Theorem cbvex2 2412

Description: Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2372. Use the weaker cbvex2v 2342 if possible. (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 16-Jun-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
cbval2.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑
cbval2.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑤𝜑
cbval2.3	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
cbval2.4	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓
cbval2.5	⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
cbvex2	⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧∃𝑤𝜓)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦   𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝑤   𝑧,𝑤

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤)   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤)

Proof of Theorem cbvex2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		cbval2.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑
2	1	nfn 1860	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧 ¬ 𝜑
3		cbval2.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤𝜑
4	3	nfn 1860	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤 ¬ 𝜑
5		cbval2.3	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
6	5	nfn 1860	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 ¬ 𝜓
7		cbval2.4	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓
8	7	nfn 1860	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦 ¬ 𝜓
9		cbval2.5	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
10	9	notbid 318	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → (¬ 𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓))
11	2, 4, 6, 8, 10	cbval2 2411	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦 ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑧∀𝑤 ¬ 𝜓)
12		2nexaln 1832	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦 ¬ 𝜑)
13		2nexaln 1832	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑧∃𝑤𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑧∀𝑤 ¬ 𝜓)
14	11, 12, 13	3bitr4i 303	. 2 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑧∃𝑤𝜓)
15	14	con4bii 321	1 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧∃𝑤𝜓)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 396  ∀wal 1537  ∃wex 1782  Ⅎwnf 1786

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-10 2137  ax-11 2154  ax-12 2171  ax-13 2372

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 845  df-ex 1783  df-nf 1787

This theorem is referenced by: (None)