
Theorem	ecres 38457*	Restricted coset of 𝐵. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 9-Dec-2018.)
⊢ [𝐵](𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑥)}
Theorem	eccnvepres 38458*	Restricted converse epsilon coset of 𝐵. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 11-Feb-2018.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 21-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → [𝐵](◡ E ↾ 𝐴) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴})
Theorem	eleccnvep 38459	Elementhood in the converse epsilon coset of 𝐴 is elementhood in 𝐴. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 27-Jan-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵 ∈ [𝐴]◡ E ↔ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	eccnvep 38460	The converse epsilon coset of a set is the set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 27-Jan-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → [𝐴]◡ E = 𝐴)
Theorem	extep 38461	Property of epsilon relation, see also extid 38488, extssr 38761 and the comment of df-ssr 38750. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 10-Jul-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ([𝐴]◡ E = [𝐵]◡ E ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	disjeccnvep 38462	Property of the epsilon relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 27-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (([𝐴]◡ E ∩ [𝐵]◡ E ) = ∅ ↔ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅))
Theorem	eccnvepres2 38463	The restricted converse epsilon coset of an element of the restriction is the element itself. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → [𝐵](◡ E ↾ 𝐴) = 𝐵)
Theorem	eccnvepres3 38464	Condition for a restricted converse epsilon coset of a set to be the set itself. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 11-May-2021.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ dom (◡ E ↾ 𝐴) → [𝐵](◡ E ↾ 𝐴) = 𝐵)
Theorem	eldmqsres 38465*	Elementhood in a restricted domain quotient set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 21-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵 ∈ (dom (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) / (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴)) ↔ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 = [𝑢]𝑅)))
Theorem	eldmqsres2 38466*	Elementhood in a restricted domain quotient set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵 ∈ (dom (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) / (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴)) ↔ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑥 ∈ [ 𝑢]𝑅𝐵 = [𝑢]𝑅))
Theorem	qsss1 38467	Subclass theorem for quotient sets. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Sep-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐴 / 𝐶) ⊆ (𝐵 / 𝐶))
Theorem	qseq1i 38468	Equality theorem for quotient set, inference form. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 3-Jun-2021.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 / 𝐶) = (𝐵 / 𝐶)
Theorem	brinxprnres 38469	Binary relation on a restriction. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 2-Jan-2019.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵(𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × ran (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴)))𝐶 ↔ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐶)))
Theorem	inxprnres 38470*	Restriction of a class as a class of ordered pairs. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 2-Jan-2019.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × ran (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴))) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥𝑅𝑦)}
Theorem	dfres4 38471	Alternate definition of the restriction of a class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 2-Jan-2019.)
⊢ (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) = (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × ran (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴)))
Theorem	exan3 38472*	Equivalent expressions with existential quantification. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 10-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∃𝑢(𝐴 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅) ↔ ∃𝑢(𝑢𝑅𝐴 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝐵)))
Theorem	exanres 38473*	Equivalent expressions with existential quantification. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 2-May-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) → (∃𝑢(𝑢(𝑅 ↾ 𝐴)𝐵 ∧ 𝑢(𝑆 ↾ 𝐴)𝐶) ↔ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝐶)))
Theorem	exanres3 38474*	Equivalent expressions with restricted existential quantification. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 10-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) → (∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐵 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ [𝑢]𝑆) ↔ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝐶)))
Theorem	exanres2 38475*	Equivalent expressions with existential quantification. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 10-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) → (∃𝑢(𝑢(𝑅 ↾ 𝐴)𝐵 ∧ 𝑢(𝑆 ↾ 𝐴)𝐶) ↔ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐵 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ [𝑢]𝑆)))
Theorem	cnvepres 38476*	Restricted converse epsilon relation as a class of ordered pairs. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 10-Feb-2018.)
⊢ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)}
Theorem	eqrel2 38477*	Equality of relations. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 8-Mar-2019.)
⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ Rel 𝐵) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝐴𝑦 ↔ 𝑥𝐵𝑦)))
Theorem	rncnv 38478	Range of converse is the domain. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Feb-2018.)
⊢ ran ◡𝐴 = dom 𝐴
Theorem	dfdm6 38479*	Alternate definition of domain. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 2-Mar-2018.)
