Theorem ceqsex 3514

Description: Elimination of an existential quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 2-Mar-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 22-Jan-2025.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ceqsex.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
ceqsex.2	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
ceqsex.3	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ceqsex	⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝜓(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem ceqsex

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		alinexa 1843	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → ¬ 𝜑) ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
2		ceqsex.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
3	2	nfn 1857	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 ¬ 𝜓
4		ceqsex.2	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
5		ceqsex.3	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
6	5	notbid 318	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (¬ 𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓))
7	3, 4, 6	ceqsal 3503	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → ¬ 𝜑) ↔ ¬ 𝜓)
8	1, 7	bitr3i 277	. 2 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ¬ 𝜓)
9	8	con4bii 321	1 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395  ∀wal 1538   = wceq 1540  ∃wex 1779  Ⅎwnf 1783   ∈ wcel 2109  Vcvv 3464

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-12 2178

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-clel 2810

This theorem is referenced by:  ceqsex2  3519