Theorem ceqsal 3466

Description: A representation of explicit substitution of a class for a variable, inferred from an implicit substitution hypothesis. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ceqsal.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
ceqsal.2	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
ceqsal.3	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ceqsal	⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝜓(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem ceqsal

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ceqsal.2	. 2 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
2		ceqsal.1	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
3		ceqsal.3	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
4	2, 3	ceqsalg 3464	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V → (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))
5	1, 4	ax-mp 5	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205  ∀wal 1537   = wceq 1539  Ⅎwnf 1786   ∈ wcel 2106  Vcvv 3432

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2108  ax-12 2171

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1542  df-ex 1783  df-nf 1787  df-sb 2068  df-clab 2716  df-clel 2816

This theorem is referenced by:  ceqsalvOLD  3468  ralxp3f  33685  aomclem6  40884