⊢ dom 𝑅 = {𝑥 ∣ [𝑥]𝑅 ≠ ∅}
Theorem	dfrn6 38480*	Alternate definition of range. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 1-Aug-2018.)
⊢ ran 𝑅 = {𝑥 ∣ [𝑥]◡𝑅 ≠ ∅}
Theorem	rncnvepres 38481	The range of the restricted converse epsilon is the union of the restriction. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 11-Feb-2018.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 26-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ran (◡ E ↾ 𝐴) = ∪ 𝐴
Theorem	dmecd 38482	Equality of the coset of 𝐵 and the coset of 𝐶 implies equivalence of domain elementhood (equivalence is not necessary as opposed to ereldm 8691). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 9-Oct-2018.)
⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝑅 = 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → [𝐵]𝑅 = [𝐶]𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	dmec2d 38483	Equality of the coset of 𝐵 and the coset of 𝐶 implies equivalence of domain elementhood (equivalence is not necessary as opposed to ereldm 8691). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Oct-2018.)
⊢ (𝜑 → [𝐵]𝑅 = [𝐶]𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅 ↔ 𝐶 ∈ dom 𝑅))
Theorem	brid 38484	Property of the identity binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 18-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 I 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 I 𝐴)
Theorem	ideq2 38485	For sets, the identity binary relation is the same as equality. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Jun-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 18-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 I 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	idresssidinxp 38486	Condition for the identity restriction to be a subclass of identity intersection with a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 19-Jul-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ( I ↾ 𝐴) ⊆ ( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)))
Theorem	idreseqidinxp 38487	Condition for the identity restriction to be equal to the identity intersection with a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 19-Jul-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = ( I ↾ 𝐴))
Theorem	extid 38488	Property of identity relation, see also extep 38461, extssr 38761 and the comment of df-ssr 38750. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴]◡ I = [𝐵]◡ I ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	inxpss 38489*	Two ways to say that an intersection with a Cartesian product is a subclass. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Jul-2019.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝑆 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥𝑆𝑦))
Theorem	idinxpss 38490*	Two ways to say that an intersection of the identity relation with a Cartesian product is a subclass. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥𝑅𝑦))
Theorem	ref5 38491*	Two ways to say that an intersection of the identity relation with a Cartesian product is a subclass. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)𝑥𝑅𝑥)
Theorem	inxpss3 38492*	Two ways to say that an intersection with a Cartesian product is a subclass (see also inxpss 38489). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 8-Mar-2019.)
⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥(𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵))𝑦 → 𝑥(𝑆 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵))𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥𝑆𝑦))
Theorem	inxpss2 38493*	Two ways to say that intersections with Cartesian products are in a subclass relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 8-Mar-2019.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ (𝑆 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥𝑆𝑦))
Theorem	inxpssidinxp 38494*	Two ways to say that intersections with Cartesian products are in a subclass relation, special case of inxpss2 38493. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 4-Jul-2019.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ ( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑦))
Theorem	idinxpssinxp 38495*	Two ways to say that intersections with Cartesian products are in a subclass relation, special case of inxpss2 38493. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 6-Mar-2019.)
⊢ (( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥𝑅𝑦))
Theorem	idinxpssinxp2 38496*	Identity intersection with a square Cartesian product in subclass relation with an intersection with the same Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 4-Mar-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ⊆ (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥𝑅𝑥)
Theorem	idinxpssinxp3 38497	Identity intersection with a square Cartesian product in subclass relation with an intersection with the same Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Mar-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ⊆ (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ↔ ( I ↾ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝑅)
Theorem	idinxpssinxp4 38498*	Identity intersection with a square Cartesian product in subclass relation with an intersection with the same Cartesian product (see also idinxpssinxp2 38496). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 8-Mar-2019.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥𝑅𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥𝑅𝑥)
Theorem	relcnveq3 38499*	Two ways of saying a relation is symmetric. (Contributed by FL, 31-Aug-2009.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝑅 = ◡𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑦𝑅𝑥)))
Theorem	relcnveq 38500	Two ways of saying a relation is symmetric. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Aug-2018.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (◡𝑅 ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ◡𝑅 = 𝑅))